研究生: |
王偉州 Wang, Wei-Zhou |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
精熟學習整合擴增實境對閱讀理解之成效 The Effect of Integrating Mastery Learning with Augmented Reality for Reading Comprehension |
指導教授: |
張國恩
Chang, Kuo-En |
口試委員: |
張國恩
Chang, Kuo-En 宋曜廷 Sung, Yao-Ting 劉遠楨 Liu, Yuan-Chen |
口試日期: | 2022/10/31 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
資訊教育研究所 Graduate Institute of Information and Computer Education |
論文出版年: | 2023 |
畢業學年度: | 111 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 115 |
中文關鍵詞: | 精熟學習 、閱讀理解 、擴增實境 、擴增實體書 、國文領域 |
英文關鍵詞: | Mastery Learning, Reading Comprehension, Augmented Reality, Augmented Reality Book, Chinese Learning |
研究方法: | 準實驗設計法 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202300745 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:129 下載:7 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在探討精熟學習整合擴增實境對於國中二年級學習者,在國文領域<聲音鐘>單元的教學活動之學習成效、延宕、神馳經驗以及行為序列之影響。研究對象為新北市某國中二年級,有效樣本數為 47 人,其中控制組共 23 人(男生 9 人、女生 14 人);實驗組共 24 人(男生 12 人、女生 12 人)。本研究採單因子之準實驗研究法並以班級為單位進行隨機分派,控制組為課本搭配講義、實驗組為平板電腦搭配精熟學習整合擴增實境系統。
研究結果發現:(一)在學習成效方面,控制組顯著優於實驗組,其原因可能是其擴增方式不夠多元;(二)在延宕測驗方面,控制組與實驗組並無任何顯著差異,表示在教材內容的呈現更應具多樣化;(三)在神馳經驗方面,控制組與實驗組並無任何顯著差異,說明需多設計學習者與教材之間的互動;(四)在行為序列方面,控制組與實驗組有明顯差異,其行為模式可能與精熟標準有關。
The purpose of this study was to explore effects of mastery learning integrated with augmented reality on second year of junior high school students’learning performance, delay posttest, flow experience and behavioral patterns in learning of Chinese domain“bell of sound”unit. The Participants were eighth grade students selected from a junior high school in New Taipei City, and the effective sample size was 47 people, of which the control group was 23 people (9 boys、14 girls);the experimental group was 24 people (12 boys、12 girls). A quasi-experimental design was adopted, and random assignment by class. The control group did not receive any system, while the experimental group received mastery learning-based AR Book (MAR Book) to support them.
The results showed that, (1) there was a significant difference between the control group and the experimental group in terms of learner performance. This difference may be due to the higher level of diversity required by augmented reality;(2) Neither the control group nor the experiment group showed significant differences in delay posttest, which indicates that the learning resources could present in multiple forms. (3) When it came to flow experience, the control group and the experimental group did not differ significantly, suggesting that the design of curricula and study materials should involve more collaboration and interaction. (4) The behavioral patterns used by the control group and the experimental group differ significantly in terms of mastery standards and behavioral sequences.
Adeniji, S. M., Ameen, S. K., Dambatta, B. U., & Orilonise, R. (2018). Effect of Mastery Learning Approach on Senior School Students' Academic Performance and Retention in Circle Geometry. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 951-962.
Adler, C. R. (2001). Put Reading First: The Research Building Blocks for Teaching Children to Read (pp. 49-54). National Institute for Literacy.
Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1-11.
Anderson R. C., Hiebert E. H., Scott J. A., & Wilkinson I. (1985). Becoming a nation of readers. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Education.
Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355-385.
Benson, J. S., & Yeany, R. H. (1980). Generalizability of diagnostic-prescriptive teaching strategies across student locus of control and multiple instructional units. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Boston, MA, April 7-11, 1980).
Billinghurst, M., Kato, H., & Poupyrev, I. (2001). The MagicBook: a transitional AR interface. Computers & Graphics, 25(5), 745-753.
Blackburn, K. T., & Nelson, D. (1985). Difference between a group using a traditional format with mastery learning and a group using a traditional format only in developmental mathematics courses at the university level: Implications for teacher education programs. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (19th, Chicago, IL, March 31-April 4, 1985).
Block, C. C., & Pressley, M. (2002). Introduction. In C. C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension Instruction: Research-Based Best Practices (pp. 1-7). New York: Guilford Press Inc.
Block, J. H. (1979). Mastery Learning: The Current State of the Craft. Educational Leadership, 37(2), 114-17.
Block, J. H., & Anderson, L. W. (1975). Mastery learning in classroom instruction. Macmillan Publishing Company.
