簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 黃秋玉
Chiu-yu Huang
論文名稱: 故事圖解法對台灣高中生英文看圖寫作之影響
The Effects of Story Mapping on Picture Writing for EFL Senior High School Students in Taiwan
指導教授: 丁仁
Ting, Jen
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 英語學系
Department of English
論文出版年: 2006
畢業學年度: 94
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 138
中文關鍵詞: 故事圖解法看圖寫作寫作焦慮英文寫作
英文關鍵詞: Story-mapping Instruction, Picture Writing, Writing Apprehension, English Writing
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:398下載:73
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 中文摘要
    本研究主旨再探討故事圖解法對高中生英文看圖故事寫作之效益。藉由提供故事文法為寫作前活動,探討受試者是否在文章長度,故事文法及英文寫作能力有無改變。文中並探討故事文法教學是否能降低受試者得英文寫作焦慮並提高英文寫作興趣。
    本研究以桃園縣平鎮市平鎮高中兩班七十六位高二學生為研究對象,在2004三月到2004五月為期十週的期間,所有受試者在每週英文寫作課接受故事圖解教學,並根據提供的三張連環圖畫寫一篇英文故事。在資料分析方面,分為量的分析及質的探討。量的分析主要針對前測及後測上學生在英文故事寫作上字數,故事文法內容,寫作表現,及寫作焦慮之差異加以做統計資料比較及分析。此外,研究者根據學生對於英文故事圖解教學的回應及建議作質的分析及探討。
    本研究主要發現如下:
    1. 故事圖解教學法有助高中生寫出較長的英文文章。(前測字數: 77.89; 後測字數: 183.08)
    2. 故事圖解教學法有助高中生寫出重要故事文法。根據前後測比較,學生在主角,地點,時間,目標,起始事件,情節,結局,及反應皆有顯著進步。
    3. 故事圖解教學法有助高中生增進英文寫作能力,不論在內容,組織,文法,用字修辭,及標點符號,大小寫皆有顯著進步。
    4. 根據前後測寫作焦慮評量表及學生訪談,發現故事圖解教學法明顯降低受試者得英文寫作焦慮並提高英文寫作興趣。
    5. 結合英文閱讀及寫作教學更能提高學生英文寫作能力。因為閱讀不僅讓學生熟悉英文故事文章架構,更能強化其閱讀及寫作興趣。
    根據以上研究結果,筆者建議除了傳統的寫作前活動,英文老師在英文寫作課中可介紹故事文法的概念,以提高學生的英文寫作興趣,英文寫作能力,及降低英文寫作焦慮。

    English Abstract
    The study investigates the effects of the story-mapping instruction on the story writing and writing performance of EFL senior high school students in Taiwan. Seventy-six sophomores from two classes in Ping-Jeng Senior High School participated in the present study. The study lasted for 10 weeks from March 2004 to May 2004. During the experiment, the participants took the ESL version of the Daly-Miller Writing Apprehension Test, underwent the story-mapping instruction, and responded to a questionnaire.
    The differences in the students’ story writing performance were analyzed in terms of the t-test results of three elements: word count, story grammar units, and writing performance; furthermore, the Daly-Miller Writing Apprehension Test was applied for analysis of the students’ writing apprehension pretest and posttest. Besides, the qualitative data were summarized and discussed. The findings are as follows.
    1. The story-mapping instruction helped the students composed longer stories. (Pretest: 77.89; posttest: 183.08)
    2. The story-mapping instruction helped the students write stories with more important story elements. The students made significant improvement in the “Character,” “Locale,” “Time,” “Goal,” “Starter event,” “Actions,” “Ending,” and “Reaction.”
    3. The story-mapping instruction helped the students in writing performance, including the content, organization, grammar, vocabulary, and mechanism.
    4. The story-mapping instruction helped reduce the students’ writing apprehension and enhance their interest in writing.
    5. Integrating reading to writing helped improve the student’s writing. Reading extensively can not only familiarize the students with the story structure but also enhance the students’ interest in reading and writing.
