本研究是探討在高中進行人工智慧教學的情況，希望能瞭解高中生對於學習人工智慧的態度與反應，並且於人工智慧領域中挑選主題以電腦實驗課程的方式進行教學，比較實驗活動教學與傳統講述教學的成效。
為了探討高中生對於學習人工智慧的態度與反應，以及比較實驗活動教學與傳統講述教學的成效，本研究分別以中山女高一年級78位學生及新店高中一年級155位學生作為研究樣本，進行準實驗研究。以成就測驗前、後測成績分析實驗活動教學對學生學習成效的影響，並以調查問卷瞭解學生對於學習人工智慧的看法。
研究結果發現，學生對於人工智慧的概念並不陌生，並且願意接受人工智慧的課程。而以實驗策略進行人工智慧教學確實能提高學生的學習成效及學習興趣，學生也多希望能以實驗課的方式進行教學。

The purpose of this research is to investigate if laboratory based instruction can be used to advantage in the teaching and learning of artificial intelligence (AI) to high school students. The laboratory package includes in-class teaching slides, laboratory worksheets, and a software simulator. A teaching experiment was conducted in which students learn selected core concepts of AI from three in-class and three close-lab sessions. The experimental group used the developed lab-based approach to learn about AI while the control group was taught in the usual way with only in-class lectures and discussions. The ANCOVA statistical procedure was employed to analyze the students’ performance and a questionnaire was given to collect students’ comments n the laboratory activities.
The experimental results showed that the students in the experimental group performed significantly better over the students in the control group. Furthermore, majority of the students consider the laboratory activities as being helpful in their learning and that they prefer laboratory learning over pure in-class lectures.

教育部 （民85）：高級中學課程標準。台北。
張惠博 （民82）：邁向科學探究的實驗教學。教師天地, 62, pp12-20.
ACM/IEEE Task Force. (2001). Computing Curricula 2001. http://www.computer.org/education/cc2001/index.htm.
Aiken, R. M., The New Hurrah! Creating a Fundamental Role for AI in Computing Science Curriculum. Education and Computing, 1991.
Aiken, R., Allemang, D., and Wehrle, T. (1992). Designing laboratory modules for novices in an undergraduate AI course track: artificial intelligence. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 24(1), 76-80.
Boroni, C. M., Eneboe, T. J., Goosey, R. W., Ross, J. A., and Ross, R. J. (1996). Dancing with Dynalab. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 28(1), 134-139.
Canas, J., Bajo, M., & Gonzalvo, P. (1994). Mental Models and Computer Programming. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40, 794-811.
Cartereau, M. (1994). A tool for operating system teaching. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 26(3), 51-55.
Collette, A. T., & Chiappetta, E. L. (1984). Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools. New York, NY: Macmillam.
Denning, P. J., & et al. (1989). Computing as a discipline. Communications of the ACM, 32(1), 9-23.
Guimaraes, M. A. M., Lucena, C. J. P., and Cavalcanti, M. R. (1994). Experience using the ASA algorithm teaching system. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 26(4), 44-50
Hartel, P., & Hertzberger, L. (1995). Paradigms and laboratories in the core computer science curriculum: An overview. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 27(4), 13-17.
Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (1982). The role of the laboratory in science teaching: Neglected aspects of research. Review of Educational Research, 52(2), 201-217.
Kirschner, P. A., & Meester, A. M. (1988). The laboratory in higher science education：Problems, premises and objectives. Higher Education, 17, 81-98.
Jarc, D., J. (1999). Assessing the Benefits of Interactivity and the Influence of Learning Styles on the Effectiveness of Algorithm Animation using Web-based Data Structures Courseware. Doctoral Dissertation, The George Washington University.
Knox, D., & Wolz, U., (joint chairs). Use of laboratories in Computer Science education: Guidelines for Good Practice. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, Special Edition - Integrating Technology into Computer Science Education, 167-181.
Kumar, D., and Meeden, L. (1998). A robot Laboratory for teaching artificial intelligence. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 30(1), 341-344.
Lee, G., & Wu, J. (1999). DebugIt: A debugging practicing system. International Journal on Computers and Education, 32(2), 164-179.
Lin, J. M.-C., Wu, C.-C., & Liu, H.-J. (1999). Using SimCPU in cooperative learning laboratories. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20(3), 251-269.
Little JC, Cooper LJ, Davis BC, Alexander J, JoyceP and Schmitt CJ. (1988) An industry/academic partnership experiment: a course in artificial intelligence, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 20 (1), 171-178.
Naps, T. L. (1990). Algorithm Visualization in Computer Science Laboratories, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, Vol.22, No.1, 104-110
Newell, A., J. C. Shaw, & H. A. Simon. (1963). “Empirical Explorations with the Logic Theory Machine: A Case Study in Heuristics,” in Computers and Thought, E. A. Feigenbaum & J. Feldman(Eds.), McGraw-Hill, New York,
Paxton, JT A novel approach to teaching artificial intelligence. ACM SIGCE Bulletin 27, no.1, 283-286.
Pilgrim, R. A., TIC-TAC-TOE: Introducing Expert Systems to Middle School Students. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin , 27(1), 340-344
Roberge, J., & Suriano, C. (1991). Embedding laboratories within the computr science curriculum. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 23(1), 6-10.
Robling, G. & Freisleben, B. (2001). Animal script: An extensible scripting language for algorithm animation. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 33(1), 70-74.
Ross, R. J., “Experience with the DYNAMOD Program Animator,” ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, Vol. 23, No.1, 1991, 34-42.
L. Stern and L. Sterling, Department of Computer Science, The University of Melbourne, “Teaching AI Algorithms Using Animations Reinforced by Interactive Exercises” , ACM Journal of Educational Resources in Computing, (JERIC),1997
Tamir, P. (1989). Training teachers to teach effectively in the laboratory. Science Education, 79(1), 59-69
Tucker, A. B. (chair). (1991). A summary of the ACM/IEEE-CS joint curriculm task force report: Computing Curricula 1991. Communications of the ACM, 34(6), 69-84.
Wu, C.-C., Lin, J. M.-C., & Hsu, I. Y.-W. (1997). Closed laboratories using SimLIST and SimRECUR. Computers & Education, 28(1), 54-64.