過去已有相當多關於國際學生能力評估計劃(the Program for International Student Assessment, PISA)的研究，而隨著網路時代的來臨及學生健康議題的關注，本研究主要探討學生健康狀況和數位網路設備對PISA分數的影響。研究方法採用最小平方法(Ordinary-Least-Squares, OLS)之迴歸模型，主要研究解釋變數學生健康狀況及網路設備的使用，另外也包含家庭背景(如:父母教育程度、家戶所得)、家庭資源(如:教育資源、教育經費支出)與自我父母期望等變數。為了讓研究更加完善，採用2009年、2012年、2015年及2018年的PISA資料，擴及22個國家，期望研究結果更全面。研究結果發現，學生健康狀況對PISA成績有顯著的正向影響，學生健康保持良好，確實有助於學業成績的表現，另外在數位網路設備使用上，學生擁有越多元的數位網路設備，在學習利用上更有效率，有助於PISA成績的表現，呈現顯著的正向影響，然而在網路網頁瀏覽的變數，卻與PISA成績呈反向影響，可見網路使用是需要更妥善的管理與運用，才能發揮正向的影響力。最後，22國家區域的比較分析中，發現東南亞國家在PISA分數表現上，相對於落後其他地區，尤其以東亞及北歐國家的PISA分數表現最佳，而其中東亞地區國家再深入探討，發現新加坡、中國的分數特別突出，值得我國台灣教育決策者借鏡，以及師生一起共同努力。

Numerous studies have been conducted in the past about the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA). In light of the internet era and growing concerns about student health, this study focuses on examining the influence of student health conditions and digital internet devices on PISA scores. The research methodology utilizes the Ordinary-Least-Squares (OLS) regression model, with health conditions of students and the usage of digital internet devices as the primary explanatory variables. It also incorporates factors such as parental education backgrounds, household income, educational equipment and expenditure, and self-expectations.

To enhance the comprehensiveness of the research, data from PISA assessments conducted in 2009, 2012, 2015, and 2018 are analyzed, encompassing 22 countries. By incorporating a broader range of data, the study aims to generate more compelling outcomes. The research findings reveal a significant positive impact of health conditions of students on PISA scores, emphasizing the role of good health in academic performance. Moreover, students who possess a diverse array of digital internet devices demonstrate more efficient learning, resulting in improved PISA scores and exhibiting a notable positive effect. However, the variable related to internet web browsing exhibits a negative impact on PISA scores, underscoring the need for proper management and utilization of internet usage to leverage its positive influence.

Lastly, in the comparative analysis among the 22 countries, it is evident that Southeast Asian countries lag behind other regions in terms of PISA performance. Particularly, East Asian and North Europe countries display the highest PISA scores. Among the East Asian countries, Singapore and China excel with exceptional scores, offering valuable insights for educational policymakers in Taiwan and motivating teachers and students to strive for improvement.

Ammermueller, A. (2008). PISA: What makes the difference? Explaining the gap in test scores between Finland and Germany. The economics of education and training, 241-265.

Bai, Y., Tang, B., Wang, B., Mo, D., Zhang, L., Rozelle, S., and Mandell, B. (2023). Impact of online computer assisted learning on education: Experimental evidence from economically vulnerable areas of China. Economics of Education Review, 94, 102385.

Białecki, I., Jakubowski, M., and Wiśniewski, J. (2017). Education policy in Poland: The impact of PISA (and other international studies). European Journal of Education, 52(2), 167-174.

Brunello, G., and Rocco, L. (2013). The effect of immigration on the school performance of natives: Cross country evidence using PISA test scores. Economics of Education Review, 32, 234-246.

Carter, S. P., Greenberg, K., and Walker, M. S. (2017). The impact of computer usage on academic performance: Evidence from a randomized trial at the United States Military Academy. Economics of Education Review, 56, 118-132.

Christensen, S. (2015). Healthy competition and unsound comparison: Reforming educational competition in Singapore. Globalization, Societies and Education, 13(4), 553–573. https://doi. org/10.1080/14767724.2014.979769.

Comi, S. L., Argentin, G., Gui, M., Origo, F., and Pagani, L. (2017). Is it the way they use it? Teachers, ICT and student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 56, 24-39.

De Paola, M., Gioia, F., and Scoppa, V. (2023). Online teaching, procrastination and student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 94, 102378.

Hassan Al-Taai, S. H., Kanber, H. A., and Mohammed al-Dulaimi, W. A. (2023). The Importance of Using the Internet of Things in Education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18(1).

Hsu, M., and Chen, B.L, (2019). A study on the intergenerational transfer mechanism of parent-child education in Taiwan. Economic Reviews, 47(2), 217-272. 徐美、 陳明郎(2019)。台灣親子教育跨代移轉機制之研究。經濟論文叢刊，47(2)，217-272。

Jahan, S., Ali, S. A., and Hussaini, T. (2021). Impact of Internet Usage on the Academic Performance of Undergraduate Students in Karachi. Univers. J. Educ. Res, 9, 579-585.

