我國於86年4月23日將「殘障福利法」內容修正並且更名為「身心障礙者保護法」，
其中對於身心障礙者生活內涵均規劃「全面性」生活品質的遠景，然而對身心障礙者而言
，無障礙的生活環境，更是關係其生活品質重要的一環，因此如何有效地運用「生活品質
」的理念，透過無障礙生活環境的改善，以落實並提升殘障者生活品質，將是未來我國規
劃提升殘障者生活、就學及就業服務的重點。
本研究旨在瞭解在職肢體障礙者的無障礙生活品質現況，並進一步探討無障礙生活品
質與其相關變項之間的關係，以提供我國對肢體障礙者的相關服務及建立無障礙生活環境
的規劃、實施及改進措施的參考。
本研究之研究方法為文獻探討、問卷調查。文獻探討分析有關生活品質的概念與相關
研究，並分析肢體障礙者無障礙生活的內涵，及探討台北市對肢體障礙者的相關福利措施
及現況，問卷調查對象為立意取樣台北市政府勞工局就業服務中心之肢體障礙者。研究工
具採自編之「在職肢體障礙者無障礙生活品質調查問卷」。資料分析採用次數分配、百分
比、平均數、標準差、及皮爾遜積差相關等統計方法及開放式問題分析。
本研究主要發現如下：
1.在生活品質指數上，本研究之在職肢體障礙者對在「無障礙生活品質問卷」（量表
）方面的反應，對社會支持、工作環境主觀感受及心理環境適應三個層面的生活品質指數
是傾向於佳（指數為正），而在工作環境客觀支持及社區物理環境二個層面則傾向於不佳
（指數為負）。
2.由相關分析結果，在問卷的五個層面上，各個層面之間都有顯著正相關；「工作收
入」與社會支持、工作環境主觀感受及心理環境適應有顯著的正相關，「現職工作資歷」
與社會支持、工作環境主觀感受及心理環境適應有顯著的正相關，而「曾換工作數」則與
社會支持呈現顯著的負相關，其餘社會人口變項與無障礙生活品質無顯著相關。
3.在無障礙設施的意見反應上，對殘障專用停車位的意見與需求最多，肢障者對無障
礙設施的需求超出公共建築物設置殘障者使用設施之範圍及設置設施的內容規範之外，其
需求範圍更廣，在工作環境的反應上，對就業機會提出意見的頻率最高，在交通上，對公
車服務所提出的意見最多。
基於文獻探討及研究發現，本研究提出對政府行政機關、就業服務及肢障者等方面之
建議，以為提升肢障者無障礙生活品質之參考。

On April 23, 1997, the Welfare for the Handicapped Act was revised as the Protection Act for Persons with Disabilities in which the quality of life issue was considered as a blue print for a comprehensive understanding for life planning for individuals with concerned. For persons with disabilities, the barrier-free environment is one of the most important aspects related to the quality of life issue. The present research intends to investigate the quality of life for workers with physical disabilities in Taipei city, to identify variables related to barrier-free living style, and to provide suggestions for career planning and daily living counseling in order to improve services for persons with physical disabilities in R.O.C..
This study includes literature review and questionnaire survey. Previous studies concerning concepts quality of life and relationships between quality of life and barrier-free environment were reviewed. This study discussed current welfare policies of Taipei City government and the barrier-free environments situations in the city. Workers with physical disabilities registered in the Office of Labor Service of Taipei City government were subjects of the study. The sampling procedures included to use a survey-guide to check quality of life for 260 workers with physical disabilities to ask their experiences with the barrier-free environment among the 138 returned questionnaires, 123 copies were considered effective. Statistical methods (frequency, percentage mean, standard deviation, Person product-moment correlation) were used to analyze the sampling results.
The results of this survey revealed:
1.The workers with physical disabilities showed a positive response (positive numbers in quality of life index in the Evaluation Table of Survey Guide) in the aspects of social support, satisfaction of working environment, and self-adjustment. However, responses to physical support of working places and domestic environment were negative.
2.Analytical results showed positive correlation in following categories: income vs. social support; income vs. satisfaction of working places; and income vs. self-adjustment. Correlation between work experiences and soical support, satisfaction of working places and self-adjustment were also positive. But correlation between times of job change and social support were negative. Other variations such as seamed irrelevant to quality of life in relation to barrier-free environment.
This survey also showed a strong need in parking spaces for persons with physical disabilities. It is suggested that all the public facilities need to consider the convenience of persons with physical disabilities. Other opinions collected from this survey include: more job opportunities for physical disabilities and complains of inconvenience of city bus services. Suggestions to provide better services for persons with physical disabilities were offered. Hopefully, the city government can consider the results and suggestions of this study to established a barrier-free environment for all individuals with physical disabilities.