研究生: |
黃子庭 Huang, Tzu-Ting |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
負向情感的圖像在多媒體學習上的成效分析 The Effect of Graphics with Negative Emotion in Multimedia Learning on Learners’ Performance |
指導教授: |
張國恩
Chang, Kuo-En 宋曜廷 Sung, Yao-Ting 劉子鍵 Liu, Tzu-Chien |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
資訊教育研究所 Graduate Institute of Information and Computer Education |
論文出版年: | 2017 |
畢業學年度: | 105 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 67 |
中文關鍵詞: | 多媒體學習 、負向情感 、認知負荷 、學習成效 |
英文關鍵詞: | Multimedia Learning, Negative Emotion, Cognitive Load, Performance |
DOI URL: | https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202202074 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:177 下載:9 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
根據過去的研究結果顯示,若在多媒體學習中加入不同種類的圖像就會有不同的學習成效。在一些衛生教育、疾病預防等特定科目領域中的教學現場、演講或是教科書中經常會使用能夠引起學習者注意且與課程相關的圖像,像是一些病症症狀、災難現場等可能隱含比較負向的情感,然而這樣的負向情感對學習是否會產生影響?過去探討負向情感對多媒體學習的影響結果仍不一致,而大多引發自學習前,使用的素材也都與課程無關,這樣的作法基本上較違背一般的課室教學,因此本研究不刻意使用其他工具促發負向情感,而是探討在多媒體教材中經常使用的兩種本身可能隱含負向情感的圖像(真實圖像和插畫圖像)與沒有使用圖像的課程進行比較,探討有無使用這類圖像對學習成效的影響。研究結果顯示雖然使用真實圖像會讓學習者感到不愉快,但可以降低學習者的外在認知負荷和增加增生認知負荷,並促進學習,而且也較能維持學習成效。然而,插畫圖像與無圖像組在情感上沒有顯著差異,雖然也能夠降低外在認知負荷、增加增生認知負荷、促進學習成效,但未能夠維持學習效果。
According to the studies in the past, different types of graphics we use in the multimedia learning will result in different learning performance. In the domain of health education or disease preventing, we usually use some kind of graphics like wounds or diseases that not only relates to the learning content, but also with negative emotions. How does this kind of negative emotions effect students’ learning? The results of the studies that investigate negative emotions in multimedia learning so far did not have consistency, and most of them evoke the emotions before learning and the materials have no relation to the course. Therefore, this study won’t evoke negative emotion on purpose. We use two kinds of graphics, real pictures and illustrations, to compare with non-graphic, and to investigate the effect of graphics with negative emotion in multimedia learning on learners’ performance. The result reveals that although real pictures make students unhappy, they still reduce the extraneous load and increase the germane load and promote longer learning. On the other hand, illustrations don’t have significant difference in negative emotion comparing to non-graphic and thus can’t promote longer learning. Nevertheless, illustrations can reduce the learners’ extraneous load and increase the germane load to promote immediate learning.
Baddeley, A. (1992). Working Memory and Conscious Awareness. Theories of memory, 11-20.
Bartsch, R. A., & Cobern, K. M. (2003). Effectiveness of PowerPoint presentations in lectures. Computers & education, 41(1), 77-86.
Bradshaw, A. C. (2003). Effects of presentation interference in learning with visuals. Journal of Visual Literacy, 23(1), 41-68.
Brünken, R., Moreno, R., & Plass, J. L. (Eds.). (2010). Cognitive Load Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Calvo, M. G., & Lang, P. J. (2004). Gaze patterns when looking at emotional pictures: Motivationally biased attention. Motivation and Emotion, 28(3), 221-243.
Chen, X., & Latham, G. P. (2014). The effect of priming learning vs. performance goals on a complex task. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 125, 88e97.
Chung, S., Cheon, J., & Lee, K. W. (2015). Emotion and multimedia learning: an investigation of the effects of valence and arousal on different modalities in an instructional animation. Instructional Science, 43(5), 545-559.
Danielson, R. W., Schwartz, N. H., & Lippmann, M. (2015). Metaphorical graphics aid learning and memory. Learning and Instruction, 39, 194-205.
Ellis, H. C., Thomas, R. L., McFarland, A. D., & Lane, J. W. (1985). Emotional mood states and retrieval in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11(2), 363.
Garner, R., Gillingham, M. G., & White, C. S. (1989). Effects of'seductive details' on macroprocessing and microprocessing in adults and children.Cognition and instruction, 6(1), 41-57.
Harp, S. F., & Mayer, R. E. (1997). The role of interest in learning from scientific text and illustrations: On the distinction between emotional interest and cognitive interest. Journal of educational psychology, 89(1), 92.
Harp, S. F., & Mayer, R. E. (1998). How seductive details do their damage: A theory of cognitive interest in science learning. Journal of educational psychology, 90(3), 414.
Heidig, S., Müller, J., & Reichelt, M. (2015). Emotional design in multimedia learning: Differentiation on relevant design features and their effects on emotions and learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 81-95.
Isen, A. M., Johnson, M. M., Mertz, E., & Robinson, G. F. (1985). The influence of positive affect on the unusualness of word associations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 48(6), 1413.
Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of personality and social psychology, 52(6), 1122.
Isen, A. M., & Reeve, J. (2005). The influence of positive affect on intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Facilitating enjoyment of play, responsible work behaviour, and self-control. Motivation and Emotion, 29(4), 295–323.
Johnson, D. A., & Christensen, J. (2011). A comparison of simplified-visually rich and traditional presentation styles. Teaching of Psychology, 38(4), 293-297.
Kalyuga, S. (Ed.). (2008). Managing cognitive load in adaptive multimedia learning. IGI Global.
Kettanurak, V. N., Ramamurthy, K., & Haseman, W. D. (2001). User attitude as a mediator of learning performance improvement in an interactive multimedia environment: an empirical investigation of the degree of interactivity and learning styles. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 54(4), 541-583.
Khader, P., Burke, M., Bien, S., Ranganath, C., & Rösler, F. (2005). Content-specific activation during associative long-term memory retrieval. NeuroImage, 27(4), 805-816.
Knörzer, L., Brünken, R., & Park, B. (2016). Facilitators or suppressors: Effects of experimentally induced emotions on multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 44, 97-107.
Knörzer, L., Brünken, R., & Park, B. (2016). Emotions and multimedia learning: the moderating role of learner characteristics. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(6), 618-631.
Leffingwell, T. R., Thomas, D. G., & Elliott, W. H. (2007). Microsoft Producer: A software tool for creating multimedia PowerPoint® presentations. Teaching of Psychology, 34(1), 57-63.
Lenzner, A., Schnotz, W., & Müller, A. (2013). The role of decorative pictures in learning. Instructional Science, 41(5), 811-831.
Leppink, J., Paas, F., Van der Vleuten, C. P., Van Gog, T., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. (2013). Development of an instrument for measuring different types of cognitive load. Behavior research methods, 45(4), 1058-1072.
Leutner, D. (2014). Motivation and emotion as mediators in multimedia learning.Learning and Instruction, 29, 174-175.
Li, J., Chen, J., & Wang, S. (2011). Introduction. In Risk Management of Supply and Cash Flows in Supply Chains (pp. 1-48). Springer New York.
Liew, T. W., & Su-Mae, T. (2016). The effects of positive and negative mood on cognition and motivation in multimedia learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(2), 104.
Liu, T. C., Lin, Y. C., Gao, Y., Yeh, S. C., & Kalyuga, S. (2015). Does the redundancy effect exist in electronic slideshow assisted lecturing?. Computers & Education, 88, 303-314.
Magner, U. I., Schwonke, R., Aleven, V., Popescu, O., & Renkl, A. (2014). Triggering situational interest by decorative illustrations both fosters and hinders learning in computer-based learning environments. Learning and Instruction, 29, 141-152.
Marsh, E. E., & White, M. D. (2003). A taxonomy of relationships between images and texts. Journal of Documentation, 59(6), 647e672.
Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2003). Learning and instruction. Prentice Hall.
Mayer, R. E. (Ed.). (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge university press.
Mayer, R. E., Griffith, E., Jurkowitz, I. T., & Rothman, D. (2008). Increased interestingness of extraneous details in a multimedia science presentation leads to decreased learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14(4), 329.
Mayer, R. E. (2010). Unique contributions of eye-tracking research to the study of learning with graphics. Learning and instruction, 20(2), 167-171.
Mayer, R. E., & Estrella, G. (2014). Benefits of emotional design in multimedia instruction. Learning and Instruction, 33, 12-18.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational psychologist, 38(1), 43-52.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological review, 63(2), 81.
Moreno, R. (2005). Instructional technology: Promise and pitfalls. Technology-based education: Bringing researchers and practitioners together, 1-19.
Moreno, R. (2006). Does the modality principle hold for different media? A test of the method‐affects‐learning hypothesis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(3), 149-158.
Nummenmaa, L., Hyönä, J., & Calvo, M. G. (2006). Eye movement assessment of selective attentional capture by emotional pictures. Emotion, 6(2), 257-268.
Oaksford, M., Morris, F., Grainger, B., & Williams, J. M. G. (1996). Mood, reasoning, and central executive processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,
Memory, and Cognition, 22(2), 476.
Paas, F. G., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. (1994). Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of educational psychology, 86(1), 122.
Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38, 1–4.
Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian journal of psychology, 45(3), 255-287.
Park, B., Moreno, R., Seufert, T., & Brünken, R. (2011). Does cognitive load moderate the seductive details effect? A multimedia study. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 5-10.
Park, B., Plass, J. L., & Brünken, R. (2014). Cognitive and affective processes in multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 125-127.
Park, B., Knörzer, L., Plass, J. L., & Brünken, R. (2015). Emotional design and positive emotions in multimedia learning: An eyetracking study on the use of anthropomorphisms. Computers & Education, 86, 30-42.
Park, B., Flowerday, T., & Brünken, R. (2015). Cognitive and affective effects of seductive details in multimedia learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 267-278.
Park, S., & Lim, J. (2007). Promoting positive emotion in multimedia learning using visual illustrations. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia,16(2), 141.
Pekrun, R. (1992). The impact of emotions on learning and achievement: Towards a theory of cognitive/motivational mediators. Applied Psychology, 41(4), 359-376.
Plass, J. L., Heidig, S., Hayward, E. O., Homer, B. D., & Um, E. (2014). Emotional design in multimedia learning: Effects of shape and color on affect and learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 128-140.
Rey, G. D. (2012). A review of research and a meta-analysis of the seductive detail effect. Educational Research Review, 7(3), 216-237.
Rey, G. D. (2014). Seductive details and attention distraction–An eye tracker experiment. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 133-144.
Schallberger, U. (2005). Kurzskalen zur Erfassung der Positiven Aktivierung, Negativen Aktivierung und Valenz in Experience Sampling Studien (PANAVA-KS). Theoretische und methodische Grundlagen, Konstruktvalidität und psychometrische Eigenschaften bei der Beschreibung intra-und interindividueller Unterschiede.
Schneider, S., Nebel, S., & Rey, G. D. (2016). Decorative pictures and emotional design in multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 44, 65-73.
Schnotz, W., Fries, S., & Horz, H. (2009). Motivational aspects of cognitive load theory. Contemporary motivation research: From global to local perspectives, 69-96.
Seibert, P. S., & Ellis, H. C. (1991). Irrelevant thoughts, emotional mood states, and cognitive task performance. Memory & Cognition, 19(5), 507-513.
Sitzmann, T., & Johnson, S. (2014). The paradox of seduction by irrelevant details: How irrelevant information helps and hinders self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 34, 1-11.
Sokolowski, R. (2008). Phenomenology of the human person. Cambridge University Press.
Sung, E., & Mayer, R. E. (2012). When graphics improve liking but not learning from online lessons. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1618-1625.
Sweller, J. (1980). Transfer effects in a problem solving context. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(2), 233-239.
Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional design in technical areas. Camberwell, Australia:ACER Press.
Um, E., Plass, J. L., Hayward, E. O., & Homer, B. D. (2012). Emotional design in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(2), 485.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070
Yilmazel‐Sahin, Y. (2009). A comparison of graduate and undergraduate teacher education students' perceptions of their instructors' use of Microsoft PowerPoint. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 18(3), 361-380.