四學（自學、共學、互學、導學）教學策略的目的在根據學生的學習狀況給予適時的指導，培養學生的自主學習能力，四學教學策略對於學生的學習動機與學習投入影響仍需進一步研究。本研究依據四學教學策略的指引編寫教材，並在國民中學九級資訊科技課程中實施教學實驗，以前後測的方式來評估四學教學策略對學生學習動機和學習投入的影響。
研究結果顯示：
一、教師在課堂中運用四學教學策略對於提高學生的學習動機有顯著效果，使其更加積極地參與學習，並展現出更高的學習動機。
二、教師在課堂中運用四學教學策略，學生更能理解學科價值的重要性和效用性，有助於學生認識所學內容的實用性。
三、教師在課堂中運用四學教學策略對於提高學生的學習投入有顯著效果，比起傳統教學學生即使面對困難也能堅持學習。

The objective of the "Four Learnings" (self-learning, co-learning, mutual learning, guided learning) teaching strategy is to provide timely guidance based on students' learning conditions, thereby fostering their autonomous learning abilities. Further research is needed to understand the impact of the Four Learnings on students' learning motivation and engagement. This study developed teaching materials based on the Four Learnings guidelines and conducted a teaching xperiment in a ninth-grade information technology course at a junior high school. The impact of the Four Learnings teaching strategy on students' learning motivation and engagement was evaluated using pre- and posttests.
The results of the study indicate that:
1. The application of the "Four Learnings" teaching strategy by teachers in the classroom has a significant effect on enhancing students' learning motivation, making them more actively engaged in learning and demonstrating higher learning motivation.
2. When teachers employ the "Four Learnings" teaching strategy in the classroom, students are better able to understand the importance and utility of the subject matter, which helps them recognize the practical value of the content they are learning.
3. The use of the "Four Learnings" teaching strategy by teachers in the classroom has a significant effect on increasing students' learning engagement. Compared to traditional teaching methods, students are more persistent in their learning even when facing difficulties.

中文部分
王文科（1989）。教育心理學。台北：五南。
王福林（1990）。新制師院學生與師專學生家庭社經地位及其學習行為學習成就之分析。國立台灣師範大學，台北市。
何世敏（2014）。自主學習1.0至2.0及之後：如何讓學生成為學習的真正主角。教育局新學制學校領導人研討會系列201四學會學習 2.0：從宏觀規畫到具體實施」研討會，香港教育局九龍塘教育服務中心。
林安儒（2013）。國中三年級學生的學校投入與學習成就之關係研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化市。
李世鴻（2005）。學習動機對學習成就之影響-國中學生學習理化科之狀況分析。國立台灣師範大學，台北市。
洪詠善（2020）。停課不停學：當自主學習成為日常。課程研究，15（1），15-33。
楊致慧（2013）。科技大學英文教師教學風格、師生互動、學生學習投入與學習自我效能關係之研究（未出版之博士論文）。高雄師範大學，高雄市。
張春興（2007）。教育心理學－三化取向的理論與實踐（重修二版）。臺北市：東華。
張峰誌（2006）。自學能力的探索。國立台灣師範大學，台北市。
陳美芳（1994）。學生因素與題目因素對國小高年級兒童乘除法應用問題解題影響之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立台灣師範大學，台北市。
陳婉玉（2010）。國小英語分組與能力高低對學生的學習動機與學習投入之調節效果（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，台北市。
郭庭芳（2010）。國民小學學生知覺教師人格特質、班級氣氛與學習投入之相關研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺南大學，台南市。
郭偉民（2010）。雲林縣家長參與、學校教育秩序認知與學童學校投入之相關研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立中正大學，高雄市。
薛人華（2009）。學習謙虛、學習投入與學業成就的關係（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，台北市。
簡瑋成（2012）。學習自我效能、學習投入與學習成就之後設分析（未出版之碩士論文）。國立暨南國際大學，台南市。
劉政宏、黃博聖、蘇嘉鈴、陳學志、吳有城（2010）。國民中小學習動機量表之編製及其信、效度研究。測驗學刊，57（3），71-402。
劉怡佳（2021）。青少年學習投入與心理幸福感的關聯研究：目的感之中介效果（未出版之碩士論文）。國立台灣師範大學，台北市。
鄭美芳（2012）。以多元智能理論為基礎的繪本教學對國中生的學習投入與創造力影響之實驗研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化市。
鄭毓信(1998)：數學教育哲學。台北市：九章。
劉俊庚（2001）。迷思概念與概念改變教學策略之文獻分析－以概念構圖和後設分析模式探討其意涵與影響。國立台灣師範大學，台北市。