Bloom, B. S. (1968). Learning for Mastery. Instruction and Curriculum. Regional Education Laboratory for the Carolinas and Virginia, Topical Papers and Reprints, Number 1. Evaluation Comment, 1(2), n2.
Bloom, B. S. (1971). Mastery learning. In J. H. Block (Ed.), Mastery learning: Theory and practice (pp. 47–63). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Bloom, B. S. (1976). Human characteristics and school learning. McGraw-Hill.
Bloom, B. S. (1984). The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Leadership, 41(8), 4-17.
Bressler, D. M., & Bodzin, A. M. (2013). A mixed methods assessment of students' flow experiences during a mobile augmented reality science game. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(6), 505-517.
Brookbank, D., Grover, S., Kullberg, K., & Strawser, C. (1999). Improving student achievement through organization of student learning. Chicago: Master’s Action Research Project, Saint Xavier University and IRI/Skylight. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED435094).
Carrell, P. L. (1989). Metacognitive awareness and second language reading. The Modern Language Journal, 73(2), 121-134.
Carroll, J. B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers college record, 64(8), 1-9.
Chang, K. E., Chang, C. T., Hou, H. T., Sung, Y. T., Chao, H. L., & Lee, C. M. (2014). Development and behavioral pattern analysis of a mobile guide system with augmented reality for painting appreciation instruction in an art museum. Computers & Education, 71, 185-197.
Chang, K. E., Zhang, J., Huang, Y. S., Liu, T. C., & Sung, Y. T. (2020). Applying augmented reality in physical education on motor skills learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(6), 685-697.
Chang, Y. L., Hou, H. T., Pan, C. Y., Sung, Y. T., & Chang, K. E. (2015). Apply an augmented reality in a mobile guidance to increase sense of place for heritage places. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(2), 166-178.
Chen, B. C. (1999). Discrepancy of reading strategies for academic purposes between high achievers and low achievers at a junior college in Taiwan. In The Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on English Teaching (pp. 223-233).
Cheng, K. H. (2017). Reading an augmented reality book: An exploration of learners’ cognitive load, motivation, and attitudes. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(4).
Cheng, K. H. & Tsai, C. C. (2013b). Affordances of augmented reality in science learning: suggestions for future research. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(4), 449– 462.
Cheng, K. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2016). The interaction of child–parent shared reading with an augmented reality (AR) picture book and parents' conceptions of AR learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(1), 203-222.
Chiang, T. H., Yang, S. J., & Hwang, G. J. (2014). An augmented reality-based mobile learning system to improve students’ learning achievements and motivations in natural science inquiry activities. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 352-365.
Conley, M. M. W. (2005). A study of the impact of teacher expectations, staff development for teachers, and mastery learning on student achievement in reading comprehension. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Chicago.
Corcoran, T. (1927). The Winnetka school plan. The Irish Monthly, 55(644), 63-67.
Dale, E. (1969). Audio-visual methods in teaching (p. 108). Rinehart & Winston, NYHolt.
Danaei, D., Jamali, H. R., Mansourian, Y., & Rastegarpour, H. (2020). Comparing reading comprehension between children reading augmented reality and print storybooks. Computers & Education, 153, 103900.
Decker, D. F. (1976). Teaching to Achieve Learning Mastery by Using Retesting Techniques. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 133 002)
Dillashaw, F. G., & Okey, J. R. (1983). Effects of a modified mastery learning strategy on achievement, attitudes, and on‐task behavior of high school chemistry students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(3), 203-211.
Duke, N. (2003). Comprehension instruction for informational text. In Presentation at the annual meeting of the Michigan Reading Association, Grand Rapids, MI.
Dünser, A. (2008). Supporting low ability readers with interactive augmented reality. Annual Review of Cybertherapy and Telemedicine, 6(1), 39-46.
Estapa, A., & Nadolny, L. (2015). The effect of an augmented reality enhanced mathematics lesson on student achievement and motivation. Journal of STEM Education, 16(3).
Ferrer-Torregrosa, J., Torralba, J., Jimenez, M. A., García, S., & Barcia, J. M. (2015). ARBOOK: Development and assessment of a tool based on augmented reality for anatomy. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(1), 119-124.
Fier, S. R. (2007). The effect of mastery learning on student learning of chemical stoichiometry (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University).
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Tindal, G. (1986). Effects of mastery learning procedures on student achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 79(5), 286-291.
Gagné, E. D. (1985). The cognitive psychology of school learning. Boston: Litle, Brown and Company.
Garzón, J., Pavón, J., & Baldiris, S. (2017, June). Augmented reality applications for education: Five directions for future research. In International conference on augmented reality, virtual reality and computer graphics (pp. 402-414). Springer, Cham.
Gilakjani, A. P., & Ahmadi, S. M. (2011). The relationship between L2 reading comprehension and schema theory: A matter of text familiarity. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 1(2), 142-149.
Gladding, G., Gutmann, B., Schroeder, N., & Stelzer, T. (2015). Clinical study of student learning using mastery style versus immediate feedback online activities. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 11(1), 010114.
Goodman, K. S. (1967). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. Literacy Research and Instruction, 6(4), 126-135.
Gough, P. B. (1972). One second of reading. Visible Language, 6(4), 291-320.
Grabe, W. (1991). Current developments in second language reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 375-406.
Guskey, T. R. (1980). Mastery learning: Applying the theory. Theory Into Practice, 19(2), 104-111.
Guskey, T. R. (1985). Implementing Mastery Learning (2nd ed.). Wadsworth Publishing.
Guskey, T. R., & Gates, S. L. (1985). A synthesis of research on group-based mastery learning programs. In: Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago (ERIC document Reproduction Service No. ED 262 088).
Guskey, T. R., & Gates, S. L. (1986). Synthesis of research on the effects of mastery learning in elementary and secondary classrooms. Educational Leadership, 43(8), 73.
Guskey, T. R., & Pigott, T. D. (1988). Research on group-based mastery learning programs: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Educational Research, 81(4), 197-216.
Herber, H. L. (1970). Teaching reading in the content areas. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Ibáñez, M. B., Di Serio, Á., Villarán, D., & Kloos, C. D. (2014). Experimenting with electromagnetism using augmented reality: Impact on flow student experience and educational effectiveness. Computers & Education, 71, 1-13.
Johnson, L., Levine, A., Smith, R., & Stone, S. (2010). Simple augmented reality. The 2010 Horizon Report, 1.
Jones, B. F. (1978). Improving Reading Comprehension: Embedding Diverse Learning Strategies within a Mastery Learning Instructional Framework. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
Katims, M., & Jones, B. F. (1985). Chicago mastery learning reading: Mastery learning instruction and assessment in inner-city schools. The Journal of Negro Education, 54(3), 369-387.
Keenan, J. M., Betjemann, R. S., & Olson, R. K. (2008). Reading comprehension tests vary in the skills they assess: Differential dependence on decoding and oral comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12(3), 281-300.
Keene, E. O., & Zimmermann, S. (1997). Mosaic of thought: Teaching comprehension in a reader's workshop. Heinemann, 361 Hanover Street, Portsmouth, NH 03801-3912.
Kesim, M., & Ozarslan, Y. (2012). Augmented reality in education: current technologies and the potential for education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 297-302.
Kingstone, A. (1967). Some thoughts on reading comprehension. Hafner, L.(szerk.): Improving reading comprehension in secondary schools. Macmillan, New York, 72-75.
Kintsch, W., & Walter Kintsch, C. B. E. M. A. F. R. S. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge university press.
Kletzien, S. B. (1991). Strategy use by good and poor comprehenders reading expository text of differing levels. Reading Research Quarterly, 67-86.
Klopfer, E. (2008). Augmented learning: Research and design of mobile educational games. MIT press.
Kulik, C. L. C., Kulik, J. A., & Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1990). Effectiveness of mastery learning programs: A meta-analysis. Review of educational research, 60(2), 265-299.
Lee, K. (2012). Augmented reality in education and training. TechTrends, 56(2), 13-21.
Lin, T. H., Liu, C. H., Tsai, M. H., & Kang, S. C. (2015). Using augmented reality in a multiscreen environment for construction discussion. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 29(6), 04014088.
Lin, W., Lo, W. T., & Yueh, H. P. (2019, March). How the multimodal media in augmented reality affects museum learning Experience. In 2019 12th Asia Pacific Workshop on Mixed and Augmented Reality (APMAR) (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
Lu, S. J., & Liu, Y. C. (2015). Integrating augmented reality technology to enhance children’s learning in marine education. Environmental Education Research, 21(4), 525-541.
McNeil, J. D. (1969). 2: Forces Influencing Curriculum. Review of Educational Research, 39(3), 293-318.
Milgram, P., & Kishino, F. (1994). A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems, 77(12), 1321-1329.
Morrison, H. C. (1926). The practice of teaching in the secondary school. University of Chicago Press.
Mueller, D. J. (1976). Mastery learning: Partly boon, partly boondoggle. Teachers College Record, 78(1), 1-9.
Nalçacı, A., & Ercoşkun, M. H. (2005). The materials used in primary education social studies lesson. Journal of Kazim Karabekir Education Faculty, 11.
Ozden, M. (2008). Improving science and technology education achievement using mastery learning model. World Applied Sciences Journal, 5(1), 62-67.
Pani, S. (2004). Reading strategy instruction through mental modelling. ELT journal, 58(4), 355-362.
