戶外教育對學生身心發展具正面積極效能，教育部將戶外教育列入十二年國教新課綱重大議題，並以戶外教育修訂校外教學法規，要求學校每學期至少實施一次，此重大舉措，使戶外教育發展方式多元。除單獨實施外，可整合各項重大議題，或結合部訂課程，成為跨領域課程的利器，或發展成為形塑符合學生需要與學校特色的學校本位課程，強化學生自主學習，形塑核心素養。學校本位課程更是新課綱是否落實的關鍵。因此，本研究採自然典範，探討以戶外教育為學校本位課程多年，極具課程特色的個案學校，其於十二年國教新課綱頒布前，戶外教育學校本位課程發展歷程為何？十二年國教新課綱施行後，其實施戶外教育學校本位課程的現況為何？並探究影響個案學校持續推動戶外教育學校本位課程的關鍵因素為何？並就其豐富的經驗，本研究結果如下：
一、十二年國教新課綱頒布前，個案戶外教育學校本位課程發展歷：（一）課程型態變革歷程：從初期單一班級活動，到中期全校性班級活動，至後期由教務主任領導下，轉向學校本位課程的永續規劃與發展。課程型態發展歷程中，除家長協助與校長支持外，教務主任角色更是舉足輕重，教務主任才是將戶外活動轉化為課程的重要推手，其在課程領導中承上啟下，推動課程發展、整合資源、溝通協調、促使行政支持教學系統，並激勵組織的學習動能。（二）面臨的挑戰，分成六大因素：外部環境因素：主要是家長干預影響課程；資源因素：教材不足、補助不確定；學校因素：人事異動與學生差異；課程與教學因素：課程認知落差，課程化難度高；教師因素：專業與體能差異，產生壓力；安全管理因素：天候與高山症難預測。（三）因應策略：外部環境因素：事前溝通訂出界線；資源因素：以外部資源增能教師，就地取材訓練學生；學校因素：教師共備共學、學生個別訓練；課程與教學因素：支持性環境，以課程核心具體規劃；教師因素：經驗共享相互提攜；安全管理因素：備案、備藥與家長協助。
二、十二年國教新課綱施行後的現狀：（一）課程實施方式：在既有基礎上積極迎接變革；提前全面實施滾動修正；固定排課；連結部定課程進行跨領域整合；注重縱向銜接連貫；固定場域以深化課程；以共同核心素養貫穿課程。（二）面臨的挑戰，分六因素：外部環境因素：家長參與程度差距大；資源因素：人力物力資源不足；學校因素：面臨適性教學設計與教師任職穩定度問題；課程與教學因素：新課綱課程轉化的挑戰；教師因素：教師條件不同，壓力與負擔龐大；安全管理因素 ：應變能力考驗大。（三）因應策略：資源因素：沿用過去因應方式；學校因素：同儕協作同行，改變師生互動模式共同成長；課程與教學因素：體現新課綱精神；教師因素：同僚專業相互支持楷模學習；安全管理因素 ：固定領域與增加醫療量能。惟面對教師對戶外教育喜愛、本位課程認同度與人事異動問題，以及新課綱課程轉化及學習重點對應，尚未提出具體措施。
三、影響個案學校持續推動戶外教育學校本位課程的關鍵因素：（一）學校生態：正向健康（二）學生學習成效：顯著（三）國家政策：具體明確（四）教師專業成長：精實。可見發展戶外教育為學校本位課程，必須建立於：教育行政機關以及外部系統支持、教師自主與專業發展、學校生態健全與安全氛圍、學生正向學習成長四大要素。
綜合本研究結果，歸納出個案學校戶外教育學校本位課程發展特色：一、善用國家具體政策為課程說帖。二、善用各方資源。三、學校生態正向健康。四、教師專業成長精實。五、長期實施並跨領域多元呈現的戶外教育。六、戶外教育成效顯著。個案學校戶外教育學校本位課程發展模式為：一、以既有基礎持續滾動修正。二、跨領域教學的遠見。三、從隨性到固定排課的轉變。四、注重縱向銜接與橫向連貫的改變。五、轉向固定場域以深化課程。六、創新嘗試以共同核心素養貫穿課程。
針對研究結果與發現提出建議：一、減輕教務主任工作負擔；二、師培育單位應系統性增加戶外課程；三、拓展戶外教育與學校本位課程共享資料庫內容；四、增加正式教師員額配置；五、擴充穩定補助學校發展戶外教育經費；六、建立完整核心素養評量機制。

Due to the outdoor education has positive influence on student’s mental development, the Department of Education has listed it as social issues for the 12-Year Curriculum Guidelines. Accompanied with the alteration of regulations of outside-school education with outdoor education, schools are required to perform outdoor education activity at least once in every semester; this significant decision has diversified the development pattern of outdoor education. Except for separate implementation, these outdoor education activities can also be combined with various important issues, such as combining with department-assigned curriculums, making it a great tool for cross-domain specific curriculum, or developed into school-based education that meets the students’ need with every school’s individual characteristic, reinforcing self-motivated study and promoting core competency. As school-based education plays an irreplaceable role in the implementation of the new curriculum. Thus, this study took on the natural-model approach to evaluate a unique case study with its long-term implementation of outdoor education curriculum. This study will also be discussing their development of school-based outdoor education before the introduction of Curriculum Guidelines of 12-Year Basic Education and the current situation of the school-based outdoor education after introduction of Curriculum Guidelines of 12-Year Basic Education. With the case study, this paper will also explore the key factors affecting how the case study’s continuing implementation of school-based outdoor education, with the rich experiences of the case study school, this study concludes:

1. Before the promulgation of the new curriculum of the Curriculum Guidelines of 12-Year Basic Education, the development course of the standard curriculum of the outdoor education case study school.
(1) The process of pattern alternation of curriculum: initially only one single class activities then to the school-wide class activities in medium-term, then under the leadership of the Dean, the school-based curriculum has been turned to permanent planning and development in the late period. In addition to parental assistances during curriculum development, support of the Principal and the role of the Dean are even more important, and the Dean is the important pushing hand to turn outdoor activities into a curriculum. The Dean promotes curriculum development, integrate resources, communicate, and coordinate, and encourage administrative to support for the teaching department and stimulate the learning kinetic energy of the organization.
(2)Challenges : Challenges are divided into six major factors: off-campus environmental factors: mainly home Long intervention impact courses; Resource factors: insufficient teaching materials, uncertain subsidies; School factors personnel changes and student differences; course Factors: poor course cognition, high difficulty of curriculum; Teacher's personal factors: the difference between professional and physical fitness produces pressure; Security management factors: Weather and mountain disease are difficult to predict.
(3) Responding strategy: the environmental factors outside of the school: pre-communication to draw a line; resource factors: external resources to enhance teachers, in-place material for training students; school factors: teachers’ co- preparation and co-learning, individual training of students; curriculum factors: supportive environment, with the core of the curriculum specific planning; teacher's personal factors: experience sharing and helping each other; safety management factors: filing, medicine preparation and parental assistance.

2. Key factors affect case study school continually promote outdoor education as school-base curriculum
(1) School ecology: positive and healthy
(2) Student learning results: significant
(3) National policy: specific and clear
(4) Professional growth of teachers: refined.
The development of outdoor education as a school-based curriculum, must be relied on four elements: organization of education administrative and external system support, teachers’ autonomy and professional development, integrity of school ecological and security atmosphere, students are positively learning and progress.

3. The current situation after the implementation of the new Curriculum Guidelines of 12-Year Basic Education
(1) The pattern of curriculum implementation: positively receiving transformation on the existing basis; full implementation of rolling corrections in advance; fixed scheduling; linking the assigned courses of Education Department for cross-domain integration; focus on vertical jointing and connection; deepen the courses in fixed domains; throughout the courses with common core literacy.
