本研究旨在探討影響職業學校組織創新相關因素，並藉以瞭解職業學校組織成員對影響相關因素的看法，據此提出推動學校組織創新的參考。
為達到研究目的，首先探討有關文獻，作為研究的理論基礎；經信度（Cronbach’s α信度係數考驗）及效度（因素分析）檢驗，再經專家會議修正，編成正式問卷「學校組織創新因素及創新績效問卷」施測，以此蒐集資料，作為推論依據。
研究對象係台灣地區職業學校公私立職業學校組織成員，有效樣本共計有506份。蒐集所得資料採用次數分配、平均數、標準差等描述統計方法及t考驗、單因子變異數分析、雪費事後考驗、積差相關、多元逐步迴歸分析等推論統計方法。經過統計分析結果，獲得下列結論：
（一）在影響職業學校組織創新相關因素共有組織特性、領導風格、組織學習、團隊運作、創造能力、集權化程度、正式化程度、資源提供等八個構面因素。
（二）學校成員對影響相關因素看法
1、學校成員對於影響學校組織創新相關因素看法呈現高影響程度，
且在集權化程度、組織特性、團隊運作、組織學習、資源提供等五個構面認為影響程度較高，而創造能力、領導風格、正式化程度等三構面影響程度則偏低；2、成員性別、服務年資、教育背景、現任職務、任教科別、曾任行政工作年資、學校屬別、學校位置等不同背景組織成員對於影響相關因素看法一致；3、學校規模、學校歷史等組織變項對於影響相關因素有顯著差異
（三）學校成員對組織創新績效的看法
1、學校成員對於學校組織創新績效看法呈現高績效程度，且技術創新績效高於管理創新績效；2、成員性別、服務年資、教育背景、現任職務、任教科別、曾任行政工作年資、學校屬別、學校位置等不同背景教師對於學校組織創新績效看法一致；3、學校規模、學校歷史等組織變項對於學校組織創新績效看法有顯著差異
（四）學校組織創新因素與組織創新績效的關係
1、學校組織創新影響因素中之領導風格、創造能力、組織特性、團隊運作及組織學習構面與管理創新績效有高度相關，集權化程度及資源提供構面為中度相關，正式化程度構面為負相關；2、學校組織創新影響因素中之組織學習、領導風格、創造能力、組織特性及團隊運作構面與技術創新有高度相關，集權化程度及資源提供構面為中度相關，正式化程度構面為負相關；3、學校組織創新影響因素中之領導風格、創造能力、組織學習、組織特性及團隊運作與整體創新績效有高度相關，集權化程度及資源提供構面為中度相關，正式化程度構面為負相關；4、學校整體組織創新相關因素與學校整體組織創新績效為高度相關；5、學校組織創新相關因素中之領導風格、組織特性、創造能力、組織學習、團隊運作構面對學校組織創新績效具有預測力

This study consists of two major purposes: one is to explore the relevant factors that influence organization innovation in senior vocational high schools, and the other is to get familiarized with the comments provided by the members of the organization. On this basis, valuable reference for solid improvement in organization innovation will be provided.
To ensure the success of this study, all relative literature is researched in detail to lay the theoretical foundation required. After the reliability test(Cronbach’s α) and validity test(factor analysis), and the modification of the experts’ conference, a well-prepared questionnaire listing the relevant influential factors helps to collect all the information and to support the conclusions.
The respondents include the members in Taiwan’s both public and private senior vocational high schools. There were 506 copies of effective samples received. The information collected from the questionnaires was processed by means of descriptive statistics, including frequency distribution, means and standards, variations, and inferential statistics including t-test, one-way analysis of variance , Scheffe’s posterior comparisons, product-moment correlation, and stepwise multiple regression. The statistical conclusions are listed below:
1. Eight relevant significant factors that affect organization innovation in senior vocational high schools are organization characteristics, leadership style, organization learning, team process, creativity, centralization, formalization, and supplied resource.
2. Comments on the relevant influential factors presented by the members are:
(1)The members think the influential factors are very significant, in particular the centralization, organization characteristics, team process, organization learning, supplied resource are positive, and the creativity, leadership style, formalization are less positive. (2)Members of different backgrounds, including gender, working experience, educational background, present position, teaching subject, administrative experience, the type and location of schools, have a consensus of opinions on the relevant influential factors. (3)Members of organization variables including school scales, school history, etc think very differently about the influential factors.
3. Comments on effects of organization innovation presented by the members are:
(1)Members in schools regard the results of organization innovation as effectual. Furthermore, they regard the results of technique innovation as more effectual than those of management innovation. (2) Members of different backgrounds, including gender, working experience, educational background, present position, teaching subject, administrative experience, the type and location of schools, have a consensus of opinions on the effects of organization innovation. (3) Members of organization variables including school scales, school history, etc think very differently about the effects of the organization innovation.
4. The relationship between the factors and the effects of organization innovation:
(1)There is highly correlation between the effects of management innovation and the influential factors of organization innovation, including leadership style, creativity, organization characteristics, team process, and organization learning. In addition, to the effects of management innovation, centralization and supplied resource are middle correlated, and formalization is negative correlated. (2) There is highly correlation between the effects of technique innovation and the influential factors of organization innovation, including organization learning, leadership style, creativity, organization characteristics, and team process. Besides, to the effects of technique innovation, centralization and supplied resource are middle correlated, and formalization is negative correlated. (3) There is highly correlation between the whole effects of innovation and the influential factors of organization innovation, including leadership style, creativity, organization learning, organization characteristics, and team process. In addition, to the whole effects of innovation, centralization and supplied resource are middle correlated, and formalization is negative correlated. (4)There is highly correlation between the relevant factors and the effects of the whole organization innovation. (5)Five relevant factors in organization innovation, including leadership style, organization characteristics, creativity, organization learning, and team process are predictive to the effects of organization innovation.

一、中文部份
黃政傑（民89），技職教育的發展與前瞻。台北：師大書苑
王保進（民88），視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究。台北：心理出版社
張明輝（民88），學校教育與行政革新研究。台北：師大書苑
黃政傑（民87），翱翔於教改的天空。台北：漢文
秦夢群（民87），教育行政-理論部分。台北：五南
吳清山（民81），學校效能研究。台北：五南
姜占魁（民82），組織行為與行政管理。台北：于聰玲
陳鐵民（民80），領導行為心理分析。台北：博遠
邱皓政（民89），量化研究與統計分析。台北：五南
林清山（民82），心理與教育統計學。台北：東華
吳明隆（民89），SPSS統計應用實務。台北：松崗
河野豐弘著，彭德中譯（民79），改造企業文化。台北：遠流
司徒達賢（民88），非營利組織的經營管理。台北：天下文化
謝文全（民 84），比較教育行政。台北：五南
國立台灣師範大學教育研究中心（民84），開放與前瞻─新世紀中小學教育改革建議書。台北：國立台灣師範大學教育研究中心
尤克強（民90），知識管理與創新。台北：天下文化。
Peter Drucker著，王美音/楊子江譯（民84）：再創企業生機─彼得‧杜拉克談創新與創業。台北：卓越叢書
Rowan Gibson編著，張思忠/李滄哲譯（民88）：預思未來。台北：晨星
Gareth Morgan著，戴文年譯（民84）：組織意象。台北：五南
Richard L. Daft著，李再長譯（民88）：組織理論與管理。台北：華泰
Tom Peters著，顧淑馨譯（民89）：Tom Peters談創新。台北：商周
Quinn、Baruch、Zien著，洪明洲譯（民89）：知識管理與創新。台北：商周
Rosabeth Moss Kanter、John Kao著，蘇仲怡譯（民89）：創新高手談創新。台北：智庫文化
Robert G.Owens著，林明地、揚振昇、江芳盛譯（民89）：教育組織行為。台北：揚智文化
蔡啟通（民86）：組織因素、組織成員整體創造性與組織創新之關係。國立台灣大學商學研究所博士論文。未出版
林朝夫（民89）：縣市政府教育局組織文化與組織效能關析之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所博士學位論文。未出版
陳禹辰（民88）：創新負擔與新興科技的採用與實施：電子銀行的實徵研究。國立中央大學資訊管理學系博士學位論文。未出版
沈明權（民88）：個人特質、組織特性與組織創新之研究。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。未出版
劉碧琴（民87）：個人創越、企業文化對組織創新的影響。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。未出版
鍾振輝（民87）：企業文化、組織運作、製造策略與經營績效之關係研究。國立成功大學碩士論文。未出版
黃耀卿（民74）：國民中學組織結構與組織氣氛關係之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士學位論文。未出版
鄭淑惠（民88）：國民中學組織發展之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士學位論文。未出版
陳長士（民89）：高屏地區國民小學組織氣候與組織決策之研究。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士學位論文。未出版
張碧娟（民88）：國民中學校長教學領導、學校教學氣氛與教師教學校能關係之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士學位論文。未出版
邱貴發（民70）：國民小學組織氣氛之調查研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士學位論文。未出版
王令宜（民85）：教育創新的推廣與組織氣氛關係的研究—以淡江大學實施全面品質管理體系的個案為例。私立淡江大學教育資料科學研究所碩士學位論文。未出版
汪昭芬（民89）：組織學習、知識創造、知識蘊蓄與創新績效之關聯性研究: 科技製造業、一般製造業及服務業之實證。未出版
簡文娟（民88）：「組織創新氣候」評鑑量表之建立－以高科技產業為實證研究對象。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士學位論文。未出版
林佳慧（民89）：組織內部創新氣氛與知識管理機制關係之探討。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士學位論文。未出版
賴明凱（民88）：資訊電子產業研究發展創新相關因素之探討。
邱皓政（民88）：組織環境與創意行為：組織創新量表的發展與創新指標的建立（從科技產業到政府機構）。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計劃。未出版
黃盈彰（民89）：國小教師的工作特質、學校組織氣候、控制信念與成就動機對工作滿意度影響之研究。國立台東師範學院教育研究所碩士學位論文。未出版
張正霖（民86）：國民小學全面品質教育、學校組織氣氛與學校效能之研究：以台北地區為例。台北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士學位論文。未出版
林鈺欽（民86）：個人創越、組織氣氛與學習性組織關係之研究。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士學位論文。未出版
羅潔伶（民85）：影響企業薪酬之因素探討。國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士學位論文。未出版
張瑞村（民80）：高級職業學校校長領導型態與學校組織氣氛關係之研究。國立彰化師範大學工業教育研究所碩士學位論文。未出版
林新發（民79）：我國工業專科學校校長領導行為組織氣氛與組織績效關係之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士學位論文。未出版
王炎燐（民82）：台灣區高工職校組織溝通方式與組織氣氛相關之研究。國立台灣師範大學工業教育研究所碩士學位論文。未出版
黃仁祈（民91）：企業文化、組織學習、組織創新與企業核心能力間之關
係研究。國立成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班碩士學位論文。未出版
蔡仁隆（民91）：國民小學教師認知知識經濟時代與教學創新之研究。臺中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士學位論文。未出版
劉嘉雄（民91）：影響企業創新績效之組織因素研究-以台灣地區製造業為例。靜宜大學企業管理學系碩士學位論文。未出版
謝幸達（民90）：組織衰退、寬鬆資源與組織創新之研究。: 國立中正大學企業管理研究所碩士學位論文。未出版
蔡如菱（民90）：企業內部創新發想過程及影響因素之探討。國立中正大學企業管理研究所碩士學位論文。未出版
周翠萍（民90）：影響組織創新的前置因素之研究。逢甲大學企業管理所碩士學位論文。未出版
鄭波 （民90）：組識創新的影響因素探討：以電子公司研發部門為例。銘傳大學管理科學研究所碩士在職專班碩士學位論文。未出版

二、英文部份
Amabile, T.M.(1988). A model of creativity and innovation in
organization in B.M. Staw. & L.L. Cummings(Eds.), Research in
Organizational Behavior, 10, 123-167.
Anderson,N.,Hardy,G.,West,M.(1992). Management team innovation.
Management Decision.30(2).
Andrew W. Halpin ＆ Don B. Croft(1962).The Organizational Climate of Schools, Chicago Midwest Adminstration Center, The University of Chicago
Baldridge, J.V. & Burnham, R.A. (1975). Organizational innovation:
Individual, organizational, and environmental impacts.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 165-176.
Burgess,G.H.(1989). Industrial organization. Englewood Cliffs,
N.J.:Prentice-Hall.
Burns,T.＆Stalker,G.M.(1962). The Management of Innovation.
London: Tavistock.
Daft,R.L.(1978). A dual-core model of organizational innovation.
Acaremy of Management Journal,21(2),193-210.
Daft,R.L.(1989). Organization theory and design. St. Paul: West.
Damanpour,F.(1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of
effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management
Journal,34(3),555-590.
Damanpour, F., & Evan, W.M. (1984). Organizational innovation and
performance: The problem of organizational lag. Administrative
Science Quarterly, 29, 392-409.Y
Dougherty,D.＆Bowman,E.H.(1995). The effects of organizational
Downsizing of product innovation. California Management Review, 37(4),28-44.
Drucker,P.F.(1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles. London: Heinemann.
Duncan,R.B.(1976). The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual
Structurals for innovation.In R.H.Kilmann,L.R.Pondy,＆
D.P.Slevin (Eds.),The management of organization: strategy and implementation, vol.1,167-188.New York: North-Holland.
Guilford, J.P.（1950）.Creativity. American Psychologist, 5 444-454
Guison , R.M.(1973). A note on organization climate. Organizational
Behavior and Human Performance, 9,120-125.
Hage,J.(1980). Theories of organizations. New York: Wiley.
Halpin. A.W., (1966). The organizational climate of schools theory and research in administration. New York: The Macmillan Company.
Hoy,W.R＆Miskel,C.G(1987). ”Mintzberg’s structural framework” In
educational administration：Theory research and practice.
Hull,F.,＆Hage,J.(1982). Organizing for innovation: Beyond burns
And stalker’s organic type.Sociology,16,564-577.
J.M.Ivanceivich, A.D.Szilaayi Jr. & M. J. Wallace, Jr., Organization Behavior and Performance, California: Goodyear Publishing Company, Inc. 1977, p. 325.
Johannessen,J.A.＆Dolva,J.O.(1994) Competence and innovation: Identifying critical innovation factors .Entrepreneurship,
Innovation,And Change,3(3),209=222
J. P. Campbell, M. D. Dunnett, E. E. Lawler, & K. E. Weick（1970）. Managerial Behavior, performance,and Effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
K. A. Lewin(1935).Dynamic Theory of Personality, New York: McGraw-Hill
Kao,John J.(1991). Managing creativity.Englewood.Cliff：N.JJ.：
Prentice-Hall.
Kimberly,J.R.(1986). The organizational context of technological
Innovation.In D.D.Davis(Ed.),Managing technological innovation ,23-43.San Francisco: Jossy-Bass.
Kimberly,J.R.,＆Evanisko,M.(1981). Organizational innovation:
The influence of individual, organization, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Academy of Management Journal,24,689-713.
Kottkamp,P.B.,Mulhem,J.A.,Hoy,W.K.,（1987）Secondary school climate： A revised of the OCDQ. Educational Administration Quartely.23（3）. Larson, Carl E.＆Lafasto, Frank M.J.（1989）.Teamwork：What must go right/What can go wrong.CA：Sage Publications,Inc.,26.
McGourty,J.,Tarshis,L.A.,Dominick,P.（1996）Managing innovation：
Lessons from world class organizations. International Journal of Technology Management.11(3/4).
Neumann, Y.,R. & Saad, I.A., (1988). Organizational climate and work
satisfaction: The case of Beduin elementary school in Israel. The Journal of Educational Administration 26(1), 82-96.
Owen, R.G. (1970). Organizational behavior in education englewood
cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
R.D.Pritchard & B.W.Karasick(1973), The Effect of Organizational Climate
on Managerial Job Performance and Job Satisfaction.
Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 1973, 9, p.126.
R. Likert(1967). The Human Organization: Its Management and Value, New York: McGraw-Hill
Robbins,S.P.(1996) Organizational Behavior: Concepts, Controversies and Applications. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.:Prentice-Hall.
Russel,R.D.(1995). An investigation of some organizational correlates of corporate entrepreneurship: Toward a systems model of Organizational innovation.
Schein,E.H.（1996）.Three cultures of management：The key to
organizational learning. Sloan Management Review.38（1）
Scott,S.G.＆Bruce,R.A.(1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy
of Management Journal,37(3),580-607.
Sisk, H.L.(1969), Principles of management: A systems approach to the management process, Cincinnati: South-western Pub. Co.Smith
Silver,P.F.（1983）.Educational administration：Perspectives on
practice and research. Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Change,4(4),295-314.
Stern, G. G.,＆ Steinhoff,C.R.（1963）.Characteristics of intellectual climate in college environments. Harvard Education Review,31（Winter 1963）,5-41.
Sternberg, R.J. & Lubart, T.I. (1996). Investing in creativity.
American Psychologist, 51(7), 677-688.
Tagiuri, R. （1968）. Orgnizational climate : explotion of a concept.
Cambridge : Harvard University.
Tang,H.（1999）.An inventory of organizational innovativeness.
Technovation.19（1）.
Van Gundy, A,（1987）Organizational creativity and innovation ,In S,G, Isaksen（Ed.）,Frontiers of creativity reaearch：Beyond the basics, Buffalo, NY：Bearly Limited .
Weick,K.E.（1976）.Educational organizations as loosely coupled
system. Administrative sciences quarterly.21（1）.
William A.C (1976)., Working together: Communication in a Healthy
Organization. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E.Merrill.
Willower, D. J., Eidell, T. L. & Hoy, W. K. (1967). The school and pupil control ideology. Pennsylvania State University.
Woodman, R.W. Sawyer, J.E. & Griffin, R.W.(1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management review, 18(2),293-321.