本研究的主要目的在探討燈光儀器訓練組及傳統敏捷訓練組對接球球移動時間的影響，排球選手需具備高速度、高速耐力、高爆發力及個人基本技術等基本能力，希望透過不同的訓練方式來加強上述的基本能力。排球運動不會因個人體型嬌小而造成先天條件的不公平，它能透過完善規劃做整體訓練彌補先天不足的部分，相信我國排球在球場上能得到優異成績大放異彩，並能重返國際比賽舞台上。此研究主要測試項目為接發球常用步伐（跨步、踮步跨、側併步），本研究以國立臺灣師範大學女子排球代表隊選手作為受試對象（女子平均身高為172±4、女子體重為63±5.7kg、年齡為 20 ± 4.76yrs、球齡為 8 ± 2.88yrs）。以隨機取樣法（Stratified Sampling），選手平均分成兩組，第一組為燈光儀器訓練組，第二組為傳統敏捷訓練組。在每周星期一、三、五做訓練，訓練六周，訓練時間為一個半小時，其中一組平常訓練的基礎上增加燈光儀器訓練組內容，另一組則加上傳統敏捷訓練。本實驗中所實施的體能訓練包括跳躍，力量和協調性訓練。各個訓練都是以能迅速掌握正確動作為目的，在作示範的前提下進行的，六周後利用反應時間測試儀進行後測，本研究將所得資料以敘述性統計之平均數、標準差，呈現實驗研究對象之基本資料與各項實驗紀錄資料，再以單因子共變數分析（One-way ANCOVA）檢驗兩組實驗分組之間在前、後測的成績，在起步的反應時間是否達到顯著水準，研究結果如下：
一、 在經過六周燈光儀器訓練後，有助於提升跨步、踮步跨以及側併步的秒數，雖然前兩者未達顯著水準，後者有達到顯著水準，但從平均數統計結果來看皆有明顯進步。
二、 在經過傳統敏捷訓練後，無助於提升跨步、踮步跨以及側併步的秒數，也未達顯著水準。
三、 比較燈光儀器訓練(實驗組)及傳統敏捷訓練(對照組)，實驗組明顯比對照組來的有效果，傳統敏捷訓練組則維持。

The main objective of this study was to compare the effect of training with fitLight Trainer™ and conventional agility training on movement time of serve reception. Speed, endurance, power and individual fundamental techniques are important capacity of volleyball athlete. Various training methods are used to improve these capacity. Smaller stature is not an innate disadvantage that forms inequality. It can be made up by robust training. Our national team is still capable of obtaining distinctive result and returning to international arena. This study has tested common serve reception footwork (stride step, split step, shuffle step). Athletes from National Taiwan Normal University Women’s Volleyball Team has participated in this studies (mean height 172 ± 4 cm, mean weight 63 ± 5.7 kg, mean age 20 ± 4.76 years, mean experience 8 ± 2.88 years). The participants were evenly distributed with Stratified Sampling into two group: fitLight Trainer™ training group and conventional agility training group. Both groups were trained every Monday, Wednesday and Friday for 90 minutes each day for 6 weeks. fitLight Trainer™ training group was trained with fitLight Trainer™ while the conventional agility training group was trained with conventional agility training protocol. The strength and conditioning training incorporated in this study included jumping, strength and coordination training. The objective of the training was to acquired correct movement as demonstrated as soon as possible. Test on reaction time was carried out after 6 weeks of training as post-test. Descriptive statistics such as mean, standard deviation were presented. The results obtained were analyzed with One-way ANCOVA to test if reaction time of movement initiation between both groups as well as between pre- and post-test has reached significant level. The results were reported as below:
1. After 6 weeks of training with fitLight Trainer™, reaction time of shuffle step has reached significant level. Although the for stride step and split step have not reached significant level, the mean reaction times have both notably improved.
2. Conventional agility training did not improve the reaction time of stride step, split step and shuffle step.
3. Comparing the fitLight Trainer™ training group (experiment group) and the conventional agility training group (control group), the experiment group was significantly more effective than the control group.

