本論文結合宏觀與微觀視角，由外與由內雙向切入觀察台灣戰後之初（1945.8-1947）的社會現象，尤重民生經濟的演變。宏觀層面提出預示性的「前置條件」概念，微觀層面運用「小歷史」方法。 「前置條件」關注歷史的連續性，凸顯焦點時空的所以然取決於外在於該時空的先行時代背景；「小歷史」方法實作主要藉由戰後之初在台外國人的經驗紀錄來情境化那個時空當中具體細微的歷史事實和過程。 本研究第二章嘗試宏觀掌握制約戰後福爾摩沙地緣政治位置與內部社政經條件的歷史脈絡，包括例如二〇 年代中期到 1947 年的中國內政、援蔣關説集團在美國的運作、麥卡錫主義的影響、「美國版世界和平」構想與「共產巨擘」神話的對峙等。這些重層脈絡的交織，清楚預示了戰後福爾摩沙的權力關係結構及由此而來的政經趨勢及後果。 第三至第八章依外人的背景、來台動機分類，他們大多現場參與或見證戰後之初福爾摩沙的社會過程。筆者逐章介紹這些個人和組織的背景、在台扮演的角色及分別帶來的影響以外，尤其關注他們留下的文字記錄——包括陳述、所持立場及詮釋框架，此外另一個用意是紀念這些在福爾摩沙（人）最孤立的時刻同理其遭遇的外來友人，因為除了被國民黨當局污名化的葛超智以外，台灣戰後史幾乎無視他們的存在。 本論文借重戰後長期被圍堵或忽略的另類資料——戰後之初在台外國人筆下的動態小歷史——來評量黨國版台灣史之「製造性」。分析架構以世界史和小歷史為座標，首先將台灣史置回世界史地平線，揭示中、美兩國各別的內政以及美中蘇三向地緣政治如何影響台灣戰後史，畢竟真正關注台灣史的人都多少知覺，關乎台灣及其人民福祉的重大決定通常不由她（們）自決、而是任遠端的強權行動體定案。

This thesis approaches early postwar Formosa history (1945.8-1947) from without as well as within. It combines macro and micro perspectives, formulating for the former the concept of “constitutive preconditions” and for the latter utilizing the microhistory method. “Constitutive preconditions” in practice are concerned with the relationship between structural conditions of a given society and its potentialities. Microhistory engages in structural and symbolic analyses by way of experiential small histories, which situate facts and processes in context. Chapter 2 aims to illuminate the preconditions that dictate postwar Formosa’s structure of power relations and its attendant politico-economic consequences. These conditions include, for instance, Chinese politics from mid-1920s through 1947, Chiang’s Lobby in American politics, McCarthyism, the perceived battle between Pax Americana and the Communist Monolith, etc.. Chapters 3-8 organize outsiders to early postwar Formosa by personal or organizational background and motive. Most of these individuals and organizations were on-the-spot observers of or participants in the political, social, and economic processes. These chapters note the roles they play, their impact, and in particular their written records in terms not only of experiences and observation described, but also perspectives involved, and analyses arrived at. This part of the thesis is done in their memory, since Taiwan’s postwar history hardly ever registers their existence except for the case of George Kerr’s notoriety as a result of ostracization by KMT officialdom. Regarding research method, this thesis situates Taiwan in the field of world history, unveiling how Chinese and American domestic politics, respectively, as well as the US-China-Russia relations come to bear on Formosa’s postwar history. After all, for all who has ever been concerned with Taiwan history, it is well understood that the most crucial decisions related to the island and her peoples’ well-being are generally dealt remotely by powers and actors unjustly beyond her control. Meanwhile, this writing foregrounds the “small histories” materialized by outsiders to early postwar Formosa as illuminating bases to access some factual fragments from that particular time-space, as well as to assess the “manufactured” nature of KMT sanctioned history.

Shackleton, Allan J., 1948, “Formosa Calling” typed manuscript, Taipei 228 Museum collection.
United States Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, 1950, State Department Employee Loyalty Investigation Part 2 Appendix, Eighty-First Congress, Second Session, Hearing held March 8-June 28, 1950 pursuant to Senate Resolution 231. https://archive.org/details/statedepartmente195002unit/page/1960/mode/2up, accessed 2024.6.23.
