研究生: |
許彩榮 Tsai Jung Hsu |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
非正規體制中的科學教育:科學館的科學教育個案研究 Informal scientific education:Case study of the scientific education at the National Taiwan Science Education Centre. |
指導教授: |
黃芳裕
Huang, Fang-Yu |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
化學系 Department of Chemistry |
論文出版年: | 2001 |
畢業學年度: | 89 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 162 |
中文關鍵詞: | 科學語言 |
英文關鍵詞: | scientific terms |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:193 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
近年來,為了因應社會快速進步的腳步,教育不斷呈現多元的面貌,除了學校正規教育,亦不可忽視社會教育所扮演非正規教育的角色。對於社會教育的功能,本研究針對與科學教育相關的國立台灣科學教育館,以質性研究方式,就提升全民科學素養所設定的科學研習活動,進行深入的分析及探討。就文獻分析,從柏拉圖等上古對知識的來源,從理性思維到知識是客觀可傳授,因而有結構主義等教育方式,將知識以整理現貨的方式來教授學生,之後維高斯基學派等後現代主義的介入,知識其實是和社會環境脫離不開的,學生對知識的建構是和教師、學習環境相互牽連的。本研究對結果分析發現:一、教師認為知識是循序漸進的,但不一定要知道某種程度後才有能力進入下一階段;二、講述概念時,科學語言不是常識,須加以引導;三、教師本身對教育的價值觀不同,課程設計的廣度及教學活動的表現就非常多樣性。研究建議:一、研習活動的場地,除了館方可做開放式的設計,也可加強與學校間的合作,使教育資源做最有效的利用;二、隨著館方社會教育功能的擴充,宜多儲備研習指導人員,並加強志工制度的推廣,讓活動更完備。
In the recent years, not only school teaching but also social education changes in many different ways. Moreover, meta-analysis of related researches revel that the acquirement of knowledge is greatly influenced by learning environment. This study therefore examined the practices of the scientific studying activities designed to promote nation-wide scientific education, exemplified by the current work of the scientific teachers at the National Taiwan Science Education Centre.
Major findings of this study are as follows:
1. Teachers thought that the acquirement of knowledge was progressive, but students didn’t have to accomplished the task step by step.
2. Scientific terms must be introduced and explained before hands.
3. Teaching program and activities varied according to teachers’ values.
丁庭宇(1988),Craib著,當代社會理論,桂冠出版社,台北市。
尹淑萍(2000),師資培育制度下科學實習教師實習個案研究。國立台灣師範大學化學研究所碩士論文。
朱元鴻等譯(1994),Best & Kellner著,後現代理論──批判的質疑,巨流出版社,台北市。
杜聲鋒(1997),皮亞傑及其思想。遠流出版公司,台北市。
李幼蒸(1987),結構主義。谷風出版社,新店市。
李淑珺譯(2000),McCurley, S. & Lynch, R.著,志工實務手冊。張老師文化事業股份有限公司,台北市。
邱花妹(1996)徐仁修的荒野傳奇。天下雜誌特刊,144-145。
林勝義主編(1997),社教機構營運問題與對策,國立台灣師範大學社會教育學系,台北市。
高宣揚(1990),結構主義。遠流出版公司,台北市。
翁寧娜主編(1987),Alfred Weber著,希臘哲學,金楓出版有限公司,台北市。
黃芳裕(1996),建構論在科學教育研究的典範類型與應用(二):當今科學哲學對建構論的評析。科教月刊,188,2-14。
陳秉璋(1988),社會學理論。三民書局股份有限公司,台北市。
張譽騰(1987),科學博物館教育活動之理論與實際。文史哲出版社,台北市。
葉淑儀譯(1999),Linda Lambert著,教育領導──建議論的觀點。桂冠出版社,台北市。
傅統先(1971),唯心哲學。三信出版社,台北市。
楊大春(1996),後結構主義。揚智文化,台北市。
楊龍立(1998),建構教學的研究。台北市立師範學院學報,29,21-37。
趙金祁、洪文東(1993),教育的語言──布魯納對教育的提示。科教月刊,162,5-13。
趙金祁、許榮富、黃芳裕(1995),建構論在科學教育研究的典範類型與應用(一):建構論的典範與評析。科教月刊,180,2-16。
熊偉編(1994),現象學與海德格,遠流出版事業股份有限公司,台北市。
蔣中柱(1998),博物館如何推廣科學教育──以國立台灣科學教育館為例。博物館與學校合作實務研討會,95-98。
蔡錚雲(1995)從現象學到後現代。唐山出版社,台北市。
蔡錚雲(2000)另類哲學:現代社會的後現代文化。台灣書店,台北市。
錢志純、黎惟東譯(1991),René Descartes著,方法導論.沉思錄,志文出版社,台北市。
賴雨陽譯(1990),Ian Bruce著,如何辦理志工訓練。內政部社會司,台北市。
Arthur, J. (1998) Communitarianism and its critics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Arthur, J. (2000) Schools and community:The Communitarian agenda in education. Falmer Press: London.
