簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳怡舟
Chris Chen
論文名稱: 注意力限制與運動強度對大專拳擊選手心理動作表現之影響
THE EFFECTS OF ATTENTION LIMITED AND ANAEROBIC THRESHOLD ON PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE OF AMATEUR COLLEGE BOXERS
指導教授: 方進隆
Fang, Chin-Lung
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 體育學系
Department of Physical Education
畢業學年度: 87
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 78
中文關鍵詞: 心理動作表現注意力限制運動強度雙重工作選擇反應時間
英文關鍵詞: Psychomotor performance, attention limited, exercise Intensity, dual task procedure, choice reaction time (CRT)
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:266下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 注意力限制與運動強度對大專拳擊選手心理動作表現之影響
    摘要
    本研究之目的在於探討不同程度之注意力限制(attention limited)及運動強度對於大專拳擊選手心理動作表現的影響。本實驗之參加者為32名健康且自願參與實驗之大專拳擊專項選手,平均年齡20.5歲、身高170公分、體重64.4公斤。所有參與本實驗的選手皆接受以下之實驗測試:(1)在不同注意力限制及運動強度下之選擇反應時間(Choice Reaction Time, 簡稱CRT)測試;(2)不同運動強度下之出拳準確性測試。本實驗進行前,以四名選手進行換氣閾值之再現性的前測(r = 0.992,α< .05)。正式實驗時,以選手出拳擊向不同複雜度的目標區來作為主要工作之注意力限制的基礎,以特製的配戴式筆尖及目標靶來進行不同運動強度下之出拳準確性測試。本研究之基本假設為:(1)在不同程度之注意力限制下,隨著主要工作之動作複雜度的增加,次要工作之選擇反應時間(CRT)也隨之增加;(2)此反應時間與運動強度產生交互作用;適當的運動強度有助於縮短反應時間;(3)出拳的準確性誤差隨著運動強度的增加而增加。資料經收集後,以重複量數單因子變異數分析29名選手在不同強度下之出拳準確性;以混合設計二因子變異數分析不同運動強度與組拳動作複雜度對選擇反應時間的影響。本研究結果發現:(一)隨著注意力限制的增加,拳擊選手選擇反應時間明顯的增加(F = 6.85, P < .05;F = 3.84, P < .05, F = 7.92, P < .05 ),並且,(二)注意力限制並未與運動強度產生交互作用;(三)在出拳準確度方面,在三種不同運動強度下除了「刺拳」在安靜與VT時未達顯著之外,其餘準確性誤差皆達到顯著性差異,隨著運動強度增加準確性誤差增加。(刺拳(AE):F = 5.89,P < .05;主直拳(AE):F = 15.57,P < .05 )。本研究之結論為:
    (一) 非熟練之複雜性動作,可能會限制選手之注意力分配,並進一步影響其運動表現。
    (二) 在某種程度上,無氧閾值之運動強度並不會影響到選手之內在訊息處理的能力。不過,卻可能影響到選手在動作控制上的準確性與穩定性,此種結果可能是由於周邊(peripheral)的疲勞(如:肌肉)所引起的。
    關鍵詞:心理動作表現 運動強度 選擇反應時間
    注意力限制 雙重工作

    THE EFFECTS OF ATTENTION LIMITED AND ANAEROBIC THRESHOLD ON PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE OF AMATEUR COLLEGE BOXERS
    Abstract
    The purpose of the present study was to examine the effect of attention limited and exercise intensity on the psychomotor performance of amateur boxers. The participants was 32 college boxers, age :20.5 ±1.6, height :170 ±6.5cm , weight : 64.4 ±9.1kg, who volunteered to participate in the experiment. All the participants were accepted following test: (1) The dual task procedure for main task on attention limited and secondary task on Choice Reaction Time, (CRT). (2)The punching accuracy test under different exercise intensity. Before the experiment, four boxer were tested for pilot study on the replicatebility of anaerobic threshold ( r = 0.992, α<. 05).Method:during the experiment, the attention limited of main task was based on the complexity of the blow which punched to the different dimension of the target. A secondary task on CRT was used to probe the attention demanding of the main task. In the other hand, the special designed color pen was worn on the fist to test the punching accuracy. The basic assumption of the study was: (1) Under different extent of attention limited, the more complex punches the main task was;the slower CRT of the secondary task. (2) There are no interactions between CRT and exercise intensities. (3) There is a negative correlation between exercise intensity and punching accuracy. All the data was analyzed by one-way ANOVA and two-way ANOVA. The result of the study as follows:
    (1)when the attention limited of the main task was increased, the secondary CRT task increased(F = 6.85, P < .05;F = 3.84, P < .05, F = 7.92, P < .05).and:(2)There are no interactions between attention limited and exercise intensity.(3)There are significant difference of punching accuracy on three exercise intensity (Jab(AE):F = 5.89, P < .05;Straight(AE):F = 15.57, P < .05).
