簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林恩如
Lin, En-Ju
論文名稱: 探討自我-他人親密程度對科技接受模型之調節效果
Exploring the Moderating Effect of Self-Other Intimacy on the Technology Acceptance Model
指導教授: 張佳榮
Chang, Chia-Jung
口試委員: 張佳榮
Chang, Chia-Jung
鄒蘊欣
Chou, Yun-Hsin
劉素娟
Liu, Su-Chuan
口試日期: 2023/07/29
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理研究所
Graduate Institute of Management
論文出版年: 2023
畢業學年度: 111
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 76
中文關鍵詞: 擴增實境科技接受模型自我-他人親密程度購買意願
英文關鍵詞: AR, technology acceptance model (TAM), self-other intimacy, purchase intention
研究方法: 實驗設計法
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202301452
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:69下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究的主要目的在於探討擴增實境(AR)對消費者購買行為的影響,特別關注自我與他人之間的親密程度對於再次使用意願的影響。研究結合了科技接受模型(TAM)與自我-他人親密程度作為調節變數,透過兩個實驗場景來探討不同親密程度的他人在影響自身使用AR技術的意願方面所造成的差異。在實驗一和實驗二中,本研究選用AR虛擬試穿作為研究場景,以探討不同情境下的消費者行為。實驗一著重於探討自己幫助不同親密程度的人做決定時,自己對AR再次使用意願的影響。研究結果顯示,不同親密程度的人確實會影響自己幫助他人做決定時對AR的再次使用意願。而在實驗二中則探討了聽取不同親密程度的人的意見時對AR再次使用意願的影響。結果發現,不同親密程度的人同樣會影響自己聽取他人意見時對AR的再次使用意願。

    The primary objective of this study is to investigate the impact of Augmented Reality (AR) on consumer purchasing behavior, with a specific focus on the influence of self-other intimacy on the behavior intention to reuse AR again. The research combines the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) with self-other intimacy as a moderating variable, employing two experimental scenarios to explore the variations in the impact of different levels of intimacy between individuals on their willingness to use AR. In study 1 and study 2, the study employs AR virtual try-on as the research context to examine consumer behavior in different scenarios. Study 1 concentrates on how one's behavior intention to reuse AR is affected when assisting individuals with different levels of intimacy in making decisions. The findings indicate that the varying levels of intimacy do indeed influence one's behavior intention to reuse AR while helping others make decisions. Study 2 investigates the effect of receiving opinions from individuals with different intimacy levels on the behavior intention to reuse AR. The results demonstrate that the degree of intimacy once again affects individuals' behavior intention to reuse AR when listening to others' opinions.

    1.Introduction 1 2.Literature Review 4 2.1Augmented Reality(AR) 4 2.2Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Behavior intention to reuse 5 2.3TAM, Self-Other Intimacy, Behavior intention to reuse 7 2.4Behavior intention to reuse, Purchase intention 13 3.Research Methods 14 3.1 Research Framework 14 3.2 Study 1 14 3.2.1 Participants and Design 14 3.2.2 Materials and Procedure 15 3.2.3 Results 17 3.3 Study 2 21 3.3.1Participants and Design 21 3.3.2Materials and Procedure 22 3.3.3Results 24 4.General Discussion 31 4.1 Conclusion 31 4.2 Theoretical Implication 32 4.3 Practical Implication 34 4.4 Limitations and Future Research 34 References 36 Appendix 43

    Adhani, N. I., & Rambli, D. R. A. (2012). A survey of mobile augmented reality applications. In 1st International conference on future trends in computing and communication technologies (pp. 89-96).
    Ain, N., Kaur, K., & Waheed, M. (2016). The influence of learning value on learning management system use: An extension of UTAUT2. Information Development, 32(5), 1306-1321.
    Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. Groups, leadership, and men, 177-190.
    Augmented Reality (AR) Market MARKET ANALYSIS, 2018-2030. (2022). Grand View Research.