Bell, D. A. (1993) Communitarianism and its critics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Blumer, H.(1951) Collect Behavior. In Alfard Mclung Lee(ed.) New outline of the principles of sociology. pp.165-220. New York:Barness & Noble.
Bown, L. & Okedara, J. T.(1981) An introduction to the study of adult education: a multidisciplinary and cross-cultural approach for developing countries. New York:University Press Limitied, pp. 13-14.
Bruner, J.(1966)The growth of representational process in children. Paper presented at the 18th international congress of psychology. Mascoco.(Reprinted in Burner, J.(1972). beyond the information given, pp. 313-334), New York: Norton.
Daley, M.(1994) Communitarianism: A new public ethics. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Elkana, Y.(2000), Science, Philosophy of Science and Science Teaching. Science and Education . 9:463-485.
Etzioni, A.(1997) The new golden rule: community and morality in a democratic society. Now York: Basic Book.
Foucault, M.(1979) Discipline and punish. New York: Vintage.
Gardner, H. (1994) Teaching for understanding—within and across disciplines. Educational-Leadership,51(5):14-18.
Gardner, H. (1995) Reflections on multiple intelligences: Myths and messages. Phi-Delta-Kappan,77(3):200-203, 206-209.
Gardner, H. (1997)Multiple intelligences as a partner in school improvement. Educational-Leadership,55(1):20-21.
Glesne, C. & Peshkin, A.(1992) Becoming qualitative researchers: an introduction. New York: Longman.
Goetz, J. P. & LeCompte M. D.(1984) Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. Orlando: Academic Press.
Golby, M.(1997)Communitarianism and education. Curriculum Studies, 5(2),125-139.
Hart, C. & Mulhall, P. & Berry A. & Loughran, J. & Gunstone, R.(2000) What is the purpose of this experiment? Or can students learn something from doing experiments? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(7),655-675.
Husserl, E.(1983) Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy. Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Illich,I.(1970) Deschooling society. New York: Harper & Row.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983)Mental models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Jones, M. G., Rua, M. J. & Carter, G.(1998) Science teachers’ conceptual growth within Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development. Jourmal of research in science teaching, 35(9),967-985.
Kelly, G. A.(1955) The psychology of personal constructs. New York:Norton.
Kuhn, D.(1999) A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational Researcher, 28(2),16-26.
Kuhn, T. S.(1970) The structure of scientific revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Norman, D. A.(1983) Some observations on mental models. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens(Eds.), Mental models , Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
Packer, M. J. & Goicoechea, J.(2000) Sociocultural and constructivist theories of learning: Ontology, not just epistemology. Educational psychologist, 35(4), 227-241.
Parsons, T.(1971) The system of modern society. New Jersey: Pentice Hall.
Perry, W. G. Jr(1970)Forms of intellectual and ethics developments in college years:A scheme. New York:Holt, Rinehant and Wiston.
Peters, M. & Marshall, J. (Eds)(1989) Individualism and community-education and social policy in the postmodern condition. Falmer Press: London.
Phillips, D. C. (1995) The good, the bad, and the ugly: The many faces of constructivism. Educational Researcher, 24(7), 5-12.
Rowlands, S., Graham, T. & Berry, J. (1999) Can we speak of altermative frameworks and conceptual change in mechanics. Science and Education. 8,241-271.
Saunders, W. L.(1992) The constructivist perspective: Implications and teaching strategies for science. School Science and Mathematics:92(3), 136-141.
Schon, D. A. & Argyris, C.(1974) Theory in practice: increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jessey-Bass Publishers.
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J.(1998) Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications: California.
Tam, H.(1998)Communitarianism: A new agenda for politics and citizenship. London: Macmillan Press.
Von Glasersfeld, E.(1995) Radical constructivism:A way of knowing and learning. The Falmer Press, London.
Vygotsky, L. S.(1962) Thought and language.(E. Hanfmann & G. Vakar, Trans.)Cambridge, MA:MII Press.(Original work published 1934)
Vygotsky, L. S.(1978) Mind in society:The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.