United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary, 1952, Institute of Pacific Relations, Report of the Committee on the Judiciary, Eighty-Second Congress, Second Session, Hearing held July 25, 1951-June 20, 1952 by the Internal Security Subcommittee. https://archive.org/details/instituteofpacif1952unit/page/n3/mode/2up, accessed 2024.6.23.
The China Weekly Review《密勒氏評論報》（1945.10-1949）
Life
New York Times
Time
The Washington Post
《大公報》
《台灣省統計要覽》
《台灣評論》
《台灣統計通訊》
《台灣銀行季刊》
《政經報》
《善後救濟總署台灣分署月報》
《新台灣》
Fleming, Nancy Hsu 著，蔡丁貴譯，2009，《狗去豬來：二二八前夕美國情報檔案》。台北：前衛。
Jarman, Robert L. ed. 1997, Taiwan Political and Economic Reports 1861-1960. Vol. 8. Slough, UK: Archive Editions.
United States Department of State, 2020, The Far East (Foreign Relations of the United States Diplomatic Papers, 1941, Volume IV), Office of the Historian, Bureau of Public Affairs. Ebook, https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1941v04, accessed 2024.6.22.
United States Department of State, 1957, Foreign Relations of the United States: Diplomatic Papers, 1943, China, eds. G Bernard Noble and E. R. Perkins, Washington: Government Printing Office. https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1943China [accessed 2022.10.7]
United States Department of State, 1969, Foreign Relations of the United States: Diplomatic Papers, 1945, Volume VII, The Far East, China, eds. Ralph R. Goodwin, Herbert A. Fine, Velma H. Cassidy and Francis C. Prescott, Washington: Government Printing Office. https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1945v07 [accessed 2022.10.8]
United States Department of State, 1972, Foreign Relations of the United States, 1947, Volume VII, The Far East: China, eds. Ralph E. Goodwin, Herbert A. Fine, John G. Reid and Francis C. Prescott, Washington: Government Printing Office, Documents 328-377. https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1947v07 [accessed 2022.10.7]
United States Department of State, 1949, United States Relations with China: With Special Reference to the Period 1944-1949, U.S. Government Printing Office. https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/_/0a3PAAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0, accessed 2023.6.30.
高雄史料集成編輯委員會編、王興安等譯，2018，《解密——國際檔案的二二八事件：海外檔案選譯》。新北：遠足、高雄市立歷史博物館、國史館台灣文獻館。
陳怡宏編、台南市水交社文化學會編譯，2017，《美國國家檔案館藏台灣資料選譯（1942-1960）》。台南：台灣史博館。
黃富三、翁佳音、Mrs. Farrington主編，1998，Taiwan Archives in the British Public Record Office. Vol. IV-V. 台北：中研院籌備處。
蘇瑤崇編，2000，《葛超智先生相關書信集（上、下）》Correspondence by and about George H. Kerr (I-II). 台北：台北市228紀念館。
蘇瑤崇編，2000，《葛超智先生文集》Collected Papers by George H. Kerr. 台北：台北市228紀念館。
蘇瑤崇編，2004，鈴木茂夫資料提供，《最後的台灣總督府：1944-1946年終戰資料集》。台中：晨星。
蘇瑤崇編，2006，《聯合國善後救濟總署在台活動資料集》。 台北：台北二二八紀念館。
蘇瑤崇編，2007，《台灣終戰事務處理資料集》。台北：台灣古籍。
Barrett, David D., 1970, Dixie Mission: the United States Army Observer Group in Yenan, 1944. Berkeley: University of California.
Davies, John Paton Jr., 2012, China Hand: An Autobiography. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Davies, John Paton Jr., 1972, Dragon by the Tail: American, British, Japanese, and Russian Encounters with China and One Another. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
Hart, John N., 1985, The Making of an Army “Old China Hand”: A Memoir of Colonel David D. Barrett. Berkeley: University of California.
Powell, John B., 1945, My Twenty-Five Years in China. New York: MacMillan. https://books.google.com/books/about/My_Twenty_Five_Years_In_China.html?id=l0FwCwAAQBAJ, accessed 2023.1.23.