Paris, S. G., Wasik, B. A., & Turner, J. C. (1991). The development of strategic readers. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. II, pp. 609–640). New York, NY: Routledge.
Pascarella, E. T. (1977). Aptitude-Treatment Interaction in a College Calculus Course Taught in Personalized System of Instruction and Conventional Formats.
Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hume (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (p. 227–247). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
Pokrajac, N., Schertzer, K., Poffenberger, C. M., Marin-Nevarez, P., Winstead-Derlega, C., & Gisondi, M. A. (2020). Mastery learning ensures correct personal protective equipment use in simulated clinical encounters of COVID-19. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 21(5), 1089.
Pressley, M., Symons, S., McGoldrick, J. A., & Snyder, B. L. (1995). Reading comprehension strategies. Cognitive strategy instruction that really improves children’s academic performance, 2, 57-100.
Pritchard, R. (1990). The effects of cultural schemata on reading processing strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 273-295.
RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension.
Rose, S., Potter, D., & Newcombe, M. (2010). Augmented Reality: A Review of available Augmented Reality packages and evaluation of their potential use in an educational context.
Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Toward an interactive model of reading. In Attention and performance VI (pp. 573-603). Routledge.
Santos, M. E. C., Chen, A., Taketomi, T., Yamamoto, G., Miyazaki, J., & Kato, H. (2013). Augmented reality learning experiences: Survey of prototype design and evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 7(1), 38-56.
Shaffer, S. C., & Rosson, M. B. (2013). Increasing student success by modifying course delivery based on student submission data. ACM Inroads, 4(4), 81-86.
Shelton, B. E., & Hedley, N. R. (2002, September). Using augmented reality for teaching earth-sun relationships to undergraduate geography students. In The First IEEE International Workshop Agumented Reality Toolkit, (pp. 8-pp). IEEE.
Smith, J. K., & Katims, M. (1977). Reading in the city: the Chicago mastery learning reading program. The Phi Delta Kappan, 59(3), 199-202.
Song, M. J. (1998). Teaching reading strategies in an ongoing EFL university reading classroom. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 8(1), 41-54.
Su, C. (2006). Evaluation of reading skills applied in the first-year college English reading course. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium on English Teaching. Taipei, Crane (pp. 579-587).
Suherman, S., Zafirah, A., Agusti, F. A., & Usman, R. (2020, May). The Effectiveness of AR-Geometry Interactive Book in Increasing Students’ Mathematical Reasoning Skill. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1554, No. 1, p. 012075). IOP Publishing.
Sutherland, I. E. (1968, December). A head-mounted three dimensional display. In Proceedings of the December 9-11, 1968, Fall Joint Computer Conference, part I (pp. 757-764).
Tullis, J. G., & Benjamin, A. S. (2011). On the effectiveness of self-paced learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 64(2), 109-118.
Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension.
Wixson, K. K., Peters, C. W., Weber, E. M., & Roeber, E. D. (1987). New directions in statewide reading assessment. The reading teacher, 40(8), 749-754.
Wood, E., & Woloshyn, V. (1995). Cognitive strategy instruction for middle and high schools. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
Wu, L. J., Weng, S. E., Chang, K. E., Lan, Y. J., & Sung, Y. T. (2009). The effect of the game-based problem-posing system for mathematical learning. In 17th International Conference on Computers in Education, ICCE 2009 (pp. 35-39).
Yalın, H. İ. (2006). Öğretim Teknolojileri ve Materyal Geliştirme. Ankara: Nobel Yayınları.
Yeany, R. H. (1979). The Effects of Diagnostic Prescriptive Instruction and Locus of Control on the Achievement and Attitudes of University Students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 17(6), 537-45.
Yip, J., Wong, S. H., Yick, K. L., Chan, K., & Wong, K. H. (2019). Improving quality of teaching and learning in classes by using augmented reality video. Computers & Education, 128, 88-101.
Yoon, S. A., Elinich, K., Wang, J., Steinmeier, C., & Tucker, S. (2012). Using augmented reality and knowledge-building scaffolds to improve learning in a science museum. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(4), 519-541.
Zhang, J., Sung, Y. T., & Chang, K. E. (2011, October). Using a mobile digital armillary sphere (MDAS) in astronomical observation for primary school students. In E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 2632-2641). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Zhang, J., Sung, Y. T., Hou, H. T., & Chang, K. E. (2014). The development and evaluation of an augmented reality-based armillary sphere for astronomical observation instruction. Computers & Education, 73, 178-188.
Zhang, J., Yen, S. H., Liu, T. C., Sung, Y. T., & Chang, K. E. (2020). Studies on learning effects of AR-Assisted and PPT-based lectures. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 1-10.