消費者在日常生活中進行購買決策時，常會受到周邊與目標產品沒有直接相關的其他因素所影響，因此在沒有察覺時受到廠商的操弄，改變自己的決策與態度。而廠商則需要在當今這競爭激烈的市場中，透過巧妙的行銷手法，讓消費者對自家品牌增加正面的態度。因此本論文以解釋範圍重疊模型(Chien, 2010)與相互假設理論(Hsiao, 2002)做延伸，來研究在消費者不知情時，雙重促發物會和目標物會產生何種促發效果，以及會如何影響消費者的態度和評價轉變。
此外由於過去有許多研究者探討過相關的議題，因此本研究會從樣本數量、衡量面向、促發物的性質以及衡量標準等呈現方式，與過去研究做出區別，觀察在經過操弄調整後，是否可以找到創新的發現。

Consumers are often influenced by external factors unrelated to the target product when making purchase decisions in their daily lives. As a result, they may be manipulated by marketers without realizing it, leading to changes in their decisions and attitudes. Meanwhile, marketers need to use clever marketing techniques to increase consumers' positive attitudes towards their brands in today's fiercely competitive market. Therefore, this thesis will extend The Dimensional Range Overlap Model (Chien, 2010) and Reciprocity Hypothesis (Hsiao, 2002) to observe the priming effects of dual prime and the target when consumers are unaware, as well as how they affect consumers' attitudes and evaluations.
Furthermore, since many researchers have explored related issues in the past, this study will differentiate from previous research in sample size, measurement dimensions, the nature of the primes, and measurement standards to observe whether innovative discoveries can be found after manipulation adjustments.

呂睿益(2014)。雙重背景下之脈絡效果：正負促發物對產品判斷的影響。碩士論文。台北：國立臺灣師範大學。
吳思穎(2014)。雙重正價促發物對目標產品評價之影響。碩士論文。台北：國立臺灣師範大學。
許舒婷(2015)。雙重正價促發物的周邊效果：解釋範圍重疊模型之延伸。碩士論文。台北：國立臺灣師範大學。
蘇怡如(2016)。正負促發效果如何影響消費者品牌形象。碩士論文。台北：國立臺灣師範大學。
林智慧(2016)。雙重促發物下之周邊效果：正負促發物如何影響消費者判斷。碩士論文。台北：國立臺灣師範大學。
蔡岳翰(2016)。衡量消費者在產品評價所產生態度上轉變的因素: 正負向價促發物產生之週邊效果。碩士論文。台北：國立臺灣師範大學。
陳力瑜(2016)。以解釋範圍重疊模型探討雙重正價促發物對消費者態度之影響。碩士論文。台北：國立臺灣師範大學。
張月亭(2017)。延伸解釋範圍重疊模型：正負向促發效果影響消費者態度評價之研究。台北：國立臺灣師範大學。
沈玨葳(2017)。雙重正價促發物對消費者產品態度轉變之影響：解釋範圍重疊模型之延伸。碩士論文。台北：國立臺灣師範大學。
楊子嫻(2017)。雙重正向促發物對消費者產品態度轉變之影響。碩士論文。台北：國立臺灣師範大學。
白家安(2019)。雙重正向促發物如何影響消費者對目標產品之評價。碩士論文。台北：國立臺灣師範大學。
Chien, Y., Wegener, D.T., Hsiao, C., & Petty, R.E., (2010). Dimensional Range Overlap and Context Effects in Consumer Judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(3), 530-542. Higgins, E. Tory, William S. Rholes, & Carl R. Jones (1977). Category Accessibility
Higgins, E.T., & King, G. A. (1981), Accessibility of social constructs: Information processing consequences of individual and contextual variability. In N. Cantor &J. Kihlstrom (Eds.), Personality cognition, and social interaction (pp.69-121). Hillsdales, NJ: Erlbaum.
Herr, Paul M., Sherman, S. J., & Fazio, R.H.(1983). On the consequence of priming: Assimilation and contrast effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,19 , 323-340
Higgins, E. Tory, Bargh, J. A., & Lombardi, W. J. (1985). Nature of priming effects on Categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 59-69
Hsiao, Chung-Chiang (2002). The Reciprocity Hypothesis as an Explanation of Perception Shifts in Product Judgment, Dissertation, Purdue University.