中文文獻
1. 王保奎. (2005). 排球运动中移动能力的理论分析及训练方法. 贛南師範學院學報, 26(6), 93-94.

2. 王衍超. (2009). 不同層級排球選手接發球準確性, 啟動時間, 動作時間之探討. 臺灣師範大學運動科學研究所學位論文, 1-53.

3. 何金山. (2011). 低欄架敏捷性訓練對排球選手左右移位之訓練分析. 嘉大體育健康休閒期刊, 10(2), 217-225.

4. 李俊毅. (2010). 下肢增強式訓練對劍道攻擊速度及反應時間的影響, 未出版碩士論文. 中國文化大學, 臺北市.

5. 杜曉偉, & 楊勁蒼. (1999). 每球得分制新規則對男排比賽得分規律影響的初步研.西安體育學院學報，16 卷 2 期，頁 45-47

6. 周文祥. (1992). 不同運動項目大學運動員全身反應時間之研究. 國立雲林技術學 院報，1，157-163.

7. 林正常, 蔡崇濱, 林信甫, 林政東, 吳柏翰, & 鄭景峰. (2004). 肌力與體能訓練. 新店市: 藝軒.(Thoms RB & Roger WE, 2004).

8. 林正常. (2002). 運動科學與訓練-運動教練手冊-(修訂三版). 台北縣: 銀禾文化.

9. 林竹茂. (1999). 當今排球技戰術主要特徵與展望研析. 大專排球研究論集,(7), 1-28.

10. 林竹茂. (2000). 新規則實施對排球比賽與訓練影響探討. 發表於中華民國大專院校八十九學年度排球教練研習會, 臺中市, 臺中市立雙十國中.

11. 林彥廷, & 麥財振. (2009). 籃球敏捷性之訓練方式. 大專體育, (101), 131-138

12. 林清和. (1996). 運動學習程式學. 文史哲.

13. 林耀豐. (1996). 運動對反應時間影響之探討. 中華體育季刊, 10(2), 113-121.

14. 林耀豐. (1996). 影響反應時間因素之探討及應用. 中華體育季刊, 9(4), 81-88.

15. 洪聰敏, & 豐東洋. (2003). 運動員與非運動員訊息處理之研究. 體育學報, (35), 117-126.

16. 涂瑛芳. (2008). 不同球速與照度對大學生網球截擊反應時間與動作時間之研究, 未出版碩士論文. 國立屏東教育大學, 屏東市.

17. 張木山. (2004). 不同訓練方法對彈跳能力發展與評估模式之研究,未出版碩士論文. 國立體育大學, 桃園縣.

18. 張意德. (1998). 反應速度對排球時間因素掌控之探討. 。大專排球研究論集，4，71-79。

19. 許樹淵. (1982). 排球運動技術分析. 台北: 協進圖書公司.

20. 陳幸苹. (2009). 球體速度與顏色對國小棒球選手接球反應時間與動作時間的影響, 未出版碩士論文.國立屏東教育大學, 屏東市.

21. 陳俊汕. (1995). 不同羽球發球方式、視覺前線索與技能水準對預期羽球落點的影響 , 未出版之碩士論文. 國立台灣師範大學, 台北市.

22. 萬江, & 田琳. (2002). 發展排球專項力量素質的理論與方法 (Doctoral dissertation). 武漢體育學院學報, (9), 59-65.

23. 劉妍秀. (2004). 技擊反應動作時間訓練器之研發與應用. 大專體育學刊, 6(2), 213-225.

24. 劉雅甄. (2003). 動體視力在運動中的意義與應用. 中華體育季刊, 17(2), 57-65.

25. 劉雅甄. (2003). 動體視力在運動中的意義與應用. 中華體育季刊, 17(2), 57-65.

26. 劉雅甄, & 王泠. (2003). 藥球訓練之理論與實務. 教練科學, (2), 221-228.

