近年來創造力教育備受重視，瞭解使用何種方法能夠增進創造力的學習便十分重要，而在教學現場中，範例可謂是教師最常使用的方法之一，因此本研究的目的為：瞭解高低獨創力範例對學生創造力的影響，以及不同創造力程度的學生，在提供高低獨創力範例後的創造力表現。本研究以實驗研究法探究高低獨創力範例對256位國中生創造力表現的影響。自變項為高低獨創力範例及學生的創造力，依變項則為創造力的表現。範例從新編創造思考測驗的常模中篩選，並以報紙的不尋常用途測驗及新編創造思考測驗進行創造力的測量。假設提供高低獨創力範例，學生在創造力表現會有差異，且不同創造力程度的學生，在提供高低獨創力範例後的創造力表現會有差異。研究結果發現：一、提供高獨創力範例，學生在圖形測驗中流暢力、變通力及獨創力及總分的表現會顯著高於給予低獨創力範例，而精進力則無顯著差異；二、低創造力的學生給予高獨創力範例在圖形測驗的流暢力、變通力、獨創力及總分的表現會高於給予低獨創力範例，而精進力則無顯著差異；三、範例的影響對圖形較語文明顯；四、若為提升創造力，需提供高獨創力範例；五、高低獨創力範例與個體創造力在創造力表現上無交互作用。

In recent years, creative education has paid much attention. It is very important to understand how to improve students’ creativity. In addition, giving the example can viewed as one of the most commonly used methods. Therefore, this study focuses on the effect of high and low originality examples on the junior high school students’ creativity. This study explores the impact of high and low originality examples on 256 junior high school students’ creativity by experimental research. Independent variables are high and low originality examples and the different level of students’ creativity. Dependent variable is student’s creativity performance. Examples were selected from the norm of the New Test of Creative Thinking. “Unusual Uses of the Newspapers Test” and “The New Tests of Creative Thinking” were used to measure creativity. Assuming high and low originality examples provided, students will behave differently in creativity, and different creativity students will differ in their performance after providing different examples. The results show that: First, after provided high originality example, students’ fluency, flexibility, originality and total score in the figural test will be significantly higher than given low originality example, while there is no significant difference in elaboration. Second, low creativity students giving high originality example shows higher fluency, flexibility, originality and total score than given low originality example, while there is no significant difference in elaboration. Third, the impact of the example shows much more on figural than on verbal creativity. Fourth, in order to enhance creativity, teachers have to provide high originality examples. Fifth, there aren’t interaction between different type of examples and different creative students.

一、中文文獻
毛連塭、郭有遹、陳龍安、林幸台（民89）。創造力研究。臺北市：心理。
吳靜吉、陳甫彥、郭俊賢、林偉文、劉士豪、陳玉樺（1999）。新編創造思考測　　驗研究。學生輔導，62，132-146。
李分明、莊耀輝（民97）。創意思考。臺北縣：新文京開發。
林美宇（2010）。拋磚引玉是真的嗎?示範對不同創造力者的影響。國立中正大　　學心理學研究所碩士學位論文。未出版，嘉義。
凃金堂（2011）。運用 「範例 (worked-out example)」 在國小數學問題解決　　的教學實驗研究。教育心理學報，43(1)，25-49。
徐芝君、陳學志、邱發忠（2012）。「報紙的不尋常用途」測驗之編製。創造學　　刊，3(2)，33-56。
張世彗（2013）。創造力：理論、技法與教學。臺北市：五南。
張玉山、李大偉、游光昭、林雅玲（2009）。不同範例展示及實作經驗對國中生　　科技創造力的影響。教育科學研究期刊，54(4)，1-27。
郭有遹（2001）。創造心理學。臺北市：正中。
陳龍安（2006）。創造思考教學的理論與實際（第六版）。臺北市：心理。
黃一泓、虞翔（2014）。不同範例與解題組合對初學者在學習上的影響。教育心　　理學報，45(4)，497-515。
黃博聖、陳學志、黃鴻程、劉政宏（2009）。「詞彙聯想策略擴散性思考測驗」之編製。測驗學刊，56(2)，153-177。
詹秀美（1991）。國小學生創造力與問題解決能力的相關變項研究。臺中師院學　　報，5，1-21
劉世南、郭誌光（2001）創造力的概念與定義。資優教育季，102，1-7。
劉映（2011）論課程教學中的範例選擇。教育教學論壇，26，176-177。
二、英文文獻
Barron, F. (1969). Creative person and creative process. Oxford, England: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Davis, G. A. (2004). Creativity is forever. Kendall Hunt Publishing Company.
Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Lexington: D.C. Heath.
Guilford, J. P. (1968). Intelligence, creativity, and their educational implications. Edits Pub.
Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1988). The role of the environment in creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity, 11-38. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Jansson, D. G., & Smith, S. M. (1991). Design fixation. Design studies, 12(1), 3-11.
Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). The expertise reversal effect. Educational psychologist, 38(1), 23-31.
Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., Tuovinen, J., & Sweller, J. (2001). When problem solving is superior to studying worked examples. Journal of educational psychology, 93(3), 579.
Mueller, L. K. (1978). Beneficial and detrimental modeling effects on creative response production. The Journal of psychology, 98(2), 253-260.
Parnes, S. J. (1967). Creative behavior guidebook. Scribner.
Polya, G. (1957). How to Solve It : a new mathematical method. New York: Doubleday.
Sanderlin, O. (1971). Creative teaching. New Jersey: AS Barnes and Co.
Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Willse, J. T., Barona, C. M., Cram, J. T., Hess, K. I., ... & Richard, C. A. (2008). Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: Exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(2), 68.
Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., & Schumacher, J. S. (1993). Constraining effects of examples in a creative generation task. Memory & Cognition, 21(6), 837-845.
Sweller, J., & Cooper, G. A. (1985). The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra. Cognition and Instruction, 2(1), 59-89.
Torrance, E. P. (1962). Guiding creative talent. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, US: Prentice-Hall.
Ward, T. B. Smith, S. M., & Finke, R. A.（2005）。創造性認知。載於R. J. Sternberg（主編），創造力（李乙明、李淑貞譯）（頁2-19）。臺北市：五南。
Williams, F. E. (1972). A Total Creativity Program for Individualizing and Humanizing the Learning Process: Identifying and Measuring Creative Potential (Vol. 1). Educational Technology.