研究生: |
許美玲 Hsu, Mei-Lin |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
公司治理與股權結構對公司經營績效之影響 The Effect of Corporate Governance and Ownership Structure On Corporate Operating Performance |
指導教授: |
蔡蒔銓
Tsai, Shih-Chuan |
口試委員: |
蔡蒔銓
Tsai, Shih-Chuan 張振山 Chang, Chen-Shan 邱文昌 Chiu, Wen-Chang |
口試日期: | 2022/02/19 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
高階經理人企業管理碩士在職專班(EMBA) Executive Master of Business Administration |
論文出版年: | 2022 |
畢業學年度: | 110 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 54 |
中文關鍵詞: | 公司治理 、公司治理評鑑 、股權結構 、公司經營績效 |
英文關鍵詞: | corporate governance, corporate governance assessments, shareholding structure, company operating performance |
研究方法: | 實驗設計法 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202200567 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:152 下載:9 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究資料期間以西元2014 年至西元 2019 年共計六年期,樣本資料擷取經濟新報資料庫全台灣「上市公司」之公司治理評鑑評等結果作為研究主體,自2014年施行公司治理評鑑以來,探討公司治理對公司經營績效之影響,研究發現公司治理對公司經營績效呈正向顯著之影響,進一步從公司不同的股權結構進行分析,發現對於外部法人持股高之公司以及對於經理人持股高之公司,其正向影響皆更為顯著。
實證結果顯示,當公司治理較好的公司,代表越能強化監督功能,減低代理成本,更能顯著提高公司的經營績效。尤其法人具有專業的知識與高效能監督的能力,配合完善的公司治理機制下,法人持股高更能確實監控公司的營運,提高營運績效,而其經理人持股高會產生與股東所追求最大利益目標一致,配合完善的公司治理機制,可預防經理人持股高產生濫權,防範圖謀私利,促使經理人可積極管理公司提升營運績效。
This study investigates the impact of corporate governance on the company's operating performance since the corporate governance assessments has been implemented in 2014. Using the result of corporate governance assessments of listed companies in Taiwan, collected by the Taiwan Economic Journal from 2014 to 2019, this study finds that corporate governance has a positive and significant impact on the company's operating performance. Further analysis of the company's different shareholding structures shows that the positive impact is more significant for companies with a higher shareholding ratio of external juridical persons and for companies with a higher shareholding ratio of managers.
The empirical results show that when a company has better corporate governance, it is more likely to strengthen the supervisory function, reduce the agency cost, and significantly improve the company's operating performance. In particular, the juridical person has professional knowledge and the ability to supervise the company efficiently. Cooperating with the perfect corporate governance mechanism, companies with a higher shareholding ratio of juridical persons are more likely to truly monitor the company's operations and improve its operational performance. On the other hand, companies with a higher shareholding ratio of managers are more likely to pursue the same goal with shareholders. With the corporate governance mechanism, those companies can prevent managers from abusing their power due to high shareholding, prevent self-seeking, and encourage managers to actively manage the company to improve operational performance.
Agrawal, A., & Knoeber, C. R. (1996). Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31(3), 377-397.
Alba, P., Claessens, S., & Djankov, S. (1998). Thailand’s corporate financing and governance structures: impact on firms’ competitiveness. Paper presented at the Conference on Thailand’s Dynamic Economic Recovery and Competitiveness.
Alkhafaji, A. F. (1990). Effective boards of directors: An overview. Industrial Management & Data Systems.
Barclay, M. J., & Holderness, C. G. (1991). Negotiated block trades and corporate control. The journal of finance, 46(3), 861-878.
Berle, A. (1932). Gardiner MEANS–The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York.
Berle, A. A. (1932). For whom corporate managers are trustees: a note. Harvard law review, 45(8), 1365-1372.
Berle Jr, A. A., & Gardner, C. M. (1934). ECONOMICS‐LAW AND PLANNED BUSINESS: The Modern Corporation and Private Property. Public Administration, 12(2), 191-212.
Bonbright, J. C., & Means, G. C. (1932). The holding company: Its public significance and its regulation: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Cadbury, S. A. (1993). Thoughts on corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 1(1), 5-10.
Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J., & Lang, L. (1999). Expropriation of minority shareholders in East Asia. Unpublished working paper. The World Bank, Washington, DC.
Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. economica, 4(16), 386-405.
Connelly, B. L., Hoskisson, R. E., Tihanyi, L., & Certo, S. T. (2010). Ownership as a form of corporate governance. Journal of management studies, 47(8), 1561-1589.
Connelly, C. E., Zweig, D., Webster, J., & Trougakos, J. P. (2012). Knowledge hiding in organizations. Journal of organizational behavior, 33(1), 64-88.
Demsetz, H., & Lehn, K. (1985). The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of political economy, 93(6), 1155-1177.
Durnev, A., & Kim, E. H. (2005). To steal or not to steal: Firm attributes, legal environment, and valuation. The journal of finance, 60(3), 1461-1493.
Earle, J. S., Kucsera, C., & Telegdy, Á. (2005). Ownership concentration and corporate performance on the Budapest stock exchange: do too many cooks spoil the goulash? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(2), 254-264.
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983a). Agency problems and residual claims. The journal of law and Economics, 26(2), 327-349.
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983b). Separation of ownership and control. The journal of law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.
Gilson, R. J., & Roe, M. J. (1993). Understanding the Japanese keiretsu: Overlaps between corporate governance and industrial organization. Yale Law Journal, 871-906.
Horner, S. V. (2010). Board power, CEO appointments and CEO duality. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 9(2), 43.
Hudson, P. J., Dobson, A. P., & Newborn, D. (1992). Do parasites make prey vulnerable to predation? Red grouse and parasites. Journal of animal ecology, 681-692.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305-360.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1999). Specific knowledge and divisional performance measurement. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 12(2), 8-17.
Jensen, M. C., & Ruback, R. S. (1983). The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of financial economics, 11(1-4), 5-50.
Johnson, S., Boone, P., Breach, A., & Friedman, E. (2000). Corporate governance in the Asian financial crisis. Journal of financial economics, 58(1-2), 141-186.
Lee, T. S., & Yeh, Y. H. (2004). Corporate governance and financial distress: Evidence from Taiwan. In (Vol. 12, pp. 378-388): Wiley Online Library.
Lo, M.-y. (2014). 台灣銀行業股權結構之公司治理效果. National Central University,
McConnell, J. J., & Servaes, H. (1990). Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. Journal of financial economics, 27(2), 595-612.
Mitton, T. (2002). A cross-firm analysis of the impact of corporate governance on the East Asian financial crisis. Journal of financial economics, 64(2), 215-241.
Monks, R. A. (1995). Nell Minow: Corporate Governance. In: Blackwell Publishers, Massachusetts.
Morck, R., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1986). Management ownership and corporate performance: An empirical analysis. In: National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge, Mass., USA.
Oswald, S. L., & Jahera Jr, J. S. (1991). The influence of ownership on performance: An empirical study. Strategic Management Journal, 12(4), 321-326.
Peng, W.-C. (2016). 公司治理與股權結構對資訊透明度之關聯性. National Central University,
Pound, J. (1988). Proxy contests and the efficiency of shareholder oversight. Journal of financial economics, 20, 237-265.
Prowse, S. (1998). Angel investors and the market for angel investments. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22(6-8), 785-792.
Rajan, R. G., & Zingales, L. (1998). Which capitalism? Lessons form the east Asian crisis. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 11(3), 40-48.
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The journal of finance, 52(2), 737-783.
Turnbull, S. (1997). Corporate governance: Its scope, concerns and theories. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 5(4), 180-205.
Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of financial economics, 80(2), 385-417.
