研究生: |
劉政宏 Cheng-Hong Liu |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
考試壓力、回饋方式對國小學生學習表現、自我價值及學習動機之影響 The Effects of Test Stress and Feedback Style on Primary School Students’ Learning Performance, Self-Worth and Learning Motivation |
指導教授: | 張景媛 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
教育心理與輔導學系 Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling |
論文出版年: | 2003 |
畢業學年度: | 91 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 210 |
中文關鍵詞: | 考試壓力 、回饋方式 、學習表現 、自我價值 、學習動機 、科學文章 |
英文關鍵詞: | Test Stress, Feedback Style, Learning Performance, Self-Worth, Learning Motivation, Science Article |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:493 下載:155 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究主要目的是:一、了解考試壓力對國小學生科學文章學習立即效果之影響;二、分析考試壓力、回饋方式對不同學習成就國小學生科學文章學習保留效果、科學文章學習自我價值、科學文章學習動機之影響;三、探討科學文章學習自我價值與科學文章學習動機之間的因果關係。為達成上述研究目的,研究者採用準實驗設計及不同資料處理方法進行研究,可區分為三個部份加以說明:
第一部份主要針對研究目的一。本部份採準實驗單因子設計,選取台北市文化國小六年級四個班級共131位學生接受不同實驗處理,兩班學生在高考試壓力下學習科學文章,兩班則在低考試壓力下進行學習。而實驗結束後則以科學文章成就測驗前測結果為共變項,考試壓力為自變項,科學文章成就測驗後測結果為依變項,進行單因子共變數分析,考驗實驗處理是否產生效果。
第二部份主要針對研究目的二。本部份在實驗程序上緊接於第一部份之後,在第一部份實驗操弄的是考試壓力變項 (各兩班),而本部份則在成就測驗後測之後,除了以兩種回饋方式提供各個班級學習成果的回饋 (成績單及學習單回饋),更依據成就測驗後測結果將各班學生區分為後測高、中、低成就等三個成就水準,因此本部份屬2 × 2 × 3準實驗三因子設計 (考試壓力 × 回饋方式 × 後測成就)。而在實驗結束後,則分別以科學文章成就測驗、科學文章學習自我價值、科學文章學習動機前測結果為共變項,考試壓力、回饋方式、後測成就為自變項,科學文章成就測驗延後測結果、科學文章學習自我價值後測及延後測結果、科學文章學習動機後測及延後測結果為依變項,進行三因子共變數分析 (若違反共變數分析基本假定,則轉以實得分數分析進行資料處理),藉以考驗考試壓力、回饋方式對不同成就學生科學文章學習保留效果、學習自我價值、學習動機之影響。
第三部份主要針對研究目的三。本部份除了透過觀察回饋方式對不同成就學生科學文章學習自我價值、學習動機的影響,以推論學生學習自我價值與學習動機的因果關係外,更分別以科學文章學習自我價值後測及延後測結果為預測變項,科學文章學習動機後測及延後測結果為效標變項進行兩次簡單迴歸分析,以了解學習自我價值與學習動機之間的因果關係。
綜合研究結果,本研究的主要發現如下:
一、考試壓力、回饋方式對國小學生學習表現之影響:1.考試壓力能激發學生產生短暫的立即學習效果,但無助於學得知識的長久保存。2.回饋方式對學生學習保留效果並無影響。
二、考試壓力、回饋方式對國小學生學習自我價值之影響:1.考試壓力不利於學生之學習自我價值。2.成績單回饋方式不利於成就較低學生之學習自我價值。
三、考試壓力、回饋方式對國小學生學習動機之影響:1.考試壓力不利於成就較低學生之學習動機。2.成績單回饋方式不利於成就較低學生之學習動機。
四、國小學生之學習自我價值對其學習動機有顯著的影響:本研究發現,對於學業越有正向學習自我價值的學生,其學習動機將越高,而對於學業越有負向學習自我價值的學生,其學習動機將越低。
最後,研究者歸納研究結論,並提出研究結果應用及未來相關研究之建議,做為學校教師教學、輔導以及未來研究之參考。
The purposes of this study were: (1) to understand the effect of test stress on primary school students’ science article instant learning performance; (2) to analyze the effects of test stress and feedback style on science article learning retentive performance, self-worth, and learning motivation between the primary school students with different learning achievement; and (3) to explore the cause-effect relationship between the science article learning self-worth and science article learning motivation. In order to accomplish these purposes, the researcher adopted the quasi-experimental design and different statistical methods. The whole study could be described in three parts:
The first part was mainly for the first purpose of this study. A one-factor quasi-experimental design was adopted in this part. There were 131 sixth-grade students drawn from four classes of Wen-Hwa Elementary School in Taipei as the participants. The students of two classes learned science article under high test stress and the others learned under low test stress. The collected data were analyzed by one-way ANCOVA. The independent variable was the test stress. The covariate was the pretest of the Science Article Achievement Test. The dependent variable was the posttest of the Science Article Achievement Test.