(2) Challenges, divided into six factors: external environmental factors: the gap of parental participation is large; resources factors: insufficient resources of man power and material; school factors: facing the problem of appropriate teaching design and teachers' employment stability; curriculum factors: the challenge of the transformation of the new curriculum; teachers' personal factors: teachers' conditions are different, the pressure and burden are huge; safety management factors: resilience is a big task.
(3) Responding strategy: resource factors: following the past responses; school factors: peers’ collaboration, change the interaction model between teachers and students to grow together; curriculum factors: reflecting the spirit of the new curriculum; teacher's personal factors: mutual support in professional range among colleagues, model learning; safety management factors: located in fix areas and increased medical capacity. However, in facing the favor of teachers in outdoor education, recognition of standard curriculum and personnel changes, as well as the transformation of the new curriculum and corresponding learning key points has not yet put further step.

Sum up the research results, the developing characteristics of outdoor education school-based curriculum of the case school are: First, make good use of the specific national policies post for the courses. Second, make good use of the resources of all parties. Third, the school ecology is positive and healthy. Fourth, the professional growth of teachers is solid. Fifth, long term implementation and present across multiple fields of outdoor education. Sixth, the effect of outdoor education is remarkable. The development mode of outdoor education school-based curriculum of case school is: First, continuous correction on the existing basis. Second, the vision of education in crossing areas. Third, transform to fixed scheduling of lessons. Fourth, vertical conjunction and horizontal connection. Fifth. Deepen the course in fixed field. Sixth, with mutual core literacy throughout the curriculum.

To make suggestions through the research results: First, to reduce the working load of the Dean; Second, the division of cultivation units systematically increased outdoor courses; Third, expanding contents of sharing database of outdoor education and school-based curriculum; Fourth, increase quote of regular teachers; V. stably increase funds for development of outdoor education in schools; Sixth, establish a complete evaluation mechanism of core literacy.

壹、中文部分
丁一顧、江姮姬（2020）。臺灣教師專業學習社群實徵研究之分析與展望。教育研究 與發展期刊，16 (2)，135‒162。
丁一顧、陳佳琳(2019)。善用教師專業學習社群提升教師專業資本。臺灣教育評論 ，8 (3)，1 – 8。
丁淑觀（2021）。後疫情時代的「共好」素養評量推動。臺灣教育評論月刊 ，10（3），016–
020。
中華民國內政部統計處（2017）。106年第8週內政統計通報(我國15歲以上人口教育程度統計)。取自 https://www.moi.gov.tw/chi/chi_site/stat/news_detail.aspx?sn=11673
王文科、王智弘（2014）。課程發展與教學設計論（九版）。五南。
方德隆（2001）。學校本位課程發展的理論基礎。課程與教學，4（2），1-24。
王鑫（1997）。國民小學『鄉土及環境教學單元活動』教師自行設計參考手冊。教育部環境保護小組。中華民國環境教育學會。
平野吉直（2017）。遇見田野～日本的野外教育。楊惠淳、許毅璿 （譯）。取自教育部放眼國際-戶外教育的多元演替與發展趨勢。（原著出版於2017 年)。
卯靜儒（2009）。美國60年代課程改革:從被動遭逢到主動面質。載於卯靜儒（主編），課程改革：研究議題與取徑（頁95-113）。學富。
世界銀行 (2005)。「為年輕人增加機會、培養能力：中等教育新方案」。 取自
https://siteresources.worldbank.org/EDUCATION/Resources/278200-1099079877269/547664-1099079967208/Expanding_Opportunities_Secondary.pdf
古騏豪（2013）。花蓮縣國民小學戶外教學提升體驗學習之研究 〔未出版之碩士論文，國立東華大學〕。碩博士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/8c2mjz
朱正雄 、 林俊瑩（2011）。追求卓越精進的動力來源－學前教師參與專業成長活動的影響機制 。臺北市立教育大學學報，教育類，42 (1)。 https://Doi.org/10.6336/JUTe/2011.42(1)5
江嘉杰（2017）。偏鄉國小校本特色課程的在地實踐。臺灣教育評論月刊，6
（5），90-95。
行政院主計處中華民國統計資訊網（2009）。青少年狀況調查。
取自 https://www.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=39937&ctNode=1857&mp=4
李丹維 （2017)。國民中學校外教學政策及問題之研究─ 以臺中市某國中為例
〔未出版之碩士論文，逢甲大學〕。碩博士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/5s7dt9
李宇欣（2014）。校外教學不能只是遊樂園。親子天下雜誌，55，100-102。
李京倫、章凱閎（2019，3月25日）。國際網站推估臺灣生育率全球最低。聯合新聞網。取自https://udn.com/news/story/7266/3716747
李尚展（2017）。邁向卓越～二十一世紀蘇格蘭戶外教育發展。取自教育部放
眼國際─戶外教育的多元演替與發展趨勢。
李明鴻（2014）。利用STS教學法探討學生自主規劃戶外教學之研究〔未出版之碩士論文，臺北市立大學〕。碩博士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/t4rg3t
李崑山（2006）。國民小學戶外教學現況與挑戰~由資深教師的角度觀之。臺灣教育，12，6-10。
李瑞娥（2005）。 學校組織學習、組織創新與學校效能的關係。高雄師大學報，18，45-59。
何宜謙、Stefanie Block、Dr. Sean Blenkinsop （2017）。繽紛的綠蔭～加拿大多元的戶外教育。取自教育部放眼國際─戶外教育的多元演替與發展趨
勢。
呂秀蓮（2017）。課綱使用理論與實例：素養導向課程發展與設計入門概念。 大衛營文化出版社。
呂秀蓮（2021）。素養評量：虛幻或實存的美麗花朵. 臺灣教育評論月刊 ，10（3）， 037–042。
余舒蓉（2018）。十二年國教新課綱轉化與實踐之個案研究：以前導學校為例。 雙溪教育論壇，7，113-133。
吳明烈（2004）。聯合國教科文組織與終身學習的發展：新人文主義取向。社
教雙月刊，123，18-29。
吳璧純（2017）。素養導向教學之學習評量。臺灣教育評論月刊，6（3）， 30-34。
吳璧純、詹志禹（2018）。從能力本位到素養導向教育的演進、發展及反思。
教育研究與發展期刊，14（2），35-64。
兒童福利聯盟 (2009)。2009年臺灣兒童課後照顧概況調查報告。取自 https://www.children.org.tw/news/advocacy_detail/298 。
兒童福利聯盟（2012）。2012年兒童運動狀況調查報告。取自 https://www.children.org.tw/research/detail/70/531。
兒童福利聯盟 (2013)。2013年青少年休閒生活現況調查報告。取自 https://www.children.org.tw/news/advocacy_detail/1063 。
兒童福利聯盟（2015）。臺灣家庭3C沉迷現象檢視調查報告。取自 https://www.children.org.tw/news/advocacy_detail/1487
兒童福利聯盟（2018）。2018年兒童運動現況調查報。 取自 https://www.children.org.tw/research/detail/70/1350 。
周新富（2017）。課程發展與設計。五南。
林永豐（2018）。素養的概念及其評量。教育人力與專業發展，31（6），
35-48。
林志成（2018年12月31日）。催生甜頭少少子化難解。中時電子報。 取自https://tw.news.yahoo.com/催生甜頭少-少子化難解-215006957.html
林志成、周雯娟（ 2021）。專業學習社群領導智慧之探究 。學校行政，131（1）1-21。 https://Doi.org/10.6423/HHHC.202101_(131).0001
林秀珍（2001）。「教育即生活」抑「生活即教育」？—杜威觀點的詮釋。教育研究集刊，47。
林秀珍（2007）。經驗與教育探微-杜威教育哲學之詮釋。師大書苑。
林佩璇（2000a）。學校本位課程發展及其影響因素之探討。載於教育部臺灣
省國民學校教師研習會（編），九年一貫課程試辦學校研習資料（頁76-93）。
林佩璇（2000b）。個案研究在教師研究上的應用。載於中正大學教育研究所
主編，質的研究方法（頁239-264）。麗文。
林佩璇（2004）。學校本位課程—發展與評鑑。學富。
林佳儀（2020）。環境教育特色課程之行動研究-以臺北市某國小為例〔未出版之碩士論文，國立屏東大學〕。碩博士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/jhkhsh
林湘芸、 黃靖文 （2019）。 國小教師團體凝聚力與組織效能關係之研究－教師專業發展之中介效果。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，1（83）。https://0-Doi.org.opac.lib.ntnu.edu.tw/10.3966/207136492019041201004
林琪桓（2019）。建構國小教師戶外教育風險管理指標之研究〔未出版之碩士論文，國立臺北教育大學〕。碩博士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/ac9n24
邱俊翰 （2020）。Tubalace紮根課程：地方本位戶外教育對原住民學生地方連結之影響〔未出版之碩士論文，國立中山大學〕。碩博士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/7hmu5m
金車教育基金會 (2014) 。青少年生態休閒素養調查。取自 https://www.sow.org.tw/info/news/20141022/3202
金車教育基金會(2017) 。青少年休閒問卷。取自https://kingcar.org.tw/survey/402
金車文教基金會（2018）。2018年青少年暑假休閒生活問卷調查。取自 https://kingcar.org.tw/survey/500574
施又瑀、施諭璇(2019)。國民小學戶外教育之探討。臺灣教育評論月刊，8 (4), 89。
洪詠善、范信賢（主編）（2015）。同行～走進十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。國家教育研究院。
姜韻梅（2018）。從逆境中突起－偏鄉學校學校本位課程變革的實例。臺灣教育評論月刊，7（1），336-349。
柯慧儀（2016）。學校本位的冒險教育課程發展經驗之探究-以新竹市一所國中為例〔未出版之碩士論文，國立體育大學〕。碩博士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/u6d3cb
國立教育廣播電臺新聞（2018）。「戶外教育」讓學生找到自信與舞臺 「忙到
沒有時間打架、遲到」。取自https://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E6%88%B6%E5%A4%96%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2-%E8%AE%93%E5%AD%B8%E7%94%9F%E6%89%BE%E5%88%B0%E8%87%AA%E4%BF%A1%E8%88%87%E8%88%9E%E5%8F%B0-%E5%BF%99%E5%88%B0%E6%B2%92%E6%9C%89%E6%99%82%E9%96%93%E6%89%93%E6%9E%B6-%E9%81%B2%E5%88%B0-062707663.html 。
范信賢（2016）。核心素養與十二年國民基本教育課程綱要：導讀《國民核心
素養：十二年國教課程改革的DNA》。教育脈動，5，1 - 7。
徐榮崇（2005）。學校鄉土活動教學之設計。國教新知，52，1-13。
國家教育研究院（2011）第八次全國教育會議實錄。取自國家教育研究院 。
張志明、許添明 (1999)。學校本位經營之理論與實踐：以東臺灣教育為例-學校
本位經營之教師聘任與教師財政研究（1 ）（計畫編號 NSC88-2413-H259-005-F19 ）〔補助〕。行政院國家科學委員會。
張芬芬、張嘉育(2015)。十二年國教「議題融入課程」規劃芻議。臺灣教育評
論月刊，4（7），26-33。
張春興（2017）。教育心理學：三化取向的理論與實踐（重修二版第19刷）。東華書局。
張素貞、李俊湖(2014)。面對十二年國民基本教育：精進教學有效學習的教師專業成長方案規劃之研究。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，7（1），1-22
張茵倩、楊俊鴻（2019）。從校訂到校本：校長課程領導的行動策略。課程研究，14(2），49–65。http://doi.org/10.3966/181653382019091402003
張嘉育 (1999)。 國民中小學學校本位課程發展。〔未出版之博士論文文，國立臺灣師範大學〕。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/jhvpg7
張嘉育 （2000）。 學校本位課程發展。師大書苑。
教育部（2002）。「教育部補助直轄市縣（市）政府辦理國民中小學校外教學要點」。取自取自 http://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL001146。
教育部（2003）。「國民中小學九年一貫課程暫行綱要」。取自取自 http://history.moe.gov.tw/policy.asp?id=2。
教育部（2011年3月31日）。「中華民國教育報告書－黃金十年、百年樹人」，穩健邁向精緻、創新、公義、永續的教育新境界。教育部新聞稿取自 https://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=4F8ED5441E33EA7B&sms=B69F3267D6C0F22D&s=7C918B776473300A
教育部（2014）。十二年國民基本教育實施計畫。取自 https://www.edu.tw/News_Content4.aspx?n=D33B55D537402BAA&sms=954974C68391B710&s=37E2FF8B7ACFC28B
教育部（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。取自 https://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/attach/87/pta_18543_581357_62438.pdf。
教育部（2014）。中華民國戶外教育宣言。 取自https://www.edu.tw/Advanced_Search.aspxq=%E6%88%B6%E5%A4%96%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2
教育部（2015）。十二年國民基本教育領域課程綱要核心素養發展手冊 。國家教育研究院課程及教學研究中心 核心素養工作圈。取自 https://ws.moe.edu.tw/001/Upload/23/relfile/8006/51358/9df0910c-56e0-433a-8f80-05a50efeca72.pdf
教育部（2015）。國民中小學課程標準。取自教育部國民中小學課程與教學資
源整合平臺。取自 https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/Facet/Home/index.aspx?HtmlName=Home&
教育部（2016）。教育部令 。取自 https://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/attach/87/pta_16461_5724983_49147.pdf
教育部 (2017) 。戶外教育研究室計畫-成果報告。取自取自 https://outdoor.naer.edu.tw/base/research/1/106%E5%B9%B4-%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E9%83%A8%E6%88%B6%E5%A4%96%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6%E5%AE%A4%E8%A8%88%E7%95%AB-%E6%88%90%E6%9E%9C%E5%A0%B1%E5%91%8A.pdf。
教育部 (2017) 。學校如何設計素養導向的學校本位課程 。取自教育部全球資訊網。取自 https://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=BA5E856472F10901&sms=5588FE86FEB94225&s=3AA5BCDF7CC7652B
教育部（2018）。「國民中小學辦理戶外教育實施原則」。取自https://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL001146#lawmenu
教育部（2018）。「學校辦理校外教學活動租用車輛應行注意事項」。取https://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL000696#lawmenu
教育部（2019）。「教育部國民及學前教育署補助實施戶外教育要點」。取自
https://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=FL046957#lawmenu