Kaptan, O., Karabay, A., and Kocabaş, İ. (2023). A panel data analysis of the effect of well-being on PISA maths skills from the perspective of equality. Quality & Quantity, 1-21.

Khan, M. A., Alvi, A. A., Shabbir, F., and Rajput, T. A. (2016). Effect of internet addiction on academic performance of medical students. Journal of Islamic International Medical College (JIIMC), 11(2), 48-51.

Kupiainen, S., Hautamäki, J., and Karjalainen, T. (2009). The Finnish education system and PISA. opetus-ja kulttuuriministeriö.

Kwon, S. K., Lee, M., and Shin, D. (2017). Educational assessment in the Republic of Korea: Lights and shadows of high-stake exam-based education system. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 24(1), 60-77.

Li, Y. R. (2021). The effects of family background, parental investment, and self-expectations on the academic performance of secondary school students: Evidence from PISA 2018. 李瑩柔(2021)。家庭背景、父母投資與自我期望對中學生學科素養表現之影響-以 PISA2018為例。國立臺灣師範大學管理研究所碩士論文，1-48。

Martins, L., and Veiga, P. (2010). Do inequalities in parents’ education play an important role in PISA students’ mathematics achievement test score disparities? Economics of Education Review, 29(6), 1016-1033.

Norsham, N. A. H., Abd Razak, S. I., Hadi, F. H. A., and Jamil, N. I. (2023). Understanding Student’s Academic Performance based on Social Factors. International Journal of Advanced Education and Development, 4(3).

Oliveira, A. P., Nobre, J. R., Luis, H., Luis, L. S., Pinho, L. G., Albacar-Riobóo, N., and Sequeira, C. (2023). Social Media Use and Its Association with Mental Health and Internet Addiction among Portuguese Higher Education Students during COVID-19 Confinement. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(1), 664.

Patterson, R. W., and Patterson, R. M. (2017). Computers and productivity: Evidence from laptop use in the college classroom. Economics of Education Review, 57, 66-79.

Reinikainen, P. (2012). Amazing PISA results in Finnish comprehensive schools. Miracle of education: The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools, 3-18.

Rouvinen, H., Sormunen, M., Kunttu, K., and Turunen, H. (2023). Internet, studying and daily rhythm: health symptoms among higher education students. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health.

Seibert, G. S., Bauer, K. N., May, R. W., and Fincham, F. D. (2017). Emotion regulation and academic underperformance: The role of school burnout. Learning and Individual Differences, 60, 1-9.

Shahibi, M. S., and Rusli, K. N. K. K. (2017). The influence of internet usage on student’s academic performance. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(8), 873-887.

Shaw, S. R., Gomes, P., Polotskaia, A., and Jankowska, A. M. (2015). The relationship between student health and academic performance: Implications for school psychologists. School Psychology International, 36(2), 115-134.

Tan, J. (2009). Private tutoring in Singapore: Bursting out of the shadows. Journal of Youth Studies (Hong Kong), 12(1), 93–104.

Huang, F.M., and Wu, C.I. (2010) The Study of Personal Characteristics, Family Background and Academic Performance of Taiwanese Junior High School Students - Evidence from a Panel Survey. Economic Reviews, 2010, 38.1: 065-097. 黃芳玫、吳齊殷 (2010)。台灣國中學生個人特質、家庭背景與學業成績── 追蹤調查資料之研究。經濟論文叢刊，2010、38.1: 065-097。

Tire, G. (2021). Estonia: a positive PISA experience. Improving a Country’s Education: PISA 2018 Results in 10 Countries, 101-120.

Ustun, U., Cansiz, M., Ozdemir, E., and Cansiz, N. (2022). Student and school-level factors to predict science literacy for two top-performing countries in PISA 2015: Finland and Singapore. International Journal of Science Education, 44(4), 579-603.

Wyatt, T. J., Oswalt, S. B., and Ochoa, Y. (2017). Mental Health and Academic Performance of First-Year College Students. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(3), 178-187.

Xayriniso, U. (2023). Opportunities of Internet in Teaching English in the Classroom. Finland International Scientific Journal of Education, Social Science & Humanities, 11(2), 650-652.

Yadav, V., Sushmita, P., and Rathore, N. S. (2023) Impact of Anxiety among College Students. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management (IJAEM), 5, 31-33.

Yang, W., Fan, G., and Chen, W. (2022). Socioeconomic status, cultural capital, educational attainment and inequality: An analysis based on PISA2018 results of China, Finland, South Korea and Singapore. International Journal of Educational Research, 113.

Zhao, L. (2023). Social Media Addiction and Its Impact on College Students' Academic Performance: The Mediating Role of Stress. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 32(1), 81-90.