簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 康靈
Kang Ling
論文名稱: 兩種強化的聽前教學對台灣地區國中學生聽力理解的影響研究: 背景知識教學與單字教學
The effects of two enhanced pre-listening supports on Taiwanese junior high students' listening comprehension: Background knowledge pre-instruction versus vocabulary pre-teaching
指導教授: 陳齊瑞
Chen, Chyi-Ruey
曾文鐽
Tseng, Wen-Ta
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 英語學系
Department of English
論文出版年: 2009
畢業學年度: 97
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 122
中文關鍵詞: 聽前教學背景知識教學單字教學聽力理解
英文關鍵詞: Pre-listening supports, Background knowledge pre-instruction, Vocabulary pre-teaching, Listening comprehension
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:193下載:8
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討兩種強化的聽前教學—背景知識教學與單字教學—對於台灣地區國中生聽力理解的影響。共有九十九位台灣八年級學生參與本次實驗,他們來自三個班級,並隨機指派其接受背景知識教學、單字教學(此為實驗組)或聽課文朗誦帶(此為對照組)。在背景教學班級,教師首先公佈聽力的題目,並給予學生「對/錯」模式的主要場景摘要句子,最後再帶領學生進行相關的討論。至於單字教學班級,教師利用附有中文/英文單字組和圖片資訊的字卡來進行教學,接著再帶領學生做句子練習。在主要實驗之後,參與者必須回答聽後的聽力測驗以及一份問卷。共變數分析顯示不論學生的語言能力高低,背景知識教學和單字教學皆可有效地增強學生的聽力理解程度。而相依樣本平均數檢定也指出這兩種聽前教學並無顯著的差異,表示兩者皆是有效的聽前活動。最後,多數的實驗組參與者也在問卷中反應他們對於兩種聽前教學抱持著正面的態度並相信聽前教學的效力。

    The present study aims to investigate the effects of two enhanced pre-listening supports, background knowledge pre-instruction and vocabulary pre-teaching, on Taiwanese junior high school students’ listening comprehension. Ninety-nine eighth-grade students participated in the study. They were recruited from three intact classes, randomly designated to receive background instruction, vocabulary teaching (as two experimental groups), or textbook CD listening (as control group). For the background class, the instructor announced the topic of listening passages, gave learners’ main-scene summary sentences of true/false mode, and led them to a related discussion. For the vocabulary class, the instructor presented the unfamiliar vocabulary with L1-L2 word-pair and pictorial information and led students to do the key-word sentence practices. After the intervention, all participants answered listening comprehension tests as well as questionnaires. ANCOVA analysis showed that both types of supports were effective enhancers of listening comprehension. In addition, their facilitating effects were independent of students’ proficiency level. Paired t-test detected no significant difference in the comparison of two listening supports, suggesting that both of them are equally helpful. Finally, students’ questionnaire responses demonstrated that the majority of participants held favorable attitudes toward listening supports and that they believed in the effectiveness of such pre-teaching.