教育部（2019）。議題融入說明手冊 - CIRN 國民中小學課程與教學資源整合平臺 。取自 https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/Upload/ckfile/files/%E5%8D%81%E4%BA%8C%E5%B9%B4%E5%9C%8B%E6%95%99/%E8%AD%B0%E9%A1%8C%E8%9E%8D%E5%85%A5%E8%AA%AA%E6%98%8E%E6%89%8B%E5%86%8A(107_12).pdf
教育部（2019，10月23日）。讓學習走入真實世界！ 戶外教育 扎根課綱 2016-2019戶外教育分享會。國民及學前教育署新聞稿。
教育部部史（2019)。重大政策發展歷程。取自http://history.moe.gov.tw/。
莊明貞（2008）。課程改革中大學與小學的夥伴關係：一個學校本位課程發展的案例分析。教育研究月刊，176，40-52。
莊明貞、彭麗琦(2019 ， 2 月 11 日) 。CIRN網站十二年國民基本教育新課綱 推動-宣導與增能-107 主題進階回流培訓研習-選修【學校本位課程發展實施與評鑑】課程檔案。取自https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/WebFile/index. Aspx?sid=1172&mid=9302
莊明貞、彭麗琦、潘志煌、周仁尹、劉淑芬（2018）。主題進階回流培訓研習 （二）：主題二學校本位課程的發展與實施。載於教育部國民及學前教育署主辦之「107-108年十二年國教課程綱要種子講師培訓及相關宣導計畫」（頁27-260）。
陳介英 (2005)。深度訪談在經驗研究地位的反思。載於齊力、林本炫（編），質性研究方法與資料分析（二版)（頁117-127）。復文。
陳文彥（2019）。專業學習社群與學校課程發展。教育研究月刊，308，17-33。http://doi.org/10.3966/168063602019120308002
陳向明 (2009)。社會科學質的研究。五南。
陳美如、郭昭佑（2001）。學校本位課程發展評鑑指標建構初探。國立臺北師範大學學報，46（2），193-212。
陳美燕、葉劭緯（2015）。國中小校外教學現況與戶外教育政策認知之調查研
究。國家教育研究院教育脈動電子期刊，12（4）， 44-67。
陳建志（2018）。學校本位課程發展：兼論理念學校與 教學卓越獎之助益。當代教育研究季刊，26（3）。http://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.201809_26(3).0003
陳信豪、潘宥安(2020)。教務主任課程領導之探討。臺灣教育評論月刊，9（4）， 135‒139 。取自https://tpl.ncl.edu.tw//NclService/JournalContentDetail?SysId=A20014061
陳淑惠（2006）。戶外環境教育教學效能之探討---以中部地區資深戶外環境教育之國小教師為例〔未出版之碩士論文，國立臺中教育大學〕。碩博士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/muke37
陳榮裕（2010）。生態遊學學校本位課程對國小四年級學童的實驗教學〔未出版之碩士論文，臺北市立教育大學〕。碩博士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/hjw2nv
陳璋玲、 鄭斐文 (2008)。利用模糊層級分析法評選旅行社承辦國小戶外教學之
研究。 休閒與遊憩研究，2，133 - 162。
郭雄軍（2015）。臺灣實施戶外教育指標建構之研究〔未出版之博士論文，國立臺北教育大學〕。碩博士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/8te65g
陳靜宜(2005)。一個教務主任初任歷程的自我敘說探究。學校行政，39，163‒178。
張慶勳(2019)。學校治理建構以核心素養為導向校本課程的理念與行動。教育研究月刊，298，4‒1。
曾建勳（2014）。公立特色學校進行式- 雙溪國小山林冒險體驗課程之個案研究〔未出版之碩士論文，臺北市立大學〕。碩博士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/3gpf28
游家政（2008）。學校本位課程評鑑的回顧與展望。課程與教學季刋，12 （1），25-48。
游振鵬、陳寶山、王逸慧（2011）。學校本位課程發展停滯原因之探究—以一
所曾獲教學特優獎之國中為例。學校行政，76，129-146。
鈕文英 (2016)。質性研究方法與論文寫作。 雙葉書廊。
黃子舜（2018）。新北市國民小學教師實施戶外教育現況與困境之研究〔未出版之碩士論文，臺北市立大學〕。碩博士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/vtc48w
黃乃熒（2005）。學校組織變革之 意識型態研究－以一所國民中學為 例。師大學報（教育類），50 (1)， 101-121。
黃光雄、周淑卿 (1992)。英國國訂課程評析。 教育研究所集刊， 34， 181-201。
黃光雄、蔡清田 (1999)。課程設計：理論與實際。 五南。
黃光雄、蔡清田（2020）。課程發展與設計新論（初版八刷）。五南。
黃武雄 （2013）。學校在窗外（教改二十周年紀念版）。左岸文化。
黃茂在、曾鈺琪（2016） 。臺灣戶外教育內涵與課程優質化初探。教育脈動 ，4，25-43。取自https://pulse.naer.edu.tw/Home/Content/38439436-e60d-4e9a-b691-60a96c39e41d?insId=af2e89d7-4c33-4f9d-a680-9aeb9324095b
黃虹茹（2020）。四季課程實施困境及其改善策略之個案研究：以宜蘭縣一所實驗學校為例〔未出版之碩士論文，國立東華大學〕。碩博士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/pkwt7v
黃政傑（2014）。課程設計（初版二十四刷）。東華。
黃書婷（2008）。戶外教育—走出教室，讓學生“活起來”。臺灣教育，649， 49-52。
黃湃翔、何俊青、邱莉蓁（2013）。國小校長推動學校特色課程之策略分析。 現代桃花源學刊，3，84-99。 http://doi.org/10.3966/160683002016090105001
黃瑞琴 (1997)。質的教育研究方法。心理。
黃寶億、丘愛鈴（ 2019）。跨縣市教師專業學習社群創新運作模式。師資培育
與教師專業發展期刊，12 (1 )，103-125。http://doi.org/10.3966/207136492019041201005
楊俊鴻（2016）。導讀：《課程發展與設計的關鍵DNA：核心素養》。教育脈
動，5，1-5。取自https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?DocID=P20160218002-201602-201603110030-201603110030-s1-5
楊崇德（2017）。國小施行戶外教育之問題與因應。臺灣教育評論月刊，6 （7），164-166。
楊惠芳（2015年1月18日)。以自然為師，教部擬訂戶外教育專法。國語日報新聞 。取自https://mdnkids.com/news/?Serial_NO=91709。
甄曉蘭（2003）。 教師的課程意識與教學實踐。教育研究集刊， 63。
甄曉蘭、 鍾靜(2002)。 學校本位課程發展相關問題及其相應措施之研究。教育科學研究期刊，1。
劉小萍（2009）。臺灣偏遠地區國小教師校外教學之實施現況、阻礙因素及戶外教學能力需求〔未出版之碩士論文，國立臺中教育大學〕。碩博士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/gvd86q
歐用生（2004）。課程領導：議題與展望。高等教育。
潘正德 （2012）。團體動力學。心理。
潘志煌 、何育真 (2019）。十二年國教學校本位課程發展與實踐之個案分析：以一所國小參與前導學校協作計畫為例。課程研究 14(2)， 1-30。http://doi.org/10.3966/181653382019091402001
潘慧玲（2003）。社會科學研究典範流變。教育研究資訊，11(1)，115-144。
潘慧玲、洪詠善（2018）。課綱轉化實踐之綜析。載於潘慧玲（主編），啟動高中課程變革：十二年國教新課綱的轉化實踐（頁267-283）。國家教育研究院。
蔡清田（2005）。課程領導與學校本位課程發展。五南。
蔡清田（2007）。學校本位課程發展的新猷與教務課程領導。五南。
蔡清田（2014）。國民核心素養：十二年國教課程改革的DNA。高等教育。
蔡清田（2012）。課程發展與設計的關鍵DNA：核心素養。五南。
蔡金田(2014)。國民小學校長領導、教師學習社群與教師專業發展關係之研究。教育行政論壇，6(1)，91‒112 。http://read.ncl.edu.tw//NclService/JournalContentDetail?SysId=A16011751
蔡清田（2017）。課程實驗：課綱爭議與出路。五南。
蔡清田（2018）。核心素養的課程發展。五南。
蔡清田（2018）。核心素養的學校本位課程發展。五南。
蔡清田、童正德（2002）。 國民中學「學校本位課程發展」之問題、影響因素與因應策略—以南部兩所試辦九年一貫課程改革的國中為例。教育研究月刊 ，11，119-131。
鄭彩鳳、黃宏文(2019)。新課綱下學校中階雙歧領導任務之挑戰。教育研究月刊， 304，46‒61。http://doi.org/10.3966/168063602019080304004
鄭淵全(2008)。國小校長在學校本位課程發展的課程領導作為及其相關問題之研究。 新竹教育大學學報，25(1)，1-19。
鄭淵全、陳殷哲（2016）。析論學校本位課程發展。教育脈動， 7，4 - 20。
鄭葉敏芬（2019）。臺灣與美國中小學教師職責丶權利和義務之比較研究。臺灣教育評論月刊，8（9）， 131-143。http://www.ater.org.tw/journal/article/8-9/monograph/02.pdf
賴志峰 （2020）。中小學中層領導的理論與實踐。教育研究月刊， 318，32–46。
賴志峰、秦夢群(2018)。一位國民小學校長之社會化探究。臺北市立大學學報， 49(1)，51‒71。http://doi.org/10.3966/168063602020100318003
賴姿樺(2013) 。校外教學風險管理之研究〔未出版之碩士論文，國立臺灣師
範大學〕。碩博士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/awvha7
聯合國 (1959)。 兒童權利宣言。取自 https://www.childrightsmanifesto.eu/ 。
聯合國（1948）。世界人權宣言。取自 https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/。
聯合國（1989）國際兒童權利公約 。取自 https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx。
謝純雅（2011）。臺北市國小教師利用親山步道進行戶外環境教育之現況調查
〔未出版之碩士論文，國立臺灣師範大學〕。碩博士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/sc628p
謝鴻儒 (2009)。國小教師戶外教學現況與障礙之研究〔未出版之碩士論文，國立臺北教育大學〕。碩博士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/4w6n3v
鍾啟泉（2005）。現代課程論（新版）。高等教育。
簡士勛（2009）。國小六年級實施學校本位課程教學之研究—以蝴蝶生態園教學為例〔未出版之碩士論文，臺北市立教育大學〕。碩博士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/vqe3ax
簡良平、甄曉蘭（2001）。學校自主發展課程之相關因素分析。教育研究集
刊，46，53-80。
簡淑玲（2020）。教師實施戶外教育考量因素及工作壓力之研究-以新竹縣國小教師為例〔未出版之碩士論文，育達科技大學〕。碩博士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/4sj428
羅先耘、葉育瑜、 黃茂在(2018)。我們準備好了嗎？臺灣戶外教育研究回顧 。
休憩管理研究，5 (2)， 63- 88。
羅厚輝（2002）。課程發展的理論基礎。學富。
羅淑娟（2018）。戶外體驗學習之個案研究－以臺中市某國中實施山野教育為例〔未出版之碩士論文，逢甲大學〕。碩博士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/gx8748
戴韋怜（2009）。國小中年級學校本位課程發展成效研究－以五股溼地為例〔未出版之碩士論文，臺北市立教育大學〕。碩博士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/a7654p
韓孟芳（2017）。國小山野教育課程實施歷程之研究〔未出版之碩士論文，國立臺北教育大學〕。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/me3k2b
藍偉瑩（2019）。教學力：深化素養學習的關鍵。親子天下。
嚴祥鸞 (2008) 。參與觀察法。見胡幼慧編，質性研究：理論、方法及本士女性研究實例（頁195-221）。巨流。
饒見維（2005）。教師專業發展： 理論與實務。五南。

中文翻譯書
Coulter, R., & Coulter, M., (2012). 管理學（黃俊隆，譯）。高立圖書 。（原著出版年 2003 )
Dewey, J. (2006). 民主與教育（薛絢，譯）。大塊文化出版社。（原著出版年 1944 )
Dewey, J. (2015). 經驗與教育（單文經，譯注）。聯經。（原著出版年 1938 年)
Hammerman, D. R., Hammerman, W. M., & Hammerman, E. L. (2008). 戶外教學(二版)（周儒、呂建政，譯）。五南。（原著出版年1994 )
Louv, R. (2013). 失去山林的孩子：拯救「大自然缺失症」兒童（郝冰、王西敏，譯）。野人。（原著出版年2009 )
Maxwell, J. (2018). 質性研究設計：互動取向的方法(陳劍涵，譯）。心理。（原著出版年 2012 )
Patton, M. Q. (1994). 質的研究與評鑑（吳芝儀、李奉儒，譯）。桂冠。（原著出版年1980）
Yin, R. (2001). 個案研究。（尚榮安，譯）。弘智文化。（原著出版年1994 )

貳、英文部分
Agostini, F., Minelli, M., & Mandolesi, R. (2018). Outdoor Education in Italian
kindergartens: How teachers perceive child developmental
trajectories. Frontiers in Psychology, , 9, 1911. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01911
Alo, E., Slinn, H., Saqipi, B., & Vogrinc, J. (2018). Effective teacher professional
development in the process of major school reforms. International Journal of
Management in Education, (2), 114. http://doi.org/10.1504/IJMIE.2018.090732
Atapattu, T., Thilakaratne, M., Vivian, R., & Falkner, K. (2019). Detecting cognitive
engagement using word embeddings within an online teacher professional
development community. Computers and Education, 140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.05.020
Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in Teaching and Teacher
Education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10–20. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007
Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996.). Reform by the book: What is-or might be-the
role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional
reform? Educational Researcher, 26(9), 6–14.
Ball, D., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is—or might be—the
role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform?
Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6–14.
Barfod, K.,  Alesandru, A.,  Lindner, M., Kätting, E.,  Johansson,K., Skånstrøm,  M.
＆ Gräfe, R. (2012) In and Out: Into the outdoor classrooms adaptation of new subject related approaches in different learning environments . 33-34. Dissertation presented at the 11th European Geoparks Conference, Arouca, Portugal. http://www.2012egnconference.com/
Bassett, M. (2016). The Role of Middle Leaders in New Zealand Secondary Schools: Expectations and Challenges. Waikato Journal of Education, 21(1), 97‒108. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1233355
Beames, S., & Ross, H. (2010). Journeys outside the classroom. Journal Of Adventure Education And Outdoor Learning, (2), 95-109.https://eric.ed.gov/?q=Journeys+outside+the+classroom.&id=EJ908778
Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D. K., & Mead, M. (1987). The Case Research Strategy in
Studies of Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 11(3), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.2307/248684
Bentsen, P., Mygind, E., & Randrup, T. (2009). Towards an understanding of
udeskole: education outside the classroom in a Danish context. Education 3 To
13,37 (1), 29-44. 
Bentsen, P., Schipperijn, J., & Jensen, F. S. (2013). Green Space as Classroom:
Outdoor School Teachers’ Use, Preferences and Ecostrategies. Landscape
Research, 38(5), 561–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2012.690860
Bentsen, P., Søndergaard Jensen, F., Mygind, E., ＆ Barfoed Randrup, T. (2010). The
extent and dissemination of udeskole in Danish schools. Urban Forestry &
Urban Greening, 9(3), 235–243.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2010.02.001
Bezzina, M. (1991). Teachers’ perceptions of their participation in school based
curriculum development: A case study. Curriculum Perspectives, 11(2), 39–34.