The second part was mainly for the second purpose of this study. This part followed the first part of this study in experimental procedure. A three-factor quasi-experimental design was adopted in this part. The collected data were analyzed by three-way ANCOVA. (If the data violated the assumptions of ANCOVA, the researcher analyzed the data with gain-score analysis.) The independent variables were the test stress, feedback style and the achievement level of each class students. The covariates were the pretest of the Science Article Achievement Test, the Science Article Learning Self-worth Scale and the Science Article Learning Motivation Scale. The dependent variables were the delayed posttest of the Science Article Achievement Test, the posttest and the delayed posttest of the Science Article Learning Self-worth Scale, and the posttest and the delayed posttest of the Science Article Learning Motivation Scale.
The third part was mainly for the third purpose of this study. In this part, in order to infer the cause-effect relationship of learning self-worth and learning motivation, we observed the effect of feedback style on science article learning self-worth and science article learning motivation of different achievement level students. Additionally, in order to realize the causality of learning self-worth and learning motivation more directly, we analyzed the data with simple regression analysis. The predictors were the posttest and the delayed posttest of the Science Article Learning Self-worth Scale. The criterions were the posttest and the delayed posttest of the Science Article Learning Motivation Scale.
The results of this study were as follows:
1. The effects of test stress and feedback style on the primary school students’ learning performance: (1) Test stress was helpful to students’ instant learning performance, but could not help students to preserve the knowledge been learned. (2) Feedback style didn’t have effect on students’ learning retentive achievement.
2. The effects of test stress and feedback style on the primary school students’ learning self-worth: (1) Test stress was detrimental to students’ learning self-worth. (2) The feedback style of report card was detrimental to the lower achievement students’ learning self-worth.
3. The effects of test stress and feedback style on the primary school students’ learning motivation: (1) Test stress was detrimental to the lower achievement students’ learning motivation. (2) The feedback style of report card was detrimental to the lower achievement students’ learning self-worth.
4. The primary school students’ learning self-worth significantly predicted their learning motivation: Those students with more positive learning self-worth had higher learning motivation, and those with more negative learning self-worth had lower learning motivation.
Finally, the researcher discussed the results and provided some suggestions for application and future research.
