簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林建志
Chien-Chih Lin
論文名稱: 運用不同教學策略於不同回饋之實驗模擬對國中學生實驗技能與實驗態度的影響
指導教授: 邱瓊慧
Chiu, Chiung-Hui
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 資訊教育研究所
Graduate Institute of Information and Computer Education
論文出版年: 2009
畢業學年度: 97
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 67
中文關鍵詞: 回饋策略教學策略電腦模擬實驗實驗技能實驗態度
英文關鍵詞: feedback strategy, instructional strategy, computer simulations, experimental skills, experimental attitudes
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:187下載:12
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討教師在實體實驗前使用理論值回饋或誤差值回饋電腦模擬實驗輔助教學時,採用教師為中心或學生為中心的教學策略對學生在實體實驗後的實驗技能與實驗態度之影響。本研究採用準實驗研究的二因子前後測設計,選取台北市信義區某公立國中九年級學生共144人參與實驗活動,並將學生以班級為單位隨機分派為四組。研究發現,當教師採用教師為中心的教學策略時,接受理論值回饋電腦模擬實驗的學生在實體實驗後的實驗技能顯著優於接受誤差值回饋的學生。當教師運用誤差值回饋電腦模擬實驗輔助教學時,接受學生為中心教學策略的學生在實體實驗後的實驗技能顯著優於接受教師為中心教學策略的學生;在實驗態度方面則無顯著差異。

    The purpose of this study was to investigate students’ experimental skills and attitudes after conducting simulations and physical experiments when administrating simulations, distinct feedback strategies and various instructional strategies intervened. A 2×2 (feedback strategy × instructional strategy) quasi-experimental research design was employed to investigate the relationship between the dependent variables (experimental skills and attitudes) and independent variables (feedback strategies and instructional strategies). One hundred and forty-four junior high school students participated in this study. The participants were divided into four groups according to instructional strategies and feedback strategies. The statistics procedure of two-way ANCOVA was used to analyse the collected data. The findings showed that the effects of theoretical values as feedback in simulation on students’ experimental skills were significantly better than experimental errors as feedback in simulations when using teacher-centered instructional strategy. The effects of student-centered instructional strategy on students’ experimental skills were significantly better than teacher-centered instructional strategy when using experimental errors as feedback in simulation. However, there were no significant differences in experimental attitudes.

    目錄 附表目錄 viii 附圖目錄 ix 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究目的 5 第三節 研究問題 5 第四節 名詞解釋 5 第二章 文獻探討 8 第一節 模擬實驗與實體實驗在實驗教學中的角色 8 第二節 模擬實驗對實驗技能的影響 11 第三節 模擬實驗對實驗態度的影響 14 第四節 模擬實驗設計 15 第五節 運用模擬實驗輔助實驗教學之策略 18 第三章 電腦模擬實驗設計 21 第一節 實驗單元 21 第二節 模擬實驗設計 22 第三節 模擬實驗之儀器與元件設計 26 第四節 模擬實驗操作流程 29 第四章 研究方法 33 第一節 研究設計 33 第二節 參與者 34 第三節 實驗處理 34 第四節 研究工具 35 第五節 實驗流程 37 第六節 資料分析 39 第五章 研究結果與討論 41 第一節 實驗技能結果分析 41 第二節 實驗態度結果分析 45 第三節 討論 48 第六章 結論與建議 52 第一節 結論 52 第二節 建議 53 參考文獻 55 中文部分 55 英文部分 57 附錄 61 附錄一:實驗技能評量 61 附錄二:實驗態度量表 67

    中文部分
    吳明隆、涂金堂(2006)。SPSS與統計應用分析。台北市:五南。
    林秀蓁(1995)。一位國中理化教師實驗室之教學與經營。未出版碩士論文,國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
    張春興(1992)。現代心理學。台北市:東華。
    張春興(1996)。教育心理學。台北市:東華。
    張國恩(2002)。從學習科技的發展看資訊融入教學的內涵。北縣教育,41,16-25。
    符碧真(2008)。從學者到網絡:美國大學教師專業發展史與教學中心的發展。民98年1月30日,取自立德大學教師專業發展中心網站。http://www.fdc.
    leader.edu.tw/teacher_link_experience02.htm
    許榮富(1984)。創造基礎科學教育的新環境。科學月刊,15(11),825-831。
    郭生玉(2005)。心理與教育研究法。中和市:精華書局。
    陳智源(2003)。電腦多媒體輔助教學在高一「力與運動」課程的教學成效探討。未出版碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學,台北市。
    傅昭銘(2006)。大學物理實驗教學的思維。物理雙月刊,28(3),573-579。
    黃福坤(2004)。實驗數據的處理與分析。民 96 年 8 月 15 日,取自:國立台灣師範大學,物理學系網站http://www.phy.ntnu.edu.tw/demolab/Notes/
    dataProcess.html
    黃福坤(2006)。透過物理模擬動畫進行物理教學與學習。物理雙月刊,28(3),536-543。

    楊文金、許榮富(1987)。物理教育中實驗的角色。科學月刊,18(2),103-105。
    潘正安(1984)。國中學生科學態度之研究。未出版碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學,台北市。
    魏明通(1997)。科學教育。台北市:五南。
    蘇懿生、黃台珠(1998)。對科學的態度-一個有待研究的問題。科學教育,215,2-13。

    英文部分
    Alessi, S. M., & Trollip, S. R. (2003). Multimedia for learning: methods and development. (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
    Allen, M. J. (2004). Assessing academic programs in higher education. Boston: Anker.
    Barbeta, V. B. (1988). Use of simulation software for physics teaching. International Conference On Engineering Education ICEE-98.
    Barmby, P., Kind, P., & Jones, K. (2008). Examining changing attitudes in secondary school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(8), 1075-1093.
    Chiaverina, C., & Vollmer, M. (2005). Learning physics from the experiments. Proc. of the 3rd International GIREP Seminar 5-9 September 2005 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
    Clariana, R.B. (2000). Feedback in computer-assisted learning. Retrieved February 14, 2009, from NETg University of Limerick Lecture Series Web Site: http://www.
    personal.psu.edu/faculty/r/b/rbc4/NETg.htm
    Economides, A.A. (2006). Adaptive feedback characteristics in CAT (Computer Adaptive Testing). International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 3(8), 15-26.
    Escobar, C., Hickman, P., Morse, R., & Preece, B. (1992). The role of laboratory activities in high school physics. Retrieved September 22, 2008, from AAPT Committee on Physics in High Schools Position Paper. Web site: http://www.
    aapt.org/Policy/roleoflabs.cfm
    Etkina, E., Heuvelen, A. V., Brookes, D. T., & Mills, D. (2002). Role of experiments in physics instruction - a process approach. The Physics Teacher, 40(6), 351-355.
    Finkelstein, N. D., Adams, W. K., Keller, C. J., Kohl, P. B., Perkins, K. K., Podolefsky, N. S., & Reid, S. (2005). When learning about the real world is better done virtually: A study of substituting computer simulations for laboratory equipment. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 1(1), 1-8.
    Finkelstein, N. D., Perkins, K. K., Adams, W., Kohl, P., & Podolefsky, N. (2004). Can computer simulations replace real equipment in undergraduate laboratories? Poster session presented at the Physics Education Research Conference 2004, Sacramento, California.
    Gravoso, R. S., Pasa, A. E., Labra, J. B., & Mori, T. (2008). Design and use of instructional materials for student-centered learning: A case in learning ecological concepts. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 17(1), 109-120.
    Han, H. P. (2006). Shifting paradigm to student-centered. Approach: Is there a Paradox? Executive Journal, 1105, 102-105.
    Haza, J. (2006). Reporting accurate measurements. Retrieved November 11, 2008, from LZHS Science Department Web Site:http://www.lz95.org/lzhs/science/
    jgyarmaty/Tutorials/Measurement/MeasurementIntro.htm
    Hirsch, G. B. (2006). Using dynamic simulation to teach physics in a real-world context. Retrieved August 24, 2006, from the Creative Learning Exchange Web site: http://www.clexchange.org/ftp/documents/Science/
    SC2006-04DynamSimPhysics.pdf
    Huba, M. E. & Freed, J. E. (2000). Learner-centered assessment on college campuses: Shifting the focus from teaching to learning. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
    Jaakkola, T. & Nurmi, S. (2007). Fostering elementary school students’ understanding of simple electricity by combining simulation and laboratory activities. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(4), 271-283.
    Johnstone, A. H., Watt, A., & Zaman, T. U. (1998). The students’ attitude and cognition change to a physics laboratory. Physics Education, 33(1), 22-29.
    Mason, B. J., & Bruning, R. (1999). Providing feedback in computer-based instruction: what the research tells us. Retrieved November 11, 2008, from David W. Brooks Teaching and Research Web Site: http://dwb.unl.edu/Edit/MB/MasonBruning.
    html
    Nancheva, N., & Stoyanov, S. (2005). Simulation laboratory in physics distance education. Proc. of the 10th Workshop on Multimedia in Physics Teaching and Learning (EPS - MPTL 10).
    Odom, A. L., Stoddard, E. R., & LaNasa, S. M. (2007). Teacher practices and middle-school science achievements. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1329-1346.
    Pyatt, K., & Sims, R. (2007). Learner performance and attitudes in traditional versus simulated laboratory experiences. Proc. ascilite Singapore 2007, Singapore.
    Ronen, M., & Eliahu, M. (2000). Simulation - a bridge between theory and reality: the case of electric circuits. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16, 14-26.
    Sethi, R. J. (2005). Using virtual laboratories and online instruction to enhance physics education. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online, 2(3), 22-26.
    Steinberg, R. N. (2000). Computers in teaching science: To simulate or not to simulate? American Journal of Physics, 68, 16-24.
    Steinberg, R. N. (2003). Effects of computer-based laboratory instruction on future teachers’ understanding of the nature of science. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 22(3), 185-205.
    Tlaczala, W., Gorghiu, G., Glava, A. E., Bazan, P., Kukkonen, J., Masior, W., et al. (2006). Computer simulation and modeling in virtual physics experiments. Proc. of MICTE Current Developments in Technology-Assisted Education, Seville.
    Van Der Meer, D., & De Bruijn, I. (2000). Using labview in physics simulations for educational purposes. Proc. Of Second European Conference on Physics Teaching in Engineering Education (PTEE 2000). Budapest, Hungary.
    Wilkinson, W.J., Treagust, D. F., Leggett, M., & Glasson, P. (1988). The teaching-learning environment in a student-centred physics classroom. Research Papers in Education, 3(3), 217-233.
    Wilson, J. M., & Redish, E. F. (1993). Student programming in the introductory physics course: M.U.P.P.E.T.. American Journal of Physics, 61, 222-232.
    Zacharia, Z. C. (2003). Using interactive simulations to enhance students’ explanations regarding physical phenomena. Proc. of the 6th International Conference on Computer Based Learning in Science, Nicosia, Cyprus.
    Zacharia, Z. C. (2007). Comparing and combining real and virtual experimentation: an effort to enhance students’ conceptual understanding of electric circuits. Journal of computer assisted learning, 23, 120-132.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE