簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 詹雅然
Chan, Ya-Jan
論文名稱: 董事酬金與風險性投資行為
Board Compensations and Risk-taking Behavior
指導教授: 林舒柔
Lin, Shu-Jou
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 全球經營與策略研究所
Graduate Institute of Global Business and Strategy
論文出版年: 2020
畢業學年度: 108
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 38
中文關鍵詞: 董事酬金董事誘因報酬董事持股比例董事間酬金差異風險性投資行為長期投資(轉投資)家族控制
英文關鍵詞: board compensation, incentive payment, board shareholding, within-board compensation heterogeneity, risk-taking behavior, family control
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202000214
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:168下載:11
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 公司議題日趨重要,近年來台灣的董事會存在肥貓的情形,使得董事報酬方案之設計更受到大眾的重視,金管會亦提出相關修正法規因應。而過去多將研究重點著眼於高階管理者的報酬,探討其對公司績效的影響,甚至有少許研究開始進一步分析報酬如何導致高階管理者後續決策行為,例如收購投資和創業基金投資等,而該風險性投資行為則會對公司績效產生影響。
    故本研究期待能以董事作為研究對象,找出董事報酬(係指酬金)對風險性投資行為的影響,故本研究將分析台灣國內上市之電子工業公司,透過長期投資(轉投資)作為風險性投資行為之衡量,且進一步探討家族控制的調節作用,而本研究得出的結論為:當董事彼此之間報酬差異越大時,更願意進行風險性投資行為,但家族企業反而對此關係有弱化效果。

    Scholars have paid increasing attention on the relationship between board compensation and corporate governance recently due to to the "fat cat" issue. Most studies, however, focused on how top manager compensation associates with performance without mentioning compensation and strategic decision-making. In this study, I analyze electronics industries in Taiwan seeking to find the relationship between board compensation and risk-taking behaviors. I find that when within-board compensation heterogeneity increases, board would engage more on long-term investments; meanwhile, family control would weaken this relationship.

    摘要 i Abstract ii 目錄 iii 表目錄 v 圖目錄 vi 第壹章 緒論 1 1.1 研究議題與動機 1 1.2 研究目的 2 第貳章 文獻回顧與假說建立 3 2.1 代理理論 3 2.2 高階管理者之誘因報酬與風險性投資行為 3 2.3 董事之誘因報酬與風險性投資行為 4 2.4 持股比例與風險性投資行為 4 2.5 報酬差異與風險性投資行為 5 2.6 主理人衝突和家族控制的調節效果 6 2.7 研究架構 7 第參章 研究方法 8 3.1 樣本資料來源 8 3.2 樣本資料篩選 8 3.3 變數衡量 9 3.4 研究方法 13 第肆章 研究結果與分析 15 4.1 共線性問題、敘述統計量和相關性分析 15 4.2 董事酬金之資料型態 17 4.3 Panel Data模型之分析結果 22 4.3 董事酬金和國內、外風險性投資行為 26 第伍章 結論與建議 32 5.1 研究結論 32 5.2 研究限制與建議 33 參考文獻 34

    王克陸,包曉天,2002。企業轉投資與其系統風險關係之研究─台灣紡織業與電子業之比較。中華管理學報3(2): 65–74.
    Acs ZJ, Morck R, Shaver JM, Yeung B. 1997. The internationalization of small and medium-sized enterprises: a policy perspective. Small Business Economics 9: 7–20.
    Acs ZJ, Preston L. 1997. Small and medium-sized enterprises, technology, and globalization: introduction to a special issue on small and medium-sized enterprises in the global economy. Small Business Economics 9: 1–6.
    Aggarwal RK, Samwick AA. 2003. Why do managers diversify their firms? Agency reconsidered. Journal of Finance 58(1): 71–118.
    Agrawal A, Mandelker GN. 1987. Managerial incentives and corporate investment and financing decisions. Journal of Finance 42(4): 823–837.
    Anderson RC, Mansi SA, Reeb DM. 2003. Founding family ownership and the agency cost of debt. Journal of Financial Economics 68(2): 263–285.
    Badrinath R. 1994. Helping small and medium-size firms to enter export markets. International Trade Forum 2: 4–9.
    Barkema HG, Gomez-Mejia LR. 1998. Managerial compensation and firm performance: a general research framework. Academy of Management Journal 41(2): 135–145.
    Barker III VL, Mueller GC. 2002. CEO characteristics and firm R&D spending. Management Science 48(6): 782–801.
    Baysinger BD, Kosnik RD, Turk TA. 1991. Effects of board and ownership structure on corporate R&D strategy. Academy of Management Journal 34(1): 205–214.
    Becher DA, Campbell II TL, Frye MB. 2005. Incentive compensation for bank directors: the impact of deregulation. Journal of Business 78(5): 1753–1778.
    Berger PG, Ofek E, Yermack DL. 1997. Managerial entrenchment and capital structure decisions. Journal of Finance 52(4): 1411–1438.
    Bryan S, Hwang LS, Klein A, Lilien S. 2000. Compensation of outside directors: an empirical analysis of economic determinants. Working paper.
    Chen HL, Hsu WT. 2009. Family ownership, board independence, and R&D investment. Family Business Review 22(4): 347–362.
    Cheung YL, Stouraitis A, Wong AW. 2005. Ownership concentration and executive compensation in closely held firms: evidence from Hong Kong. Journal of Empirical Finance 12(4): 511–532.
    Claessens S, Djankov S, Lang LHP. 2000. The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics 58: 81–112.
    De Dreu CKW, Weingart LR. 2003. Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 88(4): 741–749.
    Devers CE, Cannella AA Jr, Reilly GP, Yoder ME. 2007. Executive compensation: a multidisciplinary review of recent developments. Journal of Management 33(6): 1016–1072.
    Devers CE, McNamara G, Wiseman RM, Arrfelt M. 2008. Moving closer to the action: examining compensation design effects on strategic risk. Organization Science 19(4): 548–566.
    Dharwadkar R, George G, Brandes P, 2000. Privatization in emerging economies: an agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Review 25(3): 650–69.
    Dushnitsky G, Shapira Z. 2010. Entrepreneurial finance meets organizational reality: comparing investment practices and performance of corporate and independent venture capitalists. Strategic Management Journal 31(9): 990–1017.
    Eisenhardt KM. 1989. Agency theory: an assessment and review. Academy of Management Review 14(1): 57–74.
    Fenn GW, Liang N. 2001. Corporate payout policy and managerial stock incentives. Journal of Financial Economics 60: 45–72.
    Gomez‐Mejia LR, Makri M, Kintana ML. 2010. Diversification decisions in family‐controlled firms. Journal of Management Studies 47: 223–252.
    Goodman PS, Ravlin EC, Argote L. 1986. Current thinking about groups: Setting the stage for new ideas. In P. Goodman (Ed.), Designing effective work groups: 1-33. San Francisco: J
    Hall BJ, Liebman JB. 1998. Are CEOs really paid like bureaucrats? Quarterly Journal of Economics 113(3): 653–691.
    Hall S, Hambrick DC, Cannella AA Jr. 2009. Strategic leadership: theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.
    Handler WC. 1989. Methodological issues and considerations in studying family businesses. Family Business Review 2(3): 257–276.
    Jehn KA. 1995. A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly 40(2): 256–282.
    Jensen MC, Meckling WH. 1976. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305–360.
    Jensen MC, Murphy KJ. 1990. Performance pay and top-management incentives. Journal of Political Economy 98(2): 225–264.
    Kang SH, Kumar P, Lee H. 2006. Agency and corporate investment: the role of executive compensation and corporate governance. Journal of Business 79(3): 1127–1147.
    Kaplan SN, Strömberg P. 2004. Characteristics, contracts, and actions: evidence from venture capitalist analyses. Journal of Finance 59(5): 2177–2210.
    Kotabe M, Srinivasan SS, Aulakh PS. 2002. Multinationality and firm performance: the moderating role of R&D and marketing capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies 33(1): 79–97.
    La Porta R, Lopez‐de‐Silanes F, Shleifer A. 1999. Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance 54(2): 471–517.
    Lambert RA, Larcker DF, Weigelt K. 1993. The structure of organizational incentives. Administrative Science Quarterly 38(3): 438–461.
    Lee PM, O'Neill HM. 2003. Ownership structures and R&D investments of U.S. and Japanese firms: agency and stewardship perspectives. Academy of Management Journal 46(2): 212–225.
    López-Iturriaga F, García-Meca E, Tejerina-Gaite F. 2015. Institutional directors and board compensation: Spanish evidence. BRQ Business Research Quarterly 18(3): 161–173.
    Lu JW, Beamish PW. 2004. International diversification and firm performance: the S-curve hypothesis. Academy of Management Journal 47(4): 598–609.
    Martínez JI, Stöhr BS, Quiroga BF. 2007. Family ownership and firm performance: evidence from public companies in Chile. Family Business Review 20(2): 83–94.
    Mehran H, Tracy J. 2001. The impact of employee stock options on the evolution of compensation in the 1990s. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review December: 17–34.
    Mehran H. 1992. Executive incentive plans, corporate control, and capital structure. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 27(4): 539–560.
    Moores K, Craig JB. 2008. Agency differences in professional family businesses: the known and the unknown. Business papers 154.
    Morck R, Wolfenzon D, Yeung B. 2005. Corporate governance, economic entrenchment, and growth. Journal of Economic Literature 43(3): 655–720.
    Perry T. 2000. Incentive compensation for outside directors and CEO turnover. Working Paper.
    Steinbach AL, Holcomb TR, Holmes RM Jr, Devers CE, Cannella AA Jr. 2017. Top management team incentive heterogeneity, strategic investment behavior, and performance: a contingency theory of incentive alignment. Strategic Management Journal 38: 1701–1720.
    Weisbach MS. 1988. Outside directors and CEO turnover. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 431–460.
    Yeh YH, Woidtke T. 2005. Commitment or entrenchment?: controlling shareholders and board composition. Journal of Banking and Finance 29: 1857–1885.
    Yermack D. 1995. Do corporations award CEO stock options effectively? Journal of Financial Economics 39(2–3): 237–269.
    Young CS, Tsai LC, Hsieh PG. 2008. Voluntary appointment of independent directors in Taiwan: motives and consequences. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 35(9–10): 1103–1137.
    Zahra SA, Neubaum DO, Huse M. 2000. Entrepreneurship in medium-size companies: exploring the effects of ownership and governance systems. Journal of Management 26(5): 947–976.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE