本研究旨在探討資訊科技融入教學模式與學習動機對國中一年級學習者自我調整策略運用、動機傾向、及學習成效的影響。研究設計採因子設計之準實驗研究法，自變項包含資訊科技融入教學模式和學習動機，資訊科技融入教學模式依教學方式的不同分為探索式和引導式資訊科技融入教學模式兩種類型，學習動機依照動機傾向量表得分之平均數將學習者分為高、低學習動機兩組，受試學習分別於實驗教學前後接受測量。本研究以北部縣市國中一年級學生共102名研究樣本。
　　研究發現：一、學習動機、自我調整、動機傾向、及學習成效四者之間有著密不可分的關聯性；二、教學模式對自我調整、動機傾向、及學習成效影響差異不大；三、學習動機是影響自我調整、動機傾向、與學習成效之關鍵因素；四、探索式教學模式能有效提升深度認知策略、後設認知策略、及意志控制策略的運用；五、引導式教學模式使學習者提升環境控制策略的運用；六、探索式教學模式是有效提升學習者動機傾的方式；七、高學習動機之學習者在自我調整、動機傾向、及學習成效表現皆較佳。本研究結果與建議可供國中自然科學教學與未來相關研究參考。

The purposes of this study were to examine the correlations among information and communication technology, motivation, self-regulation, motivational orientation and performance; and to investigate the effect of information and communication technology and motivation on learner self-regulatory strategies, motivation orientation and performance. The methodology of this study was quasi-experimental design. The participants were 102 junior high school students in northern Taiwan and were randomly assigned to either the inquiry-based information and communication technology or mentoring-based information and communication technology model.
　　The results of this study were summarized as following: (a) Motivation, self-regulation, motivation orientation and performance were closely related; (b) the relationships of instructional model with and self-regulation, motivation orientation and performance were found to be insignificant; (c) motivation is a key factor of self-regulation, motivational orientation and performance; (d) the learners’ strategies in the group of inquiry-based information and communication technology were deeply improved by the control deeply cognitive learning , metacognition and volition; (e) the learner’s strategies in the group of mentoring-based information and communication technology were deeply improved by using of resource management strategies; (f) the learners’ intrinsic motivational orientation in the group of inquiry-based information and communications technology was deeply improved; and (g) Learners with a higher motivation were more likely to have higher level of self-regulation, intrinsic motivation and performance.
　　The suggestions were also given, based on the results of this study, for junior high school teachers teaching in science and further related studies.

王金國(2001)。成功學習的關鍵：自我調整學習。課程與教學，5(1)，145-164。
何榮桂(2002)。台灣資訊教育的現況與發展－兼論資訊科技融入教學。資訊與教育雜誌，87，22-48。
巫博瀚、賴英娟(2007)。人類動機的基礎－自我效能兼論自我效能對學習者自我調整學習行為與成就表現之影響。研習資訊，24(3)，49-56。
林文正(2002)。國小學生自我調整學習能力、對教師自我調整教學之知覺、動機信念與數學課業表現之相關研究。屏東師範學院教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文，未出版，屏東。
邱富宏、陳錦章(2002)。融入認知策略與工具的網路學習環境對學生學習影響之研究。科學教育學刊，10(3)，261-285。
桂慶中、劉炳輝(2002)。皮亞傑認知發展論探討自我調整學習歷程之建構與應用。中等教育，55(5)，112-122。
張春興(2002)。教育心理學-三化取向的理論與實際。台北：東華書局。
張春興(2003)。心理學原理。台北：東華書局。
張新仁(2002)。當代教學統整新趨勢: 建構多元而適配的整體學習環境。教育學刊，18，43-64。
教育部(1998)。國民教育階段九年一貫課程總綱綱要。台北：教育部。
教育部(2001)。中小學資訊教育總藍圖－總綱。教育部：作者。Retrieved November 11, 2005, from http://masterplan.educities.edu.tw/conference/total .shtml
程炳林(1995)。自我調整學習的模式驗證及其教學效果之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所博士論文，未出版，台北。
程炳林(2002)。多重目標導向、動機問題與調整策略之交互作用。師大學報：教育類，47(1)，39-58。
程炳林(2004)。動機、目標設定、行動控制、學習策略之關係：自我調整學習歷程模式之建構及驗證。師大學報:教育類，46(1)，67-92。
蔡執仲、段曉林(2005)。探究式實驗教學對國二學生理化學習動機之影響。科學教育學刊，13(3)，289-315。
賴英娟、巫博瀚(2007)。自我調整學習論在網路學習情境之應用。課程與教學，24(4)，27-34。
顏永進、何榮桂(2001)。資訊融入健康與體育領域教學。教師天地，112，71-77。
顏永進、何榮桂(2002)。資訊科技融入學習領域設計策略初探。Retrieved April 3, 2002, from http://www.ntnu.edu.tw/csd/kao/kao8/6issues/1-B.htm
Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., & Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational psychology: A cognitive view (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G.., Winters, F. I., Moos, D. C., & Greene, J. A. (2006). Using computers as metacognitive tools to foster students’ self-regulated learning. Cognition and Learning, 3, 97-104.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social fundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (1996). Ontological and epistemological terrains revisited. Journal of Behavior Therapy & Experimental Psychiatry, 27(4), 323-345.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology, 3(3), 265-299.
