本研究主要是以Larry Cuban的科技論述觀點為依據，調查我國小學教師實施ICT融入教學的現況，以及降低教師實施ICT融入教學意願的不利因素。研究是以全國公立小學教師為研究樣本，透過問卷調查方法實施。研究結果有以下主要發現：
一、實施現況部分：1.教師普遍對ICT設備感到滿意，惟電腦依舊用在處理日常事務時間多，且E化專科教室是過度銷售低度使用；2教師已不是科技恐懼者，ICT融入教學時數增加，但多數教師採用低層次融入方式，且依賴電子教科書進行教學；3.教師認同學校行政推動ICT教育作為，但對ICT教育政策之回應卻緩慢；4. ICT對教學影響有正向變化，未來重要性可期。
二、影響因素與降低意願現況部分：「個人ICT素養與技術支援需求」、「ICT融入課程教學知識與能力」、「ICT對學習行為之影響」三個面向不利實施ICT融入教學因素存在且降低教師實施ICT融入教學的意願。
三、ICT融入教學現況與降低意願在性別、職務、ICT能力、融入經驗、年齡、學歷、城鄉與學校規模等變項間存在顯著差異性。
四、綜合廻歸預測、路經分析與結構模型之結果，學校推動ICT教育成效是ICT融入教學層級與降低教師意願的重要關鍵。
根據上述研究結論，本研究提出教育行政機關應持續建置與更新ICT設備，同時關注適配性以及落實ICT融入教學能力指標化；學校單位應強化ICT教育推動的成效性，排除各種不利ICT融入教學因素；教師ICT能力要與時俱進，參與各項資訊典範教學團隊，勇於嘗試ICT創新教學；而在未來研究方面納入質性研究方法，對不預期落差之結果進一步探究等建議。

With respect to Larry Cuban’s discourse on technology, this study investigates the status of ICT integrated teaching as adopted by primary teachers in local schools. It also discusses the factors that disadvantaged ICT integrated teaching for teachers. A questionnaire is given to primary teachers in public schools nationwide. The findings are summarized below.
Firstly, current state of ICT integrated teaching--(1) most of the teachers are satisfied with the ICT facilities, but E-classrooms are oversold and underused. Computers are still used mainly for daily tasks. (2) teachers are not technophobic. The hours for ICT integrated teaching are increasing, but most teachers rely on the use of e-books. (3) teachers agree with the ICT integration policy promoted by school administrative staff, but they adapts to it at a slow pace.. (4) ICT brings a positive impact on teaching. It’s expected to be more and more influential to teachers.
Secondly, factors influencing teachers’ adoption of ICTs are-(1)digital literacy and technical demand of the teachers, (2) ICT integration knowledge and capabilities and (3) The impact of ICT on learning behavior. All are crucial to teachers’ failure in applying ICT integrated teaching in the classroom.
Thirdly, variables of gender, jobs, information skills, integration experiences, age, educational background and size and geographical location of the schools are significantly relevant to the decline of teachers’ use of ICTs.
Fourthly, the regression prediction, path analysis and structural modeling has lead to the conclusion that the effects of schools promoting ICT integration are the key determinants of teachers’ decline in adopting ICT integrated teaching.
This study wraps up with some suggestions to ICT education.
Policymakers should carry on deploying and renewing ICT facilities with discretion. Meanwhile, the performance indicators for ICT integrated teaching should be set up. School administrative staff should strengthen the effects of ICT education and eliminate factors that disadvantaged ICT integrated teaching. Teachers should enhance their digital competence and participate in projects of information innovation. For future studies, a qualitative review should be conducted. Also, the scope of the unexpected result should be explored.

壹、中文部分
王全世（2000）。資訊科技融入教學之意義與內涵。資訊教育雜誌，80，23-31。
李雪莉（2000）。教師運用資訊網路能力調查。天下雜誌2000 年教育特刋，64-102。
吳為聖（2007）。影響國中自然科教師使用資訊科技融入教學之意向模式研究。博士論文，彰化。
吳為聖、張惠博、郭重吉（2007）。影響國中自然科教師接受資訊科技融入教學之個人因素研究。科學教育學刊，15(5)，543-563。
吳鐵雄（1988）。我國各級學校資訊教育之研究：全國性調查。國家科學委員會專案研究計畫報告，編號：NSC77-0301-H003-10。
林怡君（2005）。資訊科技融入教學之層級分析-以國文科教師為例。 國立台灣師範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文，台北市。
林信志（2006）。國中數學教師資訊科技融入教學狀態之調查分析。國立臺灣師範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文，台北市。
施文玲（2006）。教師導入數位化教學之理論模式。生活科技教育月刊，39(6)，30-36。
范瑞東（2005）。資訊科技融入教學教師實施之困境與可行性策略之文獻評析。中華人文社會學報，3，133-155。
張雅芳、朱鎮宇、徐加玲（2007）。國小教師資訊科技融入教學現況之研究。教育資料與圖書館學，44(4)，413-434。
徐式寬（2008）。台北縣市國中小教師資訊融入教學之方式與影響因素研究。教學科技與媒體，86，61-78。
徐新逸（2003）。學校推動資訊融入教學的實施策略探究。教學科技與媒體，64，68-84。
袁媛、林意晨（2008）。桃園縣國民中學數學教師使用資訊融入教學之現況研究。科學教育學刊，16(5)，534-561。　
教育部（1997）。資訊教育基礎建設計畫。2011年8月15日，取自http://www.networklab.csie.ncu.edu.tw/moeplan/network_3.htm
教育部（2001）。中小學資訊教育總藍圖。2011年8月15日，取自http://192.192.169.230/edu_paper/data_image/e0001097/0n0/20010600/p0000001.pdf
教育部（2003）。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。台北市: 教育部。
教育部（2008a）。教育部中小學資訊教育白皮書2008-2011。2011年8月15日，取自http://210.240.19.129/school/data/files/201003261346530.pdf
教育部（2008b）。教育部國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。台北市: 教育部。
教育部（2009）。建置中小學優質化均等數位教育環境計畫。2011年8月15日，取自http://www.edu.tw/userfiles/url/20120920150854/附件-14建置中小學優質化均等數位教育.pdf
教育部（2011）。教育雲端應用及平台服務推動計畫。2013年7月15日，取自http://www.edu.tw/pages/detail.aspx?Node=2793&Page=16898&Index=5&WID=3EE9C9EE-F44E-44F0-A431-C300341D9F77
陳茂釗、李子建、張永明（2002）。資訊科技在香港中小學教育的現況與展望。《優質學校教育學報》編輯委員會，1-14。
崔夢萍（2001）。國小教師電腦融入教學態度及其相關因素之研究。臺北市立師範學院學報，32，169-194。
黃志燻（2004）。影響科技準備度因素之研究。中華民國科技管理學會年會暨論文研討會論文集 2004，258-267。
黃芳銘（2004）。社會科學統計方法學：結構方程模式。台北：五南。
黃陽明（2008）。國中教師資訊融入數學教學現況及相關因素之探討。國立臺南大學數位科技學習碩士班碩士論文，未出版，台南市。
楊德思、葉昌期（2009）。東吳大學資訊科技融入教學現況與教學創新方案之探究。2012年4月18日，取自http://nttlc.scu.edu.tw/lp.aspx?ctNode=591&CtUnit=219&BaseDSD=7&mp=1。
劉世雄（2011）。臺灣不同城鄉地區國小教師的教學信念與其運用資訊科技融入教學之探討。課程與教學，14(3)，47-76。
劉世雄（2000）。資訊科技融入各科教學之策略探討。資訊教育，78，60-66。
劉修豪（2009）。電腦科技應用在學校教育改革的實踐思維：Larry Cuban之科技論述。教育實踐與研究，23(2)，125-152。
蕭速農（2004）。科技/權力/教育--資訊科技對國小教學意涵與潛藏影響之研究。國立台南師範學院國民教育研究所博士論文，台南市。
顏龍源（2000）。主題化的電腦融入課程概念。資訊教育雜誌，80，32-40。

貳、西文部分

Dwyer, D.C. (1995). Changing the conversation about teaching, learning, and technology: A report on 10 years of ACOT Research. Cupertino, CA: Apple.
Afshari, M., Bakar, K. A., Luan, W. S., Samah, B. A., & Fooi, F. S. (2009). Factors affecting teachers’s use of teachers’ use of information and communication technology. International Journal of Instruction, 2(1), 77-104.
Akker van den, J., Keursten, P., & Plomp, T. (1992). The integration of computer use in education. International Journal of Educational Research, 17(1), 65-76.
Albirini, A. (2006). Teachers’ attitudes toward information and communication technologies. Computer & Education, 47, 373-398.
Apple, M. W. (2004). Are we wasting money on computers in schools? Educational policy, 18(3), 513-522.
Bogozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structure equation models. Academic of Marketing Science, 16, 76-94.
Bangkok, U. (2004). Integrating ICTs into education. Retrieved March 21, 2011, from ICT in education：http://www.unescobkk.org/index.php?id=1793.
Bauer, J., & Kenton, J. (2005). Toward technology integration in the schools: Why it isn’t happening. Technology and Teacher Education, 13 (4), 519-546.
Baylora, A. L., & Ritchieb, D. (2002). What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher morale, and perceived student learning in technology-using classrooms? Computers and Education, 39(4), 395-414.
Becker, H. J. (2000). Findings from the teaching, learning, and computing survey: Is Larry Cuban right? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(51), 2-32.
Becker, H. J. (2001). How are teachers using computers in instruction? Paper presented at the 2001 Meetings of the American Educational Research Association.
Becker, H. J., & Ravitz, J. L. (2001a). Computer use by teacher：Are Cuban’s predictions correct? Paper presented at the Paper presented at the 2001 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, Washington.
Becker, H. J., & Ravitz, J. L. (2001b). Computer use by teachers: Are Cuban’s predictions correct? Paper presented at the 2001 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association,Seattle, 1-15.
BECTA. (2004). A review of the literature on the barriers to the up-take of ICT by teachers. London: Becta.
Bitter, G. G., & Legacy, J. M. (2008). Using technology in the classroom (7th ed.). Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
bBoyd-Barrett, O., & Scanlon, E. (1991). Computers and learning: A reader. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co. in association with the Open University.
Brummelhuis, A. C. A., ten. (1995). Models of educational change: The introduction of computers in Dutch Secondary Education. Enschede(the Netherlands)：University of Twente.
Cattagni, A., & Farris, E. (2001). Internet access in U.S. public schools and classrooms:1994 – 2000. Washington DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
Collins, A. (1996). Whither technology and schools? Collected thoughts on the last and next quarter centuries. In C. Fisher, D. C.Dwyer & K. Yocam (Eds.), Education and technology: Reflections on computing in classrooms (pp. 51-66). San Francisco, CA：Jossey-Bass.
Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines : The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.
Cuban, L. (1993). Computers meet classroom: Classroom wins. Teachers College Record, 95(2), 185-210.
Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused : computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press.
Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Education Research Journal, 38(4), 813-834.
Dawes, L. (2001). What stops teachers using new technology? In M. Leask (Ed.), Issues in teaching using ICT (pp. 61-79). London: Routledge.
Demetriadis, S., Barbas, A., Molohides, A., Palaigeorgiou, G., Psillos, D., Vlahavas, I., Pombortsis, A. (2003). Cultures in negotiation: Teachers’ acceptance/resistance attitudes considering the infusion of technology into schools.Computers & Educational Administration, 41(19-37).
Dias, L. B. (1999). Integrating technology--Some things you should know. Learning & Leading with Technology, 27(3), 10-13.
Dooling, J. O. D. (2000). What students want to learn about computers. Educational Leadership, 58(2), 20-24.
Dori, Y. J., Tal, R. T., & Peled, Y. (2002). Characteristics of science teachers who incorporate web-based teaching. Research in Science Education 32, 511-547.
Drent, M., & Meelissen, M. (2008). Which factors obstruct or stimulate teacher educators to use ICT innovatively? Journal of Computers & Education, 51(1), 187-199.
Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47-61.
ETAC. (2010). Massachusetts School Technology and Readiness Chart (STaR Chart). Retrieved July 21, 2011, from http://www.doe.mass.edu/boe/sac/edtech/STaR.pdf
Fishman, B. J., Valauskas, E. J., & Soloway, E. (2000). New technologies and the challenge for school leadership. Leadership & New Technologies. Retrieved May 15, 2011, from http://www-personal.umich.edu/~fishman/downloads/fishman_b_gomez_l_soloway_e.pdf
Flanagan, L., & Jacobsen, M. (2003). Technology leadership for thetwenty-first century principal. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(2), 124-142.
Fullan, M. (1991).The best faculty of education in the country: A fable. Submitted to the strategic planning committee. Faculty of Education, University of Toronto.
Ghiselli, E. E., Campbell, J.P. , & Zedeck, S. (1981). Measurement theory for the behavioral sciences. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman
Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis. Hillsadale, New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6 ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
ISTE. (2008). NETS for Teachers 2008. Retrieved July 21, 2011, from http://www.iste.org/standards/nets-for-teachers/nets-for-teachers-2008.aspx
ITEA. (1996). Technology for all Americans: A rationale and structure for the study of technology. Retrieved April 2, 2011, from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/TAA/Taa_tech.pdf
John, P. (2005). The sacred and the profane: subject sub-culture, pedagogical practice and teachers’ perceptions of the classroom uses of ICT. Educational Review, 57(4), 469-488.
John, P. D., & Wheeler, S. (2008). The digital classroom : Harnessing technology for the future of learning and teaching. London : New York: Routledge.
Johnson, D. L. (1997). Integrating technology in the classroom: The time has come. Computers in the Schools 13(1-2), 1-5.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-36.
Law, N., Pelgrum, W. J., & Plomp, T. (2008). Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world: Findings from the IEA SITES 2006 Study: Springer.
LoTi. (2011). LoTi digital-age Framework. Retrieved July 21, 2011, from http://loticonnection.com/index.php/resources/publications/20-loti-framewo-rk
McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (1993). Research in Education. New York: Harper Collins.
Means, B. (2008). Technology's role in curriculum and instruction. In F. M. Connelly, M. F. He & J. Phillion (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Curriculum and Instruction (pp. 123-144). Los Angeles: SAGE.
Moersch, C. (1995). Levels of technology implementation (LoTi):A Framework for measuring classroom technology use. Learning and Leading with Technology, 23(3), 40-42.
Muir-Herzig, R. G. (2004). Technology and its impact in the classroom. Computers & Education, 4(2), 111-131.
NCES. (2000). Teachers’ tools for the 21st century:A report on teachers’ use of technology: U.S. Department of Education.
Niederhauser, D. S., & Stoddart, T. (2001). Teachers' instructional perspectives and use of educational software. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 15-31.
OTA. (1995). Teachers and technology: Making the connection (OTA-CHR-616). Washington, DC: U.S.: Government Printing Office.
Pelgrum, W. J., & Anderson, R. E. (1999). ICT and the emerging paradigm for life long learning : A worldwide educational assessment of infrastructure, goals and practices: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
Plomp, T. (1996). Teaching and learning for the future. Committee on multimedia in teacher training, Final report: Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science, The Hague (Netherlands).
Reid, W. A. (1999). Curriculum as institution and practice: Essays in the deliberative tradition. Mahwah, NJ. Publication Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4 ed.): Free Press.
Rosen, L. D., & Weil, M. M. (1995). Computer availability, Computer experience and technophobia among public school teachers. Computers in Human Behavior, 11(1), 9-31.
Schiller, J. (2003). Working with ICT: Perceptions of Australian principals. Educational Administration, 41(2), 171-185.
SEIR*TEC. (2001). Factors Influencing the effective use of technology for teaching and learning:Lessons learned from the SEIR*TEC intensive site schools. Retrieved July 21, 2011, from http://www.seirtec.org/publications/lessons.pdf
Selwyn, N., Dawes, L., & Mercer, N. (2000). Promoting Mr. 'Chips': The construction of the teacher/computer relationship in educational advertising. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(16).
Sprague, D., & Dede, C. (1999). Constructivism in the classroom: If I teach this way, Am I doing my job? Learning and Leading with Technology, 27(1), 6-9,16-17.
Stevenson, D. (1997). The independent ICT in schools commission, information and communications technology in UK schools: An independent inquiry.Impact noted in Jim Kelly, What the web is doing for schools. Financial Times, 2000.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics(5nd ed.).Needhan Heights, Ma: Allyn and Bacon.
UNESCO. (2008). ICT competency standards for teachers. Retrieved July 21, 2011, from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0015/001562/156209e.pdf
Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M. G. (2000). Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24, 115-139.
Volman, M., & Eck, E. v. (2001). Gender equity and information technology in education. The second decade. Review of Educational Research, 71(4), 613-631.
Voogt, J. (2003). Consequences of ICT for aims, contents, processes and environments of learning. In J. v. d. Akker, W. Kuiper & U. Hameyer (Eds.), Curriculum landscapes and trends (pp. 217-236). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Voogt, J., & Pelgrum, H. (2005). ICT and Curriculum change. Human Technology, 1(2), 157-175.
Wang, C. S., & Li, C. C. (2000). An assessment framework for information technology integrated instruction. Paper presented at the Paper presented at ICCE(International Conference on Computers in Education)/ICCAI(International Conference on Computer-Assisted Instruction) Taipei.
Wang, P., & Chan, P. S. (1995). Advantages, Disadvantages, Facilitators, and Inhibitors of Computer-Aided Instruction in Singapore's Secondary Schools. Computers & Education, 25(3), 151-162.
Waller, T. (2007). ICT and social justice: Educational technology, global capital and digital divides. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 5(1), 288-315.
Webber, C. F. (2003). New technologies and educative leadership. Educational Administration ,41(2), 119-123.
Zammit, S. A. (1992). Factors facilitating or hindering the use of computers in schools. Educational Research, 34(1), 57-66.
Zhao, Y., & Cziko, G. A. (2001). Teacher adoption of technology: A perceptual control theory perspective. Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 5-30.
Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research, 40(4), 807-840.
Zhao, Y., Pugh, K., Sheldon, S., & Byers, J. (2002). Conditions for classroom technology innovations. Teachers College Record, 104(3), 482-515.