簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 曾瓊瑤
Tseng Chiung Yao
論文名稱: 以perry基模為基礎分析高中初任化學教師教學與學習心智模型專業成長
The Investigation of Science Teacher's Professional Development in Teaching and Learning Mental Model from the basisi of Perry Scheme
指導教授: 黃芳裕
Huang, Fang-Yu
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 化學系
Department of Chemistry
論文出版年: 2007
畢業學年度: 94
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 269
中文關鍵詞: 初任教師、教師專業成長、教學與學習的心智模型
英文關鍵詞: novice teacher, professional development of teacher,the mental models of teaching and learning
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:215下載:5
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 中文摘要

    關鍵詞:初任教師、教師專業成長、教學與學習的心智模型

    每個人都不斷的在成長與改變,而且是多層面地持續在進行。學者Burden(1990)認為,了解教師的專業發展可提供教師有效的成長基礎、針對教師短程或長程的個人成長需求來輔助教師選擇發展目標及提供師資培育機構做為規畫各種介入活動的藍本以促進教師的專業成長。因此將教師的專業發展歷程做階段性的劃分,可幫助研究人員去探討不同階段教師的發展特性與需求。一般常將教師的專業發展歷程劃分為職前師資培育階段、初任教師導入階段、勝任教師精進階段。其中,初任教師進入職場後,會受到實際環境的衝突而由早期理想主義轉變為以個人生存為準,當初任教師的理想消退後,對教室管理與學生行為常有無力感,在此階段,建立教師地位成為主要目標並希望得到學生愛戴及保持距離建立權威,造成理想形象與實際師生關係間的不協調,加上本身教學知能不足,多半只能照本宣科,因此常會需要外界立即性的改正意見與提供訣竅。本研究的主要目的即是在資深教師以自身教學經驗與專業知能引領下,探討四位高中科學初任教師的教學與學習的心智模型發展。本研究採質性研究的方法,依據Vermunt(1992.1997)等學者所辨識出五種教學與學習之心智模型形式:(1)知識的吸收(2)知識的建構(3) 知識的應用(4) 刺激教育(5) 合作,做為本研究的五個分析面向。並於研究最後提出六點相關結論:(1)初任教師在實際教學現場中的專業成長受到個人特質、同僚、社會經驗、班級情境及學生學成就的影響。(2)藉由資深教師的教學經驗傳承對初任教師教學與學習的心智模型成長有明顯的助益。(3)知識的建構此模型上的成長能幫助敎師去適應多變的自然科教學。(4)嚴重的學生問題會影響教師教學與學習心智模型的成長,甚至會導致教師專業成長上的退化。(5)增進教師間的互動與合作能促進教師的專業成長。(6)教師的教學若以學生興趣為導向者能拓廣教學活動的範圍。

    Abstract

    Keywords: novice teacher, professional development of teacher,the mental models of teaching and learning
    Everyone is continually growing and changing. Academician Burden(1990) considers that knowing the professional development of teacher can not only provides effective consultation for teachers choosing suitable developable purpose, but also the framework of several interfered activities for teacher developed institution to improve teacher professional development. Therefore, it is important to divide the process of teacher professional development into several stages. Each stage owns its different character. Usually, the process of teacher professional development contains three stages: the pre-inaugural development stage of practice teacher, the lead-in stage of novice teacher, the advanced stage of expert teacher. When novice teacher enter workplace , will face the conflict between theory and reality. It leads the construction of teacher place to become the major purpose. However, due to the deficient competence of professional teaching, novice teacher needs immediate comment. The major purpose of this study is to explore the mental models of teaching and learning of four novice science teachers under the guidance of senior teacher. Qualitative Research is adopt in this paper and five analytic directions are involved according to Vermunt (1992,1997), which are :(1) the absorption of knowledge(2) the construction of knowledge (3) the appliance of knowledge (4) the stimulated education (5) cooperation. Finally, this research reveals six conclusions: (1) The professional development of novice teacher in real teaching place will be affected by personality, other teachers, social experience, classroom environment, and student achievement. (2)It is beneficial for the growth of mental models of teaching and learning by the induction of teaching experience from expert teacher .(3)The development of the mental model of the construction of knowledge will help teacher to adopt changefully science teaching (4)Serious student problems will affect teacher’s learning, even cause the regression of teacher professional development (5)Improve the interaction among teachers will promote the professional development of teachers(6)Teaching directed by student interests will broaden the range of teaching activities.

    目 次 博碩士論文上網授權書……………………………………..……………….… 學位考試委員審定書………………………………………..………...…….…. 誌謝………………………………..…………………………...……………...... 中文摘要……………………………………………………………………..…. 英文摘要…………………………………………………………....……...…… 目次…………………………………………………………………...………… 表次……………………………………………………………………………... 圖次………………………………………………………………………..……. 1. 緒論…………………………………………………………………………..1 1.1. 研究動機……………...………………………………………………1 1.2. 研究目的……………………………………………………………...3 1.3. 研究範圍與限制……………………………………………………...4 1.4. 重要名詞釋義…………………………………………………….…..6 2. 理論基礎與文獻分析……………………………………………………..…9 2.1. 教師分級制度與教師專業成長…………………………………..….9 2.2. 教學導師…………………………………………………………….22 2.3. 衝突理論與兩難情境……………………………………………….26 2.4. 教師專業社會化…………………………………………………….36 2.5. 教師角色、專業標準與成長……………………………………….40 3. 研究設計與研究架構………………………………………………………60 3.1. 研究設計…………………………………………………………….60 3.2. 研究架構…………………………………………………………….66 3.3. 資料蒐集與來源…………………………………………………….71 3.4. 研究對象背景分析………………………………………………….76 3.5. 資料分析與評量工具……………………………………………….80 3.6. 研究之信度、效度………………………………………………….92 4. 研究結果與討論……………………………………………………………94 4.1. 第一階段資料分析………………………………………………….94 4.2. 第二階段資料分析………...…………………….…...……....114 4.3. 綜合討論………..………………………………………………….179 5. 結論與建議………………………………………………………………..190 5.1. 結論………………………………………………………………...190 5.2. 建議………………………………………………………………...194 參考文獻……………………………………………………………………...197 附錄A:部分訪談資料…………………………………………………….…227 附錄B:部分現場記錄資料……………………………………………….…245 附錄C:部分其他資料…………………………………………………….…249 附錄D:第一階段資料分析範例…………………………….………………251 附錄E:第二階段資料分析範例……………………………………….…….269

    參考文獻
    中文部分:
    尹淑萍、黃芳裕(1999)以後現代主義評析國中理化教師的教育實習。以後現代主義評析國中理化教師的教育實習。第十二屆科學教育學會論文集。
    王韶霙(2002)。國中生物科資深教師教學策略之個案研究。國立高雄師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。
    王錦珍(1994)。國中實習教師社會化之俗民誌研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    王如哲(2000)《知識管理的理論與應用》。台北:五南。
    李維 譯(2000)思維與語言。台北:昭明。Vygotsky L. S. (1961) Thought and Language. Cambridge,Massachusett: M.I.T.
    李暉﹙民82﹚《國中理化教師試行建構主義教學之個案研究》。國立彰化師範大學科學科學教育研究所碩士論文。
    何福田、羅瑞玉(1992)教育改革與教師專業化。中華民國師範教育學會主編。教育專業,頁1-30。台北:師大書苑。
    林振春(1993)衝突管理理論及其在團體中的應用。社會教育學刊,22期,73-106頁。國立台灣師範大學社會教育系。
    林靜茹(1993)國民中小學校長人際衝突管理及其相關因素之研究。高雄:高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    林懿萱(2001)新制實習制度下國中理化實習教師的專業成長:質性個案研究。台北:台灣師範大學化學研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    林懿萱、黃芳裕(2000)新制實習制度下的理化實習教師之專業成長研究。第十六屆科學教育學術研討會短篇論文彙編,頁679-686。
    范揚君(2002)。一位男性國小資深教師的生命故事。國立新竹師範學院輔導教學碩士班碩士論文。
    周珮儀(1996)後現代思潮衝擊下的教育研究。研習資訊,卷13,期5。
    周寄中(1993)批判與知識的增長/拉卡托斯(Imre Lakatos),馬斯格雷夫(Alan Musgrav)。台北:桂冠。
    姜添輝(1997)教育的功能—三個社會學派的觀點。花蓮師院學報,第七期,頁215 - 240。
    胡峻豪(1997)國民小學校長衝突管理策略及其成效。台北:台北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    柯進雄(1994)衝突理論與學校領導。台北:台聯。
    施慧敏(1995)社會學理論對班級常規管理的啟示。臺灣教育,536,19-26。
    段曉林﹙民83﹚。職前化學教師教學思考之個案研究。《科學教育學刊》,2(2),115-140
    徐宗國譯(1997)質性研究概論。台北:巨流。
    唐韶鈴(2002)實習教師在不同學校社群文化與不同實習輔導理念下的專業成長表現研究。台北:台灣師範大學化學研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    唐韶鈴、黃芳裕(2002)現今師資培育願景下科學實習教師之專業成長研究。第十八屆科學教育學術研討會。
    高強華(1992)教師社會化研究及其在師資培育上的意義。中華民國師範教育學會主編。教育專業,頁53-88。台北:師大書苑。
    高強華(1992)。樂在學習、樂在工作--談教師的終生學習與專業發展。教師天地,57,33-36。
    張文軍(1998)後現代教育。台北市:揚智文化。ISBN:957-8446-64-0。
    張惠博﹙民82﹚。職前科學教師實驗教學能力培養之研究。發表於中華民國科學教育學會八十二年度年會暨中華民國第九屆科學教育學術研討會。
    張鐸嚴(1985)國民小學教師與行政人員間衝突管理之研究。台北:台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    張碧蘭(2001)國小初任教師工作困擾及其因應方式之研究。臺中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
    張煌熙(1993)《班級環境品質的改善》。輯於黃政傑等編,班級經營—理念與策略。台北:師大書苑。
    郭重吉(2002)建構論:科學哲學的省思。詹志禹主編。建構論:理論基礎與教育應用,頁1-11。台北:正中。
    陳秋瑾(1992)美術教育研究-論國小美勞科教師應具之特質。台北:藝風堂。
    陳奎熹(1999)現代教育社會學。台北:施大書苑。
    陳師榕(1998)國民小學級任教師全面品質管理特質與班級經營效能之相關研究。國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文。
    陳碧雲﹙民84﹚《初任科學教師班級經營的面貌與成長》。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。
    陳佩正(2000)從「心」教學:行動研究與教師專業成長。台北市:心理。
    梁坤明(民88)教師分級制與專業化。北縣國教輔導,8,61-62。
    教育部中等教育司(2002)高級中等以下學校及幼稚園教師資格檢定及教育實習辦法部分條文修正條文。
    單文經(2001)《教學引論》。台北:學富。
    游淑燕(1993)。國民小學教師課程決定權取向及其參與意願之研究。國立政治大學教研究所博士論文。
    黃光國(1999)多元典範的研究取向:論社會心理學的本土化。社會理論學報,2(1),頁1-51。
    黃文俊(2002)國小初任教師的教學意象之研究。臺中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
    黃儒傑(2001)國小初任教師教學信念、教學成敗歸因及其有效教學表現之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系博士論文。
    黃思華(2003)。網路科技對國民小學新手教師專業發展之研究。國立台北師範學院教育傳播與科技研究所碩士論文。
    黃秀霜(1997)。國民小學教師應具備之基本能力及素養之研究。載於中華民國師範教育學會主編,教學專業與師資培育,91-117。台北市:師大書苑。

    黃芳裕(2002a)九年一貫「自然與生活科技」國民中小學教師研習活動:後現代社會中科學教師的專業素養。教育部:國立台灣科學教育館。
    黃芳裕(2002b)九年一貫「自然與生活科技」領域研討會:九年一貫的自然和生活科技領域—A SAFE模型的介紹與範例。連江縣東引國民中小學。
    黃芳裕(2001a)九年一貫的自然與生活科技領域課程設計理念與教學範例。九年一貫課程學習領域教學研討會,頁32-42。中華民國教材研究發展學會。
    黃芳裕(2001b)自然和生活科技領域課程設計理念與範例。落實九年一貫實習輔導活動研討會,21-32。師大。台北。
    黃芳裕(2001c)科學實習教師成長的基本資料:以後現代哲學的衝突管理之社會學理論探討初任科學教師的成長動力。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫報告。
    黃芳裕(2000)追求自我實現:教育實習的實現。國立台灣師範大學實習輔導研習會。台北:師大。
    黃芳裕(1996a)建構論在科學教育研究的典範類型與應用(二)-當今科學哲學對建構論的評析。科教月刊,188,頁2-14。
    黃芳裕(1996b)科學教師在科學教學的省察發展之基本資料(Ⅰ):國中實習理化學校教學中的省察發展表徵。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。
    黃芳裕(1994)學生使用科學知識省察表徵分析。台北:國立台灣師範大學科學教育研究所博士論文,未出版。
    黃芳裕(2000)自然和生活科技的小班教學理念和活動設計 落實小班教學精神論文集,213-242。教育部。台北。
    黃芳裕、尹淑萍(1999)以後現代主義評析國中理化教師的教育實習 第十二屆科學教育學會論文集。
    黃芳裕、林懿萱(2000)新制實習制度下的理化實習教師之專業成長研究 第十六屆科學教育學術研討會短篇論文彙編,679-686。
    黃芳裕、林懿萱(1999)實習學校環境對國中理化實習教師專業成長的影響 第十二屆科學教育學會論文集。
    黃芳裕、唐韶鈴(2001)以個案研究分析:實習輔導教師與實習教師的成長關係 第十七屆科學教育學術研討會。
    黃芳裕、廖國智(2000)以心智模型理論探討實習教師成長:分析實習教師、實習學校及師資培育機構三者之間的關係 第十六屆科學教育學術研討會短篇論文彙編,751-758。
    黃芳裕、廖國智(1999)師資培育理念與教師成長的關係 第十二屆科學教育學會論文集。
    黃芳裕、廖國智、林懿萱(1999)群體或個人特性:以社會建構論分析我國科學教師知識建構特性 第十二屆科學教育學會論文集。
    黃芳裕、劉佳育(2001)教師專業成長:在不同領導類型下個案教師成長分析 第十七屆科學教育學術研討會。
    黃芳裕、羅弘志(2002)科學教育改革的省思:化學電池的知識探討 第三屆化學教育學術研討會。
    黃芳裕、廖國智、林懿萱(1999)群體或個人特性:以社會建構論分析我國科學教師知識建構特性。第十二屆科學教育學會論文集。
    黃芳裕、蕭立成、賴美娟、陳鼎元(2003)國中教師的科學教學活動對於學生學習之影響:以台北市某國中為例。第十九屆科學教育學術研討會。
    黃芳裕、羅弘志(2002)科學教育改革的省思:化學電池的知識探討。第三屆化學教育學術研討會,論文彙編,頁283-292。行政院國家科學委員會科學教育發展處。
    楊榮祥(1997):中學科學教室環境影響之之本質與其影響因素。台北市,國科會微縮小組。
    楊國賜(1991)。教育專業。載於黃光雄主編,教育概論,417-443。台北市:師大書苑。
    蔡培村(民88)我國實施教師職級制度可行性研究。教育資料與    研究,31,1-14。
    蔡培村(民90)教師分級制度規劃的內容與思維。師友,405,4-11。
    葉重新(2001)教育研究法。台北:心理。
    廖國智(2001)以心智模型理論分析科學實習教師的專業表徵。台北:台灣師範大學化學研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    趙金祁、許榮富、黃芳裕(1995)建構論在科學教育研究的典範類型與應用(一)-建構論的典範與評析。科教月刊,180,頁2-16。
    劉佳育(2002)教師專業成長:不同領導類型下個案教師成長分析。台北:國立台灣師範大學化學研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    劉佳育、黃芳裕(2002)不同領導類型、群體特性情境下科學教師專業成長之分析。第十八屆科學教育學術研討會。
    劉佳育、黃芳裕(2001)教師專業成長:在不同領導類型下個案教師成長分析。第十七屆科學教育學術研討會。
    簡炎輝(民90)邁向專業之前-教師分級的操作。師友,419,35-37。
    謝美慧(民90)。從終身進修論教師分級制度之建構。人文及社會科學教學通訊,12(3),113-131。
    羅弘志(2003)在教育政策轉換下之科學實習教師專業成長:個案研究。台北:國立台灣師範大學化學研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    羅弘志、黃芳裕(2002)後現代認識論的觀點:探討「酸鹼指示劑」知識成長過程。第十八屆科學教育學術研討會。
    饒見維(1996):教師專業發展---理論與實務。台北:五南。

    英文部分:
    Alexander, R. (1995) Versions of primary education. London: Routledge.
    Andrew, M. (1997) What matters most for teacher educators, Journal of Teacher Education, 48(3), 167-176.
    Anthanase, S. Z. (1994) Teacher’s reports of the effects of preparating portfolios of literacy instruction. Elementary School Journal, 94(4), 421-439.
    Arends, R.I.(1997) Classroom Instruction and Management. U.S.A:McGraw-Hill
    Avalos B.(2001).Global Demands for Quality:Realities and Myths in the Improvement of Initial Teacher Preparation. Education and Society, 19, 33-53
    Bacharach, S. B. & Lawler, E. J. (1980) Power and Politics in Organization. San Fransico: Jossey-Bass.
    Baird, W. E., & Rowsey, R. E. (1989). Asurvey of secondary seience teachers’ needs. School Science and Mathematics, 89, 272-284.
    Barid, W. E., Easterday, K., & Rowsey, R. E. (1993). A comparison of Alabama secondary science and mathematics teachers: Demographics and perceived needs. School Science and Mathematics, 93(4), 175-182.
    Bates, G. C. (1982). The laboratory is vital in science instruction in the secondary school. The Science Teacher, 49(2), 20-23.
    Bennett, C. A., Mauch, J. J., Stivers, F., & Mellon, E. K. (1989). Reduction of experimental scale in high school and college general chemistry laboratories. Journal of Chemical Education, 66(3), A90-A91.
    Bell, B., & Gilbert, J. (1996) Teacher development: A model from science education. London: Falmer.
    Berliner, D. C., & Calfee, R. C. (Eds.)(1996). The handbook of educational psychology. New York: Macmillan.
    Billig, M. (1988) Ideological dilemmas. London: Sage.
    Bliss, T. & Mazur, J. (1997) How INTASC standards com alive through case studies. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the America Association of College Teacher Education. Phoenix. AZ.
    Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik,, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26, 369-98.
    Borisoff, D. & Victor, D. A. (1998) Conflict Management: A Communication Skill Approach, 2nd (Ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
    Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative research for Education: An Introduction to theory and method. Bjoston : Allyn and Bacon, Inc..
    Borko, H., & Livingston, C. (1989). Cognition and improvisation difference in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers. American Education Research Journal, 26(4), 473-498.
    Bradley, A. (1994) Pioneers in professionalism. Education Week, 13,18-21.
    Brian, K.L.(2001).Rethinking Assessment from a Critical Perspective. Language Testing, 18(4), 351-372

    Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. B. (1993) In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
    Brophy, J. (1989) Conclusion: Toward atheory of teaching. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching: Vol. I. Teaching for meaningful understanding and self-regulated learning, 345-355. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
    Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989) Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 1, 32-42.
    Brown, D. E. & Chin, C.(2000). Learning Deeply in Science:An Analysis and Re- integration of Deep Approaches in Two Case Studies of Grade 8 Students Research in Science Education, 30, 173-197
    Bryman, A. & Burgess, R. G. (Eds.) (1999) Qualitative Research (vol 2). London: Sage.
    Bybee, R. W. (1993) Leadership, responsibility, and reform in sience education. Science Educator, 2, 1-9.
    Carey, S. (1986). Cognitive Science and Science Education. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1123-1130
    Carr. M. & Claxton. G.(2002). Tracking the Development of Learning Disposition. Assessment in Education, 9, 9-37
    Chen, A., & Ennis, C. D. (1995). Content knowledge transformation: An examination of the relationship between content knowledge and curricula. Teaching And Teacher Education, 11(4), 389-401.
    Ciparick, J. D., & Jones, R. F. (1989). Avariation on the demonstration of the properties of the alkali metals. Journal of Chemical Education, 66(5), 438-439.
    Clarke, D. & Hollingsworth (2002) Elaborating a model of teacher profession growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 947-967.
    Clermont, C. P., & Krajcik, J. S., & Broko, H. (1993). The influence of an intensive in-service workshop on pedagogical content knowledge growth among novice chemical demonstrators. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(1), 21-43.
    Collette, A. T., & Chiappetta, E. L. (1984). Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools, St. Louis, Missouri: Times Mirror/mosby College.
    Cochran, K. F., Deraiter, J. A. & King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative model for teacher preparation. Joural of Teacher Education, 44(4), 263-272.
    Cross, G. P., Names, J. H. & Beck, D. (1979) Conflict and Human Interaction. Dubugue, IA: Kendall Hunt.
    Crow, N. A. (1991). Personal perspectives on classroom management.Paper prepared for presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago. ( ERIC Document Reproducation Service No. ED 332 959)
    Darling-Hammond, L. & Snyder, J. (2000) Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(5/6), 523-546.
    Darling-Hammond, L. (1999) Reshaping Teaching Policy, Preparation and Practice: Influences of the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. Washington, DC: American of Colleges for Teacher Education.
    Darling-Hammond, L., Ancess, J. & Falk, B. (1995) Authentic Assessment in Action:Studies of Schools and Students at Work. New York:Teachers College Press.
    Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1995) Policies that support pro- fessional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(8), 597-605
    De Dreu, C. K. W. (1997) Productive Conflict: The Importance of Conflict Manage- ment and Conflict Issue. In USING CONFLICT in ORGANIZATION, 9-22. London: Thousand Oaks.
    Deutsch, M. (1969) Conflicts:Productive and destructive. Journal of Social Issue, 25(1), 7-41.
    Driver. et al.(1996). Young people’s images of science. U.S.A:Open University Press
    Efran, J., Luckens, M. D. & Lucken, R. J. (1990) Language, Structure, and Change. New York: Norton.
    Egan, K. (1997) The educated mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
    Elbaz, F. (1983) Teacher thinking: A study of practical knowledge. New York: Nichols.
    Elliott, J. (Ed.) (1993) Reconstruction teacher education: Teacher development. London: Falmer.
    Folger, J. P., Poole, M. S. & Stutman, R. K. (1997) Working through Conflict:Strategies for Relationships, Groups, and Organization. New York: Longman.
    Follet, M. P. (1940) Constructive Conflict in Dynamic Administration. New York: Harper.
    Fosnot, C. T. (1996) Constructivism: a psychological theory of Learning. In: Fosnot, C. T. (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, Perspectives, and Practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
    Foucault, M. (1989) Foucault Live: Interviews 1966-84. New York: Semiotext.
