簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 郭哲君
Che-Chun Kuo
論文名稱: 體育相關科系學生未來工作自我顯著與前瞻性生涯行為之相關研究:論調控焦點之個人傾向效果
Future work self salience and proactive career behavior in physical education college students: The role of regulatory focus effects
指導教授: 鄭志富
Cheng, Chih-Fu
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 體育學系
Department of Physical Education
論文出版年: 2014
畢業學年度: 102
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 98
中文關鍵詞: 前瞻性前瞻性行為生涯發展自我調控
英文關鍵詞: proactivity, proactive behavior, career development, self-regulation
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:435下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 前瞻性行為是當前熱門的研究議題,其關注的是一種促成事情發生的心理機制,涉及自發性、以改變為導向,並且以未來為焦點的一系列想法與行動。而在近年來,前瞻性研究開始關注個人生涯發展,相關研究先後從動機的觀點捕捉前瞻性生涯行為的影響因素。基於這樣的脈絡,本研究延續 Strauss 等人的觀點,試圖將動機和行為的聯結向前延伸,從個人長期慣習之調控焦點傾向開展,探討其對於未來工作自我顯著和前瞻性生涯行為的心理機制;同時,從正向心理的途徑進一步檢驗調控焦點傾向對於未來工作自我顯著和主觀幸福感的關聯性。據此,研究一以 228 名大專校院之在學學生為對象,先針對中文版之未來工作自我顯著量表、未來傾向量表,以及前瞻性生涯行為量表進行信效度檢驗,結果顯示三個量表分別具有良好之因素結構,且構念間的相關性符合個人前瞻性行為的理論主張。研究二以 225 名體育相關科系學生重複驗證中文量表之信效度,亦反映良好之心理計量特性。另外,在研究中我們發現,促進型調控焦點傾向能有效透過未來工作自我顯著的中介,分別正向預測前瞻性生涯行為與主觀幸福感。這樣的結果意味著在動機與目標的歷程上,帶有個人盼望、抱負與志向等個人慣用之促進型調控焦點傾向在正向可能自我的型塑上扮演重要的關係角色,如此的關係更能夠進一步提升個人前瞻性的生涯行為,同時增進個人的心理適應,整體上符合前瞻性的正向觀點。最後,透過本研究之重要發現,並依據調控焦點與前瞻性行為之理論視角進行討論,建議未來研究在方法上可採用貫時性研究或實驗研究方法,概念上則可探討調控焦點的個人傾向與情境之調節效果。實務方面,建議未來研究可將前瞻性概念延伸至不同的理論和情境脈絡中;同時,應用本研究翻譯之中文量表進行研究;最後,在生涯輔導方面則應於輔導前先瞭解被輔導者之動機傾向,藉以提升生涯輔導之成效。

    Proactive behavior now is an essential research issue, which concerns with the psychological mechanism of making things happen, and focus on a seris of self-initiated, change-oriented and future-focused actions that directs to improve the situation or oneself. Recently, the research approach in proactivity started to put the aim on the individual’s career development, and researcher attempted to capture the antecedents and mechanisms of proactive behavior from the view of individual’s motivation. Drawing on the contention, this study extended the findings of Strauss, Griffin, and Parker (2012) to exam the motivation- behavior mechanism. The author applied the chronic focus (regulatory focus) as the antecedent variable of future work self-salience and proactive career behavior for examing the relations among the three variables. Also, this study based on the approach of positive psychology to test the relations among chronic focus, future work self-salience, and subjective well-being. In study one, 228 college students were recruited as the research participant for confirming the psychometrics properties of Chinese version of future work self-salience measure, future orientation measure, and proactive career behavior. The findings provided an empirical support that the three measures revealed well reliability and validity. Study two replicated the study one, the author took 225 physical education college students as research participants, the author recomfirmed the factor solution and construct validity of three measures. Furthermore, the results showed that promotion focus was significantly associated with proactive career behavior via future work self-salience, and promotion focus was significantly associated with subjective well-being via future work self-salience as well. In line with the theoretical suggestions of proactivity, the findings indicated that promotion focus play important roles in shaping students’ proactive career behavior and promoting psychological adjustment. When students with promotion focus are more likely to reveal salient future work self, which would enhance proactive career behavior and subjective well-being respectively. According to the findings of this study suggests that future research can investigate the regulatory fit effect (i.e. interaction between chronic focus and situation), and the longitudinal and experimental methods are recommended. In addition, this study suggests that future research can extend the proactivity concept to different contexts by using the Chinese version measure in this study. Finally, the findings suggest that the students’ motivational tendancy should be considered before the implement of career counseling intervention.

    中文摘要 i 英文摘要 ii 目 次 iv 表 次 vi 圖 次 vii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景 1 第二節 研究目的 4 第三節 研究問題 5 第四節 研究範圍 5 第五節 研究重要性 5 第六節 名詞釋義 6 第二章 文獻探討 9 第一節 追求卓越與個人前瞻性行為 9 第二節 未來工作自我顯著與個人生涯產出結果 18 第三節 調控焦點理論與研究範式 21 第四節 調控焦點、未來工作自我顯著及生涯產出結果 28 第五節 文獻總結 32 第三章 研究方法與設計 34 第一節 研究架構與假設預期 34 第二節 研究一方法 36 第三節 研究二方法 41 第四章 研究結果與討論 47 第一節 研究一結果與討論 47 第二節 研究二結果與討論 60 第三節 綜合討論 68 第五章 結論與建議 76 第一節 結論 76 第二節 建議 78 引用文獻 82 附件一 研究問卷 91

    紀乃文、張火燦、黃仙麗 (2012) 。工作場域中的情感雙歧:探討服務人員情感雙歧與其服務品質及工作滿意度之關係。人力資源管理學報, 12(1) ,1-22。
    陳鈺萍 (2004) 。國小教師的幸福感及其相關因素之研究 (未出版碩士論文) 。國立屏東教育大學,屏東市。
    陳佳雯、陸洛、許雅玉 (2012) 。工作要求、工作資源與員工工作態度之關聯:以勤勉審慎性及主動性人格為調節變項。人力資源管理學報,12 (1) ,23-49 。
    陳麗如 (1995) 。大學生生涯發展阻隔因素量表:一個診斷與介入處理的工具。測驗年刊, 42 ,217-226。
    郭哲君、鄭志富 (2012) 。生活積極承諾之成功老化與幸福感-中高齡者體育志願服務實證研究。體育學報, 45(3) ,211-226。
    郭哲君、鄭志富 (2013) 。題項包裹法於結構方程模式分析中的應用:臺灣體育運動學術研究之內容分析。體育學報,46(4) ,429-442。
    楊淑雯 (2010) 。極大化傾向對後悔之影響:以調控焦點作為調節變項 (未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,臺北市。
    楊珮琳、林靜萍 (2009) 。師範校院體育系學生生涯發展與生涯阻隔。體育學報, 42(2) ,67-80。
    曾文正 (2002) 。就業前景大調查:十大最難找頭路的科系。時報週刊,1292,93-97。
    趙小瑩、王文中、葉寶專 (2007) 。正負向情感及身體激起量表之發展與試題反應分析:焦慮症與憂鬱症三角模式的再探討。測驗學刊, 54(1) ,223-257。
    鄭志富 (2011) 。臺灣優秀運動員生涯輔導模式建置與實證研究-期中報告(NSC99-2410-H-003-135-MY2)。臺北市:行政院國家科學委員會。
    鄭志富 (2012) 。臺灣優秀運動員生涯輔導模式建置與實證研究-期末報告(NSC99-2410-H-003-135-MY2)。臺北市:行政院國家科學委員會。
    Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423.
    Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of Structural Equation Models. Academy of Marketing Science Journal, 16(1), 74-95.
    Baron R.M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
    Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 103-118.
    Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods & Research, 16, 78-117. doi:10.1177/0049124187016001004.
    Bindl, U.K., Parker, S. K. (2011). Proactive work behavior: Forward-thinking and change-oriented action. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), Organizationsin APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Volume 2: Selecting and Developing Members for the Organization (pp. 567-598). American Psychological Association, USA.
    Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In W. L. Lonner & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 137-164). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    Brown, D. J., Cober, R. T., Kane, K., Levy, P. E., & Shalhoop, J. (2006). Proactive personality and the successful job search: A field investigation with recent college graduates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91,717-726.
    Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen, & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    Buss, D. M. (1987). Selection, evocation, and manipulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1214-1221.
    Carless, S. A., & Bernath, L. (2007). Antecedents of intent to change careers among psychologists. Journal of Career Development, 33(3), 183-200.
    Carstensen, L. L. (2006). The influence of a sense of time on human development. Science, 312(30), 1913-1915.
    Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54(3), 165-181.
    Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1982). Control theory: A useful conceptual framework for personality-social, clinical, and health psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 92(1), 111-135.
    Carver, C. S. & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67 (2), 319-333.
    Cesario, J., Grant, H., & Higgins, E. T. (2004). Regulatory fit and persuasion: Transfer from "feeling right." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 388 - 404.
    Cesario, J., & Higgins, E. T. (2008). Making message recipients feel right: How nonverbal cues can increase persuasion. Psychological Science, 19, 415-420.
    Chen, L. H., Ye, Y. C., Chen, M. Y., & Tung, I. W. (2010). Alegría! Flow in leisure and life satisfaction: The mediating role of event satisfaction using data from an acrobatics show. Social Indicators Research, 99(2), 301-313.
    Claes, R., & Ruiz-Quintanilla, S. A. (1998). Influences of early career experiences, occupational group, and national culture on proactive career behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 52, 357–378. doi: 10.1006/jvbe.1997.1626
    Crant, J. M. (2000). The proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26, 435-462.
    Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 69, 117-132.
    Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75.
    Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276-303.
    Förster, J., Higgins, E. T., & Idson, L. C. (1998). Approach and avoidance strength during goal attainment: Regulatory focus and the “goal looms larger” effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1115– 1131. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.5.1115
    Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotion. American Psychologist, 56, 218-226.
    Freitas, A.L., & Higgins, E. T. (2002). Enjoying goal-directed action: The role of regulatory fit. Psychological Science, 13, 1-6.
    Fritz, C., & Sonnentag, S. (2009). Antecedents of day-level proactive behavior: A look at jobstressors and positive affect during the workday. Journal of Management, 35(1), 94-111.
    Fuller, J. B., & Marler, L. E. (2009). Change driven by nature: A meta-analytic review of the proactive personality literature. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75, 329-345.
    Goldberg, J. R. (1990). An alternative "Description of Personality": The big five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229.
    Gould, D., Eklund, R. C., & Jackson, S. A. (1993). Coping strategies used by U.S. Olympic wresters. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 64, 83-93.
    Grant, A. M., & Ashford, S. J. (2008). The dynamics of proactivity at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 3-34.
    Grant, A. M., & Parker, S. K. (2009). Redesigning work design theories: The rise ofrelational and proactive perspectives. Academy of Management Annals, 3, 317-375.
    Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham R. L., & Black,W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). UK: Prentice-Hall International.
    Hall, D. T., & Mirvis, P. H. (1995). The new career contract: Developing the whole person at midlife and beyond. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 47, 269-289. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1995.0004
    Haws, K. L., Dholakia, U. M., & Bearden, W. O. (2010). An assessment of chronic regulatory focus measures. Journal of Marketing, 47, 967-982. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkr. 47.5.967
    Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-Discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319-340.
    Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280-1300. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.12.1280
    Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 1-46. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08) 60381-0
    Higgins, E. T. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55, 1217-1230. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.11.1217
    Higgins, E. T. (2011). Regulatory Focus Theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology Volume 1 (pp. 483-504). Singapore: SAGE.
    Higgins, E. T., Bond, R. N., Klein, R., & Strauman, T. (1986). Self-discrepancies and emotional vulnerability: How magnitude, accessibility, and type of discrepancy influence affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 5-15.
    Higgins, E. T., Friedman, R. S., Harlow, R. E., Idson, L. C., Ayduk, O. N., Taylor, A. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 3-23.
    Hirschi, A., Lee, B., Porfeli, E. J., & Vondracek, F. W. (2013). Proactive motivation and engagement in career behaviors: Investigating direct, mediated, and moderated effects. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83(1), 31-40. doi 10.1016/j.jvb.2013.02.003
    Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
    Idson, L. C., Liberman, N., & Higgins, E. T. (2000). Distinguishing gains from nonlosses and losses from nongains: A regulatory focus perspective on hedonic intensity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 252-274.
    Idson, L. C., Liberman, N., & Higgins, E. T. (2004). Imagining how you'd feel: The role of motivational experiences from regulatory fit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 926-937.
    Jones, P. S., Lee, J. W., Phillips, L. R., Zhang, X. E., & Jaceldo, K. B. (2001). An adaptation of Brislin’s translation model for cross-cultural research. Nursing Research, 50(5), 300-304.
    Kutzner, F. L. W., Förderer, S., & Plessner, H. (2013). Regulatory Fit Improves Putting in Top Golfers. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 2, 130-137.
    King, Z. (2004). Career self-management: Its nature, causes and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65, 112-133.
    King, L. A., & Patterson, C. (2000). Reconstructing life goals after the birth of a child with Down syndrome: Finding happiness and growing. International Journal of Rehabilitation & Health, 5, 17–30. doi:10.1023/A: 1012955018489
    King, L. A., & Raspin, C. (2004). Lost and found possible selves, subjective well-being, and ego development in divorced women. Journal of Personality, 72, 603-632. doi:10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00274.x
    King, L. A., & Smith, N. G. (2004). Gay and straight possible selves: Goals, identity, subjective well-being, and personality development. Journal of Personality, 72, 967-994. doi:10.1111/j.0022- 3506.2004.00287.x
    Lanaj, K., Chang, C. H. D., & Johnson R. E. (2012). Regulatory focus and work-related outcomes: A review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(5), 998-1034.
    Liberman, N., Idson, L., Camacho, C., & Higgins, E. T. (1999). Promotion and prevention choices between stability and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1135-1145.
    Lockwood, P., Jordan, C., & Kunda, Z. (2002). Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 854-864.
    MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 83-104. doi:10.1037//1082-989X.7.1.83
    Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). The possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954-969.
    Martens, P. M., & Lee, K. F. (1998). Promoting life-career development in the student athlete: how can career centers help?. Journal of Career Development, 25(2), 123-133.
    Miller, P.S., & Kerr, G.A. (2002). Conceptualizing excellence: Past, present, and future. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 14, 140-153.
    Mirvis, P. H., & Hall, D. T. (1994). Psychological success and the boundaryless career. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(4), 365-380.
    Norem, J. K., & Cantor, N. (1986a). Anticipatory and post hoc cushioning strategies: Optimism and defensive pessimism in risky situations. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 10, 347-362.
    Norem, J. K., & Cantor, N. (1986b). Defensive pessimism: Harnessing anxiety as motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1208-1217.
    Parker, S. K., & Sprigg, C. A. (1999). Minimizing strain and maximizing learning: The role of job demands, job control, and proactive personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 925-939.
    Parker, S. K., Bindl, U. K., & Strauss, K. (2010). Making things happen: A model of proactive motivation. Journal of Management, 36, 827-856. doi:10.1177/014920631036 -3732
    Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. G. (2010). Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. Journal of Management, 36, 633-662. doi:10.1177/0149206308321 554
    Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 636-652. doi:10.1037/0021-9010. 91.3.636
    Plessner, H., Unkelbach, C., Memmert, D., Baltes, A., & Kolb, A. (2009). Regulatory fit as a determinant of sport performance: How to succeed in a soccer penalty-shooting. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10, 108-115.
    Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891.
    Preffer, I. (2013). Regulatory fit message and physical activity motivation. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 35, 119-131.
    Raabe, B., Frese, M., & Beehr, T. A. (2007). Action regulation theory and career self-management. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70, 297-311.
    Rice, R. W., Frone, M. R., & McFarlin, D. B. (1992). Work-nonwork conflict and the perceived quality of life. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 155-168.
    Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (1996). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
    Seibert, S. E., Crant, J. M., & Kraimer, M. L. (1999). Proactive personality and career success. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 416-427.
    Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L., & Crant, J. M. (2001). What do proactive people do? A longitudinal model linking proactive personality and career success. Personnel Psychology, 54, 845-874. doi:10.1111/j.1744- 6570.2001.tb00234.x
    Shah, J., Higgins, E. T., & Friedman, R. S. (1998). Performance incentives and means: How regulatory focus influences goal attainment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 285 - 293.
    Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422-445. doi:10.1037//1082-989X.7.4.422
    Super, D. E. (1957). The psychology of careers. New York: Harper & Row.
    Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., & Edwards, C. S. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 742-752. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.742
    Strauss, K., Griffin, M. A., & Parker, S. K. (2012). Future work selves: How salient hoped-for identities motivate proactive career behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 580-598. doi: 10.1037/a0026423
    Thompson, M. N., & Dahling, J. J. (2012). Perceived social status and learning experiences in Social Cognitive Career Theory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 351-361.
    Tien, H. L. S., Wang, Y. C., Chu, H. C., & Huang, T. L. (2012). Career Adapt-Abilities Scale-Taiwan form: Psychometric properties and construct validity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(3), 744-747.
    Toker, D. M., Thompson, M. N., Plaufcan, M. R., & Williams, C. M. (2007). Precursors of learning experiences in social cognitive career theory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 71(3), 319-339.
    Tolentino, L. R., Garcia, P. R. J. M., Lu, V. N., Restubog, S. L. D., Bordia, P., & Plewa, C. (2014). Career adaptation: The relation of adaptability to goal orientation, proactive personality, and career optimism. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 84, 39-48.
    Unkelbach, C., Plessner, H., & Memmert, D. (2009). 'Fit' in sports: Self-regulation and athletic performances. In J. P. Forgas, R. F. Baumeister & D. M. Tice (Eds.), Psychology of self-regulation: Cognitive, affective, and motivational processes (pp. 93-105). New York: Psychology Press.
    Vogel, T., & Genschow, O. (2013). When do chronic differences in self-regulation count?: Regulatory focus effects in easy and difficult soccer tasks. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 35, 216-220.
    Watson, D. C., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
    West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables. Problems and remedies. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56–75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Wu, C. H., & Parker, S.K. (2011). Proactivity in the Workplace: Looking Back and Looking Forward. In K. S. Cameron, G. M. Spreitzer (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship (pp. 84-96). New York: Oxford University Press.
    Wu, C. H., Parker, S. K., Bindl, U. K. (2013). Who is proactive and why? Unpacking individual differences in employee proactivity. In A. B. Bakker (Ed.), Advances in positive organizational psychology (pp. 261-280). Limited, Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
    Wu, C. H., & Parker, S. K. (2013). Thinking and acting in anticipation: A review of research on proactive behavior. Advances in Psychological Science, 21(4), 679-700.
    Wu, C. H., & Yao, G. (2006). Analysis of factorial invariance across gender in the Taiwan version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(6), 1259-1268. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.012
    Wu, C. H., Chen, L. H., & Tsai, Y. M. (2009). Longitudinal invariance analysis of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 396-401. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.11.002

    無法下載圖示 本全文未授權公開
    QR CODE