研究生: |
陳美雲 Chen, Mei-Yun |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
特教教師對自閉症學生應用實證本位教學現況之調查研究-以大台北地區為例 A Survey of Special Education Teachers on the Application of Evidence-Based Practices to Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder in Taipei Metro Area |
指導教授: |
張正芬
Chang, Cheng-Fen |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
特殊教育學系 Department of Special Education |
論文出版年: | 2021 |
畢業學年度: | 109 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 103 |
中文關鍵詞: | 特教教師 、自閉症 、實證本位教學 |
英文關鍵詞: | special education teachers, Autism Spectrum Disorder, evidence-based practice |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202100302 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:208 下載:37 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究以大台北地區258位國中小在職特教教師為研究對象,探討其對自閉症學生應用實證本位教學之現況,並進一步探討特教教師的背景變項對實證本位教學熟悉程度及使用頻率的差異情形。本研究以自編之「實證本位教學(EBP)應用於自閉症學生之現況調查問卷」為研究工具,問卷所蒐集之資料以描述統計、皮爾森積差相關及單因子變異數分析等方式加以分析。研究結果如下:
一、國中小特教教師對於28種實證本位教學整體的熟悉程度,為「中高」程度。其中「增強」、「直接教學」、「提示策略」、「示範」、「工作分析」、「消弱」、「視覺支持」等策略,熟悉程度落在「高」程度,「音樂輔助介入」的熟悉程度落在「中低」程度,其餘皆落在「中高」程度。
二、國中小特教教師對於28種實證本位教學整體的使用頻率,為「中高」程度。其中「增強」、「直接教學」、「示範」、「提示策略」、「工作分析」、「視覺支持」等策略,使用頻率落在「高」程度,「擴大及替代性溝通系統」、「音樂輔助介入」的使用頻率落在「中低」程度,其餘皆落在「中高」程度。
三、國中小特教教師對實證本位教學方法熟悉程度與使用頻率呈現高度相關。
四、任教階段、是否參加過有關EBP的研討或相關培訓、是否研讀過與EBP有關的書籍或文獻對於熟悉程度及使用頻率有顯著差異。另外特教教學年資對於熟悉程度亦有顯著差異。
五、影響特教教師較常使用某些實證方法的原因為: 符合自閉症學生的需求、曾有過成功的經驗、清楚了解這些實證教學方法該如何運用、清楚了解這些實證教學方法的內涵、教學環境提供足夠支持及其他。不常使用某些實證方法的原因:受教學環境限制、不了解這些實證教學方法該如何運用、不了解這些實證教學方法的內涵、不符合自閉症學生的需求、很少有成功的經驗及其他。
The purpose of this study was to understand the current status of the utilization of evidence-based practices (EBPs) by special education teachers in elementary and junior high schools in the Taipei metropolitan area to students with autism as well as to further investigate the relationships between teacher background variables and familiarity with and frequency of utilization of EBPs. Data was obtained from 258 in-service special education teachers using a questionnaire designed by the author,” The Current Status of the Utilization of Evidence-based Practices to Students with Autism”. Data was analyzed by descriptive statistics, the Pearson product-moment correlation and one-way ANOVA. The conclusions of this study are the following:
1. The level of elementary and junior high school special education teachers’ familiarity with the 28 types of EBPs as a whole was at above average. Among these,” Reinforcement”,” Direct Instruction”,” Prompting”,” Modeling”,” Task analysis”,” Extinction”, and” Visual supports” were at a high level of familiarity with the rest at above average apart from ” Music-Mediated Intervention” which was at below average.
2. The level of elementary and junior high school special education teachers’ frequency of utilization of 28 types of EBPs as a whole was at above average. The frequency of utilization of ” Reinforcement”,” Direct Instruction”,” Prompting”,” Modeling”,” Task analysis” and” Visual supports” were at a high level with the rest at above average apart from “Music-Mediated Intervention” which was at below average.
3. The degree of familiarity with EBPs among elementary and junior high school special education teachers was significantly correlated with the frequency of EBPs utilization.
4. The level of familiarity with EBPs and frequency of EBPs utilization were associated with teachers’ EBPs seminar participation, relevant training, and knowledge of EBPs. In addition, seniority of special education teachers was significantly related to familiarity with EBPs.
5. Reasons for special education teachers' frequent EBPs utilization included: experiences with EBPs meeting the needs of students with autism, prior successful experiences, clear knowledge of EBPs utilization and related skills, sufficient teaching support, and others. Reasons for infrequent EBPs utilization included: limitations of the teaching environment, lack of understanding of EBPs utilization and related skills, EBPs do not meet student needs, limited successful experiences, and others.
壹、中文文獻
王欣宜、林巾凱 (2011):情境安排之同儕介入策略對自閉症幼兒社會技能表現影響之探討。特殊教育季刊,121,1-7。
王瑋璘、鈕文英 (2017):特殊需求學生社會技能介入文獻之分析。中華民國特殊教育學會年刊,65-81。
王慧婷 (2013):影片示範教學於教導患有自閉症學生的介紹與應用。特殊教育季刊,126,9-16。
王慧婷、鳳華、張淑芬、郭千瑜(2018):臺北市國小特殊教育教師實施應用行為分析之現況。特殊教育研究學刊,43(2),1-30。
李怡嫻、張正芬 (2019):正向行為支持計畫對國中特教班自閉症學生行為問題處理成效之個案研究。中華民國特殊教育學會年刊,87-105。
李翠玲、黃澤洋 (2014) : 自閉症學童輔助溝通系統介入成效:系統性回顧與後設分析。特殊教育與輔助科技學報,7,23-47。
吳佳蒨、鈕文英 (2012) : 社交技巧訓練對高功能自閉症及亞斯柏格症者介入成效之後設分析。特殊教育研究學刊,37(2),29-57。
林家如、王慧婷、呂翠華(2019) : 社會技巧促進系統提升國小低年級學童社會技巧表現之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,44(3),63-92。
洪儷瑜 (2018) : 如何讓實證本位教育之推動更有系統的認識與預測─談執行科學在教育研究的意義。人文與社會科學簡訊,19(4),122-124。
張正芬 (2000) :自閉症兒童問題行為功能之探討。特殊教育研究學刊,18,127-150。
張正芬(2014),自閉症學生鑑定辦法說明:載於身心障礙及資賦優異學生鑑定說明手冊。教育部特殊教育工作小組委託國立台灣師範大學特殊教育系編印。
張明莉、鳳華 (2004) : 單一嘗試教學法對增進國中自閉關症學生使用電話之成效研究。特殊教育學報,20,25-55。
陳佩玉、蔡欣坪、林沛霖 (2004):身心障礙學生功能本位行為介入方案成效之後設分析。特殊教育研究學刊,40(1),1-30。
教育部 (2008):特殊教育發展報告書。臺北:教育部。
馮士軒、鳳華(2005):同儕應用核心反應訓練增進國小自閉症兒童社會互動之研究。特殊教育學報,22,67-106。
鈕文英(2016): 身心障礙者的正向行為支持(第2 版)。新北市:心理。
黃美慧、鈕文英 (2010) : 社會故事對廣泛自閉症者介入成效之分析。特殊教育與復健學報,(22),1-23。
楊馥榮、郭慧珍、王怡仁 (2019) : 以認知行為團體治療改善自閉症類群障礙兒童之人際關係。北市醫學雜誌,16(3),181-187。
鳳華、周婉琪、孫文菊 (2015) : 應用行為分析介入方案對學齡前高功能自閉症兒童教學成效之個案報告。惠明特殊教育學刊,2,1-31。
鄭媛文 (2016) : 輔助溝通系統對自閉症學生溝通成效之後設分析。身心障礙研究季刊,14(1),34-54。
蕭小菁 (2016) : 介紹美國兒童與青少年自閉症實證成果。臺灣職能治療研究與實務雜誌,12(1),56-59。
鍾佳蓁、鳳華(2005):核心反應訓練對學齡前自閉症兒童象徵性遊戲行為學習成效之影響。特殊教育研究學刊,29,175-197。
謝彬彬、曾淑賢、陳錦茗、歐麗玲 (2009) : 運用情境教學技術於遊戲團體對提升國小自閉症學童社會適應能力之研究。精神衛生護理雜誌,4(2),26-36。
顏瑞隆、張正芬 (2014) : 臺灣自閉症者家庭碩博士論文回顧與分析。中華民國特殊教育學會年刊,247-262。
貳、英文文獻
Alexander, J. L., Ayres, K. M., & Smith, K. A. (2015). Training teachers in evidence-based practice for individuals with autism spectrum disorder: A review of the literature. Teacher Education and Special Education, 38(1), 13-27.
Callahan, K., Hughes, H. L., Mehta, S., Toussaint, K. A.,
Nichols, S. M.,Ma, P. S., et al. (2017). Social validity of evidence-based practices and emerging interventions in autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 32(3), 188–197.
Cook, B. G., & Odom, S. L. (2013). Evidence-based practices and implementation science in special education. Exceptional children, 79(2), 135-144.
Cook, B., Buysse, V., Klingner, J., Landrum, T., McWilliam, R., Tankersley, M., & Test, D. (2014). Council for Exceptional Children: Standards for evidence-based practices in special education. Teaching Exceptional Children, 46(6), 206.
Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D., Coyne, M., Greenwood, C., & Innocenti, M. S. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 149–164.
Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidencebased practice in special education.Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179.
McNeill, J. (2019). Social validity and teachers’ use of evidence-based practices for autism. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 49(11), 4585-4594.
Odom, S. L., Boyd, B., Hall, L., & Hume, K. A. (2014).
Comprehensive treatment models for children and youth with autism spectrum disorders. In F. R. Volkmar, R. Paul, S. J. Rogers,& K. A. Pelphrey (Eds.), Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders (4th ed.,Vol. 2, pp. 770-778). John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118911389
Paynter, J., Sulek, R., Luskin-Saxby, S., Trembath, D., & Keen, D. (2018). Allied health professionals’ knowledge and use of ASD intervention practices. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 48(7), 2335-2349.
Sam, A. M., Cox, A. W., Savage, M. N., Waters, V., & Odom, S. L. (2020). Disseminating information on evidence-based practices for children and youth with autism spectrum disorder: AFIRM. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 50(6), 1931-1940.
Steinbrenner, J. R., Hume, K., Odom, S. L., Morin, K. L., Nowell, S. W., Tomaszewski, B., Szendrey, S., McIntyre, N. S., Yucesoy-Ozkan, S., & Savage, M. N. (2020). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with Autism. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, National Clearinghouse on Autism Evidence and Practice Review Team.
Wang, H. T. (2016). Acceptability and usability of video modeling for teaching students with autism in Taiwan: What preliminary data tells us. 身心障礙研究季刊, 14(4), 271-289.
Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11(2), 203–214.
Wong, C., Odom, S. L., Hume, K. Cox, A. W., Fettig, A., Kucharczyk, S., … Schultz, T. R. (2014). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young ddults with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, Autism Evidence-Based Practice Review Group.
Wong, C., Odom, S. L., Hume, K. A., Cox, A. W., Fettig, A., Kucharczyk, S., … Schultz, T. R. (2015). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism spectrum disorder:A comprehensive review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(7), 1951–1966.DOI 10.1007/s10803-014-2351-z