寫筆記活動可以分為兩部分：一是記下筆記的產出過程，另一是複習筆記結果的檢閱過程。本研究旨在探討於國小資訊課學習中導入合寫筆記並以提出問題（含回答）方式進行檢閱筆記之可行性，其中，在產出筆記階段，學生以主題矩陣格式的筆記格式進行筆記產出；在檢閱筆記階段，以提出問題的方式來進行複習；而合作的方式則可以是共同編寫或相互分享。因此，本研究探討的合寫筆記活動包括：共同編寫筆記後共同編寫問題的「共編筆記與問題」寫筆記活動、及相互分享筆記後相互分享問題的「分享筆記與問題」寫筆記活動。此外，本研究為瞭解共編問題與分享問題的成效，將分別與自行閱讀的檢閱方式做比較。本研究由臺南縣某國小六年級八個班共 222 位學生參與，以班級為單位隨機分派為「共編筆記與問題」組、「共編筆記與閱讀」組、「分享筆記與問題」組、和「分享筆記與閱讀」組。研究發現，學生參與以編寫問題進行複習的合寫筆記活動時，以共編方式產出的主題矩陣格式筆記將較以分享方式產出的筆記能記下更多的課堂資訊。此外，利用分享問題方式來複習筆記摘錄的課堂內容，相較於利用共編問題方式來複習筆記，能對問題的回答更加完整且深入；同時，對於分享問題方式的回答愈完整且深入，學生的立即與保留學習成就也愈高。

Note-taking activity has two processes. One is the producing process when writing down the notes, and the other is the reviewing process when revising the notes. This study aims to investigate the feasibility of introducing collaborative note-taking, and then reviewing the notes with the student-generated questioning (including answering) in a primary computer science course. In the producing process, students used the matrix form to take notes; in the reviewing process, students used student-generated questioning strategy to review notes. The form of collaborative note-taking was either collaborative writing or mutual sharing. Therefore, the collaborative note-taking activity in this study included the note-taking activity of “co-editing notes then co-editing questions,” and “sharing notes then sharing questions.” In addition, to find out the effect of co-editing questions and sharing questions, this study compares both separately with independent review of reading notes. Total of 222 sixth graders, who came from eight classes of an elementary school in Tainan County, participated in this study and were randomly assigned to (a) “co-editing notes then co-editing questions” group, (b) “co-editing notes then reading notes” group, (c) “sharing notes then sharing questions” group, and (d) “sharing notes then reading notes” group. This study found that the way of co-editing matrix notes could take down more curricular information than the way of sharing notes when students participate in reviewing notes with student-generated questioning. Furthermore, those who share questions to review notes answer questions more completely and deeply than those who co-edit questions. Besides, among the sharing notes then sharing questions group, who answers questions more completely and deeply, would get higher learning achievement.

中文部分
林清山（1992）。心理與教育統計學（1版）。臺北：東華書局。

邱瓊慧、陳思緯、吳秋儀、陳政煥（2008）。國小學童以wiki進行合作及個別筆記之研究。論文發表於第十四屆資訊管理暨實務研討會（IMP 2008），東吳大學，臺北。

教育部國教司（2008）。97年國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。臺北：教育部。2009年5月31日取自http://www.edu.tw/eje/content.aspx?site_content_sn=15326

郭生玉（2001）。心理與教育研究法（16版）。臺北：精華書局。

英文部分
Abrandt Dahlgren, M., & Öberg, G. (2001). Questioning to learn and learning to question: Structure and function of problem-based learning scenarios in environmental science education. Higher Education, 41(3), 263-282.

Aiken, E. G., Thomas, G. S., & Shennum, W. A. (1975). Memory for a lecture: Effects of notes, lecture rate, and informational density. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(3), 439-444.

Aliakbari, M., & Mashhadialvar, J. (2006). Does it matter who makes comprehension questions? A comparison between the levels of comprehension obtained from author-generated questions and student-generated questions. In Proceedings of the 11th Conference of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics (PAAL 2006), Chuncheon, Korea (pp. 1-7). Seoul, Korea: PAAL.

Baxter, G. P., Bass, K. M., & Glaser, R. (2001). Notebook writing in three fifth-grade science classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 102(2), 123-140.

Burdick, P. M., & Denner, P. R. (1991). Effects of training ninth-grade students in the two methods of self-questioning: Why train students to self-question when they can simply reread? Paper presented at the 16th Washington Organization for Reading Development Conference (WORD 1991), Bellevue, WA.

