研究生: |
陳珮淇 Chen, Pei-Chi |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
運用差異化教學提升國中九年級學生英語聽力學習成效之行動研究 An Action Research of Differentiated Instruction to Improve Ninth -Grade Students' English Learning Outcomes |
指導教授: |
唐淑華
Tang, Shu-Hua |
口試委員: |
唐淑華
Tang, Shu-Hua 林偉文 Lin, Wei-Wen 王秀玲 Wang, Hsiu-Ling |
口試日期: | 2025/01/22 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
教育學系課程領導與教學實踐碩士在職專班 Department of Education_In-service Teacher Master's Program of Curriculum Leadership and Teaching Practice |
論文出版年: | 2025 |
畢業學年度: | 113 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 183 |
中文關鍵詞: | 差異化教學 、英語聽力策略 、英語學習動機 、學習任務偏好 |
英文關鍵詞: | Differentiated instruction, English listening strategies, English learning motivation, learning task preferences |
研究方法: | 行動研究法 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202500203 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:75 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在探討差異化教學融入九年級英語聽力教學對學習成效與動機的影響,並分析學生對差異化學習活動的偏好。本研究以 Tomlinson 的差異化教學理論與 Oxford 的語言學習策略理論為基礎,設計涵蓋內容、過程與成果差異化
的聽力教學課程。本研究採行動研究法,課程分為兩次循環,共七節課。研究對象為國中九年級共 29 名學生。 量化工具使用英語聽力成就測驗與學習動機問卷,並以相依樣本 t 檢定進行統計分析,以評估學生在本研究實施前後在聽力成效與學習動機是否有提升。此外,另以學習單、教師省思紀錄與學生訪談資料作為質性資料,以了解學生對於上課內容的綜合意見與學習感受。
經過七節課的差異化聽力教學研究 ,研究者根據所蒐集之各項資料進行分析之結論如下:一、依據學生的起點能力與興趣,選用真實情境聽力教材,結合聽力策略教學與分組差異化學習單,設計符合需求的學習活動,以提升學生的聽力
理解能力。在教學過程中,根據學生的學習情況靈活調整教學設計,以更有效回
應需求。
二、短期的差異化聽力教學課程對學生的量化聽力學習成效未產生顯著的影響,但對學生的學習參與度與策略應用能力具有正向影響。
三、實施差異化聽力教學課程前後,學生的量化學習動機得分未顯著提升,但在學習投入、自學表現能力與學習態度上有正向影響。
四、學生偏好於結合趣味性與自主性的差異化聽力學習任務。根據上述研究結果,研究者提出相關建議,以作為未來差異化教學應用於聽力教學課程設計及教學之參考。
The purpose of this action study is to explore the impact of integrating
differentiated instruction into ninth-grade English listening teaching on students' learning outcomes and motivation, as well as to analyze their preferences for differentiated learning activities.
Based on Tomlinson's theory of differentiated instruction and Oxford's language learning strategies. The researcher designed and implemented a differentiated listening
instruction program that incorporated differentiation in content, process, and outcomes. The study adopted an action research approach conducted over two cycles, involving seven lessons. The participants of this study consisted of 29 ninth-grade junior high
school students. utilizing quantitative tools such as an English listening proficiency test and a "Differentiated English Listening" learning motivation questionnaire. Paired-sample t-tests were conducted to statistically analyze whether there were improvements in students’ listening outcomes and learning motivation before and after the intervention
of this study. In addition, qualitative data, such as student worksheets, teacher reflection records, and student interview data, were collected to understand students’ opinions and
feedbacks on the lesson content and their learning experiences.
After seven lessons of a differentiated listening teaching program, the researcher analyzed the collected data and drew the following four conclusions. First, authentic listening materials were selected based on students' initial abilities and interests. These
were combined with listening strategy instruction and differentiated group worksheets to design tailored learning activities aimed at enhancing students' listening comprehension skills. The design was flexibly adjusted during the teaching process to better meet students' needs. Second, the short-term differentiated listening instruction did not have a significant impact on students' quantitative listening performance.
However, it positively influenced their learning engagement and ability to apply strategies. Third, the implementation of differentiated listening instruction did not significantly improve students' quantitative learning motivation scores, but it had a positive impact on their learning engagement, self-directed learning abilities, and
attitudes toward learning. Lastly, students expressed a preference for differentiated
listening tasks that integrate engagement and autonomy. Based on these findings, the
researcher provides recommendations for incorporating differentiated instruction into future listening course design and teaching practices.