    Fraser, B. J. & Walberg, H. J. (1995) Improving science education. Chicago. IL: National Society for the Study of Education: University of Chicago Press.
    Furman, G. C. (1998) Postmodernism and community in schools: Unraveling the paradox. Education Administration Quarterly, 34(3), 298-328.
    Galle, P. D.(2002). Science, Values and Objectivity. Science & Education, 11, 191-202
    Geddis, A. N. (1993). Transforming subject-matter knowledge: The role of pedagogical content knowledge in learning to reflect on teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 15(6), 673-683.
    Gess-Newsome, J., & Lederman, N. G. (1990). The preservice microteaching course and science teachers’ instructional decisions: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(8), 717-726.
    Gess-Newsome, J., & Lederman, N. G. (1993). Preservice biology teachers’ knowledge of professional teacher educatin: a year-long assessment. Science Education, 77(1), 47-73.
    Gil, D. et al.(2002).Defending Constructivism in Science Education. Science & Education, 11, 557-571
    Goetz, J. P. & LeCompte M.D. (1984) Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. Orlando : Academic Press.
    Good, C. V. (1659) Dictionary of education, 2nd. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
    Good, R.(1993). Editional:The slippery slopes of postmodernism . Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 30(5), 427-428.
    Gwimbi, E.M. & Monk, M. (2003) Study of Classroom Practice and Classroom Contexts amongst Senior High School Biology Teachers in Harare, Zimbabwe. Science Education, 87, 207-223.
    Haney, J. J. & McArthur J. (2002) Four Case Studies of Prospective Science Teachers’ Beliefs Concerning Constructivist Teaching Practices. Science Education, 86, 783-802.
    Hargreaves, A. (1997) Changing teachers, changing times; teachers’ work and culture in the postmodern age. London: Cassell.
    Hargreaves, A., Earl, L. & Ryan, J. (1996) Schooling for change: Reinventing education for early adolescent. London; Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
    Hargreaves, A. & Earl, L.(2002). Perspectives on Alternative Assessment Reform. American Educational Research Journal, 39, 69-95
    Hartley, J. F. (1994) Case Studies in Organizational Research. In: Cassell, C. & Symon, G. (Eds.), Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research. (pp.201-220). London: Sage.
    Hashweh, M. Z. (1987). Effects of subject-matter knowledge in the teaching of biology and physics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3(2), 109-120.
    Hashweh , M. Z. (1996). Effects of science teachers’ epistemological beliefs in teaching. Journal of Research in Science teaching, 33(1), 47-63.
    Hashweh, M. Z. (2003) Teacher Accommodative Change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 421-434.
    Hickey, D.T. & Zuiker, S.J.(2002). A New Perspective for Evaluating Innovative Science Programs. Science Education, 87, 539-563
    Hocker, J. L. & Wilmot, W. W. (1985) Interpersonal Conflict. Dubuque, I.A.: Wm. C. Brown.
    Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (1982). The role of the laboratory in science teaching: Neglected aspects of research. Review of Educational Research, 52(2), 201-217.
    Howe, A. & Stubbs, H. (1998) Empowering science teachers: A model for professional development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 8(3), 167-182.
    Ingvarson, L. (1998a) A professional development system fit for a profession, IARVT Seminar Series, No. 72, February, Victoria.
    Ingvarson, L. (1998b) Professional standards: a challenge for AATE, English in Australia, 122, 31-44.
    Ingvarson, L. (1998c) Teaching standards: foundations for frofessional development reform, In: A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan & D. Hopkins (Eds.), International Handbook of Educational Change (Dordrescht, Kluwer).
    Ingvarson, L & Marrett, M. (1997) Building professional community and supporting teachers as learners: The potential of case methods In Logan, L. & Sachs, J. (Eds.), Meeting the challenge of primary schooling in 1990s. London: Routledge.
    James, R. K., & Crawley, F. E. (1985). Laboratory teaching skills for secondary science teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 85(1), 11-19.
    Jehn, K. A. (1997) Affective and Cognitive Conflict in Work Groups: Increasing Performance Through Value-Based Intragroup Conflict. In USING CONFLICT in ORGANIZATION, 87-100. London: Thousand Oaks.
    Jones, M. G., & Vesilind, E. (1995) . Preservice teachers’ cognitive frameworks for class management . Teaching And Terchar Education, 11(4), 313-330 .
    Justi R. S. & Gilbert J. K. (2002). Science Teachers’ Knowledge about and Attitudes towards the Use of Models and Modeling in Learning Science. International Journal of Science education, 24 , 1273-1292
    Kagan, D. M. (1992). Professional growth among preservice and beginning teacher. Review of educational Research, 62(2), 129-169.