一、中文部份
王文琪 (民83):國中生學習困難、學習壓力、社會支持與生活適應的關
係。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
王保進 (民88):視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究。台北市:心理出版社。
毛國楠 (民86):成績回饋方式對不同能力水準國中生數學科的學習動
機、學習策略、學習態度與學業成就之影響。教育心理學報,29
期,117-136頁。
朱經明 (民70):國中學生自我觀念、友伴關係及其影響因素之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所集刊,24期,261-274頁。
李明堂 (民75):常模參照回饋、自我參照回饋對國小學童成敗歸因、成就動機、測試焦慮影響之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
李茂能 (民74):努力分數的回饋對國中生英語科的抱負水準、成就動機與學習效果之影響。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
李茂能 (民83):共變數分析的基本假設與應用。嘉義師院學報,8期,145-170頁。
岳修平譯 (民87):教學心理學-學習的認知基礎。台北市:遠流出版社。
呂勝瑛 (民74):工作壓力的實證研究。國立政治大學教育與心理研究,8期,157-190頁。
何英奇 (民66):成敗經驗對自我價值與抱負水準之影響。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
沈宗祐譯 (民86):昆蟲王國。台北市:牛頓出版股份有限公司。
邱連煌 (民70):談自尊心與父母的職責。中央日報4月1日~4月4日,十版。
邱連煌 (民81):談兒童的自尊心與教師的職責。現代教育,7卷2期,68-77頁。
林建平 (民83):整合學習策略與動機的訓練方案對國小閱讀理解困難兒童的輔導效果。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所博士論文。
林清山 (民81):心理與教育統計學。台北市:東華書局。
林惠真 (民91):從學校觀點談走出教育改革的困境。2003年3月2日取自http://140.112.50.101/educc/obligatory/edureform%20from%20schooling%20point%20of%20view.htm.
林銘宗 (民87):國小六年級學童的課業壓力、因應方式及社會支持之研究。國立嘉義師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
林麗華 (民91):目標導向、社會比較、自我效能與課業壓力關係之研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商學系碩士論文。
吳青蓉 (民91):英語學習歷程模式之驗證暨「主題建構式語言學習策略」對國中生英語學習表現影響之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所博士論文。
吳怡欣(民88):青少年自我尊重模式之驗證。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
吳明隆 (民85):國小學生考試壓力、學業成就與其社會心理變因關係之研究。教育資料與研究,8期,67-76頁。
吳明隆、陳昭彬 (民84):國小學生考試壓力之探索。諮商與輔導,118期,23-25頁。
吳靜吉 (民73):壓力。張老師月刊,3期,224-228頁。
吳靜吉、程炳林 (民82):國民中小學生學習動機、學習策略與學業成績之相關研究。國立政治大學學報,66期,13-39頁。
范德鑫 (民81):共變數分析功能、假設及使用之限制。師大學報,37期,133-163頁。
范儷齡 (民91):不同回饋方式對高職女學生學習動機與學業成就之影響。國立台灣科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士論文。
徐盈真 (民78):考試壓力與身心健康的關係—壓力模式的探討。國立台灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文。
徐桂峰、楊國楨、王麗雪、李金玉 (民70):千萬個爲什麼。台北市:金色年代出版社。
高源益、謝文福、林懷卿 (民73):科學教授—地球科學、理化新知篇。台北市:故鄉出版社有限公司。
高源清 (民70):科學教授—太空飛行、無線電、天文篇。台北市:故鄉出版社有限公司。
高源清 (民78):科學教授—物理。台北市:牛頓出版股份有限公司。
翁淑緣 (民74):青少年的自尊與其相關變項之研究。國立政治大學教育與心理研究,8期,79-114頁。
翁嘉英 (民86):失能慢性病患之自我評價歷程與自尊感對其初期因應策略的影響。國立台灣大學心理學研究所博士論文。
許永熹 (民71):不同競爭情境和人格特質對焦慮、親和及工作表現的影響。國立台灣師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。
飛岡健 (民78):物理與化學趣談。台北市:世茂出版社。
黃玉真 (民82):國中資優生與普通學生學校生活壓力、因應行為與學校適應之比較研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。
黃慧芬 (民88):子女知覺父母了解、關係性自我及自尊之相關研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導學系碩士論文。
莊耀嘉、黃光國 (民70):國中學生的成敗歸因與無助感特徵。中華心理學刊,23卷2期,155-164。