西文部分
Alemany-Arrebola, I., Rojas-Ruiz, G., Granda-Vera, J., and Mingorance-Estrada, A. C. (2020). Influence of COVID-19 on the perception of academic self-efficacy, state anxiety, and trait anxiety in college students. Front Psychol, 11, Article 570017. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.570017
Baker, C. R., and Logan, L. B. (2006). Using action research to promote increased academic success for educationally disadvantaged students. Global Perspectives Account Educ, 3, 1–21.
Becker, H. J (1992). Computer-based integrated learning systems in the elementary and middle grades: a critical review and synthesis of evaluation reports. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 8, 1–41. doi: 10.2190/23BC-ME1W-V37U-5TMJ
Bracey, P. (2010). Self-directed learning vs. self-regulated learning: Twins or just friends? A comparative review of literature [Paper presentation].E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, Orlando, FL.
Clark, R. E (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53, 445–459. doi: 10.3102/00346543053004445
Cole, M. S., Feild, H. S., and Harris, S. G. (2004). Student learning motivation and psychological hardiness: interactive effects on students’ reactions to a management class. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3, 64–85. doi: 10.5465/amle.2004.12436819
Connell, J. P., and Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology, 23(2), 43– 77. University of Chicago Press.
Daniels, L. M., Goegan, L. D., and Parker, P. C. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 triggered changes to instruction and assessment on university students’ self-reported motivation, engagement and perceptions. Soc. Psychol. Educ, 24, 299–318. doi: 10.1007/s11218-021-09612-3
ElTohamy, A., Hyun, S., Macaranas, A. R., Chen, J. A., Stevens, C., and Liu, C. H. (2022). Testing positive, losing a loved one, and financial hardship: real-world impacts of COVID-19 on US college student distress. J. Affect. Disord, 314, 357–364. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.07.022
Ferber, S. G., Weller, A., Maor, R., Feldman, Y., Harel-Fisch, Y., and Mikulincer, M. (2022). Perceived social support in the social distancing era: the association between circles of potential support and COVID-19 reactive psychopathology. Anxiety Stress Coping, 35, 58–71. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2021.1987418
Fortes, K., Latham, C. L., Vaughn, S., and Preston, K. (2022). The influence of social determinants of education on nursing student persistence and professional values. Journal of Professional Nursing, 39, 41–53. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.11.011
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., and Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59– 109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Gavurova, B., Ivankova, V., Rigelsky, M., and Mudarri, T. (2022). Internet addiction in socio-demographic, academic, and psychological profile of college students during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Front. Public Health, 10:85. https://doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.944085
Guay, F., Ratelle, C. F., and Chanal, J. (2008). Optimal learning in optimal contexts: the role of self-determination in education. Can. Psychol. Psychol. Can, 49, 233–240. doi: 10.1037/a0012758
Haworth, L. (1986). Autonomy: An essay in philosophical psychology and ethics. Yale University Press.
Jaeger, A. J., and Eagan, M. K. (2007). Exploring the value of emotional intelligence: a means to improve academic performance. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 44, 512–537. doi: 10.2202/1949-6605.1834
Jang, H., Kim, E. J., and Reeve, J. (2016). Why students become more engaged or more disengaged during the semester: a self-determination theory dual-process model. Learn. Instr, 43, 27–38. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.002
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. University of Chicago Press.
Kozma, R. B (1994). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42, 7–19. doi: 10.1007/BF02299087
Li H, Peng MY-P, Yang M and Chen C-C (2020). Exploring the Influence of Learning Motivation and Socioeconomic Status on College Students’ Learning Outcomes Using Self-Determination Theory. Front. Psychol, 11:849. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00849
Loyens, S. M. M., Magda, J., and Rikers, R. M. J. P.(2008). Self-directed learning in problem-based learning and its relationships with self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 411– 427. doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9082-7
Metaj-Macula, A. (2017). Emotional intelligence, its relation with social interaction and perceived social support. European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research, 10, 57–63. doi: 10.26417/ejser.v10i2.p57-63
Moafian, F., and Ghanizadeh, A. (2009). The relationship between Iranian EFL teachers' emotional intelligence and their self-efficacy in language institutes. System, 37, 708–718. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2009.09.014
Montenegro, A. (2017). Understanding the concept of student agentic engagement for learning. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 19(1), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.14483/calj.v19n1.10472
Petersen, I. H., Louw, J., and Dumont, K. (2009). Adjustment to university and academic performance among disadvantaged students in South Africa. Educ. Psychol, 29, 99–115. doi: 10.1080/01443410802521066
Pokhrel, S., and Chhetri, R. (2021). A literature review on impact of COVID-19 pandemic on teaching and learning. Higher Educ. Future, 8, 133–141. doi: 10.1177/2347631120983481
Reeve, J., and Tseng, C.-M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002
Rhoades, J. and McCabe, M. E. (1985). Simple Cooperation in the Classroom. ITA Publications.
Schreitmueller, J., and Loerbroks, A. (2020). The role of self-efficacy and locus of control in asthma-related needs and outcomes: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Asthma, 57, 196–204. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2018.1556687
Sternberg, R. J., and Spear, S. L. (1996). Harcourt teaching creative problem-solving. The Free Press.
Skinner, E. A., and Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of educational psychology, 85(4), 571– 581.
Skryabin, M., Zhang, J., Liu, L., and Zhang, D. (2015). How the ICT development level and usage influence student achievement in reading, mathematics, and science. Comput. Educ, 85, 49–58. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.02.004
Tapia, M. (2001). Measuring emotional intelligence. Psychol. Rep, 88, 353–364. doi: 10.2466/pr0.88.2.353-364.
Tang, Y. X. and He, W. G. (2023). Relationship between emotional intelligence and learning motivation among college students during the COVID-19 pandemic: A serial mediation model. Front. Psychol, 14:1109569.doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1109569
Valverde-Berrocoso J, Acevedo-Borrega J and Cerezo-Pizarro M (2022) Educational Technology and Student Performance: A Systematic Review. Front Educ, 7:916502.doi: 10.3389/feduc.2022.91650
Zhou, J. H., and Yu, H. Y. (2021). Contribution of social support to home-quarantined Chinese college students' well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: the mediating role of online learning self-efficacy and moderating role of anxiety. Soc. Psychol. Educ, 24, 1643–1662. doi: 10.1007/s11218-021-09665-4
Zhu, Y. H., Xu, S. M., Wang, W. G., Zhang, L., Liu, D., Liu, Z. L., et al. (2022). The impact of online and offline learning motivation on learning performance: the mediating role of positive academic emotion. Educ. Inf. Technol, 27, 8921–8938. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-10961-5
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemp. Educ. Psychol, 25, 82–91. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1016