本研究主要探討讀者的圖／文認知風格、全面／序列學習風格，以及線上新
聞本身的新聞圖片與新聞文字之間的訊息連結度強弱，這三者是否會影響讀者選
讀線上新聞。參與本研究的共有 60 位，其中主要為 20-30 歲的大學生和研究生。
本研究以三份問卷分別判斷線上新聞圖文相關程度、分類讀者的圖／文認知風格
和全面／序列學習風格，並設計四種選讀新聞實驗情境，透過眼動儀器記錄受試
者的眼動數據，再搭配回溯性放聲思考法，予以作 t 檢定、重複量數變異數統計
分析和瞭解受試者的選讀線上新聞行為。
實驗結果顯示：(1)讀者的圖／文認知風格不同，會造成讀者在選讀新聞時的
注意力分佈不同；(2)讀者的全面／序列學習風格不同，會使讀者在選讀新聞時的
眼動軌跡有差異；(3)線上新聞圖文高／低相關程度是會影響讀者選讀線上新聞。
雖然以上這三者在讀者選讀新聞時都有差異，但其統計結果卻都無顯著差異。根
據受試者的回溯性放聲思考結果，可以得知線上新聞為刻板印象之讀物，且讀者
容易受到新聞類別與個人閱讀偏好影響，易與其他線上資訊或刊物內容之閱讀方
式有很大不同。最後，本研究依據研究結果進行討論和提出未來研究相關建議。

This study aims to explore reader’s verbal/visual cognitive style, global/sequential
learning style, and the strength of information link between pictures in online news and
text, to see whether those factors would affect the choice of influence to online news
reading. There are 60 people attending the study, including age from 20 to 30
undergraduate students and graduate students. This study uses three questionnaires to
distinguish the relevance of pictures and text to online news, classify reader’s
verbal/visual cognitive style and global/sequential learning style. Furthermore,
researcher designs four online reading situations and records eye movement data of
subjects through eye tracker. After completing the experiment, affiliating retrospective
think aloud method, t-test and repeated-measures ANOVA are used to find out subjects’
behavior in online news reading.

The result shows the difference of reader’s verbal/visual cognitive style can cause
the discrepancy of reader’s attention distribution when it comes to online news reading.
The difference of reader’s global/sequential learning style can cause the discrepancy of
reader’s eye movement trajectory. The high/low relevance of pictures and text in online
news can affect reader in online news reading. Although from the experiment, there are
different eye movement track path, there are no significant difference among the three
experiments from statistic results. According to the result of subjects’ retrospective
think aloud method, we can refer that the arrange of picture and story are based on
stereotype. Moreover, readers are easily to be affected by news category and their own
reading preference, resulting surprising differences from other online readings
materials. Ultimately, the discussion is made according to research results and related
advices are given to future researches.

參考文獻
一、中文部分
大人物（2012）。新聞都不新聞了嗎？社群媒體的優劣兩面觀(圖解版)。檢自：
https://www.damanwoo.com/node/63431
唐大崙、莊賢智（2005）由眼球追蹤法探索電子報版面中圖片位置對注意力分
佈之影響。廣告學研究，24，頁 89-104。
林照真（2011）。因為科技，新聞正處於改變的轉捩點上。傳播研究與實踐，
1，頁 25-34。
黃郁晴（2010）。多點觸控手勢與使用者心智表徵研究（未出版碩士論文）。
國立交通大學，新竹市。
許惠晴（2012）。利用眼動追蹤法探討網路使用習慣對專注力的影響（未出版
碩士論文）。淡江大學，新北市。
陳學志、賴惠德、邱發忠（2010）。眼球追蹤技術在學習與教育上的應用。教
育科學研究，55（4），頁 39-68。
蔡琰、臧國仁（2012）。新聞圖文敘事之競合論述關係：以「水淹高雄岡山晉德
老人安養院」個案報導為例。新聞學研究，111，頁 89-127。
卓峯志（2009）。台灣的平面廣告應當如何進行圖文配置?-從本質論與建構論
觀點進行探討。第十七屆中華民國廣告暨公共關係國際學術與實務研討會論文集: 數位環境下的溝通策略。
二、英文部分
Acarturk, C., Habel, C., Cagiltay, K., & Alacam, O. (2008). Multimodal
comprehension of language and graphics: Graphs with and without annotations. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 1(3), 2.
Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt.

