研究生: |
賴瀅如 Lai, Ying-Ru |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
教保服務人員社會支持與工作滿意度相關研究:以創意教學自我效能為中介變項 The Relationship between Sense of Social Support and Job Satisfaction of Preschool Educators: The Mediating Effect of Self-efficacy for Creativity-teaching |
指導教授: |
陳學志
Chen, Hsueh-Chih |
口試委員: |
邱發忠
Chiu, Fa-Chung 郭郡羽 Kuo, Chun-Yu 陳學志 Chen, Hsueh-Chih |
口試日期: | 2024/01/18 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
創造力發展碩士在職專班 Continuing Education Master's Program of Creativity Development |
論文出版年: | 2024 |
畢業學年度: | 112 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 103 |
中文關鍵詞: | 教保服務人員 、社會支持 、工作滿意度 、創意教學自我效能 |
英文關鍵詞: | preschool educator, social support, job satisfaction, self-efficacy for creativity teaching |
研究方法: | 調查研究 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202400099 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:297 下載:27 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
鑒於教保服務人員的工作特性,他們需要與一位教保服務人員在同一個班級進行協同教學,此模式不僅是教學方式之一,更使得教保服務人員所需的社會支持變得至關重要,透過社會支持的作用,創意教學自我效能得以增強,有助於提高工作動力與教學成就進而提高工作滿意度,促進教育品質與組織的穩定運作。本研究旨在探討教保服務人員社會支持與工作滿意度相關研究,進一步探討創意教學自我效能的中介效果。本研究採用問卷調查法,以教保服務人員為研究對象,實際收回有效問卷286份。研究結果如下:一、從中介效果中,研究者發現教保服務人員的社會支持、工作滿意度與創意教學自我效能兩兩變項之間有顯著正相關。二、教保服務人員的創意教學自我效能在社會支持與工作滿意度之間具有部分中介效果,表示教保服務人員社會支持會透過創意教學自我效能正向提升工作滿意度。三、教保服務人員社會支持與工作滿意度間,僅以創意教學自我效能分量表中的「負向自覺」具部分中介效果,表示社會支持對教保服務人員有正向的影響,能夠增強其對創意教學自我效能的信心,此信心能讓教保服務人員更堅定地處理負向自覺的感受,進而提升其工作滿意度。四、教保服務人員的創意教學自我效能在不同向度之社會支持(情緒與陪伴性支持、訊息與實質性支持)與工作滿意度間,皆具部分中介效果。五、由於幼教實務現場的教保服務人員通常包含教師以及教保員,因此本研究進一步分析兩種資格之教保服務人員的差異,結果發現教師資格的社會支持與創意教學自我效能顯著高於教保員資格。六、教師資格的創意教學自我效能在社會支持與工作滿意度之間具有部分中介效果;教保員則無中介效果。七、教師資格的社會支持與工作滿意度間,僅以創意教學自我效能分量表中的「負向自覺」具部分中介效果;教保員資格皆無中介效果。八、教師資格的創意教學自我效能在不同向度之社會支持(情緒與陪伴性支持、訊息與實質性支持)與工作滿意度間,皆具部分中介效果;教保員資格皆無中介效果。最後,本研究亦依據上述研究結果,提出後續相關研究與實務建議,以供幼教工作現場教師與未來實務教學方面的參考。
Given the nature of the work undertaken by preschool educators, collaborative teaching with peers in the same classroom has become a prevalent teaching approach. This not only serves as an instructional method but also underscores the critical importance of social support for these educators. Through the lens of social support, this study investigates how preschool educators can enhance their creative teaching self-efficacy, leading to increased motivation, teaching achievement, and overall job satisfaction, thus promoting stable educational quality and organizational operations.
This research utilized a survey method, targeting preschool educators as the study participants, with a total of 286 valid responses collected. The findings are as follows:
1.Through the mediation analysis, the study identified significant positive correlations among social support, job satisfaction, and creative teaching self-efficacy for preschool educators.
