契約的制定往往涉及責任歸屬、風險轉移、利益分配等複雜因素。為了降低交易成本、促進公部門學習以及強化投標廠商之間的競爭，標準化契約（standardized contract）的概念已被廣泛運用政府部門。為了執行政府採購，中央與地方機關頻繁地使用契約範本，其制度建立迄今雖已進行多次修正，而履約爭議仍然時有所聞。若契約範本十分完美，則履約爭議案件理當有限；當履約爭議案件仍時有所聞，意味著契約範本的制度可能存在問題。在此背景下，政府採購過程中有關標準化契約的潛在功能與影響，其實是有待深入探究的。本研究將以工程採購契約範本制度作為研究主題，針對政府採購人員進行深度訪談，從受訪者回應歸納出範本的非預期效果分為三大層面：範本龐雜化、對範本過度依賴的心態與經驗傳承的斷層。其中又可區分為忽略契約內容、機關與廠商間的認知衝突、選商困境、權威型工具的用途、內部制度僵化、畏懼裁量權、甲方主導思維、培訓機制功能不彰與學習意願低落共十項非預期效果。本研究期待對標準化契約的研究領域有所貢獻，特別是深化對契約範本的完整認識。

The formulation of contracts often involves complex factors such as attribution of responsibility, transfer of risk, and allocation of benefits. The concept of standardized contracts has been widely used by government departments to reduce transaction costs, promote public sector learning, and enhance competition among bidders. Although the system has been amended several times since its inception, disputes over the implementation of the contract are still heard from time to time. If the model contract is perfect, the number of performance disputes should be limited; when performance disputes are still heard, it means that there may be problems with the model contract system. In this context, the potential function and impact of standardized contracts in the government procurement process should be explored in depth. This study will focus on the model engineering procurement contract system and conduct in-depth interviews with government procurement personnel. Respondents' responses summarized the unintended effects of the templates into three major dimensions: the overwhelming complexity of the templates, the mentality of over-reliance on the templates, and the discontinuity of experience transmission. These can be divided into ten unintended effects: neglect of contract content, cognitive conflict between the organization and the vendor, business selection dilemma, use of authoritative tools, rigidity of internal systems, fear of discretion, A-led mindset, ineffective training mechanism, and low willingness to learn. This study is expected to contribute to the field of research on standardized contracts and, in particular, to deepen the complete understanding of contract templates.

林彥妤（2016）。工程契約條款不備不明衍生爭議之探討 ─以工程採購契約範本為中心（朝陽科技大學營建工程系碩士論文）。
林益年（2012），政府採購制度變革–從新制度主義之觀點。《全球商業經營管理學報》，4，67-81。
陳向明，2002，《社會科學質的研究》。台北：五南出版社。
陳金哲（2012）。契約委外與都市政治：台南市立醫院第三期委外經營為例。政治科學論叢，(53)，121-161。
陳重安（2011）。政府契約委外的再檢視：目標、理論應用、績效衡量、與知識論基礎。公共行政學報，40，111-143。
陳敦源、張世杰（2010），〈協力夥伴關係的弔詭〉，《文官制度季刊》，2:3：17-71。
紐文英（2012），質性研究方法與論文寫作。台北：雙葉書廊。
孫本初、傅岳邦（2010），〈契約型政府的概念與實務：資訊與福利服務議題中的政府角色〉。《文官制度季刊》2(3)：1-15
孫煒（2016）。台灣地方社會服務契約委外的績效與競爭。公共行政學報，51，1-33。
孫煒（2018）。臺灣地方文化活動契約委外的績效觀感：客家節慶利害關係人的角度。行政暨政策學報，(66)，1-38。
莫永榮（2004）。〈政府服務委託外包的理論與實務--臺灣經驗〉，《行政暨政策學報》，39，75-104。
黃源協、蕭文高（2006）。〈社會服務契約管理--台灣中部四縣市社會行政人員觀點之分析〉，《臺大社會學刊》，13，173-218。
詹菡心（2007）。由不可預見與顯失公平探討工程採購契約範本之履約效果（朝陽科技大學營建工程系碩士班碩士論文）。
劉淑瓊（2005）。績效、品質與消費者權益保障：論社會服務契約委託的責信課題。 社會政策與社會工作學刊，9（2），31-93。
潘淑滿（2003）。《質性研究：理論與應用》。臺北：心理。
蕭家進（2001），〈公共工程爭議處理的省思〉，《現代營建》，260，65-70。
Bajari, P., and S. Tadelis. 2001. “Incentives versus Transaction Costs: A Theory of Procurement Contracts.” The RAND Journal of Economics 32 (3): 387–407. doi:10.2307/2696361.
Beckman MG, Hooper WC, Critchley SE, Ortel TL. Venous thromboembolism: a public health concern. Am J Prev Med. 2010 Apr;38(4 Suppl):S495-501
Blind, K. 2004. The Economics of Standards: Theory, Evidence, Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Boyne, G. A. (1998). Bureaucratic theory meets reality: Public choice and service contracting in US local government. Public Administration Review, 58(6), 474-475.
Brunsson, N., and B. Jacobsson, eds. 2000. A World of Standards. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brunsson, N., Rasche, A., & Seidl, D. (2012). The Dynamics of Standardization: Three Perspectives on Standards in Organization Studies. Organization Studies, 33(5-6), 613-632. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612450120
Domberger, S. (1998). The contracting organization: A strategic guide to outsourcing. New York: Oxford University Press.
Handler, J. F., (1996) Down from Bureaucracy: The Ambiguity of Privatization and Empowerment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Iossa, E., G. Spagnolo, and M. Vellez. 2007. Contract Design in Public-Private Partnerships. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Design in Public-Private Partnerships Report prepared for the World Bank.
Kettner, P. M. and L. L. Martin (1985). 'Issues in the development of monitoring systems for purchase of service contracting', Administration in Social Work, 9 (3): 69-82.
Martijn Van Den Hurk and Koen Verhoest. 2016. The challenge of using standard contracts in public–private partnerships, Public Management Review, 18:2, 278-299.
Van Der Veen, M. and W. K. Korthals Altes. 2012. “Contracts and Learning in Complex Urban Projects. ”International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 36 (5): 1053–1075.