    Kanter, R. M. (1977) Men and women of the corporation. New York: Colophon.
    Kelly, G. A. (1991) The Psychology of Personal Constructucts (vol 1 & 2). New York: Routledge.
    Kennedy, M. M. (1990). Trends and isseus in: Teachers’ subject matter knowledge . Washington and the American Association of College for Teacher ED. ( ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 322 100.)
    Kloss, R. J. (1994) A nudge is best. College Teaching, 42(4), 151-159.
    Koehler, J. W., et al. (1986) Public Communication. New York: Macmillan Publishing.
    Kolb, D. M. & Bartunek, J. M. (1992) Hidden Conflict Organization: Uncovering Behind-the-Scene Disputes. California: Sage.
    Kuhn, T. S. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Lederman, N. G., Gess-Newsome, J., & Latz, M. S. (1994). The nature and development of preservice science teachers’ coneptions of subject matter and pedagogy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(2), 129-146.
    Lee, O. (1995). Subject matter knowledge, classroom management, and instructional practices in middle school science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(4), 423-440.
    Leinhardt, G. (1988) Situated knowledge and expertise in teaching. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Teachers’ professional learning (146-168). London: Falmer.
    Levitt, K. E. (2001). An Analysis of Elementary Teachers’ Belief Regarding the Teaching and Learning of Science. Science Education, 86, 1-22.
    Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage.
    Lunenberg M. & Korthagen, F. A. J. (2003) Teavher educators and student-directed learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 29-44.
    Marks, U. (1990). Pedagogical content knowledge: From a mathematical case to a modified conception. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 3-11.
    Matthews, M. R.(2002). Constructivism and Science Education:A Further Appraisal. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11, 121-134
    McMillan, D. W. & Chavis, D. M. (1986) Senseof community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 6-23.
    Millar, R. (1988). Teaching physics as a non-specialist: The in-service training of science teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching, 14, 39-53.
    Mitchell, M. L. (1998) Employing qualitative methods in the private sector. London: Sage.
    Munby, H. (1984). A qualitative approach to the study of a teacher’s beliefs. Journal of Research in Science teaching, 21(1), 27-38.
    Murphy, J. (1995) Changing Roles of the teacher. Education Teachers for Leadership and Change, 311-323.
    National Council of teachers of Mathematics (NTCM, 1989) Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston. VA: NCTM.
    Nespor, J. (1987) The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19, 317-328.
    Northouse, P. G. (2001) Leadership: Theory and Practice, 2nd. California: Sage.
    Osterman, K. F. (2000) Students’ need for belonging in the school community. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 323-367.
    Pajares, M. F. (1992) Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62,307-332.
    Palinscar, A. S., Magnusson, S. J., Marano, N., Ford, D., & Brown, N. (1998) Designing a community of practice: Principles and practices of the GIsML community. Teaching and Teacher Education, 1, 5-21.
    Parsons, T. (1977) Social systems and the evolution of action theory. New York: Free Press.
    Parsons, T. (1956) Essays in sociological theory. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.
    Perakyla, A. (1997) Reliability and validity in research based on transcripts. In Silverman, D. (Ed.), Qualitative Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 201-220. London: Sage.
    Perry, W. G. Jr. (1970) Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years. New York: Holt, Rinehant and Winston, Inc.
    Piaget, J. (1967) Six Psychological Studies. New York: Vintage Books.
    Pope, M., & Gilbert, J. (1983). Personal experience and the construction of knowledge in science. Science Educatino, 67(2), 193-203.
    Rahim, M. A. (1986) Managing Conflict in Organization. New York: Praeger Publishers .
    Resnick, L.B. (1991) Shared cognition: Thinking as social practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition, 1-20. Washington, DC: APA.
    Rokeach, M. (1968) Beliefs, attitudes, and values: A theory of organization and change. San Francisco: Fossey-Bass.
    Ryan, K. (1986). The induction of new teachers. Bloomington: Fastback 237. Phi Delta Kappa Education Foundtion..(ERIC Document Reproducation Service No. ED 268 117)
    Sachs, J. (2003) Teacher Professional Standards: Controlling or Developing Teaching? Teachers and Teaching: theory practice, vol. 9, no. 2, 175-186.
    Salomon, G. (Ed.) (1993) Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Sanders, L. R., Borko, H., & Lockard, J. D. (1993). Secondary science teachers’ knowledge base when teaching science couses in and out of their area of certification. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(7), 723-736.
    Sanford, J. P. (1988). Learning on profession development of beginning science teachers. Science Education, 72(5), 615-624.
    Sarbin, T. R. (1986) Narrative Psychology: The Stories Nature of Human Conduct. New York: Preaeger.