中文部分
王今宏(2016)。差異化教學對高中生英文聽力學習之成效研究[未出版之碩士論文]。國立政治大學。
王為國(2004)。適性教學的回顧與展望。課程與教學季刊,8(1),97–110。
何宜璇(2017)。差異化教學融入國中英語課程之行動研究[未出版之碩士論文]。國立臺灣師範大學。
何曉茵(2022)。後設認知覺察對台灣國中生英語聽解力的影響-以彰化某偏鄉國中為例[未出版之碩士論文]。國立彰化師範大學。
吳秋美(2015)。探討差異化聽力教學對於高中生的英文聽力能力、聽力動機以及策略使用的效益[未出版之碩士論文]。國立高雄師範大學。
吳俊瑩(2019)。探討遊戲融合多元智能教學活動對國小學童英語聽力之影響[未出版之碩士論文]。輔仁大學。
李采葳(2019)。多元評量融入英語閱讀理解教學對國中生英語學習成效之行動研究-以九年級學生為例[未出版之碩士論文]。國立臺灣師範大學。
林乃渝(2020)。以多元智能運用工作站學習法模式於國小學童英語差異化教學提升學習態度之個案研究[未出版之碩士論文]。國立臺北教育大學。
林怡綸(2019)。探討實施差異化教學於英語科國中生學習態度與學習成就之研究
[未出版之碩士論文]。國立臺南大學。
林佩璇、李俊湖、詹惠雪(2018)。差異化教學。心理。
林思吟(2016)。淺談差異化教學。臺灣教育評論月刊,5(3),118–112。
林素貞(2013)。差異化教學與成功學習。教育研究月刊,233,49–60。
洪乃雅(2018)。後設認知式策略教學對台灣偏遠國中學生英語聽解力之效益研究-以中部某偏遠國中個案研究為例[未出版之碩士論文]。國立彰化師範大學。
高子珺(2019)。十二年國教教師必修學分─差異化教學之初探。臺灣教育評論月刊,8(5),171–176。
唐淑華(2016)。差異化教學的迷思與再探。中等教育,67(4)1–6。
國立臺灣師範大學心理與教育測驗研究發展中心(2022)。十二年國教課綱國民小學標準本位評量示例彙編:語文領域英語文。作者。
教育部(2018)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要語文領域英語文。https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/Upload/file/26192/74206.pdf
張美如(2016)。運用差異化教學於國小六年級學童英語聽力能力學習成效之研究
[未出版之碩士論文]。世新大學。
張珈綺(2021)。國小四年級英語差異化教學與評量之行動研究[未出版之碩士論文]。國立清華大學。
教育部(2012)。12年國教宣導手冊。https://www.yphs.ntpc.edu.tw/wp-content/uploads/doc/d242/12%E5%B9%B4%E5%9C%8B%E6%95%99%E5%AE%A3%E5%B0%8E%E6%89%8B%E5%86%8A%E9%9B%BB%E5%AD%90%E6%AA%941010828.pdf
教育部(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。https://www.naer.edu.tw/upload/1/16/doc/288/%E5%8D%81%E4%BA%8C%E5%B9%B4%E5%9C%8B%E6%95%99%E8%AA%B2%E7%A8%8B%E7%B6%B1%E8%A6%81%E7%B8%BD%E7%B6%B1.pdf
教育部(2023)。國民小學及國民中學常態編班及分組學習準則(112年12月12日修訂)。https://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=FL034836
陳怡杏(2016)。語境影片融入教學對國中生英語聽力影響之研究[未出版之碩士論文]。臺北市立大學。
陳珈誼(2016)。差異化教學與合作學習對國中學生提升英語成效之行動研究:以桃園市某國中為例[未出版之碩士論文]。國立東華大學。
陳美芳、洪儷瑜(2012)。差異化教學策略[PowerPoint 投影片]。2012國中種子教師工作坊。http://203.72.57.15/blog_jnature/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/05%E5%BE%8C%E4%B8%AD%E5%B7%AE%E7%95%B0%E5%8C%96%E6%95%99%E5%AD%B8%E7%AD%96%E7%95%A5.pdf
陳琬庭(2010)。聽力策略教學對台灣國中生英語聽力理解及策略運用之成效[未出版之碩士論文]。國立彰化師範大學。
陳慧芬(2011)。希望理論運用於國小六年級英語教學低成就學生學習成效之行動研究[未出版之碩士論文]。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系研究所。