2.Creative teaching self-efficacy partially mediates the relationship between social support and job satisfaction, indicating that social support positively influences job satisfaction through the enhancement of creative teaching self-efficacy.
3.Specifically, negative self-awareness, as measured in the creative teaching self-efficacy scale, partially mediates the relationship between social support and job satisfaction. This suggests that social support positively impacts preschool educators, fostering confidence in handling negative self-awareness and ultimately elevating job satisfaction.
4.Creative teaching self-efficacy demonstrates partial mediation effects between different dimensions of social support (emotional and companionship support, informational and instrumental support) and job satisfaction among preschool educators.
5.Subsequent analysis revealed differences between educators holding teacher qualifications and those with educare giver qualifications. Teacher-qualified educators reported significantly higher levels of social support and creative teaching self-efficacy compared to their educare giver counterparts.
6.Creative teaching self-efficacy partially mediates the relationship between social support and job satisfaction for teacher-qualified educators, whereas no mediation effects were observed for educare giver-qualified educators.
7.The mediation effect was observed only in the "negative self-awareness" dimension of the creative teaching self-efficacy scale between social support and job satisfaction for teacher-qualified educators, while no such effects were found for educare giver-qualified educators.
8.Similar to the overall findings, creative teaching self-efficacy demonstrates partial mediation effects between different dimensions of social support and job satisfaction for teacher-qualified educators, while no mediation effects were observed for educare giver-qualified educators.
In conclusion, this study provides valuable insights into the complex interplay of social support, job satisfaction, and creative teaching self-efficacy among preschool educators. The results highlight the need for tailored support systems based on educators' qualifications and offer implications for both future research and practical considerations in the field of early childhood education.
一、中文文獻
吳清基(1992)。教育與行政。臺北市:師大書苑。
吳清基(2018)。幼兒園教師專業成長與師資培訓發展。幼兒教育,(326)12-19。
吳煥烘、林志丞(2011)。國中教師社會支持,教師自我效能與工作倦怠相關研究以角色壓力為中介變項。嘉大教育研究學刊,(26),25-56。
李家安、郭昭佑(2014)。教師工作滿意度的新觀點-從第三域的視角出發。臺灣教育評論月刊,(32),101-105。
周昌柏(2005)。桃,竹,苗四縣市教師工作滿意度現況分析。學校行政,(40),108-123。
林志哲(2010)。大學生感恩特質及其與社會支持、因應型態及幸福感之關係(博士論文)。國立政治大學教育研究所,台北市。
林志哲(2014)。感恩,社會支持及幸福感之研究:中介效果模式之驗證。中華心理衛生學刊,27(3),453-482。https://doi.org/10.30074/FJMH.201409_27(3).0005
林明珠(2007)。國小校長家長式領導與體育教師工作士氣關係之研究。嘉南學報,(33),394-402。https://doi.org/ 10.29539/CNABH.200712.0010