    Schein, E. H. (1985) Organisational culture and leadership: Adynamic view. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Schibeci, R. A. & Hickey, R. L. (2003) Dimensions of Autonomy: Primary Teachers’ Decisions About Involvement in Science Professional Development. Science Education, 88, 119-145.
    Schmidt, S. M. (1974) Conflict:A powerful process of (good or bad) change. Management Review, 63(12), 4-10.
    Schon, D. A. & Argyris, C. (1974) Theory in practice: increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
    Senate Employment and Training Reference Committee (1998) Senate Inquiry into the Teaching Profession. A Class Act (Canberra, Australian Government Printing Service).
    Sergiovani, T. (1998) Markets and community as strategies for change: what works best for deep changes in schools, In: A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan & D. Hopkins (Eds.), International Handbook of Educational Change (Dordrecht, Kluwer).
    Seymour, J. R. & Osana, H. P. (2003) Reciprocal Teaching procedures and principles: two teachers’ developing understanding. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 325-344.
    Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Research, 15(2). 4-14.
    Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Education Review, 57(1), 1-22.
    Sipka, T. A. (1969) Social conflict and re-construction. Unpublished doctoral dissertion, Boston College, Boston.
    Smylie, M. A. (1995) Teacher learning in the workplace: Implications for school reform. In T. R. guskey, & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices, 92-113. New York: Teachers College Press.
    Southerland, S.A.(2000). Epistemic universalism and the shortcomings of curricular multicultural science education. Science & education, 9, 289-307
    Stachowski, L. L. & Mahan, J. M. (1998) Cross-culture field placements: student teachers learning from schools and community. Theory into Practice, 37(2), 155-162.
    Strauss, A. L. & Corbin, J. M. (1998) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for development grounded theory. London; Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    Strong, M. & Baron, W. (2004) An analysis of mentoring conversations with beginn- ing teachers: suggestions and responses. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 47-57.
    Tamair, P. (1989). Training teachers to teach effectively in the laboraory. Science Education, 73(1), 59-69.
    Tamir,P., & Lunetta, V. N. (1981). Inquiry-related tasks in high school science laboratory handbook. Science Education, 65(5), 477-484.
    Taylor, P. C. S., Fraser, B. J., & White, L. R. (1994) A classroom environment questionnaire for science educators interested in the constructivist reform of school science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Anaheim, CA.
    Tjosvold, D. (1997) Conflict with Interdependence: Its Value for Productivity and Individuality. USING CONFLICT in ORGANIZATION, 23-37. London; Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    Tjosvold, D. (1991) The Team Organization Model. Team Organization, 26-40. New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
    Tobin, K. (1990). Research on science laboratory activities: In pursuit of better questions and answers to improve learning. School Science and Mathematics, 90(5), 403-418.
    Van den Berg, R. (2002) Teachers’ Meanings Regarding Educational Practice. Review of Education Research, 72(4), 577-625.
    Veenman, S. (1984). Perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review of Educatinal, 54(2), 147-178
    Von Glasersfeld, E. (1991) Radical Constructivism in Mathematics Education. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
    Vygotsky, L. S. (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychologival Processes. In: M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S.Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Wertsch, J. V. (1990) The voice of rationality in a sociocultural approach to mind. In: Moll, L. C. (Ed.), Vygotsky and Education. (111-126). New York: Cam- bridge University Press.
    Weinstein, C. S. (1988). Preservice teachers’ expectations about the first year of teaching. Teaching And Terchar Education, 4(1), 31-40.
    Westerman, J. E. (1991). Minimum State teacher certification standards and their relationship to effective teaching: Implication for teacher education. Action in Teacher Education.11(2),25-32.
    Wilson, M. R. (1994). One preservice secondary teacher’s understanding of function: The impact of course intrgration mathematical contect and pedagogy. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(4), 346-370.
    Winitzty, N., & Kauchak, D. (1995). Learning to teach: Knowledge development in classroom management. Teaching And Terchar Educatin, 11(3), 215-227.
    Yamagata-Lynch, L. C. (2003) How a technology professional development program fits into teachers’ work life. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 591-607.
    Zembylas, M. (2003) Interrogating “Teacher Identity”: Emotion, Resistance, and Self-Formation. Educational Theory, 53(1), 107-127.
    Zeidler, D. L. et al. (2002). Tangled Up in Views : Beliefs in the Nature of Science and Responses to Socioscientific Dilemmas. Science Education, 86, 343-367

    Zuelke, D. C. & Willerman, M. (1992) Conflict and Decision Making in Elementary Schools: Contemporary Vignettes and case for School Administrators. U.S.A: Wm. C. Brown Publishers.

    QR CODE