    Based on the findings, the researcher recommends that the story-mapping instruction be introduced to EFL beginning writers as a prewriting activity in the writing course as to enhance their writing performance and reduce their writing anxiety.

    TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT (Chinese)……………………………………………………………….…i ABSTRACT (English)……………………………………………………………....….ii ACKNOWLEDGMENT………………………………………………………….……iv TABLE OF CONTENTS…………………...…………………………………………..v LIST OF TABLES………...………………………………………………………….viii CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION……………………...…………………...……1 1.1 Background and Motivation ……………………………………………………1 1.1.1 The Difficulty of English Writing to EFL Writers………………………1 1.1.2 Focus on Prewriting Phase…………………………………...………... 3 1.1.3 Focus on Story Writing and Picture Writing……………………………4 1.1.4 Adoption of the Story-Mapping Instruction ………….….……..………6 1.2 Purpose of the Study ………………………………………………………...…7 1.3 Research Questions…………………...………………………………….…..…8 1.4 Research Hypotheses……………………………………………………………9 1.5 Significance of the Study……………………………………………………...9 1.6 Definition of Terms………..…………………………………………………..11 1.7 Organization of the Study……………………………………………………...13 CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW……………………..……………….14 2.1 The Importance of Pre-writing Strategies……………………………………..14 2.1.1 The Related Studies on Pre-writing Strategies………………………..17 2.2 The Trend of Picture Writing……………………………………………….....19 2.2.1 The Related Studies on Picture Writing…………………………….....20 2.3 The Theory of Story Mapping………………………………………………....22 2.3.1 Definition of Story Mapping…………………………………………..25 2.3.2 Values and Related Studies on Story Mapping………………………..27 2.3.2.1 Effectiveness of Story Mapping in Improving Reading and Listening Comprehension………………………….….……...28 2.3.2.2 Effectiveness of Story Mapping in Improving Story Telling…………………………………………………….…..36 2.3.2.3 Effectiveness of Story Mapping in Lowering Students’Writing Apprehension in the Target Language…………….....36 2.3.2.4 Effectiveness of Story Mapping in Improving Students’ Story Writing Performance…………………………………….…....38 2.4 Summary………………………………………….………………………..…...43 CHAPTER THREE: METHODOLOGY………….……………………………….45 3.1 Participants……………………………………………………………………..45 3.2 Study Design…………………………………………………………………...46 3.3 Instruments……………………………………………………………………..46 3.3.1 The ESL Version of Daly-Miller Writing Apprehension Test……...……..47 3.3.2 The Questionnaire and Interviews…………………………….…….….47 3.4 Treatment………………………………………………………………….……47 3.4.1 Instruction of Story Mapping……………………….………………….48 3.4.2 Modeling………………………………………….…………………….48 3.4.3 Story-Mapping Cloze Test and Story Writing……...….……………….50 3.4.4 Story Writing………………………………………….………………..50 3.5 Procedure of the Study………………………………………………………...50 3.6 Data Analysis………………………………………………………………….53 3.6.1 Quantitative Analysis….……………………………………………….53 3.6.2 Qualitative Analysis……………………………………………………55 3.7 Raters and the Training Session……………………………………………….55 3.8 Summary………………………………………………………………………57 CHAPTER FOUR: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION…….……………………..….59 4.1 Comparison of Word Count between the Pretest and the Posttest………….….59 4.2 Comparison of Writing Performance between the Pretest and the Posttest…....61 4.3 Comparison of the Number of the Story Grammar Units between the Pretest and the Posttest…………………………………………………………………….63 4.4 Comparison of Story Grammar Units between the Pretest and the Posttest…...65 4.5 Results of the Most Difficult and Easiest Story Grammar Units ……………...67 4.6 Correlation of Score of Story Grammar, Writing Performance and Word Count…………………………………………………………………………………72 4.7 Comparison of Writing Apprehension between the Pretest and the Posttest…..73 4.8 Results of the Students’ Response to the Story-Mapping Instruction……….…79 4.9 Results of the Six Open-ended Questions and Interviews……………………..84 4.10 Summary……………………………………………………………………….94 CHAPTER FIVE: CONCLUSION…………………..……………………………95 5.1 Summary of the Findings………………………………………………….…..95 5.2 Comparison with the Previous Studies…………………………….……….….98 5.3 Pedagogical Implications……………………………………………………..101 5.4 Limitations of the Study………………………………………………………103 5.5 Suggestions for Future Studies………………………………………………..104 REFERENCES……………………………………………………………………...106 APPENDIX………………………………………………………………………….116 Appendix A…………………………………………………………………...116 Appendix B……………………………………………………………….…..118 Appendix C……………………………………………………………….…..120 Appendix D…………………………………………………………………...122 Appendix E……………………………………………………………………125 Appendix F……………………………………………………………………129 Appendix G……………………………………………………………….…..131 Appendix H…………………………………………………………………...132 Appendix I…………………………………………………………………….135 Appendix J………………………………………………………….…………136

    References:
    Anderson, R. C. & Pearson, P.D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED239236)
    Applebee, A. N. (1986). Problems in process approaches: Toward a reconception of process instruction. In Petrosky and Bartholomae (Eds.), The teaching of writing: Eighty-fifth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, (pp 95-113). Chicago, Ill.: National Society for the Study of Education.
    Baumann, J. & Bergeron, B. S. (1993). Story-map instruction using children’s literature: Effects on first graders’ comprehension of central narrative elements. Journal of Reading Behavior, 25 (4), 407-438.
    Beck, I. & McKeown, M. G.. (1981). Developing questions that promote comprehension: The story map. Language Arts, 58 (8), 913-918.
    Becker, C. (1991). Quantity and quality of writing German in early acquisition: A case for associative activities in foreign language course. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angels.
    Boulineau, T., Fore III, C., Hagan-Burke, S., Burk, M. D. (2004). Use of story-mapping to increase the story-grammar text comprehension of elementary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27(2), 105-121.
    Brown, S. P., ED.D. (1988). The effects of a story organizer on the quality of fourth-grade students’ narrative writing. Ann Arbor, Mich.: UMI.
    Byran, D. (1988). Teaching writing skills. New York: Longman.
    Cannizzar, M. & Coelho, C. A. (2002). Treatment of story grammar following traumatic brain injury: A pilot study. Brain Injury, 16(12), 1065-1073.
    Carnine, D. & Kinder, D. (1985). Teaching low-performing students to apply generative and schema strategies to narrative and expository material. Remedial and Special Education, 6 (1), 20-30.
    Carnine, D., & Kinder, B.D. (1985). Teaching low-performing students to apply generative and schema strategies to narrative and expository material. Remedial and Special Education, 6, 20-30.
    Chang, L. C. (2003). Comparison research on strategies of story-mapping and summarization toward 6-graders with low reading skills. Master Thesis of the Graduate Institute of Education, Chung Yuan Christian University.
    Charney, D., Newman, J. H., Palmquist, M. (1995). “I’m just no good at writing.” Written Communication, 12(3), 298-329.
    Chen, C. J. (2003). The effects of story grammar instruction on the reading comprehension of elementary students with reading disabilities. Master’s Thesis of the Graduate Institute of Special Education, National Taipei Municipal University of Education.
    Chen, K. Y., Huang, T. S., Lin, S. O., Lin, C. I, Su, S. F., & Kang, S. O. (1992). A Research report of construction and grading of English composition tests in the JCEE. Taipei: The ROC Center of College Entrance Examination.
    Chiang, Y. C. (2003). A study of Picture-Elicited narratives for developing junior high school students’ English writing competence. Master’s Thesis of the Graduate Institute of English, National Chengchi University.
    Clay, M. M. (1998). By different paths to common outcomes. York, Me: Stenhouse.
    Cortazzi, M. (1994). Narrative analysis. Language Teaching, 27, 157-170.
    Daly, J. A., & Miller, M. D. (1975a). The empirical development of an instrument of writing apprehension. Research in the teaching of English, 9,242-249.