    Conclusion:
    (1) Non-practiced punching complexity seems to limited the allocation of attention resources.
    (2) In some extend, the anaerobic threshold would not interfere the information-processing capacity of the athletes, but might be interrupting the spatial accuracy and stability of the motor control of limbs, this is possibly due to the fatigue of peripheral effectors.
    Keywords: Psychomotor performance, Attention limited, exercise Intensity,
    dual task procedure, choice reaction time (CRT).

    注意力限制與無氧閾值對大專拳擊選手心理動作表現之影響 目次 中文摘要………………………………………………………………..Ⅰ 英文摘要………………………………………………………………..Ⅱ 目次……………………………………………………………….…….Ⅲ 表次……………………………………………………………….….....Ⅴ 圖次……………………………………………………………….…….Ⅵ 第一章 緒論……………………………………………………………1 一、前 言…………………………………………………………1 二、問題背景………………………………………………………2 (一)在運動強度方面的研究…………………………………..3 (二)人類內部之訊息處理的相關研究………………………..4 (三)人類內部之訊息處理與身體活動強度之相關研究……..5 三、研究目的………………………………………………………6 四、研究假設………………………………………………………6 五、名詞操作性定義………………………………………………7 第二章 文獻探討………………………………………………….….10 一、名詞界定……………………………………………………..10 二、有關無氧閾方面的研究……………………………………..13 三、有關於注意力限制方面的研究……………………………..15 四、有關心理動作表現方面的研究……………………………..22 (一) 準確性方面的研究……………………………………..22 (二) 訊息處理與身體活動強度之相關的研究……………..27 五、本章總結……………………………………………………..32 第三章 研究方法與步驟……………………………………………..33 一、受試的對象…………………………………………………..33 二、先前研究……………………………………………………..33 三、實驗的時間與地點…………………………………………..34 四、實驗儀器……………………………………………………..34 五、實驗設計……………………………………………………..38 六、實驗方法與程序……………………………………………..39 (一)受試者之準備…………………………………………..39 (二)實驗前之準備…………………………………………..39 (三) 實驗流程………………………………………………..44 (四) 實驗方法………………………………………………..41 (五) 實驗處理與控制………………………………………..42 (六) 研究限制………………………………………………..45 (七) 統計方法………………………………………………..45 第四章 結果…………………………………………………………..46 一、注意力限制與運動強度對選擇反應時間之影響…………..46 二、不同運動強度對出拳準確性的影響………………………..49 第五章 討論…………………………………………………………..54 一、 注意力限制對CRT的影響…………………………………..54 二、 無氧閾值之運動強度對CRT的影響……………………….55 三、 注意力限制與運動強度兩者之交互作用…………………..56 四、 無氧閾值之運動強度強度對出拳準確性的影響…………..57 五、 結論與建議…………………………………………………..59 參考文獻…………………………………………………………...…...61 附錄 附錄一、受試者須知及同意書…………………………………...…...70 附錄二、基本資料記錄表………………………………………...…...72 附錄三、受試者健康狀況調查表………………………………...…...73 附錄四、Bruce運動負荷表……………………………………...…....74 附錄五、出拳準確性誤差平均資料…………………………...…..….75 附錄六、雙重工作下各組之平均CRT數據…………………………77 表次 表一、 組合拳複雜度之分配原則……………………………………..8 表二、受試者基本資料………………………………………………..33 表三(a)、不同注意力限制組在雙重工作下之單拳CRT表現………47表三(b)、三組選手在單拳複雜度下之單因子變異數分析摘要 表…………………………………………………………….....47 表四、不同注意力限制與運動強度之混和設計對CRT表現之單純主 要效果變異數分析摘要表……………………………………..49 表五、在不同出拳複雜度與運動強度下三組選手之反應時間……..50 表六、各項誤差之解說………………………………………………..50 表七、在三種運動強度下之出拳準確度誤差摘要表………………..52 表八、不同運動強度下「刺拳」之準確性變異數分析摘要表……..52表九、不同運動強度下主直拳之準確性變異數分析摘要表..………53表十、不同運動強度下刺拳之準確性變異數分析摘要表…………..53 表十一、不同運動強度下主直拳之準確性變異數分析摘要表……..53 圖次 圖一、雙重工作下之不同注意力分配圖……………………………20 圖二、Vmax 2900能量代謝系統與Track master 跑步機…………36 圖三、T.K.K. sw-8b八方位全身反應測量系統,包括:主機、踏 板以及訊號燈…………………………………………………36 圖四、KORG MA-20數位節拍器……………………………...……37 圖五、特殊設計之配戴式色筆………………….……………...……37 圖六、特殊設計之出拳準確性面版…………………….……...……37 圖七、特殊設計之三向度出拳定位架………………….……...……37 圖八、雙重工作測試配置圖…………………………………………43 圖九、出拳準確性測試配置圖………………………………………44 圖十、不同注意力限制與運動強度作用下之CRT表現圖…………48 圖十一、不同運動強度下之出拳準確性誤差圖……………………53

    參考文獻
    王鶴森。(民81)。無氧閾值測定法之比較研究。國立台灣師
    範大學體育研究所碩士論文。
    林正常。(民84) 。 運動生理學實驗指引。台北市:師大書
    苑。
    林玉瓊,林正常,王順正。(1995)。十分鐘走路熱身運動對
    全反應時間不同分段時間值之影響。體育學報,12,293-304。
    沈茂雄。(民68)。全身反應時間與運動之關係研究。中華民
    國大專院校體育總會六十八年度學術研討會報告書, 151-162。
    吳慧君。(民84)。無氧閾值測定法之探討。中華體育,19,35-45。
    馬啟偉,張力為。(1996)。體育運動心理學。台北市:東
    華。
    許樹淵。(民69)。不同運動強度對反應時間的影響。中華民
    國大專院校體育總會六十九年度學術研討會報告書, 146-154。
    陳玉英。(民78)。劇烈運動對注意力及反應時間的影響。體
    育學報,11,97-113。
    張春興。(1989) 。 張氏心理學辭典。台北市:東華。
    楊博民主編。(民86)。心理實驗綱要。台北市:五南。
    蔡文欽。(民81)。運動強度對男子桌球選手反應時間之影響。
    國立體育學院運動科學研究所碩士論文。
    謝啟誠。(民82)。運動員與非運動員間心理運動能力之比較。
    國立台灣師範大學體育研究所碩士論文。
    Anson, J. G. (1982). Memory drum theory: Alternative tests and
    explanations for the complexity effects on simple reaction
    time. Journal of Motor Behavior, 14, 228-246.
    Bowers, T. D., & Stratton, R. K. (1993) .Relationships of
    anticipation timing to betting experience . Journal of Sports
    and Exercise Psychology , 15, 57.
    Briem, V. & Hedman, L. R. (1995). Behavioural effect of mobile
    telephone use during simulated driving. Ergonomics,
    38,2536-2562.
    Brooks, G. A. (1985) .Anaerobic threshold : Review of the concept
    and direction for future research. Medicine and Science in
    sports and Exercise, 17, 22-31.
    Bunc, V., Heller, J., Leso, J., Sprynarova, S., & Zdanowicz, S.
    (1987) Ventilatory threshold in verious groups of highly
    trained athleted. International Journal of Sports Medicine
    .8, 275-280.
    Burch, R. W. (1989). Oxford English Dictionary, (2 nd.) :
    Oxford university press.
    Coen, B., Schwarz, L., Urhausen, A., & Kinderman, W.(1991).
    Control of training in middle and long distance running by
    means of the individual anabrobic threshold. International
    Journal of Sport Medicine, 12, 519-524.
    Conconi, F., Ferrari, M., Ziglio, P.G., Droghetti, P., & Codeca, L.
    (1982). Determination of the anaerobic threshold by non
    invasive field test in runners. Journal of Applied
    Physiology, 52, 869-873.
    Chmura, J., Krysztofiak, H., Ziemba, A.W., Nanar, K., & Kaciuba-
    Uscilko, H. (1997). Psychomotor performance during
    prolonged exercise above and below the blood lactate
    threshold. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 77,
    77-80.
    Chmura, J., Jusiak, R.(1994). Changes in psychomotor
    performance of soccer players subjected to an exercise test.
    Biology of sport, 11(3), 197-203.
    Christina, R.W. (1992). The 1991 C.H. McCloy research lecture:
    Unraveling the mystery of the response complexity effect in
    skilled movements. Research Quarterly for Exercise and
    Sport, 63, 218-230.
    Davids, J. A. (1985). Anaerobic threshold: Review of the concept
    and directions for future research. Medicine and Science in
    Sports And Exercise, 17, 6-18.
    Davids, K. (1987). The development of peripheral vision: A
    comparison of single and dual-task paradigms. Journal of
    Human Movement Studys. 13, 275-284.
    Davids, K. (1988). Developmental differences in the use of
    peripheral vision during catching performance. Journal of
    Motor Behavior. 20, 39-51.
    Fleishman, E.A. (1975) .Toward a taxonomy of human
    performance. American Psychologist, 30, 1127-1149.
    Geurts, A. C. H., and T. W. Mulder. (1994). Attention demands in
    balance recovery following lower limb amputation. Journal of Motor Behavior 26: 162-170.
    Goggin, N.L. & Meeuwsen, H.J.(1992) .Age related difference in
    the control of spatial aiming movements.Research
    Quarterly for Exercise and Sports.4, 366-372.
    Flynn, R. B. (1972). Numerical performance as a function of perior
    exercise and aerobic capacity for elementary school boys.
    Research Quarterly, 43, 16-22.
    Gaesser, G. A., Poole, D. C., & Gardner, B. P. (1984). Dissociation
    between VO2 max and Ventilatory threshold response to
    endurance training. European Journal of Applied
    Physiology , 53, 242-247.
    Gutin, B., & DiGennaro, J. (1968). Effect of one minute and five
    minute step-ups on performance of simple addition.
    Research Quarterly, 39, 958-964.
    Hargreaves, M. (1995). Exercise Metabolism. Melbourne .
    champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
    Hancock, S., & McNaughton, L. (1986). Effects of fatigue on
    ability to process visual information by experimenced
    orienteers. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 62, 491-498.
    International Amateur Boxing Association.(1996) .Fifty
    Years ,Berlin:Druckhaus Mitte.
    Johnston, R. B., Howard, M. E., Cawley P. W. & Losse, G. M.
    (1998). Effect of lower extremity muscular fatigue on motor
    control performance. Medcine and Science In Sports &
    Exercise. 30, 1703-1707.
    Kerr, R. (1982). Introduction to psychomotor learning.In J. Butler,
    Field, C., Kerr, S., Reisman, D., & Carper, J. (Eds.)
    Psychomotor learning. : CBS college publishing.
    Kim, K. N., McMillian, M. & Zelaznik, H. N. (1996) .Behaviornal
    analysis of trajectory formation: The speed – accuracy trade
    off as a tool to understand strategies of movement control.