27. 劉鎮國. (2001). 應用虛擬實境探討我國大專足球運動員反應時間.大學體育學刊, 3(2), 35-46

28. 鍾秀娟. (2008). 不同球速與工作難度對大學生網球正手截擊之反應時間與動作時間的影響, 未出版碩士論文,國立屏東教育大學,屏東市.

29. 簡秋紅. (2008). 不同球速、刺激反應相容性對國小軟式網球選手截擊之反應時間與動作時間的影響. 未出版碩士論文, 國立屏東教育大學, 屏東市。

英文文獻
1. Corbin, C. B., Lindsey, R., Welk, G. J., & Corbin, W. (2001). Fundamental concepts of
fitness and wellness. New York: McGraw-hill.

2. Chu, D. A. (1992). Jumping into plyometrics. Leisure Press

3. Chu, D. A. (1998). Jumping into plyometrics. Human Kinetics.

4. Farrow, D., Young, W., & Bruce, L. (2005). The development of a test of reactive agility for netball: a new methodology. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 8(1), 52-60.

5. Gabbett, T., & Benton, D. (2009). Reactive agility of rugby league players. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 12(1), 212-214.

6. Henry, F. M., & Rogers, D. E. (1960). Increased response latency for complicated movements and a “memory drum” theory of neuromotor reaction. Research Quarterly. American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation, 31(3), 448-458

7. Keetch, K. M., Schmidt, R. A., Lee, T. D., & Young, D. E. (2005). Especial skills: their emergence with massive amounts of practice. Journal of experimental psychology: human perception and performance, 31(5), 970.

8. Komi, P. V. (1984). Physiological and biomechanical correlates of muscle function: effects of muscle structure and stretch-shortening cycle on force and speed. Exercise and sport sciences reviews, 12(1), 81-122.

9. Long, G. M., & Riggs, C. A. (1991). Training effects on dynamic visual acuity with free-head viewing. Perception, 20(3), 363-371.

10. Long, G. M., & Rourke, D. A. (1989). Training effects on the resolution of moving targets—dynamic visual acuity. Human factors, 31(4), 443-451.

11. Long, G. M., & Rourke, D. A. (1989). Training effects on the resolution of moving targets—dynamic visual acuity. Human factors, 31(4), 443-451.

12. Magill, R. A., & Anderson, D. I. (2007). Motor learning and control: Concepts and applications (Vol. 11). New York: McGraw-Hill.

13. Maeda, A., & Tsuruhara, T. (1998). Batting training by using super high speed ball to increase batting performance visual kinetic acuity. Baseball Clinic, 8, 22-25.

14. Norman, R. W., & Komi, P. V. (1979). Electromechanical delay in skeletal muscle under normal movement conditions. Acta Physiologica, 106(3), 241-248.

15. Owings, T. M., Lancianese, S. L., Lampe, E. M., & Grabiner, M. D. (2003). Influence of ball velocity, attention, and age on response time for a simulated catch. Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 35(8), 1397-1405.

16. Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (1988). Motor learning and control.

17. Singer, R. N. (1968). Motor Learning and Human Performance; an Application to Physical Education. Macmillan.

18. Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (1999). Methodology for studying motor performance. Motor control and learning. A behaviuoral emphasis. 3rd ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers Inc, 20-5.

19. Wilderman, D. R., Ross, S. E., & Padua, D. A. (2009). Thigh muscle activity, knee motion, and impact force during side-step pivoting in agility-trained female basketball players. Journal of athletic training, 44(1), 14-25.

20. Yap, C. W., & Brown, L. E. (2000). Development of speed, agility, and quickness for the female soccer athlete. Strength & Conditioning Journal, 22(1), 9.

21. Young, W., & Farrow, D. (2006). A review of agility: Practical applications for strength and conditioning. Strength and conditioning journal, 28(5), 24.

22. Young, W. B., & Willey, B. (2010). Analysis of a reactive agility field test. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 13(3), 376-378.