曾盈琇(2018)。提升學生學習動機之策略。臺灣教育評論月刊,7(9),138–142。
曾筱晴(2020)。基於動態評量的數位遊戲學習模式對於國小高年級學童英語文法學習成效之影響[未出版之碩士論文]。國立臺中教育大學。
黃惠君(2017)。聽力策略教學對台灣國中生英語聽解力之效益研究[未出版之碩士論文]。國立彰化師範大學。
黃雅珮(2018)。差異化教學提升國中生英語學習成效之研究[未出版之碩士論文]。國立臺灣師範大學。
黃達翰(2016)。台灣英語系學生學習風格偏好、英語聽力策略使用與英語聽解力之相關性研究[未出版之碩士論文]。國立彰化師範大學。
楊婷鈴(2022)。發現聽力結合直接策略融入英語教學對聽力學習成效與自我效能之影響一以南投縣某國中為例[未出版之碩士論文]。國立彰化師範大學。
楊薏馨(2012)。台灣國中階段英語學習者聽力焦慮、使用策略與學習表現的相關研究[未出版之碩士論文]。國立臺灣科技大學。
葉米琪(2004)。動機與聽力策略對臺灣國中生英語聽力理解的影響[未出版之碩士論文]。國立高雄師範大學。
葉錫南(2013)。英文科差異化教學之理念與實施。教育研究月刊,233,37–48。
廖彩妤(2018)。運用差異化教學於國小四年級學生英語學習之行動研究[未出版之碩士論文]。國立臺中教育大學。
廖曉青(2018)。英語教學法第三版。五南。
甄曉蘭(2023)。差異化教學與評量工作坊[PowerPoint 投影片]。2023學科中心種子教師培力工作坊。https://ghresource.k12ea.gov.tw/uploads/16831848876488QMgvGf2.pdf
潘莉欣(2017)。應用精熟學習及差異化教學提升國中生英語聽力及閱讀能力之研究[未出版之碩士論文]。南臺科技大學。
蔡清田(2021)。十二年國教新課綱與教育行動研究。
蕭仕原(2012)。逐步口譯筆記技巧在台灣高中生英語聽力教學之應用[未出版之碩士論文]。國立彰化師範大學。
蕭惠芳(2018)。英語科差異化教學實踐探究-結合多層次心智圖的運用。教育理論與實踐學刊,38,99–126。
賴佳盈(2016)。後設認知聽力策略訓練對南台灣七年級學生英語聽力理解及回饋之效益研究[未出版之碩士論文]。國立高雄師範大學。
簡玉敏、高桂懷 (2015)。教室裡的春天: 差異化教學之學與思。師友月刊,575, 16–21。
顏妤庭(2020)。多元智能理論融入國中英語課程之行動研究—以英語低成就學生為例[未出版之碩士論文]。國立嘉義大學。
顏惠君、Lupo, S. M.(2013)。滿足學生學習需求,落實教育機會均等:美國維州一所公立高中實施差異化教學之經驗與啟示。教育研究月刊,233,120–138。
Tomlinson, C. A.(2014)。能力混合班級的差異化教學[張碧珠、呂潔樺、賴筱嵐、蔡宛臻、黃晶莉譯]。五南。(原著出版於2001年)
Tomlinson, C. A.(2018)。差異化班級:回應所有學習者的需求[張碧珠、呂潔樺、林芯汝、劉慧平、陳雲釵、賴筱嵐、蔡宛臻譯;1 版]。五南。(原著出版於1999年)
英文部分
Aarnoutse, J., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Oduber, R. (1998). Effects of listening comprehension training on listening and reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 263–277.
Abdalhamid, F. (2012). Listening Comprehension Strategies of Arabic-speaking ESL Learners [Unpublished master's thesis]. Colorado State University.
Ahmadi, S. M. (2016). The Importance of Listening Comprehension in Language Learning. International Journal of Research in English Education, 1(1),7–10. https://doi.org/10.29252/ijree.1.1.7
Ahmadi Safa, M., & Motaghi, F. (2024). Cognitive vs. metacognitive scaffolding strategies and EFL learners’ listening comprehension development. Language Teaching Research, 28(3), 987–1010.
Bearne, E. (Ed.). (1996). Differentiation and diversity in the primary school. Routledge.
Brown, H. D., & Lee, H. (2015). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (4th ed.). Pearson Education.
Brookhart, S. M. (2008). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. ASCD.
Buck, G. (2001). Assessing Listening. Cambridge University Press.
Cook, M., & A. J. Liddicoat (2002). The development of comprehension in interlanguage pragmatics: The case of request strategies in English. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics. 25(1), 19–39.
Fogarty, R. J, &Pete, B. M. (2011). Supporting differentiated instruction: A professional learning communities approach. Solution Tree Press.
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (1994). Inclusive schools movement and the radicalization of special education reform. Exceptional Children, 60(3), 294–309.
Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. Basic Books.
Gentry, R., Sallie, A. P., & Sanders, C. A. (2013). Differentiated instructional strategies to accommodate students with varying needs and learning styles (ERIC Report ED545458). Educational Resource Information Center. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED545458.pdf
Hall, T., Vue, G., Strangman, N., & Meyer, A. (2003). Differentiated instruction and implications for UDL implementation. National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum. http://www.cast.org/products-services/resources/2003/ncac-differentiated-instruction-udl
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of justice. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Khoii, R., & Sharififar, S. (2013). The impact of task-based listening activities on the listening proficiency of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(5), 1033–1042.
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press.
Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman.
Levy, H. M. (2008). Meeting the needs of all students through differentiated instruction: Helping every child reach and exceed standards. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 81(4), 161–164.
Liao, S. (2012). Listening strategies and applications in EFL classroom. (Report) English Education Resource Center of Senior High Schools in Taiwan. https://www.academia.edu/35260477/Listening_Strategies_and_Applications_in_EFL_Classroom
Lim, T. D. (2013). Analyzing Malaysian English Classrooms: Reading, Writing, Speaking and Listening Teaching Strategies. University of Washington.
Linang, E. R. (2005). Teachers' report on the use of pre-listening activities in activating students’ prior knowledge in a Malaysian ESL classroom in Kuching [Unpublished master's thesis]. Universiti Malaysia Sarawak.
Lin, H. H. (2005). A preliminary study on the effects of "note-taking" strategy on different proficiency levels of junior high school students [Unpublished master's thesis]. National Chengchi University
O’Malley., Chamot, A.U., & Kṻpper,L. (1989). Listening comprehension strategies in second language acquisition. Applies Linguistics, 10(4), 418–437.
Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Newbury House.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford University Press.
Renukadevi, D. (2014). The role of listening in language acquisition; the challenges and strategies in teaching listening. International Journal of Education and Information Studies, 4(1), 59–63.
Rost, M. (2002). Teaching and researching listening. Longman.
Rost, M. (2011). Teaching and researching listening (2nd ed.). Pearson.
Schank, R. C., &Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, Plans, and Knowledge. In P.N. Johnson-Laird & P.C. Wason(eds.), Thinking: readings in cognitive science. Cambridge University Press.
Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 10(3), 209–232.
Simpkins, P. M., Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (2009). Differentiated curriculum enhancements in inclusive fifth-grade science classes. Remedial and Special Education, 30(6), 300–309.
Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. Heinemann.
Subban, P. (2006). Differentiated instruction: A research basis. International Education Journal, 7(7), 935–947.SO4
Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. ASCD.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed- ability classrooms (2nd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2003). Fulfilling the promise of the differentiated classroom: Strategies and tools for responsive teaching. ASCD.
Vandergrift, L. (2012). Teaching listening: Current trends and future directions. TESOL Quarterly, 46(4), 797–807.
Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. C. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. Routledge.
Vandergrift, L. & Goh, C. C. (2018). Introduction to listening. In J. M. Newton, D. R.Ferris, C. C. M. Goh, W. Grabe, F. L. Stoller, & L. Vandergrift (Eds.), Teaching English to second language learners in academic contexts (pp. 123–144). Routledge.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and Language (Revised edition). MIT Press.
Wormeli, R. (2006). Fair isn’t always equal: Assessing & grading in the differentiated classroom. Stenhouse.
Yeldham, M. (2018). L2 listening instruction: More bottom-up or more top-down? Journal of Asia TEFL, 15(3), 805–810.
Yıldırım, S., & Yıldırım, Ö. (2016). The importance of listening in language learning and listening comprehension problems experienced by language learners: A literature review. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(4), 2094–2110.