    Chinese Abstract…………………………………………………………….i English Abstract…...…………………………………………………….ii Acknowledgements………………………………………...………………iii Table of Contents………………………...……………………………...v List of Tables………………………………………………………...viii List of Graphs…………………………………………………………...IX Chapter One: Introduction……………………………………………………..………1 1.1 Motivation…………………………………...…………………...1 1.2 Theoretical Background……………………...……………..4 1.3 Research Questions……………………………..…………..…9 1.4 Significance of the Present Study…………………………10 1.5 Definition of Key Terms……………………………………….11 1.6 Organization of the Thesis…………………………………12 Chapter Two: Literature Review……………………………………14 2.1 Listening Comprehension….…………………………………14 2.2 Top-down Processing and Bottom-up Processing.……16 2.3 Advance Organizer.…………………………….....…..…17 2.4 Background Knowledge Pre-Instruction….……………18 2.4.1 Background Knowledge and Schema Theory……..….19 2.4.2 The Effectiveness of Background Knowledge in L2 Listening...20 2.4.3 Enhanced Pre-Listening Support with Visual Contextual Clues…24 2.4.4 Enhanced Background Knowledge Pre-Instruction..26 2.4.5 Theory of Information Processing………………………28 2.5 Key Vocabulary Pre-Teaching…………………………………28 2.5.1 Role of Vocabulary in Listening Comprehension……29 2.5.2 The Effectiveness of Vocabulary Pre-Instruction…31 2.5.3 Enhanced Vocabulary Pre-Teaching……………………..33 2.5.4 Generative Theory of Multimedia Learnig..…………38 2.6 Interaction between Learners’ Listening Proficiency Level and Types of Listening Support..…........…………….38 2.7 Summary of Chapter Two………………………………………..40 Chapter Three: Methodology………………………………………………............41 3.1 Participants………….……………………………………..…41 3.2 Materials and Instruments.…………………………………42 3.2.1 Two Listening Passages…..…………………………………42 3.2.2 Main-Scene Summary Sentences……..………………………45 3.2.3 Key-Word Flashcards…..………………………………………46 3.2.4 Key-Word Sentence Practice…………..…………………..48 3.2.5 Measurement for Listening Comprehension..……………50 3.2.6 Post-Listening Questionnaire.…..……………….…….54 3.3 Study Design…………………………………………….…….56 3.4 Procedure………………………………………………..……..57 3.5 Data Analysis…………………………………………….…….60 3.6 Summary of Chapter Three……………………………………60 Chapter Four: Results……………………………………………………62 4.1 Descriptive Analysis……………………………………...62 4.2 Effects of Two Types of Enhanced Pre-Listening Supports on Participants’ Listening Comprehension…….…67 4.3 Interaction between Types of Pre-Listening Supports and Participant’s Proficiency Level….………………………..73 4.4 Participants’ Responses Toward Pre-Listening Supports.................................................77 4.5 Summary of Chapter Four……………………………………84 Chapter Five: Discussion………………………………………………86 5.1 Effects of Enhanced Background Knowledge Pre-Instruction and Enhanced Vocabulary Pre-Teaching………..86 5.1.1 Summary Results of the Effects of Background Knowledge Pre-Instruction and Enhanced VocabularyPre-Teaching…………….......................................86 5.1.2 Effects of Enhanced Background Pre-Instruction….87 5.1.3 Effects of Enhanced Vocabulary Pre-Teaching…….89 5.1.4 Comparison between Background Knowledge Pre-Instruction Support and Enhanced Vocabulary Pre-Teaching Support..................................................91 5.2 Interaction between Types of Pre-Listening Supports and Participant’s Proficiency Level..……………………………93 5.2.1 Summary Results of the Interaction between Types of Pre-Listening Supports and Proficiency Level.………………93 5.2.2 Interaction between Pre-Listening Supports and Proficiency Level…......................................94 5.3 Summary of Chapter Five………………………………………100 Chapter Six: Conclusion……………………………………………………………101 6.1 Summary of Major Findings………………………………101 6.2 Pedagogical Implications..…………………………………102 6.4 Limitations….……………………………………………………103 Reference……………………………………………………………………105 Appendix I (Transcription of Two Listening Passages)...…112 Appendix II (Worksheet for Background Knowledge Class)….114 Appendix III (Flashcards of Key Vocabulary)…………….……116 Appendix IV (Worksheet of Key Word Sentence Practice)....118 Appendix V (Listening Comprehension Test)……………….....120 Appendix VI (Questionnaire)…………………………………………122

    Ausubel, D. (1961). The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 266-274.
    Anderson, J. R. (1980). Cognitive psychology and its implications. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
    Bacon, S. M. (1992). Phases of listening to authentic input in Spanish: A descriptive study. Foreign Language Annals, 25, 317-333.
    Baddeley, A. (1990). Human Memory: Theory and Practice. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
    Berne, J. E. (1995). How does varying pre-listening activities affect second language listening comprehension? Hispania, 78, 316-319.
    Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. White Plains, NY: Longman.
    Buck, G. (1995). How to become a good listening teacher. In D. J. Mendelsohn & J. Rubin. (Eds.), A guide for the teaching of second language listening (pp. 113-131). San Diego, CA: Dominie Press.