Call, P. E. (2000). Reflective questioning: A strategy to review notes. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 43(5), 487-488.

Chan, L. K. S. (1991). Promoting strategy generalization through self-instructional training in students with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24(7), 427-433.

Chen, N. S., Wei, C. W., Wu, K. T., & Uden, L. (2009). Effects of high level prompts and peer assessment on online learners' reflection levels. Computers & Education, 52(2), 283-291.

Chin, C., Brown, D. E., & Bruce, B. C. (2002). Student-generated questions: A meaningful aspect of learning in science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(5), 521-549.

Chin, C., & Kayalvizhi, G. (2002). Posing problems for open investigations: What questions do pupils ask? Research in Science & Technological Education, 20(2), 269-287.

Choi, I., Land, S., & Turgeon, A. (2005). Scaffolding peer-questioning strategies to facilitate metacognition during online small group discussion. Instructional Science, 33(5), 483-511.

Clark, F. L., Deshler, D. D., Schumaker, J. B., Alley, G. R., & Warner, M. M. (1984). Visual imagery and self-questioning: Strategies to improve comprehension of written material. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17(3), 145-149.

Colbert, J. T., Olson, J. K., & Clough, M. P. (2007). Using the web to encourage student-generated questions in large-format introductory biology classes. CBE Life Sciences Education, 6(1), 42-48.

Cuccio-Schirripa, S., & Steiner, H. E. (2000). Enhancement and analysis of science question level for middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 210-224.

Davey, B., & McBride, S. (1986). Generating self-questions after reading: A comprehension assist for elementary students. Journal of Educational Research, 80(1), 43-46.

DeArment, C. (2007). Teaching and learning through newer technologies that promote collaboration and user generated content. In C. Montgomerie & J. Seale (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (ED-MEDIA 2007), Vancouver, Canada (pp. 3489-3492). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.

DeLisi, M. B. (2001). Comprehending expository text. Unpublished master dissertation, Kean University, New Jersey.

Denning, P. J. (2007). Computing is a natural science. Communications of the ACM, 50(7), 13-18.

Di Vesta, F. J., & Gray, G. S. (1972). Listening and note taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(1), 8-14.

Doyle, B. (2006). When to wiki, when to blog [Electronic Version]. Retrieved March 29, 2009, from http://www.econtentmag.com/?ArticleID=16900

Dreher, M. J., & Guthrie, J. T. (1990). Cognitive processes in textbook chapter search tasks. Reading Research Quarterly, 25(4), 323-339.

Dunkel, P. (1988). The content of l1 and l2 students' lecture notes and its relation to test performance. TESOL Quarterly, 22(2), 259-281.

Ebbinghaus, H. (1998). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. In R. H. Wozniak (Ed.), Classics in psychology, 1855-1914. Bristol, England: Thoemmes Continuum.

Faber, J. E., Morris, J. D., & Lieberman, M. G. (2000). The effect of note taking on ninth grade students' comprehension. Reading Psychology, 21(3), 257-270.

Faggella-Luby, M., Schumaker, J. S., & Deshler, D. D. (2007). Embedded learning strategy instruction: Story-structure pedagogy in heterogeneous secondary literature classes. Learning Disability Quarterly, 30(2), 131-147.

Ferriter, B. (2009). Learning with blogs and wikis. Educational Leadership, 66(5), 34-38.

Fisher, J. L., & Harris, M. B. (1973). Effect of note taking and review on recall. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 65(3), 321-325.

Ge, X., & Land, S. M. (2003). Scaffolding students' problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 21-38.

Glaubman, R., Glaubman, H., & Ofir, L. (1997). Effects of self-directed learning, story comprehension, and self-questioning in kindergarten. Journal of Educational Research, 90(6), 361-374.

Graesser, A. C., & Person, N. K. (1994). Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 31(1), 104-137.

Hartley, J. (1976). Lecture handouts and student note-taking. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 13(2), 58-64.

Hartley, J., & Cameron, A. (1967). Some observations on the efficiency of lecturing. Educational Review, 20(1), 30-37.

Hartley, J., & Davies, I. K. (1978). Note-taking: A critical review. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 15(3), 207-224.

Hartley, J., & Marshall, S. (1974). On notes and note-taking. Universities Quarterly, 28(2), 225-235.

Haynie, W. J. (1997). Effects of anticipation of tests on delayed retention learning. Journal of Technology Education, 9(1), 20-30.

Hofstein, A., Navon, O., Kipnis, M., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2005). Developing students' ability to ask more and better questions resulting from inquiry-type chemistry laboratories. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), 791-806.

Hopkins, K. D. (1998). Educational and psychological measurement and evaluation (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Howe, M. J. A. (1970). Using students' notes to examine the role of the individual learner in acquiring meaningful subject matter. Journal of Educational Research, 64(2), 61-63.

Huang, Z. (1991). A meta-analysis of student self-questioning strategies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Hofstra University, New York.

Imperatore, C. (2009). Wikis and blogs: Your keys to student collaboration & engagement. Techniques: Connecting Education & Careers, 84(3), 30-31.

Janssen, T. (2002). Instruction in self-questioning as a literary reading strategy: An exploration of empirical research. L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 2(2), 95-120.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, F. P. (2000). Joining together: Group theory and group skills (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Johnson, G. M. (2006). Online study groups: Reciprocal peer questioning versus mnemonic devices. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(1), 83-96.

Kam, M., Wang, J., Iles, A., Tse, E., Chiu, J., Glaser, D., Tarshish, O., & Canny, J. (2005). Livenotes: A system for cooperative and augmented note-taking in lectures. In S. M. Zhai & W. Kellogg (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2005), Portland, OR (pp. 531-540). New York, NY: ACM.

Kiewra, K. A. (1985). Investigating notetaking and review: A depth of processing alternative. Educational Psychologist, 20(1), 23-32.

Kiewra, K. A. (1989). A review of note-taking: The encoding-storage paradigm and beyond. Educational Psychology Review, 1(2), 147-172.

Kiewra, K. A., Benton, S. L., Kim, S. I., Risch, N., & Christensen, M. (1995). Effects of note-taking format and study technique on recall and relational performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20(2), 172-187.

Kiewra, K. A., DuBois, N. F., Christian, D., & McShane, A. (1988). Providing study notes: Comparison of three types of notes for review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 595-597.

Kiewra, K. A., DuBois, N. F., Christian, D., McShane, A., Meyerhoffer, M., & Roskelley, D. (1991). Note-taking functions and techniques. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 240-245.

King, A. (1990). Reciprocal peer-questioning. Clearing House, 64(2), 131-135.

King, A. (1991a). Effects of training in strategic questioning on children's problem-solving performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 307-317.

King, A. (1991b). Improving lecture comprehension: Effects of a metacognitive strategy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5(4), 331-346.

King, A. (1992a). Comparison of self-questioning, summarizing, and notetaking-review as strategies for learning from lectures. American Educational Research Journal, 29(2), 303-323.

King, A. (1992b). Facilitating elaborative learning through guided student-generated questioning. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 111-126.

King, A. (1994). Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: Effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain. American Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 338-368.

Kobayashi, K. (2006). Combined effects of note-taking/-reviewing on learning and the enhancement through interventions: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychology, 26(3), 459-477.

Kozminsky, E., & Kozminsky, L. (2001). How do general knowledge and reading strategies ability relate to reading comprehension of high school students at different educational levels? Journal of Research in Reading, 24(2), 187-204.

Laidlaw, E. N., Skok, R. L., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1993). The effects of notetaking and self-questioning on quiz performance. Science Education, 77(1), 75-82.

Landay, J. A. (1999). Using note-taking appliances for student to student collaboration. In D. Budny & G. Bjedov (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE 1999), San Juan, Puerto Rico (pp. 12c14/15-12c14/20). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.

Liu, Y. H., & Yu, F. Y. (2004). Active learning through student generated questions in physics experimentation classrooms. Paper presented at the 14th International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEE 2004), Gainesville, FL.

Maddox, H., & Hoole, E. (1975). Performance decrement in the lecture. Educational Review, 28(1), 17-30.

McInerney, V., McInerney, D. M., & Marsh, H. W. (1997). Effects of metacognitive strategy training within a cooperative group learning context on computer achievement and anxiety: An aptitude - treatment interaction study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(4), 686-695.

McMullin, B., & Munro, M. (2003). Access to lecture notes: Review and best practice [Electronic Version]. Retrieved December 23, 2007, from http://odtl.dcu.ie/wp/2004/ODTL-2004-00.html

Miyake, N., & Masukawa, H. (2000). Relation-making to sense-making: Supporting college students' constructive understanding with an enriched collaborative note-sharing system. In B. J. Fishman & S. F. O'Connor-Divelbiss (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2000), Ann Arbor, MI (pp. 41-47). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Morgan, C. H., Lilley, J. D., & Boreham, N. C. (1988). Learning from lectures: The effect of varying the detail in lecture handouts on note-taking and recall. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2(2), 115-122.

Nessel, D. D., & Graham, J. M. (2006). Thinking strategies for student achievement: Improving learning across the curriculum, k-12 (2th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

O'Neill, M. E. (2005). Automated use of a wiki for collaborative lecture notes. In W. Dann, T. L. Naps, P. T. Tymann, & D. Baldwin (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE 2005), St. Louis, MO (pp. 267-271). New York, NY: ACM.

Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175.

Paradis, L. M., & Peverly, S. (2003). The effects of knowledge and task on students' peer-directed questions in modified cooperative learning groups. Child Study Journal, 33(2), 117-139.

Paulson, D. R., & Faust, J. L. (1998). Active learning in the college classroom. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 9(2), 3-24.

Peper, R. J., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). Generative effects of note-taking during science lectures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(1), 34-38.

Pierre, A. A. S., Carruthers, S., Coady, Y., Dunn-Krahn, R., Dunn-Krahn, S., Gibbs, C., Gibbs, G., Gibbs, H., Lonergan, S., Proctor, J., Stege, U., Storey, C., & Storey, M. A. (2007). Young minds storming through challenging computer science concepts. Paper presented at the 12th Western Canadian Conference on Computing Education (WCCCE 2007), Kamloops, Canada.

Piolat, A., Olive, T., & Kellogg, R. T. (2005). Cognitive effort during note taking. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(3), 291-312.

Potts, B. (1993). Improving the quality of student notes [Electronic Version]. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 3. Retrieved December 24, 2007, from http://www.pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=3&n=8

Rakes, T. A., & Scott, S. M. (1983). Using teacher/student generated questions. Paper presented at the 21st Florida Reading Association Conference (FRA 1983), Hollywood, FL.

Robin, A., Foxx, R. M., Martello, J., & Archable, C. (1977). Teaching note-taking skills to underachieving college students. Journal of Educational Research, 71(2), 81-85.

Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 181-221.

Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1992). Text-based and knowledge based questioning by children. Cognition and Instruction, 9(3), 177-199.

Sedita, J. (1995). A call for more study skills instruction. Paper presented at the 32nd Learning Disabilities Association International Conference (LDA 1995), Orlando, FL.

Sheridan, P. (2006). Higher level thinking through student generated questions. Retrieved January 30, 2009, from http://mwp.umn.edu/summer/2006/2006images/2006demos/sheridan.pdf

Singh, G., Denoue, L., & Das, A. (2004). Collaborative note taking. In L. Denoue (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (WMTE 2004), Jhongli, Taiwan (pp. 163-167). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.

Snyder, L. (2005). Fluency with information technology: Skills, concepts, and capabilities (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Spires, H. A. (1993). Learning from a lecture: Effects of comprehension monitoring. Reading Research and Instruction, 32(2), 19-30.

Sutherland, P., Badger, R., & White, G. (2002). How new students take notes at lectures. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 26(4), 377-388.

Swanson, P. N., & De La Paz, S. (1998). Teaching effective comprehension strategies to students with learning and reading disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 33(4), 209-218.

Topping, D. H., & McManus, R. A. (2002). Real reading, real writing: Content area strategies (1st ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Trafton, J. G., & Trickett, S. B. (2001). Note-taking for self-explanation and problem solving. Human-Computer Interaction, 16(1), 1-38.

Trawick-Smith, J. (2002). Early childhood development: A multicultural perspective (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
van der Meij, H. (1994). Student questioning : A componential analysis. Learning and individual differences, 6(2), 137-161.

Williams, R. L., & Eggert, A. C. (2002). Notetaking in college classes: Student patterns and instructional strategies. The Journal of General Education, 51(3), 173-199.

Wong, B. Y. L. (1985). Self-questioning instructional research: A review. Review of Educational Research, 55(2), 227-268.

Wu, C. Y., Chen, S. W., Chen, C. H., & Chiu, C. H. (2009). The effect of integrating web 2.0 technology in collaborative note-taking on elementary students’ science learning. In G. Siemens & C. Fulford (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (ED-MEDIA 2009), Honolulu, HI (pp. 3145-3153). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.