Blank, R. , Alas, N. , & D Washington. (2009).The Effects of teacher professional development on gains in student achievement: How meta analysis provides scientific evidence useful to education leaders. Council of Chief State School Officers, 24.https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED544700
Bølling, M., Otte, C. R., Elsborg, P., Nielsen, G., & Bentsen, P. (2018). The
association between education outside the classroom and students’ school
motivation: Results from a one-school-year quasi-experiment. International
Journal of Educational Research, 22-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.03.004
Bolstad, R. (2004, November 24–26). School-based curriculum development: Redefining the term for New Zealand schools today and tomorrow . New Zealand Association for Research in Education (NZARE) Wellington,
New Zealand. https://www.nzcer.org.nz/system/files/13514.pdf.
Borko, H., & Putnam, R. T. (1996). Learning to teach. In D. C. Berliner & R. C.
Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (p. 673–708). Macmillan
Library Reference Usa; Prentice Hall International.
Boss, J. A. (1999). Outdoor education and the development of civic responsibility. ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools, Appalachia Educational Laboratory, 1999. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED425051
Bowen, D. J., Neill, J. T., & Crisp, S. J. R. (2016). Wilderness adventure therapy
effects on the mental health of youth participants. Evaluation and Program
Planning, 58, 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.05.005
Brady, L. (1992). Curriculum development: fourth edition. Prentice Hall
Brady, L. (1995). School-based curriculum development and the national curriculum:
Can they coexist? Curriculum and Teaching, 10(1), 47–54.
Brown, M., & Edelson, D. (2003). Teaching as design: Can we better understand the
ways in which teachers use materials so we can better design materials to
support their changes in practice? LeTUR Report Series. 1-11. https://www.inquirium.net/people/matt/teaching_as_design-Final.pdf
Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, Harvard University
Press.
Burridge, P. (2000) Do journey style outdoor education programs lead to change? –
What the participants think?Journal of Outdoor Education, 1-26.
Chawla, L., Cushing, D. F., Malinin, L., Pevec, I., Vliet, W., & Zuniga, K. D. (2012) 
Children and the environment. In Children and the Environment. Oxford
University Press, 1-33. http://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199791231-0034
Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L. (1986) Teachers’ thought processes. In: Handbook of
research on teaching, 3rd ed., 255–296. Macmillan.
Clarke, D., Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching And Teacher Education, (8), 947-967. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00053-7
Collopy, R. (2003). Curriculum materials as a professional development tool: How a
mathematics textbook affected two teachers’ learning. Elementary School
Journal, 103(3), 287. http://doi.org/10.1086/499727
Conlon, C. M., Wilson, C. E., Gaffney, P., & Stoker, M. (2018). Wilderness Therapy
Intervention with Adolescents: Exploring the Process of Change. Journal of
Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 18(4), 353-366.
http://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2018.1474118
Cooperrider, D. L., Sorensen, P. F., Yaeger, T. F., & Whitney, D. (2001). Apprecia-
tive inquiry: An emerging direction for organization development. Champaign,
Stipes Publishing.
Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R. C., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S.
(2009). Professional Learning in the Learning Profession: A Status Report on
Teacher Development in the United States and Abroad. Stanford, National
Staff Development Council and the School Redesign Network at Stanford
University. https://edpolicy.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/publications/professional-learning-learning-profession-status-report-teacher-development-us-and-abroad.pdf
Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing Educative Curriculum Materials to
Promote Teacher Learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3–14. http://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X034003003
Davis, E. A., Palincsar, A. S., Arias, A. M., Bismack, A. S., Marulis, L. M., & Iwashyna, S. K. (2014). Designing educative curriculum materials: A theoretically and empirically driven process. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 24-52. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.1
Dolan, A. M. (2016). Place-based curriculum making: devising a synthesis between
primary geography and outdoor learning. Journal of Adventure Education and
Outdoor Learning, (1), 49. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2015.1051563
Donaldson, G. (2010). Teaching Scotland's Future: Report of a review of teacher
education in Scotland, ScotGov, Scotland. http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/id/eprint/2178
Donaldson, G. E., & Donaldson, L. E. (1958). Outdoor education: A definition.
Journal of Health, Physical Education and Recreation, 29(17), 17-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221473.1958.10630353
Ernst, J. (2014). Early Childhood Educators’ Use of Natural Outdoor Settings as
Learning Environments: An Exploratory Study of Beliefs, Practices, and
Barriers. Environmental Education Research, 20(6), 735–752. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.833596
Ewert, A. (1987). Research in Experiential Education: An Overview. Journal of
Experiential Education, (1). https://doi.org/10.1177/105382598701000201
Fägerstam, E. (2012). Space and Place：Perspectives on Outdoor Teaching and
Learning. Linköping Studies in Behavioural Science 167. 100, Linköping
University Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning. http://liu.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A551531&dswid=4560
Fägerstam, E. (2014). High school teachers’ experience of the educational potential
of outdoor teaching and learning. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor
Learning, (1), 56-81. http://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2013.769887
Fägerstam, E., & Grothérus, A. (2018) Secondary school students’ experience of
outdoor learning: A Swedish case study. Education,138 (4), 378-392.
Fiennes, C., Oliver, E., Dickson, K., Escobar, D., Romans, A. and Oliver, S. (2015)
The existing evidence-base about the effectiveness of outdoor learning. Institute
of Outdoor Learning, Blagrave Trust, UCL & Giving Evidence Report. (Date
Accessed 19th March 2015). https://www.outdoor-learning.org/Portals/0/IOL%20Documents/Research/outdoor-learning-giving-evidence-revised-final-report-nov-2015-etc-v21.pdf?ver=2017-03-16-110244-937
Fjørtoft, I. (2001). The Natural Environment as a Playground for Children: The
Impact of Outdoor Play Activities in Pre-Primary School Children. Early
Childhood Education Journal, 29(2), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012576913074
Ford, P. M. (1981). Principles and Practices of outdoor/environmental education.
John Wiley & Sons.
Ford, P. M. (1986).Outdoor Education: Definition and Philosophy (ED267941). ERIC. https://www.ericdigests.org/pre-923/outdoor.htm
Fredrickson, B. L., Tugade, M. M., Waugh, C. E., & Larkin, G. R. (2003). What
Good Are Positive Emotions in Crises? A Prospective Study of Resilience and
Emotions Following the Terrorist Attacks on the United States on September
11th, 2001. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 365–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.365
Fullan, M. (2007) .The New Meaning of Educational Change. Fourth Edition. Teachers College Press.
Gilbertson, K., Bates, T., McLaughlin, T., & Ewert, A. (2006). Outdoor education:
Methods and strategies. Human Kinetics.
Gopinathan, S., & Deng, Z.Y. (2006). Fostering School-Based Curriculum
Development in the Context of New Educational Initiatives in
Singapore. Planning and Changing: An Educational Leadership and Policy Journal ,37(1-2).93-110. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10089339
Gorard, S. (2018). School improvement. In Education policy, equity and effectiveness: Evidence of equity and effectiveness (pp. 101-112). Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv4rfrfg.14
Gray, T. (2018). Outdoor learning: not new, just newly important. Curriculum Perspectives, 38(2), 145–149.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-018-0054-x
Gray, T., & Martin, P. (2012). The Role and Place of Outdoor Education in the
Australian National Curriculum. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education 16, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03400937
Gray, T., & Perusco, D. (1993). Footprints in the sand: The value of outdoor
education in the school curriculum. The ACHPER National Journal, 139(2), 17-20.
Gray, T., & Pigott, F. (2018). Lasting Lessons in Outdoor Learning: A Facilitation Model Emerging from 30 Years of Reflective Practice. Ecopsychology. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2018.0036 
Grootenboer, P., Edwards-Groves, C., & Rönnerman, K. (2019). Understanding middle leadership: practices and policies. School Leadership & Management, 39(3-4), 251-254. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1611712
Gummesson, E (1991) Qualitative method in Management Research, Sage
publication, California,pp.83-150 quoted in Mohd Noor, K.B (2008) Case
Study:A Strategic Research Methodology, American Journal Of Applied
Science, 5(11),1602-1603.
Hairon S., Chua, C. S. K., & Neo, W. L. (2018). School-based curriculum
development in Singapore: A case study of a primary school. Asia Pacific
Journal of Education, 38(4), 518-532. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2018.1530192
Hammerman, D. R., Hammerman, W. M., & Hammerman, E. L. (1985). Teaching in
the outdoors (3th ed.). The Interstate Printers & Publisher
Hartmeyer, R., & Mygind, E. (2016). A retrospective study of social relations in a
Danish primary school class taught in ‘udeskole.’ Journal of Adventure
Education and Outdoor Learning,16 (1), 78-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2015.1086659
Harun, M. T., & Salamuddin, N. (2010). Cultivating personality development
through outdoor education programme: the Malaysia experience. Procedia -
Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 228-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.141
Harvey, M., Rankine, K., & Jensen, R. (2017). Outdoor learning hubs. A Scottish
attainment challenge innovation fund project report. https://
www.sapoe.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Outdoor-Hub-Learning-Report-
Dec-2017-V1.pdf.
Ho, A., Watkins, D., Kelly, M. (2001). The conceptual change approach to improving
teaching and learning: An evaluation of a Hong Kong staff development
programme. Higher Education 42, 143–169. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017546216800
Hursen, C., & Islek, D. (2017). The Effect of a School-Based Outdoor Education
Program on Visual Arts Teachers’ Success and Self-Efficacy Beliefs. South
African Journal of Education, 37(3),1-17.http://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v37n3a1395
James, J. K., & Williams, T. (2017). School-Based Experiential Outdoor Education:
A Neglected Necessity. Journal of Experiential Education, 40(1), 58–71.
Http://doi.org/10.1177/1053825916676190
 Jeronen, E., Jeronen, J., & Raustia, H. (2009). Environmental Education in Finland-
A Case Study of Environmental Education in Nature Schools. International
Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(1), 1–23.
Karppinen, S..J.A. (2012). Outdoor Education in Finland: Old Experiential Method in a New Concept, Pathways: The Ontario Journal of Outdoor Education, 24(4), 30.
Ke, Z., Yin, H., Huang, S. (2019). Teacher participation in school-based professional
development in China: does it matter for teacher efficacy and
teaching strategies? Teachers And Teaching, 25(7), 821-836.
http://doi.org/ 10.1080/13540602.2019.1662777
Kellert, S. R. (2002).Experiencing nature: Affective, cognitive, and evaluative
development in children. In P. H. Kaln, & S. R. Kellert (Eds.), Children and
nature: Psychological, sociocultural, and evolutionary investigations (pp.
117-151). the MIT press.
Keys, P. (2007). A knowledge filter model for observing and facilitating change in
teachers' beliefs. Journal of Educational Change, 8,41-60.
Knapp, C. (1999). In accord with nature : helping students form an environmental
ethic using outdoor experience and reflection (ED425897). ERIC/Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools. 
Knapp, C.E. (1990). Processing the adventure experience. In J. Miles & S. Priest
(Eds), Adventure Programming. Venture Publishing.
Ko, J., Y. C. Cheng, and T. Lee ( 2016). The Development of School Autonomy and Accountability in Hong Kong: Multiple Changes in Governance, Work, Curriculum, and Learning. International Journal of Educational Management 30 (7), 1207-1230. http://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-10-2015-0145
Kuo, F. E., & Taylor, A. F. (2004). A Potential Natural Treatment for Attention-
Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Evidence From a National Study. American
Journal Of Public Health, (9), 1580–1586. http://doi.org/ 10.2105/ajph.94.9.1580
Lee, T., Cheng, Y. C., & Ko, J. (2018). Curriculum reform with a school-based approach: intellectual, structural and cultural challenges. School Leadership & Management, 38(3), 278–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2017.1386647
Lewis, C. A. (1975). The administration of outdoor education programs. Kendall-Hunt.
Luttenberg, J., Imants, J., & van Veen, K. (2013). Reform as ongoing positioning
process: the positioning of a teacher in the context of reform. Teachers And
Teaching,19 (3), 293-310. http://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2012.754161
MacQuarrie, S., Howe, C., & Boyle, J. (2012). Exploring the Characteristics of Small
Groups within Science and English Secondary Classrooms. Cambridge Journal
of Education, 42(4), 527-546. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2012.733345
Macquarrie, S. (2018). Everyday teaching and outdoor learning: Developing an
integrated approach to support school-based provision. Education 3-13, 46(3),
345-361. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2016.1263968
Marsh, C. (1992). Key concepts for understanding curriculum. Falmer Press
Marsh, C., Day, C., Hannay, L., & McCutcheon, G. (1990). Reconceptualizing
school-based curriculum development. The Falmer Press. 
Martin, D. (2018). Teaching, learning, and understanding of public history in schools as challenge for students and teachers. In Demantowsky M. (Ed.), Public history and school: International perspectives (pp. 84-94). De Gruyter.
McKenzie, M. D. (2000). How are adventure education program outcomes
achieved? a review of the literature. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 5(1), 19-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03400637
Merewether, J. (2017). Making the outdoors visible in pedagogical documentation.
In  Fleet, A., Patterson, C. & J. Robertson (Eds.), Pedagogical Documentation
in Early Years Practice: Seeing through multiple perspectives, (pp. 131–
147). SAGE. 
Merriam, S. B. (2001). Qualitative research and case study applications in
education. Jossey-Bass.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and
implementation (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Michie, M. (1998). Factors influencing secondary science teachers to organise and
conduct field trips. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 44(4), 43.
Morris, P. (1995). The Hong Kong school curriculum: Development, issues and
policies. Hong Kong University Press.
Mutz, M., & Müller, J. (2016). Mental health benefits of outdoor adventures: Results
from two pilot studies. Journal of Adolescence, 49, 105–114.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.03.009
Mutz, M., Müller, J., & Göring, A. (2019). Outdoor adventures and adolescents’
mental health: daily screen time as a moderator of changes. Journal of
Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 19(1), 56-66. 
https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2018.1507830
Mygind, E. (2007). A comparison between children’s physical activity levels at
school and learning in an outdoor environment. Journal of Adventure Education
and Outdoor Learning,7 (2), 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729670701717580
Mygind, E. , Bølling, M. , ＆Seierøe Barfod, K. . (2019). Primary teachers’
experiences with weekly education outside the classroom during a
year. Education 3-13, 47(5), 599–611. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2018.1513544
Nadler, R. S. (1993). Therapeutic process of change. In Gass M. A. (Ed.), Adventure
Therapy: Therapeutic applications of adventure programming (pp. 57– 69). Hunt Publishing.
Nicol, R. (2014). Entering the Fray: The role of outdoor education in providing
nature-based experiences that matter. Educational Philosophy & Theory, 46(5),
449–461. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2011.00840.x
OECD (1979). School-based curriculum development. OECD.
Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (pp. 169-186).
Sage.
Power, S., Taylor, C., Rees, G., & Jones, K. (2009). Out-of-School Learning:
Variations in Provision and Participation in Secondary Schools. Research
Papers in Education, 24(4), 439–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520802584095
Prawat, R. S. (1989). Promoting access to knowledge, strategy and disposition in
students: A research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 59(1), 1–41.
Priest, S. (1986). Redefining outdoor education: A matter of many relationships.