莊懷義、劉焜輝、曾端真、張鐸嚴 (民79):青少年問題與輔導。臺北縣:空中大學。
陳玉玲 (民84):目標設定、回饋方式與目標投入對國小教學作業表現的影響。教育研究,44期,49-59。
陳怡君 (民83):台北區公立高中學生學習策略、學業興趣及性向與英、數兩科學業成就之關係。國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文。
陳怡華 (民90):國小學生家庭環境、閱讀動機、與國語科學業成就之關係研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文。
陳金盛 (民86):國小數學科學習任務性質與學生情意學習之關係。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文。
陳英豪、葉懋堃、李坤崇、李明淑、邱美華 (民79):國小學生科學態度量表之編製及其相關因素之研究。國科會專題研究計劃成果報告。NSC78-0111-S024-001。
郭生玉 (民73):國小學童成敗歸因與學業成就、成就動機及成敗歸因的預期關係之研究。教育心理學報,17期,51-72頁。
郭生玉 (民86):心理與教育測驗。台北市:東華書局。
程炳林 (民84):自我調整學習的模式驗證及其教學效果之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所博士論文。
程炳林 (民89):認知/意動成份與學習表現之相關研究。師大學報:教育類,45卷1期,43-59頁。
程炳林 (民90):動機、目標設定、行動控制、學習策略之關係:自我調整學習歷程模式之建構與驗證。師大學報:教育類,46卷1期,67-92頁。
程炳林、林清山 (民91):學習歷程前決策與後決策階段中行動控制的中介角色。教育心理學報,34卷1期,43-60頁。
張宗昌 (民75):壓力情境對高低焦慮傾向國中女生飛鏢投擲準確性之影響。國立台灣師範大學體育研究所碩士論文。
張春興 (民72):青年的認同與迷失。台北市:東華書局。
張春興 (民78):張氏心理學辭典。台北市:東華書局。
張春興 (民80):現代心理學。台北市:東華書局。
張春興 (民83):教育心理學。台北市:東華書局。
張景然 (民75):國小學生親子關係、友伴關係、師生關係與學業成績之比較。輔導月刊,22卷5期,37-40頁。
張景媛 (民79):回饋方式、目標設定與後設認知對國小學生數學作業表現及測試焦慮之影響。教育心理學報,23期,189-206頁。
張景媛 (民86):國中生之正負向情緒與其後設認知、學習動機關係之研究。教育心理學報,29期,51-60頁。
張景媛 (民87):青少年學習與適應模式之驗證。教育心理學報,30卷1期,1-22頁。
曾玉娟 (民84):台南師院性別角色與自尊及成就關係的關係研究。台南師院學生學刊,16期,1-21頁。
曾美慧 (民73):國中英語科低成就學生英語科學習行為之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
楊慧松 (民82):溝通分析實驗課程對高中記過生自尊與生活適應影響之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
賈馥茗、鍾紅柱、陳如山、林月琴、梁志宏、黃恆、吳翠珍、簡仁育、侯志欽等編著 (民80):教育心理學。台北縣:國立空中大學。
鄭宇樑 (民86):後設認知閱讀教學對國小學生科學文章閱讀理解、閱讀態度及後設認知能力影響之研究。國立台南師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。
彭月茵 (民91):目標層次、回饋訊息對數學工作表現與學習動機之效果:考量國中生的控制信念。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文。
蔡文恂 (民76):我最喜歡上的課—國中、國小問卷調查。師友,239期,31-33頁。
蔡明璋 (民78):自尊心與疏離感:自我理論的檢證。中興大學法商學報,23期,179-207頁。
盧青延 (民82):我國國民中學補習學校學生學習動機、學習策略與學業成就關係之研究。國立台灣師範大學社會教育學系碩士論文。
盧欽銘 (民70):我國兒童及青少年自我觀念縱貫三年發展之研究。教育心理學報,14期,115-124頁。
盧強 (民76):山地國中學生自我概念、生活適應與學業成就之調查研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所集刊,29期,155-163頁。
謝季宏 (民62):智力、學習習慣、成就動機及家長社會地位與國中學業成就之關係。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
韓進之 (民80):大陸關於兒童、青少年個性傾向發展的研究。中國人中國心:人格與社會篇。台北市:遠流出版社。
魏麗敏 (民85):影響國小兒童數學成就之自我調節學習與情感因素分析及其策略訓練效果之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所博士論文。
藍采風 (民71):生活的壓力與適應。台北市:幼獅文化事業公司。
藍雅慧 (民91):知情意整合的國中生數學學習歷程模式之建構。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
羅彥文(民83):國中學生國文閱讀學習之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文。
二、西文部份
Ames, C. (1992). Classroom: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271.
Ames, C., & Ames, R. (1981). Competitive versus individualistic goal structures: The salience of past performance information for casual attributions and effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 411-418.
Atkinson, J. W. (1964). An Introduction to motivation. Princeton: Van Nostrand.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1991). Social Cognitive. Theory of Self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 248-287.
Bany, M. A., & Johnson, L. V. (1975). Educational Social Psychology. New York: Macmilla.
Becker, L. J. (1978). Joint effect of feedback and goal setting on performance: A field study of residential energy conservation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 428-433.
Bending, A. W. (1958). Predictive and postdictive validity of need achievement measures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 33, 538-453.
Biggs, J. (1999). Towards a model of school-based curriculum development and assessment: Using the SOLO taxonomy. Australian Journal of Education, 33, 151-163.
Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129-148.
Branden, N. (1990). What is self-esteem? ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 325-783.
Bridgeman, B., & Shipman, V. C. (1978). Preschool measures of self-esteem and achievement motivation as predictors of third-grade achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70 (1), 17-28.
Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. New York: Vintage.
Burns, R. B. (1979). The self-concept: Theory, measurement, development, and behavior. New York: Longman.
Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65 (3), 245-281.
Buunk, B. P., Collins, R. L., Taylor, S. E., VanYperen, N. W., & Dakof, G. A. (1990). The affective consequences of social comparison: Either direction has its ups and downs. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 59 (6), 1238- 1249.
Clifford, M. M. (1972). Effects of emphasizing competition in classroom- testing procedures. The Journal of Educational research, 65, 234-238.
Cohen, A. (1959). Some implications of self-esteem for social influence. In C. Hovland & I. Janis (Eds.), Personality and Persuasibility (pp. 102-120). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Scribner.
Coopersmith, S. (1967). The antecedents of self-esteem. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Cotton, N. S. (1985). The development and self-esteem regulation. In J. E. Mack & S. L. Ablon (Eds.), The Development And Sustenance of Self-esteem In Childhood (pp. 122-150). New York: International Universities Press.
Covington, M. V. (1983). Motivated cognition. In S. G. Paris, G. M. Olson, & H. W. Stenvenson (Eds.), Learning and Motivation in the Classroom. (pp.139-164). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Covington, M. V. (1984). The self-worth theory of achievement motivation: Findings and implications. Elementary School Learning, 85, 5-20.
Crandall, V. C. (1967). Achievement behavior in young children. In the young child: Reviews of research. Washington, DC: National Association for the Educational of Young Children.
Debra, S. J., Daniel, B. T., Kalen, F. P., & Yin, M. N. (1996). Exploring the role of normative-based and performance-based feedback in motivational processes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 973-992.
Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1980). The empirical exploration intrinsic motivational processes. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self- determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
Deutsch, M. (1962). Cooperation and trust: Some theoretical notes. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 275-319). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Diller, L. (1954). Conscious and unconscious self-attitudes after success and failure. Journal of Personality, 23, 1-12.
Dunham, R. B. (1973). Achievement motivation as predictive of academic performance: A multivariate. Journal of Educational Research, 67 (2), 70-72.
Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivation process affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048.
Dweck, C. S., & Elliott, E. S. (1983). Achievement motivation. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol.4: Socialization, personality, and social development. New York: Wiley.
Ebel, R. L. (1974). Shall we get rid of grades ? Measurement in Education, 5 (4), 1-5.
Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 54 (1), 5-12.
Evetts, J. (1973). The Sociology of Educational ideas. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relation, 7, 117-282.
Fineman, S. (1979). A psychosocial model of stress and its application to managerial unemployment. Human Relation, 32 (4), 323-345.
Fiske, S. T. (1981). Social cognition and affect. In J. Harvey (Ed.), Cognition, social behavior, and the environment. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Frandsen, A. N. (1967). Educational Psychology (2nd Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gagné, E. D., Yekovich C. W., & Yekovich F. R. (1993). The Cognitive Psychology of School Learning. (2nd Ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
Garner, S. Y. (1995). Self-esteem of elementary and middle school children. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 397-347.
Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. (1995). Contemporary educational psychology. New York: Longman.
Grieger, R. (1975). Self-Concept, Self-Esteem and Rational Emotive Theory. A Brief Perspective, Rational Living, 10 (1), 13-17.
Haladyna, T., & Thomas, G. (1979). The attitude of elementary school children toward school and subject matters. Journal of Experimental Education, 48, 18-23.
Harackiewicz, J. M., & Manderlink, G. (1984). A process analysis of the effects of performance-contingent rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 20, 531-551.
Harter, S. (1983). Developmental perspectives on self-system. In Paul H. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 275-468). New York: Jone Wiley & Sons.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
Hinkle, L. E., Jr. (1974). The effect of exposure to cultural change and changes in interpersonal relationships on health. In B. S. Dohrenwend (Eds.), Stressful life events: the nature and effects (pp.9-44). New York: John Wiley.
Holmes, T. H., & Rahe, R. H. (1967). The social readjustment rating scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 11, 213-218.
Ivancevich, J. M., & Matteson, M. T. (1980). Stress and Work: A managerial perspective. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1974). Instructional Goal Structure: Cooperative, Competitive, or Individualistic. Review of Educational Research, 44 (2), 213-240.
Kaufman, G., & Raphael, L. (1990). Stick up for yourself: Every kid’s guide to personal power and positive self-esteem. Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit.
Kernis, M. H., & Waschull, S. B. (1996). Level and stability of self-esteem as predictors of children’s intrinsic motivation and reasons for anger. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22 (1), 4-13.
Kolesnik, W. B. (1976). Learning: Educational Applications. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.
Lobel, T. E., & Teiber, A. (1994). Effects of self-esteem and for approval on affective and cognitive reactions: Defensive and true self-esteem. Personal Individual Difference, 16 (2), 315-321.
Locke, E. A. (1968). Toward a theory of task motivation and incentive. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 3, 157-189.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). Work motivation and satisfaction: Light at the end of the tunnel. American Psychology Society, 1 (4), 240-246.
Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row.
McCarthy, J. D., & Hoge, D. R. (1982). Analysis of age effects in longitudinal studies of adolescent self-esteem. Development Psychology, 18 (3), 372-379.
McClelland, D. C., Atkinson, J. W., Clark, R. A., & Lowell, E. L. (1953). The achievement motive. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
McFarlin, D. B., Baumeister, R. F., & Blascovich, J. (1984). On knowing when to quit: Task failure, self-esteem, advice, and nonproductive persistence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52 (2), 138-155.
McFarlin, D. B., & Blascovich, J. (1981). Effects of self-esteem and performance feedback of future affective preferences and cognitive expectations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 521-531.
Mechanic, D. (1974). Social structure and personal adaptation: Some neglected dimensions. In G. V. Coelho, D. A. Hamburg, & J. E. Adams (Eds.), Coping and adaptation (pp. 32-44). New York: Basic Books.
Melby, E. O. (1966). It’s time for schools to abolish the marking system. Nation’s Schools, 77, 104.
Minor, C. A., & Neel, R. G. (1958). The relationship between achievement motive and occupational preference. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 5, 39-43.
Mizelle, N. B., Hart, L. E., & Carr, M. (1993). Middle grade students’ motivational processes and use of strategies with expository text. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta GA.
Mouly, G. J. (1968). Psychology for Effective Teaching. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.
Nave, B. (1990). Self-esteem: The key to student success. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 341-919.
Norem-Hebeisen, A. A. (1976). A multidimensional construct of self-seteem. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 559-565.
Pekrun, R., & Frese, M. (1992). Emotions in work and achievement. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 7, 153-200. New York: Wiley.
Pintrich, P. R. (1989). The dynamic interplay of student motivation and cognition in the college classroom. In C. Ames & M. L. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Vol. 6. Motivation - enhancing environments (pp.117-160). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Podesta, C. (1990). Self-esteem and the six-second secret. Newbury, CA: Sage.
Pope, A. W., McHale, S. M., & Craighead, W. E. (1988). Self-esteem enhancement with children and adolescents. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Purkey, W. (1970). Self Concept and School Achievement. New York: Prentice-Hall.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and Adolescent Self-Image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Roth, R. M. (1959). The role of self concept in achievement. Journal of Experimental Education, 27, 265-281.
Rotter, J. B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Rudow, E., & Hautalvoma. (1975). Competition with oneself versus others as a facilitator in the classroom. Journal of Social psychology, 95, 281-282.
Schunk, D. H. (1989). Self-efficacy and cognitive skill learning. In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education. Vol. 3: Goal and cognitions (pp. 13-44). San Diego: Academic Press.
Selye, H. (1956). The Stress of Life. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Selye, H. (1974). Stress without Distress. Philadelphia: Lippincott.
Shaffer, D. R. (2000). Social & Personality Development. (4th Ed.). CA: Wadsworth.
Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretation. Review of Education Research, 46, 407-441.
Skemp, R. R. (1989). Mathematics in the primary school. London: Routledge.
Spence, K. W. (1958). A theory of emotionally-based drive and its relation to performance in simple learning situation. American Psychologist, 13, 131-141.
Spielberger, C. D. (1972). Conceptual and methodological issues in anxiety research. In C. Spielberger (Ed.), Anxiety: Current trends in theory and research.Vol.2. New York: Academic Press.
Sterbin, A., & Rakow, E. (1996). Self-esteem, locus of control, and student achievement. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 406-429.
Suls, J., & Mullen, B. (1982). Form the cradle to the grave: Comparison and self-evaluation across the life-span. In J. M. Suls (Ed.), Social psychological perspectives on the self. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Tang, T. L. P. (1991). The effects of self-esteem, task label, and performance feedback on task liking and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Social Psychology, 131 (4), 567-572.
Torrance, E. P. (1965). Rewarding Creative: Experiments in Classroom Creativity. Minnesota Univ., Minneapolis. Coll. of Education.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Hardward University Press. (Original work published 1930, 1933, 1935).
Weaver, M. D., & Matthews, D. B. (1993). The effects of a program to build the self-esteem of at-risk students. Journal of Humanistic Education and Development, 31 (4), 181-188.
Weiner, B. (1972). Theories of motivation: From mechanism to cognition. Chicago: Markham.
Weiner, B. (1980). Human motivation. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Weingberg, A. M., & Jackson, A. (1992). The effect of goal difficulty and task complexity on intrinsic motivation and task performance. Journal of Sport Behavior, 15, 159-176.
Wenden, A., & Rubin, J. (1987). Learner strategies in language learning. Englewood, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66, 297-333.
Wigfield, A. (1994). The role of children’s achievement values in the self-regulation of their learning outcomes. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance (pp.101-126). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81.
Yerkes, R. M., & Dodson, J. D. (1908). The relation of strength of habit- formation, Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology, 450-459.
Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151-175.
Ziller, R., Hagey, J., Smith, M., & Long, B. (1969). Self-esteem: A self-social construct. Journal of Consulting and Psychology, 33, 84-95.