Weaver, G., Trevino, L., Cochran, P., Wartick, S., & Collins, D. (1994). Ethics initiatives and organizational legitimacy. Paper presented at the International Association for Business and Society Proceedings.
Zahra, S. A., & Filatotchev, I. (2004). Governance of the entrepreneurial threshold firm: A knowledge‐based perspective. Journal of management studies, 41(5), 885-897.
江向才, & 何里仁. (2003). “公司治理資訊透明度” 與 “績效評核” 關聯性之研究-台灣地區電子業上市公司之例證. 管理學域學術研討會論文集, 368-380.
池祥萱, 繆文娟, & 莊瀅臻. (2014). 企業社會責任對於公司財務績效之影響是雙面刃嗎? 來自全球 500 大公司的證據. 管理學報, 31(1), 1-19.
李馨蘋, & 莊宗憲. (2007). 公司治理機制與公司績效之實證研究. 東吳經濟商學學報 (57), 1-27.
周建新, & 林宗得. (2005). 資訊透明度對企業價值增額解釋能力之研究. 會計與公司治理, 2(第 2), 25-46.
林翠蓉, 張力, 侯啟娉, 曾韻如, & 許雅棠. (2011). 家族所有權, 公司治理與公司績效關係之實證研究. 績效與策略研究, 8(1), 61-79.
祁遠芳. (2012). 股權結構對公司財務績效影響之研究—個案與上市公司實證之比較. (碩士). 國立東華大學, 花蓮縣. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/4gb489
施倫閔, & 張椿柏. (2016). 公司治理是否降低權益成本? 績效與策略研究, 13(1), 85-112.
張明峰. (1991). 股權結構對公司績效影響之研究. (碩士). 國立政治大學, 台北市. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/9q7m6f
張雅琳. (2004). 我國企業獨立董事機制與經營績效之關聯性研究, 大葉大學會計資訊研究所碩士論文.
張雅琳, & 包冬意. (2004). 我國企業獨立董事機制與經營績效之關聯性研究. 未出版之碩士論文, 大葉大學會計資訊學系碩士班, 彰化縣.
張椿柏, 王育偉, 吳欣于, & 葉哲瑋. (2017). 公司治理對盈餘預測之影響. 財金論文叢刊(27), 19-33.
張椿柏, 王育偉, 陳振傑, & 莊明哲. (2018). 公司治理對財務危機之影響. 財金論文叢刊(29), 14-36.
張鳳容. (2016). 公司治理與財務危機之關聯性. (碩士). 大葉大學, 彰化縣. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/t3s22m
陳宏姿. (2000). 董監事結構與企業財務績效關聯之研究, 國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文.
陳怡錚. (2017). 公司治理與公司經營績效之研究.
曾素花. (2005). 我國現階段公司治理之問題研討. 中原大學會計研究所學位論文, 1-115.
楊俊中. (1998). 股權結構與經營績效相關性之研究, 國立台灣大學會計研究所碩士論文.
葉銀華, & 馬君梅. (1999). 股權結構、公司價值與內部監督機制-上海證券市場實證研究. [Ownership Structure, Corporate Performance and Insider's Control: An Empirical Study on Shanghai Stock Market]. Asia Pacific Management Review, 4(1), 37-50. doi:10.6126/apmr.1999.4.1.04
趙維穎. (2004). 董事會屬性, 董事會功能與 企業經營績效之關聯性研究. 中原大學企業管理研究所學位論文, 1-105.
劉宴辰. (1993). 從代理理論觀點探究股權結構, 董事會組成對企業財務績效影響之研究--上市公司之實證分析, 淡江大學管理科學研究所碩士論文.
蔡柳卿, 邵珮雯, & 楊怡芳. 公司治理對代理成本與無形資產之影響.
謝淑娟. (1994). 以權益代理問題的觀點探討股權結構與公司經營績效之關係-以台灣上市公司實證, 國立交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文. 未出版碩士論文, 交通大學管理科學研究所.