Service, Grace, 1989, Golden Inches: the China Memoir of Grace Service. Berkeley: UC Press. https://publishing.cdlib.org/ucpressebooks/view?docId=ft3k4005b9;query=;brand=ucpress, accessed 2023.11.04.
Shackleton, Allan J. （著）、宋亞伯（譯述），1999，《福爾摩沙的呼喚：一位紐西蘭人在台灣二二八事件的親身經歷》。台北：望春風。https://sites.google.com/view/1-formosa-calling/home，下載日期2023.7.23。
Shackleton, Allan J., 2017, Formosa Calling: An Eyewitness Account of the February 28th, 1947 Incident. UK: Camphor Press.
王思翔、周夢江，1995，《台灣舊事》。台北：時報。
杜祖健編，蔡岳熹譯，2022，《島國知音——台灣問題專家葛超智其人其事》。台北：前衛。
吳國楨（著）、吳修垣（中文初譯）、馬軍（校訂註釋），2009，《夜來臨》。香港中文大學。
汪彝定，1991，《走過關鍵年代：汪彝定回憶錄》。台北：商周。
和為貴 Hildur Hermanson（撰）、卓邦宏、陳景松（譯），1985，〈用我一生〉，收於《寧願燒盡：台灣基督長老教會馬偕紀念醫院創設 105 週年紀念冊》，頁285-293。 http://www.laijohn.com/archives/pm/Hermanson,H/life/C.htm，下載日期2024.3.21。
塩見俊二著，日本文教基金會編譯，2001，《秘錄-終戰前後的台灣》。台北：文英堂。
潘稀祺，2019，〈警察護士——和為貴姑娘〉，《路加》（台中）368: 19-22。
諫山春樹等，日本文教基金會編譯，2002，《秘話 - 台灣軍與大東亞戰爭》。台北：文英堂。
蕭乾，1990，《人生採訪》。台北：聯經。
Barth, Alan, 1955, Government by Investigation. New York: The Viking Press.
Borg, Dorothy and Waldo Heinrichs eds., 1980, Uncertain Years: Chinese American Relations, 1947-1950. New York: Columbia University Press.
Chen, Lung-chu and Harold Lasswell, 1967, Formosa, China, and the United Nations: Formosa in the World Community. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Cohen, Warren ed., 1983, New Frontiers in American-East Asian Relations: Essays Presented to Dorothy Borg. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
Esherick, Joseph W. ed., 1974, Lost Chance in China: The World War II Despatches of John S. Service. New York: Random House.
Feis, Herbert, 1972, The China Tangle: The American Effort in China from Pearl Harbor to the Marshall Mission. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
Ginsburg, Norton S., 1953, Economic Resources and Development of Formosa. New York: IPR.
Grajdanzev, Andrew J., 1942, Formosa Today. New York: Institute of Pacific Relations.
Herzstein, Robert E., 2005, Henry R. Luce, Time, and the American Crusade in Asia. Cambridge Univ. Press.
Hoffman, Joyce, 1995, Theodore H. White: And Journalism as Illusion. Columbia, MO: Univ. of Missouri Press.
Johnson, Chalmers A., 1962, Peasant Nationalism and Communist Power: The Emergence of Revolutionary China 1937-1945. Stanford University Press.
Kahn, E. J. Jr., 1976, The China Hands: America’s Foreign Service Officers and What Befell Them. New York: Penguin Books.
Kerr, George H., 1974, Formosa: Licensed Revolution and the Home Rule Movement 1895-1945. Honolulu: The University Press of Hawaii.
Kerr, George H., 2018 , Formosa Betrayed. UK: Camphor Press.
Koen, Ross Y., 1974, The China Lobby in American Politics. New York: Octagon Books.
Latourette, Kenneth Scott, 1952, The American Record in the Far East: 1945-1951. New York: MacMillan.
Lattimore, Owen; compiled by Fujiko Isono, 1990, China Memoirs: Chiang Kai-shek and the War Against Japan. University of Tokyo Press.
Lauren, Paul Gordon ed., 1987, The China Hands’ Legacy: Ethics and Diplomacy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Liao, Joshua, 1950, Formosa Speaks. Hong Kong: The Formosan League for Re-emancipation.
Lin, Hsiao-ting 林孝庭, 2016, Accidental State: Chiang Kai-shek, the United States, and the Making of Taiwan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lin, Tsung-yi ed., 1998, An Introduction to 2-28 Tragedy in Taiwan: For World Citizens. Taipei: Taiwan Renaissance Foundation Press.
Mancall, Mark ed., 1964, Formosa Today. New York: Praeger.
Newman, Robert P., 1992, Owen Lattimore and the “Loss” of China. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
Olmsted, Kathryn S., 2022, The Newspaper Axis: Six Press Barons Who Enabled Hitler. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
Rand, Peter, 1995, China Hands: the Adventures and Ordeals of the American Journalists Who Joined Forces with the Great Chinese Revolution. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Riggs, Fred W., 1952, Formosa Under the Chinese Nationalists. New York: MacMillan.
Schaller, Michael, 1982, The U. S. Crusade in China, 1938-1945. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
Schubert, Gunter and Jens Damm, eds., 2011, Taiwanese Identity in the Twenty-first Century: Domestic, Regional and Global Perspectives. New York.
Service, John S., 1971, The Amerasia Papers: Some Problems in the History of US-China Relations. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
Thomas, John N., 1974, The Institute of Pacific Relations: Asian Scholars and American Politics. Seattle, WA: Univ. of Washington Press.
Tuchman, Barbara W., 1971, Stilwell and the American Experience in China, 1911-45. New York: Macmillan.
White, Theodore H. and Annalee Jacoby, 1946, New York: William Sloane; 1980, Da Capo Press.
吳聰敏，2023，《台灣經濟四百年》。台北：春山。
李東華、楊宗霖編，2007，《羅宗洛校長與臺大相關史料集》。台北：台大出版社。
陳翠蓮，2017，《重構二二八： 戰後美中體制、中國統治模式與台灣》。新北：衛城。
陳翠蓮，2023，《重探戰後台灣政治史：美國、國民黨政府與台灣社會的三方角力》。台北：春山。
張炎憲等，2006，《二二八事件責任歸屬研究報告》。台北：二二八事件紀念基金會。
黃彰健，2007，《二二八事件真相考證稿》。台北：中研院、聯經。
鮑霁，1988，《蕭乾研究資料》。北京：北京十月文藝。
Bush, Richard 卜睿哲, 2007, “The Role of George Kerr, Author of Formosa Betrayed.” Taiwan’s 228 Incident: The Political Implications of February 28, 1947, pp. 12-20. Washington, D. C.: The Brookings Institution.
Cohen, Warren I., 1975, “Who’s Afraid of Alfred Kohlberg?” Reviews in American History 3(1): 118-123.
Hamilton, John Maxwell, 1986, “The Missouri News Monopoly and American Altruism in China: Thomas F. F. Millard, J. B. Powell and Edgar Snow.” Pacific Historical Review 55: 27-48.
Herzstein, Robert E., 2006, “Alfred Kohlberg, Global Entrepreneur and Hyper-Nationalist.” https://web.archive.org/web/20060825141414/http://www.bu.edu/historic/06conf_papers/Herzstein.pdf, accessed 2023.11.15
Horae, Michael R. 郝任德，1998，〈紅毛城與二二八—英國外交部對於台灣1947的態度〉，二二八事件五十週年國際學術研討會論文，1997.2.20-22，國家圖書館國際會議廳。收於張炎憲、陳美蓉、楊雅慧編，《二二八事件研究論文集》，頁275-290。台北：吳三連台灣史料基金會。
Horae, Michael R., 2004, “British Government Policy and Taiwan 1945-1972.” Inaugural European Association of Taiwan Studies Conference, SOAS 17-18th April. Access unknown.
Jenkins, A. P., 2001, “G. H. Kerr’s Okinawa: The History of an Island People and Beyond.” The Ryukyuanist 52: 3-12.
Kirby, William C., 1990, “Continuity and Change in Modern China: Economic Planning on the Mainland and on Taiwan, 1943-1958.” The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs 24: 121-141.
Liao, Cynthia, 2008, “The February 28 Incident: American Responses to the February 28 Incident in Taiwan.” Stanford Journal of East Asian Affairs 8(1): 56-66.
Newman, Robert P., 1983, “Clandestine Chinese Nationalist Efforts to Punish Their American Detractors.” Diplomatic History 7(3): 205-222.
Powell, John W., 1980, “Japan’s Germ Warfare: the U.S. Cover-up of a War Crime.” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars 12(4): 2-17. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/14672715.1980.10405225, accessed 2023.1.18.
Schaller, Michael, 1976, “Air Strategy in China, 1939-1941: The Origins of Clandestine Air Warfare.” American Quarterly 28(1): 3-19.
Trivellato, Francesca, 2011, “Is There a Future for Italian Microhistory in the Age of Global History?” California Italian Studies 2(1). https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0z94n9hq, accessed 2024.7.3.
Tuchman, Barbara, 1973, “Why Policy-Makers Do Not Listen.” Foreign Service Journal 50(3): 18-21. https://afsa.org/foreign-service-journal-march-1973, accessed 2023.11.20.
吉原ゆかりYoshihara Yukari, 2021, “Postwar American Studies in Asia and Its Pre-history: George Kerr and Taiwan as American Frontier.” American Quarterly 73(2): 349-354.
吉原ゆかり， 2016，〈1930年代～1950年代のジョージ・H・カーと環太平洋文化交涉の地政學〉，《文藝・言語研究》70(70): 41-65。
李筱峰，1996，〈從民報社論看戰後初期的台灣政經社會〉，《台灣史料研究》（台北）8: 98-112。
吳密察，1993，〈台灣人的夢與二二八事件〉，《當代》（台北）87: 30-49。
吳聰敏，1997，〈1945-1949年國民政府對台灣的經濟政策〉，《經濟論文叢刊》（台北）25(4): 521-554。
吳聰敏，2006，〈台灣戰後的惡性物價膨脹（1945-1950）〉，《國史館學術集刊》（台北）10: 129-159。
杜正宇，2017，〈海外典藏之台灣相關檔案略論：以美國、澳洲、聯合國為例〉，《台灣史研究》（台北）24(2): 235-264。
杜正宇，2017，〈西方資料所見的二二八事件：以美國檔案為中心〉，收於許雪姬編，《七十年後的回顧：紀念二二八事件七十週年學術論文集》，台北：中研院台史所。
陳翠蓮，1996，〈三民主義青年團與戰後台灣〉，《法政學報》（新北）6: 71-88。
黃富三，2008，〈二二八事件的台灣：英國人之「如是我見」〉，收於許雪姬編，《二二八事件60週年紀念論文集》，頁395-421。台北：北市文化局、台北二二八紀念館。
黃富三，2002，〈葛超智與台灣主體意識的發展〉，收於胡建國編，《20世紀台灣歷史與人物：第六屆中華民國史專題論文集》。台北：國史館。
鈴木源吾，1972，〈台湾人における終戦処理（戦後財政史）〉，《ファイナンス》8(3): 60-73。
葉亭葶，2017，〈1945年「謀議台獨案」再探：兼論政權轉換初期台灣人的選擇、對應與困境〉，收於許文堂編，《軍事佔領下的台灣（1945-1952）》，頁103-172。台北：台灣教授協會。
網珊（鈴木源吾），1947，〈台灣工業之特徵〉，《台灣銀行季刊》（台北）創刊號。
鄭梓，1991，〈戰後台灣行政體系的接收與重建：以行政長官公署為中心之分析〉，《思與言》（台北）29(4): 217-260。
鄭梓，1997，〈二二八悲劇之序曲—戰後報告文學中的台灣光復記〉，《台灣史料研究》（台北）9: 48-81。
魏良才，2002，〈國民黨最後的美國諍友—魏德邁將軍與中美關係〉，《歐美研究》（台北）32(2): 341-386。
蘇瑤崇，2004，〈葛超智（George H. Kerr）、託管論與二二八事件之關係〉，《國史館學術集刊》（台北）4: 135-188。
蘇瑤崇，2006，〈脫殖民地乎--UNRRA 資料所見的台灣戰後善後重建問題〉，收於《 聯合國善後救濟總署在台活動資料集》，頁 9 -33 。台北：台北228紀念館。
蘇瑤崇，2007，〈論台灣省行政長官公署「軍事佔領體制」及其問題〉，《台灣文獻》（南投）60(2): 1-43。
蘇瑤崇，2007，〈「終戰」到「光復」期間台灣政治與社會變化〉，《國史館學術集刊》（台北）13: 45-87。
蘇瑤崇，2008，〈二二八事件中的媒體宣傳戰〉，《台灣文獻》（南投）59(4): 353-400。
蘇瑤崇，2008，〈二二八事件相關英日文資料介紹與問題研究〉，收於許雪姬編，《二二八事件60週年紀念論文集》，頁89-127。台北：北市文化局、台北二二八紀念館。
蘇瑤崇，2011，〈沖繩縣公文書館藏葛超智（George H. Kerr）台灣相關資料與其生平〉，《台灣史研究》（台北）18(3): 229-256。
蘇瑤崇，2014，〈謊言建構下二二八事件鎮壓之正當性：從「大溪中學女教員案」論起〉，《台灣史研究》（台北）21(3): 109-136。
蘇瑤崇，2014，〈戰後台灣米荒問題新探（1945-1946）〉，《中研院近史所集刊》（台北）86: 95-134。
蘇瑤崇，2016，〈論戰後（1945-1947）中美共同軍事佔領台灣的事實與問題〉，《台灣史研究》（台北）23(3): 85-124。
蘇瑤崇，2017，〈國際法視野下的二二八事件〉，收於許雪姬編，《七十年後的回顧：紀念二二八事件七十週年學術論文集》。台北：中研院台史所。
蘇瑤崇，2017，〈新史料新觀點下的二二八事件研究──以「軍事鎮壓」為例〉，《 高雄文獻》（高雄）7(3): 98 -125 。
蘇瑤崇，2021，〈論二戰期間美軍佔領台灣政策研究之變化（1941-1945）〉，《國史館館刊》（台北）67: 91-126。
蘇瑤崇，2024，〈歷史的「虛構」與「錯誤記憶」——論二二八事件的高雄「學生軍」與「雄中自衛隊」〉，《國史館館刊》（台北）79: 49-96。
Giovanetti, Amy, 2007, “Image-making in U.S.-China Relations: Images of Chiang Kai-shek in American Newsmagazines.” Doctoral Dissertation, Dept of History, St. John’s University.
Guptil, Marilla Bliss, 1995, “The United States and Foreign Relief: UNRRA in China, 1942-1947.” Doctoral Dissertation, Dept. of History, University of Virginia.
Haygood, Daniel Marshall, 2004, “Uncovering Henry Luce’s Agenda for China: A Comparative Analysis of Time, Incorporated and Other Media Coverage of Madame Chiang-Kai-shek’s Trips to America (1943-1948).” Doctoral Dissertation, School of Journalism and Mass Communication, Univ. of North Carolina Chapel Hill.
Lan, Shi-Chi 藍適齊, 2004, “Changing Relations: China and Taiwan, 1931-1947.” Doctoral Dissertation, Dept. of History, University of Chicago.
Shen, Fuyuan, 1993, “John William Powell and ‘The China Weekly Review’: An analysis of his reporting and his McCarthy era ordeal.” Master’s Thesis, University of Montana. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/5063, accessed 2024.4.3.
Sitzer, Abram Glenn畢凌晨，2007，〈葛超智對二二八事件與美國政府觀點之差異： 第一手觀察與外交決策間的矛盾〉。台北：國立台灣大學歷史學系碩士論文。
李文環，1998，〈戰後初期台灣對外貿易之政經分析1945-1949〉。台南：國立成功大學歷史學系碩士論文。
楊宗昌，〈佩恩先生：一位目擊二二八事件的美國友人〉，https://www.wufi.org.tw/佩恩先生─ 一位目擊二二八事件的美國友人，下載日期2022.10.19。
台美人歷史協會，〈蔡愛智生平〉，http://www.tahistory.org/蔡愛智牧師生平/，下載日期2024.6.14。