Bassi, M., Steca, P., Fave, A. D., & Caprara, G. V. (2007). Academic self-efficacy beliefs and quality of experience in learning. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 301-312.
Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3&4), 369-398.
Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 445-457.
Bottino, R. M. (2004). The evolution of ICT-based learning environments: Which perspectives for the school of the future? British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(5), 553-567.
Braten, I., Samuelstuen, M. S., & Stromso, H. I. (2004). Do students’ self-efficacy beliefs moderate the effects of performance goals on self-regulatory strategy use? Educational Psychology, 24(2), 231-247.
Brophy, J. (1987). Synthesis of research on strategies for motivating students to learn. Educational Leadership, 45(2), 40-48.
Chang, M. M. (2005). Applying self-regulated learning strategies in a web-based instruction-An investigation of motivation perception. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(3), 217-230.
Chen, C. S. (2002). Self-regulated learning strategies and achievement in an introduction to information systems course. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 20(1), 11-25.
Cheong, Y. F., Pajares, F., & Oberman, P. S. (2004). Motivation and academic help-seeking in high school computer science. Computer Science Education, 14(1), 3-19.
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathmatics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, Learning, and Instruction-Essays in honor of R. Glaser. Lawrence Earbaum Associates.
Davis, E. A. (2003). Prompting middle school science students for productive reflection: Generic and directed prompts. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(1), 91–142.
Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2001). The systematic design of instruction (Fifth edition). Addison-Wesley-Longman. New York, NY.
Dornyel, Z. (2000). Motivation in action: Towards a process-oriented conceptualization of student motivation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 519-538.
Dresel, M. & Haugwitz, M. (2006, April). Effectiveness of a computer based training approach to foster motivation and self-regulated learning during regular classroom instruction. Paper presented at the 87. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA) in San Francisco, USA.
Edelson, D., Gordin, D., and Pea, R. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8, 391-450.
Graham S, Harris K.R, MacArthur C, Schwartz S. Writing and writing instruction for students with learning disabilities: Review of a research program. Learning Disability Quarterly. 1991;14:89–114.
Hardre, P. L. (2005). Instructional design as a professional development tool-of-choice for graduate teaching assistants. Innovative Higher Education, 30(3), 163-175.
Harris, K. R., Graham, S., & Mason, L. H. (2003). Self-regulated strategy development in the classroom: Part of a balanced approach to writing instruction for students with disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 35, 1–16.
Hennessy, S., Wishart, J., Whitelock, D., Deaney, R., Brawn, R., Velle, L., et al. (2007). Pedagogical approaches for technology-integrated science teaching. Computers & Education, 48(1), 137-152.
Hodges, C. B. (2004). Designing toe motivate: Motivational techniques to incorporate in e-learning experiences. Journal of interactive online learning, 2(3), 1-7.
Hoffman, B., & Ritchie, D. (1997). Using multimedia to overcome the problems with problem based learning. Instructional Science, 25, 97-115.
Hurd, P. D. (2002). Modernizing science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 3-9.
Kelly, G. J., & Anderson, C. W. (2000). Learning with understanding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(8), 757-759.
Kitsantas, A., Zimmerman, B. J. (2006). Enhancing self-regulation of practice: The influence of graphing and self-evaluative standards. Metacognition and Learning, 3(1), 201-212.
Kumar, D. D., & Sherwood, R. D. (2007). Effect of a problem based simulation on the conceptual understanding of undergraduate science education students. Journal of Science Education the Technology, 16, 1-8.
Liu, M. (2005). The effect of a hypermedia learning environment on middle school students’ motivation, attitude, and science knowledge. Computers in The Schools, 22(3-4), 159-171.
Lyke, J. A., & Kelaher-Young, A. J. (2006). Cognition in context: Students’ perceptions of classroom goal structures and reported cognitive strategy use in the college classroom. Research in High Education, 47(4), 477-490.
Maier, P., & Warren, A. (2000). Integrating technology in learning and teaching: A practical guide for educators. London, Kogan Page Limited.
Maliaro, S. G., & Shambaugh, N. (2006). Stuent models of instructional design. Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 54(1), 83-106.
Malone, T. W., & Lepper, M. R. (1987). Making Learning Fun: A Taxonomy of Intrinsic Motivations for Learning. In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitute, Learning and Instruction: III. Conative and affective process analyses (pp. 223-253). Hilsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Martens, R. L., Gulikersw, J. & Bastiaensw, T. (2004). The impact of intrinsic motivation on e-learning in authentic computer tasks. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 20, 368–376.
McCaslin, M., & Hickey, D. T. (2001). Educational psychology, social constructivism, and educational practice: A case of emergent identity. Educational Psychologist, 36, 133 – 140.
McGregor, H. A., & Elliot, A. J. (2002). Achievement goals as predictors of achievement-relevant processes prior to task engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology. 94(2) 381-395
Miller, R. B., & Brickman, S. J. (2004). A model of future-oriented motivation and self-regulation. Educational Psychology Review, 16(1), 9-33.