林芳毓(2020)。以創意教學自我效能為中介變項探討創造人格特質對教保服務人員工作滿意度的影響。(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,台北市。https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202000809
林俊瑩(2010)。工作滿意度、組織承諾與離職意圖:中小學教師與其他職業之 比較。教育實踐與研究,23(1),1-30。
林俊瑩、謝亞恆、曹靜麗、蕭明潔(2009)。工作特性,組織氣氛對學前教師工作滿意度與工作倦怠的影響:以花蓮地區為例。教育與多元文化研究,(1),217-258。
林湘蓁、張美雲(2013)。臺中市公私立幼兒園教師社會支持與幸福感之相關研究。幼兒教保研究,(10),91-110。
林碧芳、邱皓政(2008)。創意教學自我效能感量表之編制與相關研究。教育研究與發展期刊,4(1),141-170。
林慧敏(2013)。學校教師工作滿意度之研究-以臺東縣各教學階段與公私立學校教師為例。屏東教育大學學報-教育類,(41),35-69。
林慧敏、黃毅志(2016)。臺灣中小學教師工作滿意度之研究-與其他職業做比較。當代教育研究季刊,24(3),29-64。
邱皓政(2002)。學校組織創新氣氛的內涵與教師創造力的實踐:另一件國王的新衣?應用心理研究,(15),191-224。
洪久賢、洪榮昭、林麗娟、蔡長艷(2007)。影響教師創意教學因素之研究-以綜合活動領域為例。師大學報教育類,52(2),49-71。
張芳全(2002)。東亞國家國民小學教師工作滿意度之相關因素研究:以 TALIS 資料為例。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊,15(2),65-97。
張雨霖、陳學志、徐芝君(2010)。教師創造力信念,創造力教學自我效能對創造力教學行為之影響。復興崗學報,(99),151-171。
教育部(2002)。創造力教育白皮書。臺北:教育部。
教育部(2012)。師資培育白皮書。臺北:教育部。
教育部(2017)。幼兒園教保活動課程大綱。臺北:教育部。
陳彥云(2022)。教保服務人員的感恩對創意教學自我效能之影響-以正向情緒, 社會支持為中介變項。(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,台北市。https://doi.org/ 10.6345/NTNU202200759
陳棟樑、黃明一、謝佳容(2017)。高雄市幼兒園教師工作壓力與工作滿意度之研究。兩岸職業教育論叢,1(1),24-33。
黃易文、湯家偉(2019)。國中社會領域初任教師知覺組織支持,教師同僚共享氛圍和自我效能之關係,教育實踐與研究,32(1)。
黃儒傑(2008)。教師教學思考的負荷,社會支持及其教學表現:以台中縣市幼稚園為例。教育心理學報,40(1),85-106。
黃寶園(2010)。社會支持在壓力反應歷程中的中介效果。中華心理衛生學刊,23(3),401-436。
許玉齡(1998)。桃竹地區幼稚園園長領導措施與教師工作滿意度之相關研究。新竹師院學報,11,281-300。
許惠英、蔡慧敏(2013)。新北市國小健康與體育教師社會支持,自我效能與學校效能之關係。中原體育學報,(3),68-75。https://doi.org/10.6646/CYPEJ.2013.3.68
單小琳(1990)。教師的社會支持及其相關因素之探討。臺北市立師範學院學報, 19-36(1)。
葉子明、曾雅馨(2022)。國小教師工作壓力,社會支持,休閒行為對教學效能之影響。兩岸職業教育論叢,6(1),14-31。https://doi.org/ 10.6685/ASVEJ.202210_6(1).0002
孫志麟(2003)。教師自我效能的概念與測量。教育心理學報,34(2),139-156。https://doi.org/10.6251/bep.20020619
游宗輝(2015)。屏東縣國小教師背景變項透過教師制控信念,教師間氣氛與校長領導風格對教師工作滿意度之影響。新竹教育大學教育學報,32(2),59-91。
葉芃宜(2021)。幼兒園女性教保服務人員工作壓力、 社會支持與工作倦怠之研究(碩士論文)。臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。
賈馥茗(1976)。英才教育。台北市:開明書局。
劉秀枝(2011)。私立幼兒園教師職場幸福感與工作滿意度之關係研究。幼兒教保研究期刊,6,87-115。
蔡進雄(2005)。超越轉型領導:國民中小學校長新轉型領導影響教師組織承諾之研究。國民教育研究集刊,(13),37-63。https://doi.org/10.7038/BREE.200506.0037
蕭佳純(2012)國小學生內在動機、學科知識與創造力表現關聯之研究:教師創造力教學的調節效果。特殊教育研究學刊,37(3),89-113。
蕭佳純(2015)。教師人格特質,復原力與創意教學關聯之研究:多層次調節式中介效果的探討。特殊教育研究學刊,40(1),85-115。
蕭佳純(2017)。在職進修教師創意教學自我效能發展之縱貫性研究。教育科學研究期刊,62(3),25-55。https://doi.org/10.6209/jories.2017.62(3).02
蕭佳純(2018)。參與創造力教學工作坊對教師創造力教學行為影響研究。清華教育報報,35(2),1-33。https://doi.org/10.6869/THJER.201812_35(2).0001
蕭佳純(2022)。創意自我效能、工作價值觀對教師創造力教學影響之研究:專業學習社群與教師信任的跨層次分析。教育科學研究期刊,67(1),255-289。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202203_67(1).0009
蕭美華(2017)。幼兒園課程發展-以學習區預設活動為例。國教新知,64(4),30-45。https://doi.org/10.6701/TEEJ.201712_64(4).0002
鄭英耀、王文中(2002)。影響科學競賽績優教師創意行為之因素。應用心理研究,(15),163-189。
鄭鈞元(2016)。工作動機與主觀幸福感對教保服務人員創意教學表現之影響:階層線性模式分析。幼兒教保研究(16),1-29。
鄭博真(2011)。我國幼兒教師創造力人格特質與創造力教學行為之研究。高雄師大學報:教育與社會科學類,(31),73-100。
鄭雅婷、許惟翔、邱憲義(2015)。教師組織信任,組織承諾,學校組織氣氛對工作滿意度的影響。朝陽人文學刊,13(2),97-116。
簡碧珊、陳怡靖(2020)。教保服務人員工作與家庭衝突與社會支持關係之研究。兒童與教育研究,(15),51-91。
魏美惠、謝濰潞(2015)。幼托整合下公立幼兒園教保員角色知覺與工作滿意度之研究。幼兒教保研究,(15),1-32。
羅巧玲、魏美惠(2013)。中部地區幼兒教師創造力人格特質與教學效能之相關研究。教育科學期刊,12(1),149-178。
蘇秀枝(2006)。托兒所主管行政領導,保育人員工作滿意度與托育品質之關係。朝陽學報。
蘇船利、黃毅志(2011)。教師間氣氛,校長領導風格,教師教學制控信念與教師工作滿意度關係之研究-以台東縣國民中學為例。屏東教育大學學報-教育類,(36),399-429。
二、英文文獻
Alderfer, C. P. (1969). An empirical test of a new theory of human needs. Organizational behavior and human performance, 4(2), 142-175.
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of personality and social psychology, 45(2), 357.
Armor, D. (1976). Analysis of the school preferred reading program in selected Los Angeles minority schools.
Ashton, P. T. (1982). A Study of Teachers' Sense of Efficacy. Final Report, Volume I.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental psychology, 22(6), 723. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.22.6.723
Caplan, G. (1974). Support systems and community mental health: Lectures on concept development. behavioral publications.
Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L., & Steca, P. (2003). Efficacy beliefs as determinants of teachers' job satisfaction. Journal of educational psychology, 95(4), 821. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.821
Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Steca, P., & Malone, P. S. (2006). Teachers' self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students' academic achievement: A study at the school level. Journal of school psychology, 44(6), 473-490.
Cheuk, W. H., & Wong, K. S. (1995). Stress, social support, and teacher burnout in Macau. Current Psychology, 14, 42-46.
Cobb, S. (1976). Social support as a moderator of life stress. Psychosomatic medicine, 38(5), 300-314. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-197609000-00003
Cockburn, A., & Haydn, T. (2003). Recruiting and retaining teachers: Understanding why teachers teach. Routledge.
Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological bulletin, 98(2), 310. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310
Darling, N. (2007). Ecological systems theory: The person in the center of the circles. Research in human development, 4(3-4), 203-217.
Dormann, C., & Zapf, D. (1999). Social support, social stressors at work, and depressive symptoms: testing for main and moderating effects with structural equations in a three-wave longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(6), 874.
Fuming, X., & Jiliang, S. (2007). Research on job satisfaction of elementary and high school teachers and strategies to increase job satisfaction. Chinese Education & Society, 40(5), 86-96.
Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of educational psychology, 76(4), 569-582.
Gilbert, V. (2005). Focusing on teacher efficacy and autonomy in private, parochial, chartered public, and public schools. Teachers College, Columbia University.
Guralnick, M. J., Hammond, M. A., Neville, B., & Connor, R. T. (2008). The relationship between sources and functions of social support and dimensions of child‐and parent‐related stress. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 52(12), 1138-1154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01073.x
Guskey, T. R., & Passaro, P. D. (1994). Teacher efficacy: A study of construct dimensions. American educational research journal, 31(3), 627-643.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2), 159.
Hean, S., & Garrett, R. (2001). Sources of job satisfaction in science secondary school teachers in Chile. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 31(3), 363-379.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03057920120098491
Herzberg, F. (2005). Motivation-hygiene theory. Organizational behavior one: Essential theories of motivation and leadership, eds JB Miner, ME Sharpe Inc, New York, 2(4), 61-74.
Hoppock, R. (1935). Job satisfaction.
House, JS. (1981). Work Stress and social support. In: Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.
House, J. S., Umberson, D., & Landis, K. R. (1988). Structures and processes of social support. Annual review of sociology, 14(1), 293-318.
Kooij, D., De Lange, A., Jansen, P., & Dikkers, J. (2008). Older workers' motivation to continue to work: Five meanings of age: A conceptual review. Journal of managerial psychology, 23(4), 364-394.
Lazarus, R. S., DeLongis, A., Folkman, S., & Gruen, R. (1985). Stress and adaptational outcomes: the problem of confounded measures. American Psychologist, 40(7), 770-779. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.40.7.770
Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2006). On conceptualizing and assessing social cognitive constructs in career research: A measurement guide. Journal of career assessment, 14(1), 12-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072705281364
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A Theory Of Human Motivation.
Michel, J. S., Mitchelson, J. K., Pichler, S., & Cullen, K. L. (2010). Clarifying relationships among work and family social support, stressors, and work–family conflict. Journal of vocational behavior, 76(1), 91-104.
Newmann, F. M., Rutter, R. A., & Smith, M. S. (1989). Organizational factors that affect school sense of efficacy, community, and expectations. Sociology of education, 221-238.
Piercy, N., & Morgan, N. (1991). Internal marketing—The missing half of the marketing programme. Long range planning, 24(2), 82-93.
Reber, A. S. (1995). The Penguin dictionary of psychology. penguin press.
Rosenholtz, S. J., & Simpson, C. (1990). Workplace conditions and the rise and fall of teachers' commitment. Sociology of education, 241-257.
Sarason, I. G., Levine, H. M., Basham, R. B., & Sarason, B. R. (1983). Assessing social support: the social support questionnaire. Journal of personality and social psychology, 44(1), 127.
Sarros, J. C., & Sarros, A. M. (1992). Social support and teacher burnout. Journal of Educational Administration, 30(1).
Schneider, B., & Alderfer, C. P. (1973). Three studies of measures of need satisfaction in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 489-505.
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2007). Dimensions of teacher self-efficacy and relations with strain factors, perceived collective teacher efficacy, and teacher burnout. Journal of educational psychology, 99(3), 611.
Thoits, P. A. (1982). Conceptual, methodological, and theoretical problems in studying social support as a buffer against life stress. Journal of Health and Social behavior, 145-159.
Wells, M. B. (2017). Is all support equal?: Head Start preschool teachers' psychological job attitudes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 103-115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.10116/j.tate.2016.12.004
Wexley, K. N., & Yukl, G. A. (1984). Organizational behavior and personnel psychology.
Williams, D. R., & House, J. S. (1991). Stress, social support, control and coping: a social epidemiological view. WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser, 37, 147-172.
Woolfolk, A. E., Rosoff, B., & Hoy, W. K. (1990). Teachers' sense of efficacy and their beliefs about managing students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 6(2), 137-148.
Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation.
You, S., Kim, A. Y., & Lim, S. A. (2017). Job satisfaction among secondary teachers in Korea: Effects of teachers’ sense of efficacy and school culture. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(2), 284-297. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143215587311
Zinsser, K. M., Christensen, C. G., & Torres, L. (2016). She's supporting them; who's supporting her? Preschool center-level social-emotional supports and teacher well-being. Journal of school psychology, 59, 55-66.