Journal of Environmental Education, 17(3), 13-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1986.9941413
Price, S., & Hein, G. E. (1991). More than a Field Trip: Science Programmes for
Elementary School Groups at Museums. International Journal of Science
Education, 13(5), 505–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069910130502
Prince, H. E. (2019). Changes in outdoor learning in primary schools in England,
1995 and 2017: lessons for good practice. Journal of Adventure Education and
Outdoor Learning, 19(4), 329–342. http://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2018.1548363
Propst, D. B., & Koesler, R. A. (1998). Bandura Goes Outdoors: Role of Self-
Efficacy in the Outdoor Leadership Development Process. Leisure Sciences,20 (4), 319-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409809512289
Pyle, Robert (1993). The thunder trees: Lessons from an urban wildland. Houghton Mifflin.
Quibell, T., Charlton, J., & Law, J. (2017). Wilderness Schooling: A controlled trial
of the impact of an outdoor education programme on attainment outcomes in
primary school pupils. British Educational Research Journal, 43(3), 572-587.
 https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3273
Remillard, J. T. (2000). Can Curriculum Materials Support Teachers’ Learning? Two
Fourth-Grade Teachers’ Use of a New Mathematics Text. The Elementary School Journal, 100(4), 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1086/499645
Rea, T., Waite, S. (2009) International perspectives on outdoor and experiential
learning Education 3–13: International Journal of Primary, Elementary and
Early Years Education, 37 (1).http://doi.org/10.1080/03004270802291699
Rickinson, M., Dillon, J., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M. Y., Sanders, D., & Benefield, P. (2004). A Review of Research on Outdoor Learning. Unknown Publisher. https://www.academia.edu/288162/
Rosenfeld, A, & Wise, N. (2001). The Over-schedules Child: Avoiding the Hyper
parenting Trap. St. Martin’s Press.
S. Beames, M. Atencio, H. Ross (2009 )Taking Excellence Outdoors, Scottish
Educational Review, 41 (2), 32-45.
Sabar, N. (1998). Curriculum development at school level. In T. Husen & N.
Postlewaite (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Education (pp. 1267–
1272). Pergamon.
Sharp, L. B. (1968). What is outdoor education? In D. R. Hammerman & W. M.
Hammerman (Eds.), Outdoor education─A book of readings (pp.
1-6). Burgess Publishing Company.
Sharp, L. B.. (1943) Outside the Classroom.The Educational Forum, 7(4).361-368.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00131724309340840
Sjöblom, P., & Svens, M. (2019). Learning in the Finnish outdoor classroom: Pupils’
views. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 19(4), 301–314.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2018.1531042
Skatos, M. (1979). Proposition 13 and outdoor education. Journal of Physical
Education And Recreatio 50(2), 66-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/00971170.1979.10617956
Skilbeck, M. (1984). School-based curriculum development. Falmer Press
Smith, D. (1983). On the concept of perceived curriculum decision-making space.
Curriculum Perspective 1(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2018.1482960
Smith, J. W. (1960). The Scope of Outdoor Education. The Bulletin of the National
Association of Secondary School Principals, 44(256), 156–158.
https://doi.org/10.1177/019263656004425638
Smith, J. W. (1970). Outdoor education in Michigan schools (ED498566). ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED041648
Smith, J. W., Carlson, R. E., & Donaldson, G.W. (1963). Outdoor education.
Prentice-Hall.
Snyder, J., Bolin, F., Zumwalt, K. Jackson, (1992). Curriculum implementation. In P.
W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 402–435). Macmillan.
Stern, M. J., Powell, R. B., Hill, D. (2014). Environmental education program
evaluation in the new millennium: what do we measure and what have we
learned? Environmental Education Research, 20(5), 581-611.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.838749
Szczepanski, A. & Dahlgren, L, O. (2011). Lärares uppfattningar av lärande och
undervisning utomhus. Didaktisk Tidskrift. 20(1). 21-48.
http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-20489
Taylor, A. F., Kuo, F. E., & Sullivan, W. C. (2002). Views of Nature and Self-
Discipline: Evidence from Inner City Children. Journal of Environmental
Psychology,22 (1-2), 49-63. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0241
Taylor, C., Power, S., & Rees, G. (2010). Out-of-school learning: the uneven
distribution of school provision and local authority support. British Educational
Research Journal,36 (6), 1017-1036. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920903342046
Thomas, G. J. (2019a). Effective Teaching and Learning Strategies in Outdoor
Education: Findings from Two Residential Programmes Based in
Australia. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 19(3), 242–
255. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2018.1519450
Thomas, G. J. (2019b). Learning to be a group facilitator in outdoor education: using
self-awareness to overcome fears and be fully present. Journal of Adventure
Education and Outdoor Learning, 19(4), 287–300.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2018.1509720
Thomas, G., Potter, T., & Allison, P. (2009). A tale of three journals: A study of
papers published in AJOE, JAEOL and JEE between 1998 and 2007. Australian
Journal of Outdoor Education, 13(1), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03400876
Thomas, S. (1999). Safe practice in the ‘outdoor classroom. In  Raymond, C. (Ed.). Safety across the curriculum, (pp.131-150). Falmer. 
Thorburn, M., & Allison, P. (2010). Are we ready to go outdoors now? The prospects
for outdoor education during a period of curriculum renewal in Scotland. The
Curriculum Journal, 21(1), 97-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170903560824
Truong, S. (2017). Expanding curriculum pathways between education for
sustainability and health and physical education. In K. Malone., S. Truong, & T.
Gray (Eds.), Reimagining sustainability in precarious times (pp. 239–252). Springer.
Truong, S., Gray, T. and Ward, K. (2016), Sowing and growing life skills through
garden-based learning to re-engage disengaged youth, Learning Landscapes,
10(1), 361 - 385. https://doi.org/10.36510/learnland.v10i1.738
Ulset, V., Vitaro, F., Brendgen, M., Bekkhus, M., & Borge, A. I. H. (2017). Time
spent outdoors during preschool: Links with children’s cognitive and behavioral
development. Journal of Environmental Psychology 52, 69–80.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.05.007
Waite, S. (2010). Losing our way? The downward path for outdoor learning for
children aged 2-11 years. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor
Learning, 10(2), 111. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2010.531087
Walton, J. (1978). School‐based curriculum development in Australia. In J.
Walton & R. Morgan (Eds.),Some perspectives on school based curriculum
development (pp. 3–20). University of New England Publishing Unit.
Wambugu, P. W., Stutchbury, K., Dickie, J. (2019). Challenges and Opportunities in
the Implementation of School-Based Teacher Professional Development: A Case
from Kenya. Journal of Learning for Development, 6(1), 76–82. http://hdl.handle.net/11599/3189
Wang, L.-Y., Victor, D.-T. C., & Neo, W.L. (2019). Studying the enactment of
School-Based Curriculum Development (SBCD) in Singapore. Educational
Research, 61(3), 337–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2019.1642120
Widmer, M. A., Duerden, M. D., & Taniguchi, S. T. (2014). Increasing and
generalizing self-efficacy: The effects of adventure recreation on the academic
efficacy of early adolescents. Journal of Leisure Research, 46(2), 165–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2014.11950318
Wu, P. C., Chen, C. T., Lin, K. K., Sun, C. C., Kuo, C. N., Huang, H. M., … Yang,
Y.H. (2018). Myopia Prevention and Outdoor Light Intensity in a School-Based
Cluster Randomized Trial. Ophthalmology, 125(8), 1239–1250.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.12.011
Yuen, S., Boulton, H., Byrom, T., (2018). School-based curriculum development as
reflective practice: a case study in Hong Kong. Curriculum Perspectives, 38(1),
15–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-017-0032-8
Yuen, T. W. W., A. C. K. Cheung, P. M. Wong. (2012). A Study of the Impact of the First Phase of the Curriculum Reform on Student Learning in Hong Kong. International Journal of Educational Management 26 (7) 710–728.