Moersch, C. (1995). Levels of technology implementation (LoTi): A framework for measuring classroom technology use. Learning and Leading with Technology, 23(3), 40-42.
Moos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (in press). Exploring the fluctuation of motivation and use of self-regulatory processes during learning with hypermedia. Instructional Science.
Mousoulides, N., & Philippou, G. (2005, July). Students’ motivational beliefs, self-regulation strategies and mathematics achievement. In H. L. Chick & J. L. Vincent (Eds). Proceedings of the 29th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Melbourne.
Paris, S. G., & Byrnes, J. P. (2001). The Constructivist approach to self-regulation of learning in the classroom. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement, (2nd ed, pp. 169-200). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Peng, H., Wang, Y., & Hung, R. (2006). Moderating role of online self-efficacy in relation between learning strategy and online performance. Proceedings of The 14th International Computers in Education, IOS Press, 517-520.
Pintrich, P. R. & Garcia, T. (1991). Student goal orientation and self-regulation in the college classroom. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.). Advances in motivation and achievement : Goals and self-regulatory processes (Vol. 7, pp. 371-402). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 459-470.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000a). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 544-555.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000b). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385-407.
Pintrich, P. R., & DeGroot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.
Pintrich, P. R., & Garcia, T. (1991). Student goal orientation and self-regulation in the college classroom. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 7, pp. 371-402). Greenwich CT: JAI Press.
Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Rigby, C. S., Deci, E. L., Patrick, B. C., Ryan, R. M. (1992). Beyond the intrinsic-extrinsic dichotomy: Self-determination in motivation and learning. Motivation and Emotion, 16(3), 165-185.
Ryan, A. M. Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The role of motivation and attitudes in adolescent’s help seeking in math class. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 329-341.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
Scaife, J., & Wellington, J. ( 1993). Information Technology in Science and Technology Education. Open University Press, Buckingham.
Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111-139.
Schunk, D. H. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and writing: Influence of modeling, goal setting, and self-evaluation. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19, 159-172.
Schunk, D. H. (2004). Learning theories: An educational perspective (fourth edition). New Jersey : Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice. NY: The Guilford Press.
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.). (1994). Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (1999). Instructional design (Second edition). NY: Wiley.
Song, H. D., & Grabowski, B. (2006). Stimulating intrinsic motivation for problem solving using goal-oriented contexts and peer group composition. Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 54(5), 445-466.
Sutton, L. A. (2001). The principle of vicarious interaction in computer-mediated communications. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7(3), 223-242.
Tassoobshirazi, G., Zuiker, S. J., Ander, K. T., & Hickey, D. T. (2006). Enhancing inquiry, understanding, and achievement in an astronomy multimedia learning environment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(5), 383-395.
Tollefson, N. (2000). Classroom applications of cognitive theories of motivation. Education Psychology Review, 12(1), 63-83.
Toth, E. E., Suthers, D. D., & Lesgold, A. M. (2002). The effects of representational guidance and reflective assessment on scientific inquiry. Science Education, 86(2), 264–286.
Tuan, H. L., Chin, C. C., & Shieh, S. H. (2005). The development of a questionnaire to measure students' motivation towards science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 639-654.
Tuan, H. L., Chin, C. C., Tasi, C. C., & Cheng, S. F. (2005). Investigating the effectiveness of inquiry instruction on the motivation of different learning styles students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3, 541-566.
Vermetten, Y. J., Lodewijks, H. G., & Vermunt, J. D. (2001). The role of personality traits and goal orientations in strategy use. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 149-170.
Vollmeyer, R., & Rheinberg, F. (2000). Does motivation affect performance via persistence? Learning and Instruction, 10, 293–309.
Vollmeyer, R., & Rheinberg, F. (2006). Motivational effects on self-regulated learning with different tasks. Education Psychology Review, 18, 239-253.
von Glasersfeld, E. (1998). Cognition, construction of knowledge and teaching. In M. R. Matthews(Ed.) Constructivism in Science Education (11-30). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Wang, S. K., & Reeves, T. C. (2006). The effects of a Web-based learning environment on student motivation in a high school earth science course. Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 54(6), 597-621.
Williams, P. E., & Hellman, C. M. (2004). Differences in self-regulation for online learning between firt-and second-generation college students. Research in Higher Education, 45(1), 71-82.
Winne, P. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In B. J. Zimmerman and D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed, pp. 153-189). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Winters, F. I., & Azevedo, R. (2005). High-school students’ regulation of learning during computer-based science inquiry. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33(2), 189-217.
Wolters, C. A. (1998). Self-regulated learning and college students’ regulation of motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 224-235.
Xie, K., Debacker, T. K., & Ferguson, C. (2006). Extending the traditional classroom through online discussion: The role of student motivation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(1), 67-89.
Yi, M. Y., & Davis, F. D. (2003). Developing and validating an observational learning model of computer software training and skill acquisition. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 146-169.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (Eds.). (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2 nd ed). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation : A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts & P. R. Pintrich(eds.), Handbook of self-regulation(pp. 13-39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.