研究生: |
李浚榮 Li, Chun-Jung |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
台灣肉品趨勢變化與需求價格彈性分析 The trends of meat and price elasticity of demand for Taiwan |
指導教授: |
印永翔
Ying, Yuang-Hsiang |
口試委員: |
印永翔
Ying, Yuang-Hsiang 何宗武 楊淑珺 |
口試日期: | 2021/10/14 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
高階經理人企業管理碩士在職專班(EMBA) Executive Master of Business Administration |
論文出版年: | 2022 |
畢業學年度: | 110 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 27 |
中文關鍵詞: | 需求價格彈性 、需求交叉價格彈性 、所得彈性 、消費型態 |
英文關鍵詞: | Price Elasticity of Demand, Cross-Price Elasticity of demand, Income Elasticity, Consumption pattern |
研究方法: | 次級資料分析 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202200005 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:211 下載:50 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
因應臺灣經濟的發展和國民所得的增加,國人的消費型態漸趨改變,對於動物性蛋白質的消費需求也顯著提升。在過去30年以來,每人每年的平均肉類消費量自1980年的62.89公斤上升到2019年的84.84公斤,臺灣整體的肉類消費增加了1.35倍。從肉品的種類而言,在此期間豬肉的消費比例從佔總體之59%下降為43%;反之,雞肉的消費量從整體量占比35%上升至41%,而牛肉的消費量也從3%提高至8%。
本研究之重點在於研究臺灣的豬肉、雞肉、牛肉等肉類需求的價格彈性、交叉價格彈性、所得價格彈性。以上所提到三種主要肉品的需求價格彈性雖略有不同,但都符合價格彈性與需求法則的定義。在本研究中發現在主要肉品之間,豬肉和雞肉屬於替代關係,而豬肉和牛肉與雞肉和牛肉則皆屬於互補關係。牛肉的所得彈性係數明顯大於豬肉與雞肉,這其中意涵為當國人所得增加時,對牛肉的需求量明顯比其他肉品增加更多。
本研究結論之於商業策略應用上,在於肉品供應商可以利用交叉價格彈性評估主要肉品的價格與需求數量之間的彼此關係;這有助於肉品供應商的策略形成、肉品存貨量準備,以及滿足市場需求。期望本文的發現對肉品供應商維持市場競爭力有所幫助,特別是在此新冠肺炎影響期間,能夠更加緊密地貼近消費者需求。
Due to the economic development, increasing income, and changing consumption patterns for Taiwanese, demand for animal proteins has noticeably raised. In the past thirty years, average meat consumption had risen from 62.89 kilograms in 1980 to 84.84 kilograms in 2019. The meat consumption for Taiwanese has grown 1.5 times in the last three decades. More specifically, the percentage of pork consumption had dropped from 59% to 43% in the meantime. Interestingly, chicken consumption rose from 34% to 41%; beef consumption increased from 3% to 8%.
We focus on the price elasticity of demand, cross-price elasticity of demand, income elasticity of demand for pork, chicken, and beef for Taiwan in this study. In our research, few conclusions suggest the applications of business practices. Although the price elasticity of demand for the three significant types of meat is somewhat different, all obey the definition of price elasticity or the law of demand. Moreover, we find that pork and chicken are substitutes; pork and beef are complements and the same as chicken and beef. In addition, we find that the income elasticity of beef is substantially greater than pork and chicken. It suggests that Taiwanese demand more quantity of beef than other types of meats once income increases.
In business practices, suppliers in the meat industry may apply cross-price elasticity to evaluate the relationship between quantity and price of various meats to form their strategies, prepare inventories, and meet the market demand. We believe the implications in this study may help meat suppliers be competitive, particularly in the Pandemic.
中文
王銘正 (譯)(2020)。經濟學。台北市:高利。(Parkin,M., 2019)。
王銘正 (譯)(2020)。經濟學原理。台北市:東華。(Mankiw,N.G., 2015)。
行政院農業委員會 (2020)。『農業統計年報』。臺北:行政院農業委員會。
李照皇、王金利 (1992)。台灣地區肉類需求體系之研究。台灣土地金融季刊。 29:4=114 1992.12,頁49-68。
林欣怡、劉鋼 (2004)。台灣肉類消費的漸進式需求結構轉變模型 (Doctoral dissertation, 撰者)。
洪美惠 (1993)。臺灣主要肉類的需求探討:AIDS模型之應用。臺灣銀行季刊第44卷第3期,. 頁370-393。
洪景彬 (1999)。臺灣地區食品完整需求體系之研究。國立臺灣大學農業經濟研究所博士論文。
胡珮珮 (2007)。臺灣入世後對國內牛肉產業影響之研究。中興大學應用經濟學系所學位論文。
張建文 (2007)。開放進口對臺灣肉類需求體系結構性變動之影響。國立臺灣大學農業經濟研究所碩士論文。
張魁峯、林靈宏 (2009)。消費者行為學。台北 : 五南圖書。
陳宗玄 (2001)。臺灣肉類需求動態與長期結構的研究。臺灣銀行季刊52:3 2001.09 頁244-282。
黃筱雯 (2019)。國產肉品與進口肉品的替代分析。國立中興大學農業經濟與行銷碩士學位論文。
黃錦儀 (1992)。臺灣肉品完整需求體系之研究。國立臺灣大學農業經濟研究所碩士論文。
楊政學 (1997)。臺灣主要部位肉與全肉產品需求之研究。臺灣銀行季刊,48:2 1997.06[民86.06] 頁32-55。
詹滿色 (2002)。臺灣肉類需求的結構變動分析。農業經濟叢刊,200212 (8:1期),75-105。
榮泰生 (2007)。消費者行為。台北市:五南。
樓永堅、蔡東峻、別蓮蒂、潘志偉 (2004)。消費者行為。國立空中大學。
英文
Andreyeva, T., Long, M. W., and Brownell, K. D. (2010). The impact of food prices on consumption: a systematic review of research on the price elasticity of demand for food. American journal of public health, 100(2), 216-222.
Bielik, P., and Šajbidorová, Z. (2009). Elasticity of consumer demand on pork meat in
the Slovak Republic. Agricultural economics, 55(1), 2-19.
Chantylew, D., and Belete, A. (1997). A Statistical Analysis of Demand
For Beef, Mutton/Goat, Pork and Chicken in Kenya, 1961–1991.
Chavas, J. P. (1983). Structural change in the demand for meat. American Journal of
Agricultural Economics, 65(1), 148-153.
Deaton, A., and Muellbauer, J. (1980). An almost ideal demand system. The American
economic review, 70(3), 312-326.
Eales, J. S., and Unnevehr, L. J. (1988). Demand for beef and chicken products:
separability and structural change. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 70(3), 521-532.
Hawkins, D. I., Mothersbaugh, D.L., and Best, R. J. (2008). Consumer behavior:
building marketing strategy, 10th ed.。Taipei: McGraw-Hill.
Hayes, D. J., Ahn, H., and Baumel, C. P. (1991). Meat demand in South Korea: A
systems estimate and policy projections. Agribusiness, 7(5), 433-446.
Hayes, D. J., Wahl, T. I., and Williams, G. W. (1990). Testing restrictions on a model of Japanese meat demand. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 72(3),
556-566.
Huang, J., and Bouis, H. (2001). Structural changes in the demand for food in Asia:
empirical evidence from Taiwan. Agricultural Economics, 26(1), 57-69.
Ishida, T., Ishikawa, N., and Fukushige, M. (2010). Impact of BSE and bird flu on
consumers’ meat demand in Japan. Applied Economics, 42(1), 49-56.
Rathnayaka, S. D., Selvanathan, S., and Selvanathan, E. A. (2021). Demand for animal‐derived food in selected Asian countries: A system‐wide analysis. Agricultural Economics, 52(1), 97-122.
Rickertsen, K. (1996). Structural change and the demand for meat and fish in
Norway. European review of agricultural economics, 23(3), 316-330.
Sans, P. and Combris, P. (2015). World meat consumption patterns: An overview of the last fifty years (1961–2011). Meat science, 109, 106-111.
Wadud, M. A. (2006). An analysis of meat demand in Bangladesh using the almost
ideal demand system. The Empirical Economics Letters, 5(1), 29-35.