    Davis, Z.T. (1994). Effects of pre-reading story mapping on elementary readers’ comprehension. Journal of Educational Research, 87(6), 353-360.
    Dimino, J. A. et al. (1995). Synthesis of the research on story grammar as a means to increase comprehension. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 11(1), 53-72.
    Dyson, A. H. (1989). Multiple worlds of child writers. New York: Teachers College Press.
    Ellis, S. (2003). Story writing, planning and creativity. Reading Literacy and Language, 37 (1), 27-31.
    Fine, J. C. (1991). The effect of direct instruction in story grammar using deep procession on the reading and writing achievement of second graders. (Doctoral dissertation: Florida International University: Miami, Florida) Ann Arbor, Mich.: U.M.I.
    Fitzgerald, J& Teasley, A. B. (1986). Effects of instruction in narrative structure on children’s writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(6), 424-432.
    Fitzgerald. J. & Spiegel, D. (1983). The development of knowledge of social intentions, plans, and resolutions as reflected in story productions and recall of scrambled stories in Niles, J. A., & Harris, L. A., (Eds). Searches for meaning in reading/language processing and instruction. Thirty-second yearbook of the national reading conference. National Reading Conference, Inc. (ERIC Document Reproductive Service No. ED300789)
    Foley, M. M. (2000). The (un)making of a reader. Language Arts, 77 (6), 506-511.
    Ford, M. P. (1990). Using reading strategies in writing lessons. Reading Today, 7(5), 22.
    Gambrell, L. B., & Chasen, S. P. (1991). Explicit story structure instruction and the narrative writing of fourth- and fifth-grade below average readers. Reading Research and Instruction, 31(1), 54-62.
    Gardill, M.C. & Jitendra, A. K. (1999). Advanced story map instruction: Effects on the reading comprehension of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 33(1), 2-17.
    Glaser, R., & Takanishi, R. (1986). Introduction: Creating a knowledge base for education: Psychology’s contributions and prospects. American Psychologist, 41, 1025-1028.
    Gorden, J. M. (1984). Children’s concept of story in reading and writing. The Reading Teacher, 37, 578-584.
    Graham, S., Harris, D. R., MacArthur, C., & Schwartz, S. (1998). Writing instruction. In B. Wong (Ed.), Learning about learning disabilities (391-423). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    Graves, D. H. (1994). A fresh look at writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
    Gurney D., Gersten R., Dimino J., & Carnine D., (1990). Story grammar: Effective literature instruction for high school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23(6), 335-342.
    Hagood, B. F. (1997). Reading and writing with help from story grammar. Teaching Exceptional Children, 29 (4), 10-14.
    Harris, K. R. & Graham, S. (1992). Helping young writers master the craft: strategy instruction and self-regulation in the writing process. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
    Hassan, B. A., (2001). The relationship of writing apprehension and self-esteem to the writing quality and quantity of EFL university students. (ERIC Document Reproductive Service No.ED459671)
    Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing process. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing: An interdisciplinary approach. (3-30), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrance Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
    Hsu Wen-Jiang. (2001). The effects of the story map writing instruction method on the ideas-organizing and writing performance of elementary students. Master’s Thesis of the Graduate Institute of Compulsory Education, National Hualien University of Education.
    Huang, Chiung-ju. (2003). The effects of teaching organizing strategies in the prewriting phase on Chinese students’ English writing proficiency. Master’s Thesis of the Graduate Institute of English, National Taiwan Normal University.
    Hyerle, D. (1995). Thinking maps: Seeing is understanding. Educational leadership, 99 (1), 85-89.
    Idol, L. (1987). Group story mapping: A comprehension strategy for both skilled and unskilled readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20(4), 196-205.
    Idol, L., & Croll, V. J. (1987). Story-mapping training as a means of improving reading comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10, 214-229.
    Jackie, P. (1989). Using storytelling to promote language and literacy development. Reading Teacher, 43 (2), 138-141,
    Kincheloe, J. L. & Steinberg, S. R. (1993). A tentative description of post-formal thinking: The critical confrontation with cognitive theory. Harvard Educational Review, 63 (3), 296-321.
    Kroll, Barbara. Ed. (1990). Second language writing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Leaman, R. E. (1993). Effects of direct instruction of story grammar on story writing and reading comprehension of elementary school learning disabled students. In Rasinski, T. V. & Padak, N. D. (Eds). Inquiries in literacy learning and instruction: The fifth yearbook of the college reading association. College Reading Association. (ERIC Document Reproductive Service No. ED361665)
    Lee, L. (1994). L2 writing: Using pictures as a guided writing environment. (ERIC Document Reproductive Service No. ED386951)
    Lee, S. Y. (1990). Writing apprehension: Why some people don’t perform their competence in The proceedings of the seventh international symposium on English teaching.
    Li, C. C. (1992). Breaking the barrier of ESL writing: An analysis of English compositions written for Taiwan’s Joint University Entrance Examinations. Taipei: Crane Publishing Co.
    Li, M. M. K. (2000). American Writers & Their Works. Taipei: Pyramid Press.
    Lin ,P. J. (2003). The effects of the story structure instruction on students with learning disabilities in junior high school. Master Thesis of the Graduate Institute of Special Education National Changhua University of Education.
    Lytle, S., & Botel, M. (1988). PCRP II: Reading, writing and talking across the curriculum. Pennsylvania State Dept. of Education, Harrisburg. (ERIC Document Reproductive Service No.ED313658)
    Mandler, J. M. & Johnson N. S. (1980). On throwing out the baby with the bathwater: a reply to Black and Wilensky’s evaluation of story grammars. Cognitive Science, 4, 305-312.
    Mandler, J. M. & Johnson, N. S. (1977). Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall. Cognitive Psychology, 9 (1), 111-51.
    Mathes, P. G., Fuchs, D. & Fuchs, L. S. (1997). Cooperative story mapping. Remedial And Special Education, 18(1), 20-27.
    McGarvey , L.T. (1999). Using aesthetic work to inspire storytelling, writing and illustration. (ERIC Document Reproductive Service No. ED430247)
    Montague, M., & Graves, A. (1993). Improving students’ story writing. Teaching Exceptional Children, 25 (4), 37-51.
    Montague, M., Maddux, C. D., Dereshiwsky, M. I. (1990). Story grammar and comprehension and production of narrative prose by students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23 (3), 190-197.
    Noyce, R. M, & Christie, J. F. (1989). Integrating reading &writing instruction in grades K-8. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
    Pajares, F., & Viliante, G. (1997). Influences of self-efficacy on elementary students’ writing. Journal of Educational Research, 90(6), 353-360.
    Pearson P. D. (1985). The changing face of reading comprehension. The reading teacher, 38,724-738.
    Pearson, P. D. (1982). Asking questions about stories. Ginn occasional papers. Columbus, OH: Ginn.
    Pressley, M. & McComick, C. B. (1995). Cognition, teaching, ad assessment. New York: HarperCollins College Publishers.
    Rentel, V. M. & King, M. L. (1983). A Longitudinal study of coherence in children’s written narratives, March 31, 1981-March 31, 1982. Ohio State Univ., Columbus. Research Foundation (ERIC Document Reproductive Service No.ED237989)
    Reutzel, D. R. (1986). Investigating a synthesized comprehension instructional strategy: The cloze story map. Journal of Educational Research, 79(6), 343-349.
    Roth, F. P. (2000). Narrative writing: development and teaching with children with writing difficulties. Top Lang Disord, 20(4),15-28.
    Routman, R. (1991). Invitations: changing as teachers and learners K-12. Toronto, Canada : Irwin Pub. ; Portsmouth, NH : Heinemann.
    Ruddell, M. R. (2004). Teaching content reading & writing. Hoboken, N.Y.: Wiley.
    Rumelhart, D. E. (1975). Notes on a schema for stories. In: Daniel Bobrow and Allan Collins, (Eds.), Representation and understanding. New York: Academic Press, 211-236.
    Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Understanding and summarizing brief stories. In D. LaBerge and S. Jay Samuels (Eds.), Basic Processes in reading: Perception and comprehension (pp. 265-303). Hillsdale, NY: Lawrance Erlbaum Associates.
    Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, & B. Bruce (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading and comprehension. (pp. 30-58). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Saddler, B., Moran, S., Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2004). Preventing writing difficulties: The effects of planning strategy instruction on the writing performance of struggling writers. Exceptionality, 12(1), 3-17.
    Sarkar, S. (1978). The use of pictures in teaching English as a second language. English language teaching journal, 32 (3), 175-80.
    Schmelzer, R. & Dickey, J. P, (1990). Using story grammar to teach literature: Episodic mapping. (ERIC Document Reproductive Service No.ED322482)
    Schweiker-Marra, K. E. & Marra, W. T. (2000). Investigating the effects of prewriting activities on writing performance and anxiety of at-risk students. Reading Psychology, 21, 99-114.
    Shanahan, T. & Shanahan, S. (1997). Character perspective charting: Helping children to develop a more complete conception of story. The Reading Teacher, 50 (8), 668-677.
    Simmons, D. C., Kameenui, E. J., Dickson, S., Chard, D., Gunn, B., Baker, S. (1993), Integrating narrative reading comprehension and writing instruction for all learners. (ERIC Document Reproductive Service No.ED365943)
    Sinatra, R. (1973). A visual strategy plan for writing and organizational improvement. (ERIC Document Reproductive Service No.ED102578)
    Singer, H., & Donlan, D. (1983). Active comprehension: Problem-solving schema with question generalization for comprehension of complex short stories. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 166-185.
    Sorrell, A. L.(1990). Three reading comprehension strategies: TELLS, story mapping, and QARs. Academic Therapy, 25 (3), 359-68.
    Stein, N. L.& Glenn, C. G. (1975). A development study of children’s recall of story material. (ERIC Document Reproductive Service No.ED115386)
    Stein, N. L., & Trabasson, T. (1982). What’s in a story: An approach to comprehension and instruction. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advanced instructional psychology, 2, 213-267. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Stewig, J.W. (1980). From visuals to words. (ERIC Document Reproductive Service No., ED186111)
    Thompson, M.O. (1983). The returning student: Writing anxiety and general anxiety. TETYC, 10 (1), 35-39.
    Thompson. M. O. (1979). A study of writing anxiety: The effects of several classroom strategies. (ERIC Document Reproductive Service No.ED206339)
    Thorndyke, P. W. (1977). Knowledge acquisition from newspapers stories. Rand Corp., Santa Monica, CA.
    Tompkins, G.E. (1990). Teaching writing: Balancing process and product (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Macmillan.
    Tompkins, G. E., & Friend, M. (1986). On your mark, get set, write! Teaching Exceptional Children, 18, 82-89.
    Tori Cecil Fore III, Shanna Hagan-Burke, & Mack D. Burke, (2004). Use of story-mapping text comprehension of elementary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27, 105-121.
    Tribble, C. (1996). Writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Troia, G. A., Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1999). Teaching students with learning abilities to mindfully plan when writing. Exceptional Children, 65, 235-252.
    Tseng, J. Y. (2002). Research on the Teaching of Composition-Writing via Pictures.
    Master’s Thesis of the Graduate Institute of Elementary and Secondary Education National Chiayi University.
    Vallecorsa, Ada L., deBettencourt, Laurie U., (1997). Using a mapping procedure to teach reading and writing skills to middle grade students with learning disabilities. Education & Treatment of Children, 20(2), 173-188.
    Walsh, S. M. (1986). New directions in Research on writing apprehension. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED 361 716)
    Wang, B. (2003). A Study of the Effects of Student-teacher Dialogue Journals on EFL Writing in High Schools in Taiwan. Master Thesis of the Graduate Institute of Education National Taiwan Normal University.
    Yeh, S. M. (2002). Effects of cooperative story mapping on the reading comprehension of the elementary students with low-performing reading. Master’s Thesis of the Graduate Institute of Education, National Taichung University.

    QR CODE