    H. N.Zelaznik, (ed.) Advance in motor learning and
    control.(pp.1- 12). Human Kinetics.
    Klapp. (1996) .Reaction time analysis of centrol motor control. H.
    N.Zelaznik, (ed.) Advance in motor learning and
    control.(pp.13- 35). Human Kinetics.
    Klapp, S. T. (1975). Feedback versus motor programming in the
    motor control of aimed movements. Journal of
    Experimental Psychology:Human perception and
    performance. 1,147-153
    Lofthus, G.,& Hanson , C.(1980). The influence of laterality and
    fatigue upon the performance of a two handed reaction
    task .Research Quarterly for exercise and sports , 51,501-
    508.
    Magill, R. A. (1993) . Motor learning: concepts and
    applications(4th ed.). Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.
    Mcardle , Katch , Katch .(1994). Essentials of Exercise
    Physiology. Pennsylvania , Lea & Febiger.
    Meyers,C., Zimmerli,W., Farr,D.,& Bashnagel, N.(1969). Effect of
    strenuous physical activity upon reaction time. Research
    Quarterly, 40, 332-337.
    Meyer-Lindenberg, A. Rammsayer, T. Ulferts, J. Gallhofer,
    B .(1997). The effects of sulpiride on psychomotor
    performance and subjective tolerance.European
    Neuropsychopharmacology. Vol 7(3) 219-223.
    Philip, B. G. (1986). Webers third new international dictionary.
    Springfeld:Merriam-Wester Inc.
    Populin, L., Rose, D.J., & Heath, K. (1990).The role of attention in
    one – handed catching.Journal of Motor Behavior.22, 149-
    158.
    Redelmeier, D.A., & Tibshirani, R. J.,(1997).Association between
    cellular tetephone calls and motor vehicle collisions. The
    New England Journal of Medicine. 336, 453-458.
    Schmidt, R. A. (1969). Movement time as a determiner of timing
    accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 79, 43-47.
    Schmidt, R. A. (1988). Motor control and learning :A behavioral
    emphasis (2nd ed.). champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
    Schmidt, R. A. (1991). Motor Learning and Performance. Form
    principles to practice. Champign, IL: Human Kinetics.
    Schmidt, R. A. & Lee, T. D. (1999). Motor control and learning :A
    behavioral emphasis (3rd ed.). champaign, IL: Human
    Kinetics.
    Sidaway, B., Christina, R. W., & Shea, J. B.(1988). A movement
    constraint interpretation of the response complixity effect on
    programming time. In A. Colley & J. Beench (Eds),
    Cognition and action in skilled behavior (pp. 87-
    102).Amsterdam;North-Holland.Tomporowski, P. D., &
    Ellis, N. R.(1986) . Effects of exercise on cognitive process : a
    review. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 338-346.
    Tsorbatzoudis, H., Barkoukis, V., Danis, Apostolos, & Grouios, G.,
    (1998). Physical exertion in simple reaction time and
    continuous attention of sport parcitipants. Perceptual and
    Motor Skills. 86, 571-576.
    Umberto C. & Carlo U. (1988). Temporal dimensions of mental
    effort in different sports.International Journal of sport
    psychology.19, 199-120.
    Willmore & Costill (1994). Physiology of Sport and Exercise.
    Human Kinetics , United State.
    Williams, L.,Pottinger, P.,& Shapcott, D.(1985). Effect of exercise
    on choice reaction latency and movement speed.Perceptual
    and Motor Skills, 60,67-71.
    Williams, L. R. Pottinger, P. R., & Shapcott, D. G. (1985). Effect
    of exercise on choice reaction latency and movement speed.
    Persceptual and Motor Skills, 60, 67-71.
    Woodworth, R.S. (1899) .The accuracy of voluntary movement.
    Psychological Review. 3: 1-114.
    Zervas, Y. (1990). The effect of a physical exercise session on
    verbal , visuospatial , and numerical ability. Perceptual and
    Motor Skills, 71, 379-383.

    無法下載圖示
    QR CODE