簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表
研究生： 陳玫伶
Chen, Mei-Ling
論文名稱： 慣性式肌力訓練對排球動作表現之影響
The effect of inertial resistance training on volleyball functional movements
指導教授： 相子元
Shiang, Tzyy-Yuang
學位類別： 碩士
Master
系所名稱： 運動競技學系
Department of Athletic Performance
論文出版年： 2013
畢業學年度： 101
語文別： 中文
論文頁數： 50
中文關鍵詞： 訓練速度 、轉動慣量 、爆發力
英文關鍵詞： MOI, movement speed, explosive strength
論文種類： 學術論文
相關次數： 點閱：285  下載：20 
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

    • 目的：探討不同轉動慣量之之自主最快訓練速度慣性式阻力訓練，對於排球功能性動作表現之影響。方法：26名男女乙組代表隊選手參與本研究，使用可調整轉動慣量之自製慣性式阻力訓練器材，給予各組別不同的轉動慣量進行訓練，並記錄三週與六週的動作表現測試結果，使用二因子重複量數變異數分析法比較不同轉動慣量間以及訓練前後的差異。結果：經訓練後，上肢訓練結果，在站立與助跑扣球球速的表現沒有明顯增加，而下肢訓練結果的立定跳遠、折返跑、單/雙手立定摸高與單/雙手住跑摸高等動作表現皆有明顯進步，在但不同轉動慣量組別間上、下肢皆無差異。結論：六週慣性式肌力訓練對於下肢訓練較能有效增加動作表現，而慣量大小並沒有影響訓練效果，因此，建議未來選擇從事慣性式阻力訓練時，訓練全程盡最大自主動作速度即可。

    Purpose: To examine the effect of different Moment of Inertia (MOI) resistances on volleyball functional movements. Methods: Twenty-six (male and female) volleyball players were recruited and arranged to different MOI groups for 6 weeks lower and upper limbs inertial resistance training. The performances of volleyball functional movement after 3 weeks and 6 weeks training were obtained. Two-way analysis of variance (mixed design) was processed. Significant level was set at =.05. Results: In upper limbs results, the performance of run-up and stand spike were not significantly improved after training. In lower limbs results, the performance of standing long jump, shuttle run, single / both hands standing reach and single / both hands run-up reach were all significantly improved after training. But there was no significant difference among groups. Conclusions: The 6 weeks inertia resistance training can effectively increase the performance of lower limbs in volleyball functional movements. And there was no significant difference among different MOIs. To earn the best training effect, we suggest MOI selection for training should based on the movement speed.

    中文摘要.............................................ii 英文摘要.............................................iii 謝致詞.............................................. iv 目次................................................vi 表次................................................viii 圖次.................................................ix 第壹章緒論.................................................1 ㄧ、研究背景.................................................1 二、研究問題..............................................3 三、研究目的...........................................3 四、研究假設............................................4 五、研究範圍與假設.........................................5 六、名詞操作性定義......................................5 第貳章文獻探討.......................................9 一、速度與負荷之肌力訓練文獻探討............................9 二、慣性式訓練當前運用..................................10 三、慣性訓練動作型態與強度................................10 四、文獻總結..........................................11 第参章方法..............................................12 一、研究對象與地點........................................12 二、測量儀器與設備.......................................12 三、實驗步驟..........................................16 四、實驗流............................................19 五、資料蒐集.............................................21 六、統計分析..........................................21 第肆章結果...........................................22 一、受試者基本資料........................................22 二、不同慣量間訓練結果...................................24 三、下肢不同慣量之前、中、後訓練結果....................25 四、上肢不同慣量之前、中、後訓練結果.........................30 五、不同慣量之各測驗項目進步程度.............................31 第伍章討論..............................................34 一、不同慣量間對訓練效果的影響..............................34 二、下肢不同慣量對前、中、後訓練的影響........................34 三、上肢不同慣量對前、中、後訓練的影響........................36 四、結論.................................................36 五、建議................................................37 引用文獻.............................................38 表次 表1-1 慣性式與傳統式肌力訓練優缺點比較.........................2 表3-1 轉動慣量測定結果.....................................17 表4-1 受試者基本資料........................................22 表4-2 不同慣量在下肢各階段訓練動作表現之描述性統計............24 表4-3 不同慣量在上肢各階段訓練動作表現之描述性統計.............25 圖次 圖1-1 轉動慣量調整重量塊(左)與慣性輪盤(右) .....................6 圖1-2 扣球動作向心收縮訓練動作.................................6 圖1-3 股四頭肌向心收縮訓練動作..............................7 圖1-4 扣球動作離心收縮訓練動作................................7 圖1-5 股四頭肌離心收縮訓練動作................................8 圖3-1 慣性輪盤與轉動慣量調整重量塊............................13 圖3-2 皮帶與張力彈簧組...................................13 圖3-3 驅動輪盤、纜線絞盤以及纜線..........................14 圖3-4 轉速計與定位磁鐵.....................................14 圖3-5 把手纜線與慣性式阻力器材.............................15 圖3-6 膝踢直/彎曲動作訓練椅、纜線與慣性式阻力器材................15 圖3-7 轉動慣量測定方式；已知力矩及角加速度比值.................17 圖3-8 上肢肩關節向/離心訓練動作............................18 圖3-9 下肢膝踢直向/離心訓練動作...........................19 圖3-10 實驗流程圖......................................20 圖4-1 上肢訓練動作速度...................................23 圖4-2 下肢訓練動作速度...................................23 圖4-3 不同慣量前中後測折返跑平均速度........................26 圖4-4 不同慣量前中後測立定跳遠平均距離.......................27 圖4-5 不同慣量前中後測立定單手摸高平均高度......................27 圖4-6 不同慣量前中後測立定雙手摸高平均高度...................28 圖4-7 不同慣量前中後測助跑單手摸高平均高度.......................29 圖4-8 不同慣量前中後測助跑雙手摸高平均高度.....................29 圖4-9 不同慣量前中後測站立跑扣球球速平均高度..................30 圖4-10 不同慣量前中後測助跑扣球球速平均高度.....................31 圖4-11 不同慣量下肢動作進步百分比.............................32 圖4-12不同慣量上肢動作進步百分比..............................33

    王翔星、劉強(2000)。彈震式阻力訓練之簡介，大專體育學刊，48，137-143。
    王文筆（2003）。不同負荷肌力訓練對男性肌力素質與肢圍效果的研究，大專體育學刊，15(1)，175-183。
    張硯涵(2009)。被動反覆衝擊是肌力訓練與增強是訓練對籃球選手下肢爆發力之比較(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學，台北市。
    黃怡仁、劉宗德、李建毅(2011)。排球選手應用核心肌力訓練增強體能分析探討，運動知識學報，19，201-210。
    Alfredson, H., Pietilä, T., & Lorentzon, R. (1998). Concentric and eccentric shoulder and elbow muscle strength in female volleyball players and non-active females. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports,, 8(5), p265-270
    Abendroth-Smith, J., & Kras, J. (1999). More B-boat: the volleyball spike. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 70(3), 56-59.
    Aagaard, P., Simonsen, E. B., Andersen, J. L., Magnusson, P. & Dyhre-Poulsen, P. (2002). Increased rate of force development and neural drive of human skeletal muscle following resistance training . Journal of Applied Physiology, 93(4), 1318–1326.
    Alkner, B. A., & Tesch, P. A. (2004). Efficacy of a gravity-independent resistance exercise device as a countermeasure to muscle atrophy during 29-day bed rest. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, 181(3), 345-357.
    Berg, H. E., & Tesch, P. A. (1998). Force and power characteristic of a resistive exercise device for use in space. Acta Astronautica, 42(1), 219-230.
    Blazevich, A. (2012) Are training velocity and movement pattern important determinants of muscular rate of force development enhancement? European Journal of Applied Physiology, 112(10), 3689-3691.
    Claflin, D. R., Larkin, L. M., Cederna, P. S., Horowitz, J. F., Alexander, N. B., Cole, N. M., … & Ashton-Miller J. A. (2011). Effects of high- and low-velocity resistance training on the contractile properties of skeletal muscle fibers from young and older humans. Jornal of Applied Physiology, 111(4),1021-1030.
    Komi, P. V. (1984). Physiological and biomechanical correlates of muscle function: Effects of muscle structure and sretch-shortening cycle on force and Speed. Exercise and Sport Science Reviews, 12(1), 81-121.
    Lacourpaille, L., Nordez, A., & Hug, F. (2013). Influence of stimulus intensity on electromechanical delay and its mechanisms. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 23(1), 51-55..
    Mickiewicz, A., Jaskólski, A. (2012). Muscle activity during inertial and free weights exercise. Occupational Therapy: the International Perspective, 6, 217-224.
    Norrbrand L. (2008). Acute and early chronic responses to resistance exercise using flywheel or weight. Stockholm (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Mid Sweden university, Stockholm, SE.
    Norrbrand, L., Pozzo, M. & Tesch, P. T. (2010). Flywheel resistance training calls for greater eccentric muscle activation than weight training. European Jornal of Applied Physiology, 110(5), 997–1005.
    O’Bryant, H. S. (1985). Roundtable:Determining factors of strength-part Π. National Strength and Conditioning Association Journal, 7, 10-17.
    Onambele, G. L., Maganaris, C. N., Mian, O. S., Tam, E., Rejc E., McEwan, I. M., & Narici M. V. (2008). Neuromuscular and balance responses to flywheel inertial versus weight training in older persons. Journal of Biomechanical, 41(15), 3133-3138.
    Romero-Rodriguez, D., Gual, G., & Tesch, P. A. (2011). Efficacy of an inertial resistance training paradigm in the treatment of patellar tendinopathy in athletes: A case-series study. Physical Therapy in Sport, 12(1), 43-48.
    Suetta, C., Aagaard, P., Rosted, A., Jakobsen, A. K., Duus, B., Kjaer, M., & Magnusson, S. P. (2004). Training-induced changes in muscle CSA, muscle strength, EMG, and rate of force development in elderly subjects after long-term unilateral disuse. Journal of Applied Physiology, 97(5), 1954–1961.
    Selvanayagam, V. S., Riek, S., & Carroll, T. J. (2011). Early neural responses to strength training. Journal of Applied Physiology, 111(2), 367–375.
    Wallerstein, L. F., Tricoli, V., Barroso, R., Rodacki, A. L., Russo, L., …. & Ugrinowitsch, C. (2012). Effects of strength and power training on neuromuscular variables in older adults. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 20, 171-185.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE