本研究旨在以全職實習諮商師觀點探討對其個人與諮商專業成長之重要督導事件內涵，包括重要督導事件、督導者在該督導事件中的行為、受督者對該行為的想法與感受、以及對受督者的衝擊。研究參與者共八位，皆為在大專院校擔任全職實習諮商師。研究者以訪談法訪問了八位全職實習階段的新手諮商師，以及以紮根理論資料分析中的開放編碼程序進行資料的分析。研究結果發現全職實習新手諮商師所知覺到對於個人與專業成長產生衝擊的重要事件可歸納為四大類：（一）督導關係事件：共十五件，歸納為六大主類別，分別為督導風格、創造滋養的督導環境、督導者的開放度、督導者的投入參與、對受督者的評估與場面構成；（二）個人化事件：共二十二件，歸納為兩大主類別，分別是諮商中受督者個人情緒、個人議題對諮商的影響；（三）諮商技巧與歷程介入事件：共十九件，歸納為三大主類別，分別是個案問題的介入處理、諮商歷程技巧、其他專業技術；（四）概念化事件：共六件，歸納為一大主類別為對個案的概念化。每一督導事件中有其相對應的正向或負向或中性未定向的督導行為，研究結果發現影響督導行為效益性的因素可分為受督者因素與督導者因素，在受督者因素方面，受督者對督導行為的認知、受督者的調適能力、受督者對督導行為的認同感、受督者的自省能力、受督者對督導者的開放度、受督者在諮商專業發展中的發展特性、受督者對督導者的信任度；督導者因素包括督導行為是否隨受督者的督導需求而彈性調整、督導者面對受督者回饋的開放度、督導者是否具體示範諮商技巧、督導者是否保持彈性的態度。研究者針對上述研究結果進行討論，並據此對督導者以及未來研究提出建議。

關鍵字：全職實習、諮商新手、紮根理論、督導行為、助益、衝擊

This study is based on the view of Full-Time Trainee Counselor to discuss the meaning of those important supervision events for the advance of themselves and the counseling skill: including the important supervisory events, the behavior of the supervisor during supervision, the thinking and feeling of the supervisee about the behavior that made by supervisor, and the impact to the supervisee. There are eight participators in this research. Each of them works in Collage as a Full-Time Trainee Counselor. The author interviewed eight Full-Time Trainee Counselors and analyzed the result using the open-coding procedure based on grounded theory. The result of the analysis found that those important events impact to the advance of themselves and the counseling skill were sensed by Full-Time Trainee Counselors can be summarized into four subjects: (1)Events of supervisory relationship: There are 15 cases in total and can be summarized into 6 categories: the style of supervision, creating a positive supervisory environment, the opening degree of the supervisor, the degree of the supervisor participating in, the evaluation to the supervisee and structuring.(2)Personalized events: There are 22 cases in total and can be summarized into 2 categories: the emotion of the supervisee, personal issue impact on counseling. (3)The events of counseling skills and intervening to the supervision: There are 19 cases in total and can be summarized into 3 categories: intervening to the case, the skill of counseling, other professional skills.(4)Conceptualized events: There are 6 cases in total and can be summarized into a category: Conceptualized case.
Each of the supervisory event is corresponding to a supervisory behavior that is positive, negative, or uncertain. The report of the research found that the factor effected the benefit of supervisory behavior can be classify as Factors of supervisor and Factors of Supervisee. The factors of supervisee include the understanding of supervisory behavior, adjustment ability of supervisee, the consideration of supervisory behavior, introspective ability of supervisee, the opening degree of the supervisee to the supervisor, the supervisees’ the development characteristic, and the trust of supervisee to supervisor. The factors of supervisor include whether the supervisory behavior will be adjust according to the supervisory needs of supervisee, the opening degree while supervisor facing the response made by supervisee, whether the supervisor demonstrates the counseling skill clearly, whether the supervisor has a flexible attitude. The author is focus on those result found in the research and trying to analyze the result and proposes the suggestions to supervisors and the future works.

Keywords: full-time trainee, novice counselors, grounded theory, behavior of supervisor, benefit, impact

王大維（2009）。多元文化取向督導模式之探討。輔導季刊，45（1），12-24。
王子欣（2011）。從受督者的知覺談什麼是高品質的督導。諮商與輔導，306，45-49。
王素瑩、連廷嘉（2012）。從督導風格、依附風格談諮商督導同盟關係的促進。諮商與輔導，315，2-7。
吳秀碧（2012）。受督者知覺有益學習的督導關係內涵之探究，中華輔導與諮商學報，33，87-118。
呂艾珉（2007）。實習諮商師個別諮商專業能力發展之研究。中國文化大學心理輔導研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
周怡伶（2009）。督導者知覺影響諮商督導過程之受督導者因素研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商系碩士論文，未出版，彰化市。
卓紋君、黃進南（2003）。諮商實習生接受個別督導經驗調查：以高雄師範大學輔導研究所為例，應用心理研究，18，179-206。
胡幼慧（1996）。質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。台北：巨流。
胡景妮（2006）。全職實習諮商員的督導支持、諮商焦慮與諮商自我效能之相關研究。國立臺南大學諮商與輔導研究所，未出版，台南市。
姜淑卿、陳慶福（2009）。諮商初學者在督導經驗中負向經驗及因應方法之探討。輔導季刊，45（4），2-11。
翁令珍、廖鳳池（2005）。諮商督導歷程中人際行為與受督者知覺之分析研究，教育心理學報，37（2），99-122。
翁令珍、廖鳳池（2007）。督導介入對受督導者之衝擊-以區辨模式為架構之歷程分析。教育心理學報，2，241-261。
高淑清（2008）。質性研究的18堂課：首航初探之旅。高雄：麗文文化。
連廷嘉、徐西森（2003）。諮商督導者與實習諮商員督導經驗之分析。應用心理研究，18，89-111。
連廷嘉（2008）。諮商督導工作同盟關係與受督導者滿意度之相關研究。新竹教育大學教育學報，25（2），33-63。
張玉鈴、蔡秀玲（2012）。重要事件與督導者之介入的初探分析。教育心理學報，43（3），591-612。
張淑芬、廖鳳池（2007）。諮商督導結盟歷程之初探研究：以一對督導為例。輔導與諮商學報，29（1），67-86。
張淑芬、廖鳳池（2010）。受督者知覺之諮商督導關係歷程及督導關係事件研究。教育心理學報，42（2），317-388。
張淑芬、廖鳳池（2011）。督導雙方對諮商督導關係知覺之配對研究。中華輔導與諮商學報，30，79 -102。
許雅惠（2006）。督導者的回饋介入對實習諮商師的衝擊及諮商行為影響之分析研究：以一對諮商督導為例。國立高雄師範大學輔導與諮商研究所，未出版，高雄。
許雅惠、廖鳳池（2005）。不同階段個別諮商督導歷程中督導議題與督導策略之分析研究。輔導與諮商學報，27（1），65-82。
許雅惠、廖鳳池（2009）。督導回饋對受督導者之衝擊與諮商行為影響之研究。新竹教育大學教育學報，26（1），63-91。
許韶玲（2001）。受督導者於督導過程中的焦慮來源及其對焦慮因應策略之探討。諮商與輔導，192，6-10。
許韶玲（2003）。督導者知覺受督導者影響諮商督導過程之因素。應用心理研究，18，113-144。
許韶玲（2004a）。受督導者對諮商督導過程的影響因素-從受督導者的知覺檢視。諮商輔導學報-高師輔導所刊，10，31-50。
許韶玲（2004b）。受督者於督導過程中的隱而未說現象之探究。教育心理學報，36（2），109-125。
許韶玲（2005）。諮商新手在督導過程隱藏未揭露的訊息。輔導季刊，41，31-38。
許韶玲（2007）。為什麼受督者隱而不說？中華輔導學報，21，167-200。
鈕文英（2006）。教育研究方法與論文寫作。台北：雙葉書廊。
黃政昌（1997）。準諮商員性別、督導員性別及支持程度對準諮商員知覺督導滿意度、接受督導意願及自我效能之影響研究。國立台灣師範大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
鄭如安、廖鳳池（2005）。督導中重要事件內涵之分析研究。諮商輔導學報，12，35-70。
蔡秀玲（2004）。受督者自覺諮商情境相關情緒在督導過程中情緒覺察歷程之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所博士論文，未出版，台北市。
蔡秀玲、陳秉華（2009）。諮商督導任務中受督者情緒覺察之督導介入初探分析。教育心理學報，41，205-222。
蔡秀玲（2012）。影響督導工作同盟發展之要素：督導雙方之觀點。教育心理學報，43（3），547-566。
蔡曉雯、郭麗安、楊明磊（2010）。督導關係中的權力意涵研究-受督者觀點。中華輔導學報，27，39-77。
劉一竹（1998）。團體督導對準諮商師專業諮商能力影響之研究。彰化師範大學輔導系碩士論文，未出版，彰化。
顏禎慧（2008）。實習諮商心理師與個案及督導互動經驗與其諮商專業成長之分析研究。高雄師範大學輔導與諮商研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄市。
藍菊梅（2011）。受督者實習中途轉換諮商督導者經驗-引而未說的增加導致較不滿意的督導關係，止善，11，73-104。
Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (2004). Fundamentals of clinical supervision(3rd ed). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Bernard, J. M. (1979). Supervisor training: a discrimination model.Counselor Education and Supervision, 19, 60-68.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods (3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Bordin, E. S., (1994). Theory and research on the therapeutic working alliance: New directions. In A. O. Horvath & L. S. Greenberg (Eds.). The working alliance: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 13–37). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Cherniss, C., & Equatios, E. (1977). Style of clinical supervision in community mental health programs. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 1195-1196.
Chung, Y. B., Baskin, M. L., & Case, A. B. (1998). Positive and negative supervisory experiences reported by counseling trainees. Psychological Reports, 86, 752.
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design Choosing Among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Drapela,V. J (1983). The counselor as counltant and supervisior. Springfield, USA: Thomas Publication.
Elliott, R. (1984). A discovery-oriented approach to significant change events in psychotherapy: Interpersonal process recall and comprehensive process analysis. In L. N. Rice & L. S. Greenberg(Eds.), Patterns of change (pp. 249-286). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Elliott, R., & Shapiro, D. A.（1992）. Client and therapist as analysts of significant events. In S. G. Toukmanian & D. L. Rennie(Eds.), Psycgotherapy process research (pp. 163-186). London: Sage.
Epps, A. M. (2000). The effect of attachment styles on the working alliance in counselor supervision (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Texas A and M University, TX.
Falender, C. A., & Shafranske, E. P. (2004). 360-degree evaluation applied to psychology training. Manuscript in preparation.
Friedlander, M. L., & Ward, L. G. (1984). Development and validation of the supervisory styles inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31, 541-557.
Gazzola, N., & Theriault, A. (2007). Super-（and not-so-super-）vision of counselors-in-training: Supervisee perspectives on broadening and narrowing processes. British Journal of Guidance & Counseling, 35(2), 189-204.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Gray, L. A., Ladany, N., Walker, J. A., & Ancis, J. R. (2001). Psychotherapy trainees’ experience of counterproductive events in supervision. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48(4), 371-383.
Greenberg, L. S.（1986）. Change process research. Journal of Counsulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 4-9.
Harris, M. B. (1994). Supervisory evaluation and feedback. In L. D. Borders (Ed.), Supervision: Exploring the effective components. Greensboro, NC: Educational Resources Information Center.
Hawkins, P., & Shohet, R. (2000). Supervision in the helping professions: An individual, group and organizational approach (2nd Ed.). Philadelphia, UK: Open University Press.
Holloway, E. L. (1999). A framework for supervision training. In E. Holloway & Carroll (Eds.), Training counseling supervisors (pp. 8-43). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Holloway, E. L. (1995). Clinical supervision: a system approach. Stage Publications, Inc.
Horvath, A. O., & Symonds, D. B. (1991). Relationship between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 139-149.
Howard, E., Inman, A., & Altman, A.（2006）. Critical incidents among novice counselor traniees. Counselor Education and Supervision, 46, 88-102.
Hsu, S. L., & Tsai, S. L. (2006). Dropout from supervision: An intensive analysis of one supervisory dyad. Bulletin of Education Psychology, 38(2), 213-225.
Hutt, C. H., Scott, J., & King, M. (1983). A phenomenological study of supervisees’ positive and negative experience in Supervision. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 20 , 118-123.
Kim, S. H., & Birk, J. M. (1998). Influence of trainee attachment on counselor supervision. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Annual Convention.
Ladany, N., Ellis, M. V., & Friedlander, M. L. (1999). The supervisory working alliance, trainee self-efficacy, and satisfaction. Journal of Counseling and Development, 77(4), 447-455.
Ladany, N., Hill, C. E., Corbett, M. M., & Nutt, E. A. (1996). Nature, extent, and importance of what psychotherapy trainees do not disclosure to their supervisors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 12-24.
Ladany, N., Melincoff, D. S. (1999). The nature of counselor supervision nondisclosure. Counselor Education and Supervision, 38, 161-176.
Ladany, N., Walker, J. A., & Melincoff, D. S. (2001). Supervisory Style:Its Relation to the Supervisory Working Alliance and Supervisior Self-Disclosure. Counselor Education & Supervision, 40(4), 263-275.
Ladany, N., & Walker, J. A. (2003). Supervisor self-disclosure: Balancing the uncontrollable narcissist with the indomitable altruist. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 59(5), 611-621.
Magnuson, S., Wilcoxon, S. A., & Norem, K. (2000). A profile of lousy supervision: Experienced counselors’ perspective. Counselor Education and Supervision, 39(3), 189-202.
Markoczy, E. (2004). Parallel process and supervisees’ openness in psychotherapy supervision: A qualitative analysis (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). California Institute of Integral Studies, CA.
Moskowitz, S. A., & Rupert, P. A. (1983). Conflict resolution within the supervisory relationship. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 14, 632-641.
Nelson, M. L., & Friedlander, M. L. (2001). A close look at conflictual supervisory relationships: The trainee’s perspective. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48(4), 384-395.
Neufeldt, S. A. (1999). Supervision strategies for the first practicum. (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.
Norem, K., Magnuson, S., Wilcoxon, S. A., & Arbel, O. (2006). Supervisees’ contributions to stellar supervision outcomes. Journal of Professional Counseling: Practice, Theory and Research, 34(1), 33-48.
Patton, M. J., & Kivlighan, D. M. (1997). Relevance of the supervisory alliance to the counseling alliance and to treatment adherence in counselor training. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44(1), 108-115.
Pistole, M. C., & Watkin, C. E. (1995). Attachment theory, counseling process, and supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 23(3), 457-478.
Ramos-Sanchez, L., Esnil, E., Goodwin, A., Riggs, S., Touster, L. O., Wright, L. K., et al. (2002). Negative supervisory events: Effects on supervision satisfaction and supervisory alliance. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33(2), 197-202.
Stoltenberg, C. D. (1981). Approaching supervision from a developmental perspective: The counselor complexity model. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 59-65.
Stoltenberg, C. D. & Delworth, U. (1987). Supervising counselors and therapists. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Stoltenberg, C. D., & McNeil, B. W. (2010). IDM Supervision: An integrative developmental model for supervising counselors and therapists (3th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2001). 質性研究入門：紮根比論研究方法（吳芝儀、廖梅花譯）。台北：心理。（原著出版年：1998年）
Tsong, Y. V. (2005). The roles of supervisee attachment styles and perception of supervisors’ general and multicultural competence in supervisory working alliance, supervisee omissions in supervision, and supervision outcome (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Southern California.
Walsh, B. B., Gillespie, C. K., Greer, J. M., & Eanes, B. E. (2002). Influence of dyadic mutuality on counselor trainee willingness to self-disclose clinical mistakes to supervisors. The Clinical Supervision, 21(2), 83-98.
White, V. E., & Queener, J. (2003). Supervisor and supervisee attachments and social provisions related to the supervisory working alliance. Counselor Education and Supervision, 42(3), 203-218.
Worthington, E. L. (1984). Empirical investigation of supervision of counselors as they gain experience. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31(1), 63-75.
Yamartino, K. C. (1998). Left unsaid: nondisclosure in their supervisory relationship from the supervisee’s perspective (clinical supervision). Massachusetts School of Professional Psychology.
Yourman, D. B. (2003). Trainee disclosure in psychotherapy supervision: The impact of shame. Journal of Clinical psychology, 59(5), 601-609.