研究生: |
林香君 Lin Shiang-June |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
變的知識建構與建構知識的變 THE KNOWLEDGE CONSTRUCTION OF CHANGE AND THE CHANGE DURING KNOWLEDGE CONSTRUCTION |
指導教授: |
金樹人
Jin, Shuh-Ren |
學位類別: |
博士 Doctor |
系所名稱: |
教育心理與輔導學系 Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling |
畢業學年度: | 86 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 251 |
中文關鍵詞: | 變 、知識建構 、第二序改變 、敘說研究 、重新框定 |
英文關鍵詞: | change, knowledge construction, second-order change, narrative research, reframing |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:243 下載:26 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究探索的主題是「變」,目的在理解一個人心理上
經驗到「變」時,她/他發生了什麼?歷程是如何?整個研
究的過程可視為一場關於「變」的知識建構歷程。
本研究採取自我敘說的研究。知識建構歷程中經歷兩次
理解循環:第一循環從文獻探討得到「第二序改變」的概念
,用以指稱主體的「變」,並企圖以編碼、歸類的分析方法
解讀展開於改變的自傳敘說資料,企圖為發展「第二序改變
」的特徵以作為界定,再從敘說訪談中整理出「變」的本質
與歷程;研究者自傳文本分析後進行批判反思,發現這樣的
研究行動,還是受限於實證典範的思考,無法建構主體性的
知識,因而進入第二循環的知識建構,改採詮釋現象學方法
,回到主體經驗,不預先對「變」作界定,而以「視框」作
為概念工具,分析改變經驗的敘說資料,本研究透過研究者
自身以及一位諮商專業領域女性的改變經驗敘說文本,企圖
理解主體如何建構「變」的意義,詮釋分為兩層:一為主體
改變經驗的意義建構,一為研究者從社會脈絡重新解讀主體
經驗的意義。
從主體意義的詮釋中,研究者建構出的「變」指涉主體
與世界關係方式的改變,透過內在核心結構的「重新框定」
而發生,「重新框定」是主體從原結構進入解構,移動到對
立面結構,再移動到更高邏輯層次的新結構的辯證歷程;研
究者再從社會脈絡詮釋主體經驗,「變」指涉主體在社會脈
絡中與世界關係方式的改變,是透過脈絡視框的「重新框定
」,從個人心理視框到社會脈絡視框的移位,而賦予經驗社
會脈絡意義而達成。綜合兩層的理解,本研究建構出的「變
」指涉了系統/脈絡/建構三層意義,據此,對諮商/心理
治療專業領域的理論與實踐進行反思。
The Knowledge Construction of Change and
The Change during Knowledge Construction
Lin Shiang-June
Abstract
The research is on the exploration of change. We
intent to explore experience of what and how the 'change'
is. The research is as a process toward the knowledge
construction of 'change'.
Self-narrative study was adopted. In the beginning,
we started the research by the 'Second-Order Change'
exploration and intended to have a definition.
A coding method was adopted to analyze the change-narrative
text. After the analysis, the researcher had a reflection
on that research action and find it was not the right way
to approach to the subject's experience. By this reflection,
we had a methodological detour to Hermeneutics-Phenomenology
research. Instead of defining what 'change' is, we went back
to the subjectivity--the experience themselves. We had two
texts to be interpreted: one from the researcher's autobiography
and the other from a female co-researcher's narrative-interview,
who both were professional counselors. Each text was interpreted
according two layers: the first for how the subjects framed the
change experience from their context; and the second for the
recontextualization from social context.
The researcher got the knowledge of 'change' from these
narratives interpretation: on the subject's context layer, 'change'
was referred to the different pattern by way of the 'reframing' of
personal construct; and on the social context layer, 'change' was
referred to the different pattern in the social context by way of
the reframing from personal context to social context. Based on
the knowledge construction about 'change', reflection and discussion
were proposed.