    Baier, D., Rese, A., & Schreiber, S. (2015). Analyzing online reviews to measure augmented reality acceptance at the point of sale. Successful Technological Integration for Competitive Advantage in Retail Settings, I. Lee and E. Pantano, Editors.
    Berscheid, E., Snyder, M., & Omoto, A. M. (1989). The Relationship Closeness Inventory: Assessing the closeness of interpersonal relationships. Journal of personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 792.
    Bruner II, G. C., & Kumar, A. (2005). Explaining consumer acceptance of handheld Internet devices. Journal of business research, 58(5), 553-558.
    Business Standard. (2015, August). Caratlane launches virtual jewellery try-on app. Retrieved from http://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ians/caratlane-launches-virtual-jewellery-try-on-app-115082000799_1.html.
    Chang, C. C., Chuang, S. C., Cheng, Y. H., & Huang, T. Y. (2012). The compromise effect in choosing for others. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25(2), 109-122.
    Chang, C. J., Hsu, B. C. Y., & Chen, M. Y. (2022). Viewing sports online during the COVID-19 pandemic: The antecedent effects of social presence on the technology acceptance model. Sustainability, 14(1), 341.
    Chatterjee, P. (2001). Online reviews: do consumers use them?.
    Dacko, S. G. (2017). Enabling smart retail settings via mobile augmented reality shopping apps. Technological forecasting and social change, 124, 243-256.
    Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.
    Davis, F. D. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International journal of man-machine studies, 38(3), 475-487.
    Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8), 982-1003.
    De Regt, A., & Barnes, S. J. (2019). V-commerce in retail: nature and potential impact. Augmented reality and virtual reality: The power of AR and VR for business, 17-25.
    Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of marketing research, 28(3), 307-319.
    Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.
    Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of consumer research, 24(4), 343-373.
    Guo, J., Zhu, Y., Li, A., Wang, Q., & Han, W. (2016). A social influence approach for group user modeling in group recommendation systems. IEEE Intelligent systems, 31(5), 40-48.
    Hilken, T., de Ruyter, K., Chylinski, M., Mahr, D., & Keeling, D. I. (2017). Augmenting the eye of the beholder: exploring the strategic potential of augmented reality to enhance online service experiences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45, 884-905.
    Holt, D. B. (2005). How societies desire brands: Using cultural theory to explain brand symbolism. In Inside consumption (pp. 295-313). Routledge.
    Hsu, C. L., & Lu, H. P. (2004). Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience. Information & management, 41(7), 853-868.
    Huang, T. (2022). What Affects the Acceptance and Use of Hotel Service Robots by Elderly Customers? Sustainability, 14(23), 16102.
    Javornik, A. (2016). ‘It’s an illusion, but it looks real!’Consumer affective, cognitive and behavioural responses to augmented reality applications. Journal of Marketing Management, 32(9-10), 987-1011.
    Javornik, A. (2016). Augmented reality: Research agenda for studying the impact of its media characteristics on consumer behaviour. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 30, 252-261.
    Dibble, J. L., Levine, T. R., & Park, H. S. (2012). The Unidimensional Relationship Closeness Scale (URCS): reliability and validity evidence for a new measure of relationship closeness. Psychological assessment, 24(3), 565.
    Jung, T., tom Dieck, M. C., Lee, H., & Chung, N. (2016). Effects of virtual reality and augmented reality on visitor experiences in museum. In Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2016: Proceedings of the International Conference in Bilbao, Spain, February 2-5, 2016 (pp. 621-635). Springer International Publishing.
    Kelman, H. C. (1958). Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change. Journal of conflict resolution, 2(1), 51-60.
    Kwon, S., Ha, S., & Kowal, C. (2017). How online self-customization creates identification: Antecedents and consequences of consumer-customized product identification and the role of product involvement. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 1-13.
    Kwon, S., Ha, S., & Kowal, C. (2017). How online self-customization creates identification: Antecedents and consequences of consumer-customized product identification and the role of product involvement. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 1-13.
    Li, Y., Duan, Y., Fu, Z., & Alford, P. (2012). An empirical study on behavioural intention to reuse e‐learning systems in rural China. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(6), 933-948.
    Lichtenstein, S., Fischhoff, B., & Phillips, P. (1982). Calibration of probabilities: The state of the art to 1980. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 306–334). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of personality and social psychology, 37(11), 2098.
    Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015). Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013. Universal access in the information society, 14, 81-95.
    Masrom, M. (2007). Technology acceptance model and e-learning. Technology, 21(24), 81.
    Milgram, P., & Kishino, F. (1994). A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems, 77(12), 1321-1329.
    Morwitz, V. (2014). Consumers' purchase intentions and their behavior. Foundations and Trends® in Marketing, 7(3), 181-230.
    Peck, J., & Shu, S. B. (2009). The effect of mere touch on perceived ownership. Journal of consumer Research, 36(3), 434-447.
    Preece, J., Sharp, H., & Rogers, Y. (2015). Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction. John Wiley & Sons.
    Reid, S. A., & Hogg, M. A. (2005). Uncertainty reduction, self-enhancement, and ingroup identification. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 31(6), 804-817.
    Rese, A., Baier, D., Geyer-Schulz, A., & Schreiber, S. (2017). How augmented reality apps are accepted by consumers: A comparative analysis using scales and opinions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 124, 306-319.
    Rese, A., Baier, D., Geyer-Schulz, A., & Schreiber, S. (2017). How augmented reality apps are accepted by consumers: A comparative analysis using scales and opinions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 124, 306-319.
    Rosenberg, M. (1973). Which significant others? American Behavioral Scientist, 16(6), 829-860.
    Sherwin, H., Chatterjee, K., & Jain, J. (2014). An exploration of the importance of social influence in the decision to start bicycling in England. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 68, 32-45.
    Song, H. K., Baek, E., & Choo, H. J. (2020). Try-on experience with augmented reality comforts your decision: Focusing on the roles of immersion and psychological ownership. Information Technology & People, 33(4), 1214-1234.
    Spears, R. (2021). Social influence and group identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 367-390.
    Steinicke, F. (2016). Being really virtual (pp. 19-32). Immersive natives and the future of virtual reality: Springer.
    Stone, E. R., Yates, A. J., & Caruthers, A. S. (2002). Risk taking in decision making for others versus the self 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(9), 1797-1824.
    Tri andis, H. C. (1977). Interpersonal Behavior. Brooks. Cole, Monterey.
    Tussyadiah, I. P., Wang, D., & Jia, C. (2017). Virtual reality and attitudes toward tourism destinations. In Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2017: Proceedings of the International Conference in Rome, Italy, January 24-26, 2017 (pp. 229-239). Springer International Publishing.
    Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases: Biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty. science, 185(4157), 1124-1131.
    Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision sciences, 27(3), 451-481.
    Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS quarterly, 157-178.
    Whang, J. B., Song, J. H., Choi, B., & Lee, J. H. (2021). The effect of Augmented Reality on purchase intention of beauty products: The roles of consumers’ control. Journal of Business Research, 133, 275-284.
    Yaniv, I. (2004). The benefit of additional opinions. Current directions in psychological science, 13(2), 75-78.
    Yaniv, I., & Choshen-Hillel, S. (2012). When guessing what another person would say is better than giving your own opinion: Using perspective-taking to improve advice-taking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(5), 1022-1028.
    Yaniv, I., & Kleinberger, E. (2000). Advice taking in decision making: Egocentric discounting and reputation formation. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 83(2), 260-281.
    Yaniv,I. (2004). Receiving other people’s advice: Influence and benefit. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 93(1), 1-13.

    無法下載圖示 電子全文延後公開
    2028/08/10
    QR CODE