Althaus, S. L. , & Tewksbury, D. (2000). Patterns of Internet and traditional news media
use in a networked community. Political Communication, 17(1), 21-45.
Beymer, D., Orton, P. Z., & Russell, D. M. (2007). An eye tracking study of how
pictures influence online reading. In IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 456-460). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more
mysterious mechanisms. Metacognition, motivation, and understanding, 65-116.
Bucher, H. J., & Schumacher, P. (2006). The relevance of attention for selecting
news content. An eye-tracking study on attention patterns in the reception of
print and online media. Communications, 31(3), 347-368.
Chen, S. Y., & Macredie, R. D. (2002). Cognitive styles and hypermedia navigation:
Development of a learning model. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, 53(1), 3-15.
Childers, T. L., Houston, M. J., & Heckler, S. E. (1985). Measurement of individual
differences in visual versus verbal information processing. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(2), 125-134.
Clark, S. D., & Latshaw, C. A. (2012). Effects of learning styles/teaching styles and
effort on performance in accounting and marketing courses. World Journal of Management, 4(1), 67-81.
Dalmaijer E. (2014) Is the low-cost EyeTribe eye tracker any good for research?
PeerJ PrePrints, 2, 1-35. Retrieved from https://peerj.com/preprints/585v1.pdf.
Derntl, M., & Graf, S. (2009, July). Impact of learning styles on student blogging
behavior. In Advanced Learning Technologies, 2009. ICALT 2009. Ninth IEEE
International Conference on (pp. 369-373). IEEE.
Deuze, M. (2003). The web and its journalisms: considering the consequences of
different types of newsmedia online. New media & society, 5(2), 203-230.
Ellis, A. W., & Miller, D. (1981). Left and wrong in adverts: Neuropsychological
correlates of aesthetic preference. British Journal of Psychology, 72(2), 225-229.
Fasihuddin, H. A., Skinner, G. D., & Athauda, R. I. (2014). Personalizing open
learning environments through the adaptation to learning styles. ICITA.
Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering
education. Engineering education, 78(7), 674-681.
Felder, R. M., & Spurlin, J. (2005). Applications, reliability and validity of the index
of learning styles. International journal of engineering education, 21(1), 103-112.
Garry, M., & Gerrie, M. P. (2005). When photographs create false memories. Current
Directions in Psychological Science, 14(6), 321-325.
Gibson, M. L. (1991). Editing in the electronic era. Iowa State Press.
Graf, S., Viola, S. R., & Kinshuk, T. L. (2006). Representative characteristics of
felder-silverman learning styles: An empirical model. In Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age (CELDA 2006), Barcelona, Spain.(pp. 235-242).
Guan, Z., Lee, S., Cuddihy, E., & Ramey, J. (2006). The validity of the stimulated
retrospective think-aloud method as measured by eye tracking. In Proceedings of
the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems (pp. 1253-1262).
ACM.
Hariri, N., Asadi, M., & Mansourian, Y. (2014). The impact of users’ verbal/imagery
cognitive styles on their Web search behavior. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 66(4), 401-423.
Holsanova, J., Holmberg, N., & Holmqvist, K. (2005). Tracing Integration of Text
and Pictures in Newspaper Reading. Lund University Cognitive Studies.
Holmqvist, K., Holsanova, J., Barthelson, M., & Lundqvist, D. (2003). Reading or
scanning? A study of newspaper and net paper reading. Mind, 2(3), 4.
Holmqvist, K., & Wartenberg, C. (2005). The role of local design factors for
newspaper reading behaviour-an eye-tracking perspective. Lund University Cognitive Studies, 127, 1-21.

Hyrskykari, A., Ovaska, S., Majaranta, P., Räihä, K. J., & Lehtinen, M. (2008). Gaze
path stimulation in retrospective think-aloud. Journal of Eye Movement Research,
2(4).
Kinley, K., Tjondronegoro, D., Partridge, H., & Edwards, S. (2012). Human-computer
interaction: the impact of users' cognitive styles on query reformulation behaviour during web searching. In Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference. (pp. 299-307). ACM.
Knobloch, S., Hastall, M., Zillmann, D., & Callison, C. (2003). Imagery effects on the
selective reading of Internet newsmagazines. Communication Research, 30(1), 3-29.
Leckner, S. (2012). Presentation factors affecting reading behaviour in readers of
newspaper media: an eye-tracking perspective. Visual Communication, 11(2), 163-184.
Lee, C. H. M., Cheng, Y. W., Rai, S., & Depickere, A. (2005). What affect student
cognitive style in the development of hypermedia learning system?. Computers &
Education, 45(1), 1-19.
Lee, J. (2007). The effects of visual metaphor and cognitive style for mental modeling
in a hypermedia-based environment. Interacting with Computers, 19(5-6), 614-
629.
Lee, J., & Boling, E. (2008). Information‐conveying approaches and cognitive styles of
mental modeling in a hypermedia‐based learning environment. Journal of the
Association for Information Science and Technology, 59(4), 644-661.
Mcdermott, P. A., & Beitman, B. S. (1984). Standardization of a scale for the study
of children's learning styles: Structure, stability, and criterion validity. Psychology in the Schools, 21(1), 5-14.

Mendelson, A. L., & Thorson, E. (2004). How verbalizers and visualizers process the
newspaper environment. Journal of Communication, 54(3), 474-491.
Messick, S. (1976). Individuality in learning: Implications of cognitive styles and
creativity for human development.
Mitchelstein, E., & Boczkowski, P. J. (2009). Between tradition and change A review
of recent research on online news production. Journalism, 10(5), 562-586.
Müller, M. G., Kappas, A., & Olk, B. (2012). Perceiving press photography: a new
integrative model, combining iconology with psychophysiological and eye-tracking methods. Visual Communication, 11(3), 307-328.
Olk, B., & Kappas, A. (2011). Eye tracking as a tool for visual research. Handbook of
visual research methods, 433-451.
Ooms, K., Dupont, L., Lapon, L., & Popelka, S. (2015). Accuracy and precision of
fixation locations recorded with the low-cost Eye Tribe tracker in different experimental set-ups. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 8(1).
Adam, P. S., Quinn, S., & Edmonds, R. (2007). Eyetracking the news: A study of print
and online reading. United States of America: Poynter.
Rayner, S., & Riding, R. (1998). Cognitive styles and learning strategies:
Understanding style differences in learning and behavior. Routledge.
Riding, R. J. (1991). Cognitive styles analysis. Learning and Training Technology,
Birmingham: Learning and Training Technology.
Riding, R., & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles—an overview and integration.
Educational psychology, 11(3-4), 193-215.
Riding, R. J., & Pearson, F. (1994). The relationship between cognitive style and
intelligence. Educational Psychology, 14(4), 413-425.

Riding, R. J., & Sadler‐Smith, E. (1997). Cognitive style and learning strategies:
Some implications for training design. International Journal of Training and Development, 1(3), 199-208.
Sanders, Mark S., & Ernest J. McCormick (1987). Human factors in engineering and
design . New York: McGRAW-Hill Book Company.
Stash, N., Cristea, A. I., & De Bra, P. (2006). Adaptation to learning styles in e-learning:
Approach evaluation.
Stevens, K. C.(1980). The effect of background knowledge on the reading
comprehension of ninth graders. Journal of reading behavior, 12(2), 151-154.
Triantafillou, E., Pomportsis, A., & Demetriadis, S. (2003). The design and the
formative evaluation of an adaptive educational system based on cognitive styles. Computers & Education, 41(1), 87-103.
Wen-Hsiung Tsai, & Lih-Shyang Chen. (2010). A study on adaptive learning of
scratch programming. Retrieved from http://worldcomp-proceedings.com/proc/p2011/EEE3748.pdf
Van den Haak, M. J., & de Jong, M. D. (2003). Exploring two methods of usability
testing: concurrent versus retrospective think-aloud protocols. In Professional
Communication Conference, 2003. IPCC 2003. Proceedings. IEEE International
(pp. 3-pp). IEEE.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1985). Structures of news in the press. In Discourse and
communication: New approaches to the analysis of mass media discourse and
communication.
Voßkühler, A., Nordmeier, V., Kuchinke, L., & Jacobs, A. M. (2008). OGAMA
(Open Gaze and Mouse Analyzer): open-source software designed to analyze eye and mouse movements in slideshow study designs. Behavior research methods, 40(4), 1150-1162.
Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P.W. (1977). Field
dependent and field independent cognitive styles and their educational
implications. Review of Educational Research, 47, 1-64.