    Buck, G. (2001). Assessing Listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Bonk, W. J. (2000). Second language lexical knowledge and listening comprehension. International Journal of Listening, 14, 14-31.
    Carr, T. H., Verne, R. B. & Mehner, D. S. (1977). Preparing children to look at pictures: Advance descriptions direct attention and facilitate active processing. Child Development, 48, 22-27.
    Chang, A. C-S. & Read, J. (2006). The effects of listening support on the listening performance of EFL learners. TESOL QUARTERLY, 40, 375-397.
    Channell, J. (1988). Psycholinguistic considerations in the study of L2 vocabulary acquisition. In R. Carter & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary and language teaching. London: Longman.
    Chiang, C. S. & Dunkel, P. (1992). The effects of speech modification, prior knowledge, and listening proficiency on EFL lecture learning. TESOL QUARTERLY, 26, 345-357.
    Chung, J. M. & Plass, J. L. (1996). Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 80, 183-198.
    Chung, J. M. & Plass, J. L. (1997). Research on text comprehension in multimedia environments. Language Learning & Technology, 1, 1-35.
    Chung, J. M. & Huang, S. C. (1998). The effects of three aural advance organizers for video viewing in a foreign language classroom. System, 26, 553-565.
    Chung, J. M. (1999). The effects of using video texts supported with advance organizers and captions on Chinese college students’ listening comprehension: An empirical study. Foreign Language Annals, 32, 295-308.
    Chung, J. M. (2002). The effects of using two advance organizers with video texts for the teaching of listening in English. Foreign Language Annals, 35, 231-241.
    Cohen, A. C. & Aphek, E. (1980). Retention of second-language vocabulary over time: Investigating the role of mnemonic associations, System, 8, 221-235.
    Cohen, J. (1998). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Craik, F. I. M. & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: a framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 67-84.
    Elley, W. (1989). Vocabulary acquisition from listening to stories. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 174-187.
    Ellis, N. & Beaton, A. (1993). Psychological determinants of foreign language vocabulary learning. Language Learning, 43, 559-617.
    Fischer, R. & Farris, M. (1995). Instructional basis of Libra. IALL Journal of Language Learning Technologies, 28, 29-90.
    Field, J. (2004). An insight into listeners’ problem: too much bottom-up or too much top-down? System, 32, 363-377.
    Hudson. T. (1982). The effects of induced schemata on the “Short Circuit” in L2 Reading: Non-decoding factors in L2 reading performance. Language Learning, 32, 1-32.
    Hammadou, J. (1991). Interrelationships among prior knowledge, inference, and language proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 75, 27-38.
    Hansen, C. & Jensen, C. (1994). Evaluating lecture comprehension. In Flowerdew, J. (Ed.), Academic Listening (pp. 241-268). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Herron, C. (1994). An investigation of the effectiveness of using an advance organizer to introduce video in the foreign language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 190-198.
    Herron, C. A. & Hanley, J. B. & Cole, S. P. (1995). A comparison study of two advance organizers for introducing beginning foreign language students to video. The Modern Language Journal, 79, 387-395.
    Hanley, J. B. & Herron, C. A. & Cole, S. P. (1995). Using videoas an advance organizer to a written passage in the FLES classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 79. 57-66.
    Herron, C. A. & Cole, S. P. & York, H. & Linden, P. (1998). A comparison study of student retention of foreign language video: Declarative versus interrogative advance organizer. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 237-247.
    Hoven, D. (1999). A model for listening and viewing comprehension in multimedia environments. Language Learning & Technology, 3, 88-103.
    Hunt, A. & Beglar, D. (2002). Current research and practice in teaching vocabulary. In Richards, J. C. & Renandya, W. A. (Eds.), Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Joiner, E. G. (1990). Choosing and using videotexts. Foreign Language Annuals, 23, 53-64.
    Jones, L. C. & Plass, J. L. (2002). Supporting listening comprehension and vocabulary acquisition in French with multimedia annotations. The Modern Language Journal, 86, 546-561.
    Jones, L. C. (2003). Supporting listening comprehension and vocabulary acquisition with multimedia annotations: The students’ voice. CALICO Journal, 21, 41-65.
    Kellogg, G. , & Howe, M. J. (1971). Using words and pictures in foreign language learning. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 17, 87-94.
    Kost, C. R., Foss, P., & Lenzini, J. J. (1999). Textual and pictorial glosses: Effectiveness on incidental vocabulary growth when reading in a foreign language. Foreign Language Annals, 32, 89-113.
    Laufer, B. (1989). What percentage of text-lexis is essential for comprehension? In C. Lauren & M. Nordman (Eds.), Special Language (pp.316-323). Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
    Laufer, B. (1992). How much lexis is necessary for reading comprehension? In P. Arnaud & H. Béjoint (Eds.), Vocabulary and applied linguistics (pp. 126-132). London: Macmillan.
    Laufer, B. (2006). Comparing focus on form and focus on forms in second-language vocabulary learning. Canadian Modern Language Review, 63, 149-166.
    Long, D. R. (1990). What you don’t know can’t help you: An exploratory study of background knowledge and second language listening comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 65-80.
    Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32, 1-19.
    Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia Learning. Cambridge, MA: Oxford.
    Meskill, C. (1996). Listening skills development through multimedia. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 6, 179-201.
    Mueller, G. A. (1980). Visual contextual cues and listening comprehension: An experiment. The Modern Language Journal, 64, 335-340.
    Markham, P. L. & Latham, M. (1987). The influence of religion-specific background knowledge on listening comprehension of adult second language students. Language Learning, 37, 157-170.
    Mendelsohn, D. (1995). Applying learning strategies in the second/foreign language listening comprehension lesson. In D. J. Mendelsohn & J. Rubin (Eds.), A guide for the teaching of second language listening (pp. 132-150). San Diego, CA: Dominie Press.
    Omaggio, A. C. (1979). Pictures and second language comprehension: Do they help? Foreign Language Annals, 35, 107-116.
    Omaggio Hadley. A. C. (1993). Teaching language in context. 2nd ed. Boston: Heinle.
    Oxford, R. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. New York: Newbury House.
    Prince, P. (1996). Second language vocabulary learning: The role of context versus translations as a function of proficiency. Modern Language Journal, 80, 478-493.
    Rubin, J. (1994). A review of second language listening comprehension research. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 199-221.
    Rost, M. (2002). Teaching and researching listening. UK: Pearson Education.
    Schmidt-Rinehart, B. C. (1994). The effects of topic familiarity on second language listening comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 179-189.
    Schmitt, N. & Schmitt, D. (1995). Vocabulary notebooks: Theoretical underpinnings and practical suggestions. ELT Journal, 49, 133-143.
    Shrum, J. L. & Glisan, E. W. (1994). Teacher’s handbook. Boston: Heinle.
    Sun, K. C. (2002). Investigation of English listening difficulties of Taiwan students. Selected papers from the eleventh international symposium on English teaching. Fourth Pan-Asian conference, 518-526.
    Teng, H. C. (1994). Effects of cultural schemata and visual cues on Chinese students’ EFL listening comprehension. Paper presented at the 11th National Conference on English Teaching, R. O. C. Taipei.
    Tsui, A. & Fullilove, J. (1998). Bottom-up or top-down processing as a discriminator of L2 listening performance. Applied Linguistics 19, 432-451.
    Tsi, C. H. (2002). The effects of two pre-listening tasks on L2 listening proficiency. Selected papers from the eleventh international symposium on English teaching. Fourth Pan-Asian conference, 546-554.
    Underwood, M. (1998). Teaching listening. London: Longman.
    Vandergrief, L. (2003). From prediction through reflection: Guiding students through the process of L2 listening. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 59, 425-440.
    Vandergrief, L. (2006). Second language listening: listening ability or language proficiency? The Modern Language Journal, 90, 6-18.
    Wiseman, S., & Tulving. E. (1976). Encoding specificity: Relations between recall superiority and recognition failure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 349-361.
    Witkin, B. R. (1990). Listening theory and research: The state of art. International Journal of Listening, 4, 7-32.
    Yen, A. C. (1987). An assessment of listening comprehension difficulties encountered by Chinese college English majors. Unpublished mater’s thesis, Graduate Institute of English, NTNU.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE