隨著網際網路的快速發展，圖書館運用各種Web 2.0工具以拓展服務，提供更便利的溝通管道與讀者互動，近年來國內外均有圖書館在Facebook社群網站中建立粉絲專頁，發佈圖書館活動公告、影音記錄或開發各種便於讀者查找資訊之應用程式，而讀者亦可藉此管道發表意見、詢問問題。本研究之研究目的在於探討大學圖書館於Facebook中經營服務的方式，藉由瞭解國內圖書館Facebook的建置內容、互動情況以及讀者查找資訊與解決問題的特性、對社群網站的接受程度等，進而歸納大學圖書館於社群網站中發展服務的方向。
截至民國99年11月，國內共有33個大學圖書館粉絲專頁及6個公共圖書館粉絲專頁，本研究透過「內容分析法」分析國內圖書館Facebook中所設置之功能以及發佈訊息之性質及互動情況。在使用者調查部份則採用「問卷調查法」瞭解師大圖書館讀者利用圖書館參考服務詢問問題之經驗及對於師大圖書館Facebook的看法，透過網路問卷的發放，共回收348份有效問卷。
研究結果發現許多圖書館Facebook僅有開設功能，但並未善加利用與管理，讀者於頁面中發佈之訊息以廣告、閒聊居多，且公共圖書館互動情況較大學圖書館來得熱絡。使用者調查部份，讀者較傾向自行於網際網路中搜尋以解決問題，且認為自己能夠解決問題而選擇不向圖書館求助，其中教職員使用者較少向圖書館詢問問題。大部分讀者對於師大圖書館Facebook之使用態度是正面的，且對於圖書館提供新的服務管道願意積極嘗試，但Facebook並不適合做為討論學術研究相關問題的管道。本研究建議圖書館Facebook可提供更豐富的資訊內容，與讀者的互動、回應更要積極，並可嘗試提供新的功能。

With the rapid development of internet, there are many libraries use various Web 2.0 tools to expandd services, providing more convenient channel to communicate with readers. In recent years, many libraries build their Facebook Fan Page, publishing library bulletins, photos, videos and develop applications to help readers find information. Readers can also express their views, ask questions on Facebook. Purpose of this research is to investigate the operating status of library with Facebook and to know how users’ solving problems through library and their perspective and acceptance of library with Facebook. Then conclude some new ideas of academic library with social networking sites.
Until November 2010, there are 33 academic library Facebook and 6 public library Facebook in Taiwan. The research used content analysis to analyse the functions each fan page provides and the reactions between libraries and users. Furthermore, researcher designed a questionnaire to understand readers’ experience of asking questions by reference service and their views of Facebook of National Taiwna Normal University Library. The questionnaire was sending by internet, and 348 were returned.
The results of this study revealed that some libraries establish functions on Facebook but did not make the best use and management. Most messages posted by readers are chatting and advertising messages. The reactions of public library Facebook is more active than academic library. On the part of user survey, readers believe that they can solve problems by searching information via the internet and choose not to turn to the library. Although staff users seldom seek for help from the library, most readers have postitive attitude towards library with Facebook. If library provides new services, readers are willing to try, but Facebook is not very suitable as a environment to discuss academic research issues. This study suggests that the information content provided by library on Facebook should be richer, the interaction with readers should be more positive, and try to provide new functions and new ideas.

中文文獻
Neuman, W. L. (2002)。當代社會研究法（王佳煌、潘中道譯）。台北市：學富文化。
王愉文、程蘊嘉（2008）。淺談數位時代的圖書館變革。臺灣圖書館管理季刊，4（4），34-45.
王錫璋（1997）。圖書館的參考服務 : 理論與實務。台北市：文史哲。
古德興、侯冠宇、陳奕任（2007）。以科技接受模式探討線上付費服務。稻江學報，2（1），32-42。
林伯峰（2007）。Web 2.0之創新應用服務與經營模式之研究。國立中山大學企業管理學研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。
林怡君（2009）。以TAM與IDT觀點探討Library 2.0的資訊服務系統之現況-以國內大學圖書館為例。中華大學資訊管理學研究所碩士論文，未出版，新竹市。
林雅惠（2008）。我國大學圖書館參考館員工作內容、專業能力及繼續教育之研究。國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
邱皓政（2005）。量化研究法（二）統計原理與分析技術。台北市：雙葉書廊。
洪妍涵（2007）。以TAM2理論探討Web 2.0網站使用者之行為。中華大學資訊管理學研究所碩士論文，未出版，新竹市。
許玉潔（2010）。網路平台的參與度對學習成果及學習態度之影響。國立新竹教育大學數位學習科技研究所碩士論文，未出版，新竹市。
徐新隆（2005）。數位時代下資訊隱私權問題之研究──以個人資料保護為中心。國立臺北大學法律學院法學系研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北縣。
張淳淳（2003）。參考資源與服務。台北縣蘆洲市：國立空中大學。
陳玉婷、蔡立元（2009）。從科技接受模式觀點探討資訊科技融入學習。台南科大學報，28，217-236。
陳書梅（2007）。新時代公共圖書館館員通才知能探討。臺北市立圖書館館訊，25（2），1-15。
黃國書（2008）。Web 2.0 之網路平台資訊分析 - 以Social Network Service為例。國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
楊惠合（2006）。以科技接受模型探討數位學習滿意度之研究。產業論壇，8（1），93-108。
羅珮萍（2010）。上班族與大學生對於以電子郵件強化線上英語學習系統之使用行為研究。 國立東華大學網路與多媒體科技研究所碩士論文，未出版，花蓮縣。

西文文獻
Allan, C. (2009). Evolve Your Research Guides into the Web 2.0 Ecosystem. Texas Library Journal, 85 (1), 20-21.
Barnett-Ellis, P., & Charnigo, L. (2007). Checking Out Facebook.com: The Impact of a Digital Trend on Academic Libraries. Information Technology and Libraries, 26 (1), 23-34.
Chad, K., & Miller, P. (2005). Do libraries matter? The rise of Library 2.0. Retrieved December 20, 2010, from http://www.talis.com/applications/downloads/white_papers/DoLibrariesMatter.pdf
Connell, R. S. (2009). Academic Libraries, Facebook and MySpace, and Student Outreach: A Survey of Student Opinion. Libraries and the Academy, 9 (1), 25-36.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35 (8), 982-1003.
Dorner, J. (2009). Study of UC Berkeley Student Use of Facebook for Academic Purposes. Retrieved December 18, 2010, from www.ucop.edu/lauc/committees/rpd/recipients/dorner_2009.pdf
Farkas, M. (2007). Going Where Patrons Are: Outreach in MySpace and Facebook. American Libraries, 38 (4), 27.
Graham, J. M., Faix, A., & Hartman, L. (2009). Crashing the Facebook party: One library's experiences in the students' domain. Library Review, 3 (58), 228-236.
Granfield, D., & Robertson, M. (2008). Preference for Reference: New Options and Choices fro Academic Library Users. Reference & Services Quarterly, 48 (1), 44-53.
Griffiths, J. R., & Brophy, P. (2005). Student Searching Behaviour and the Web: Use of Academic Resources and Google. Library Trends, 53 (4), 539–554.
Hendrix, D., Chiarella, D., Hasman, L., Murphy, S., & Zafron, M. L. (2009). Use of Facebook in academic health sciences libraries. J Med Libr Assoc, 97 (1), 44–47.
Hewitt, A., & Forte, A. (2006). Crossing boundaries: Identity management . student/faculty relationships on the Facebook. Paper presented at the Computer Supported Cooperative Work, November 4-8, 2006. Banff, Alberta, Canada.
Holliday, W., & Li, Q. (2004). Understanding the millennials: updating our knowledge about students. Reference Services Review, 32 (4), 356-366.
Horn, J., & Kjaer, K. (2000). Evaluating the "Ask a Question" SErvice at the University of California, Irvine. In D. R. Lankes, J. W. Collins, & A. S. Kasowitz (Eds.), Digital reference service in the new millennium : planning, management, and evaluation (pp. 135-151). New York : Neal-Schuman Publishers.
Ishizuka, K. (2007). Librarians on Facebook. School Library Journal, 53 (10), 22.
Ismail, L. (2010). What net generation students really want Determining library help-seeking preferences of undergraduates. Reference Services Review, 38 (1), 10-27.
Jensen, M. J. (2006). Evolution, Intelligent Designers, Climate Change, and the Scholarly Publishing Ecosystem. Paper presented at the Association of American University Presses' Electronic Publishing Workshop, June 15, 2006. New Orleans, USA.
Johnson, D. (2006). Dangers and Opportunities: Challenges for Libraries in the Digital Age. Paper presented at the Queensland Public Library Conference, June 5, 2006. Cairns, Australia.
Joint, N. (2008). Virtual reference, Second Life and traditional library enquiry services. Library Review, 57 (6), 416-423.
Kroski, E. (2010). 10 Technology Ideas Your Library Can Implement Next Week. American Libraries, 3 (43), 30-33.
Mack, D., Behler, A., Roberts, B., & Rimland, E. (2007). Reaching Students with Facebook: Data and Best Practices. Electronic Journal of Academic and Special Librarianship, 8 (2).
Maness, J. M. (2006). Library 2.0 Theory: Web 2.0 and Its Implications for Libraries. Webology, 3 (2).
Martin, P. N. (2009). Societal Transformation and Reference Services in the Academic Library: Theoretical Foundations for Re-Envisioning Reference. Library Philosophy and Practice 2009. Retrieved December 15, 2010, from http://www.webpages.uidaho.edu/~mbolin/pamelamartin.htm
Numminen, P., & Vakkari, P. (2009). Question Types in Public Libraries' Digital Reference Service in Finland: Comparing 1999 and 2006. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60 (6), 1249-1257.
O'Connell, J. (2008). School Library 2.0: new skills, new knowledge, neew futures. In P. Godwin, & J. Parker (Eds.), Information literacy meets library 2.0 (pp. 51-62). London : Facet Publ.
Powers, A. C., Schmidt, J., & Hill, C. (2008). Why Can't We Be Friends? The MSU Libraries Find Friends on Facebook. Mississippi Libraries, 72 (1), 3-5.
Sowers, L., & White, M. D. (2000). National Museum of American Art Reference Desk: A Usage Analysis of a Digital Reference Service. In D. R. Lankes, J. W. Collins, & A. S. Kasowitz (Eds.), Digital reference service in the new millennium : planning, management, and evaluation (pp. 153-178). New York : Neal-Schuman Publishers.
Straw, J. E. (2004). Expecting the stars but getting the moon : negotiating around patron expectations in the digital reference environment. In D. R. Lankes, J. Janes, L. C. Smith, & C. M. Finneran (Eds.), The virtual reference experience : integrating theory into practice (pp. 87-106). New York: Neal-Schuman Publishers.
Stutzman, F. (2006). An Evaluation of Identity_Sharing Behavior in Social Network Communities. Journal of the International Digital Media and Arts Association, 3 (1), 10-18.
Weiler, A. (2005). Information-Seeking Behavior in Generation Y Students: Motivation, Critical Thinking, and Learning Theory. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31 (1), 46-53.
Widdows, K. (2009). Web 2.0 moves 2.0 quickly 2.0 wait: setting up a library Facebook presence at the University of Warwick. SCONUL Focus, 46, 54-59.
Zabel, D. (2005). Trends in Reference and Public Services Librarianship and the Role of RUSA. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 45 (1), 7-10.
Zorica, M. B., & Eremic, A. (2009). Libraries in Web 2.0 Environment. Paper presented at the Future of Information Sciences(INFuture2009), November 4-6, 2009. Zagreb, Croatia.