研究生: |
蔣宛儒 Chiang, Wan-Ju |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
大學生志工參與育幼院攜手輔育方案評估研究 A Program Evaluation of College Student Volunteers Participating Hand-in-Hand Guidance Project for Children's Home |
指導教授: |
林家興
Lin, Chia-Hsin |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
教育心理與輔導學系 Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling |
論文出版年: | 2016 |
畢業學年度: | 104 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 164 |
中文關鍵詞: | 大學生志工 、育幼院 、攜手輔育計畫 、院童 、方案評估 |
英文關鍵詞: | college student volunteers, children's home, hand-in-hand guidance project, children in children’s home, program evaluation |
DOI URL: | https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202204206 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:180 下載:24 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在對於「大學生志工參與育幼院攜手輔育方案」進行全面性的評估。研究者以CIPP評估模式針對此方案的背景、輸入、過程與成果四方面進行全面性的考核評估;使用的研究方法包括:焦點團體訪談、深度訪談以及文獻分析法。
經研究發現,院童在心理陪伴上主要的需求為:(1)傾聽的對象;(2)安全感;(3)信任的關係;(4)生活適應議題的討論與處理;以及(5)穩定專注的關心與陪伴。院方對於服務之期待為:(1)陪伴院童的角色;(2)正向楷模;(3)協助瞭解與評估院童;以及(4)協助關懷平時較易被忽略的院童。而經由過程與成果評估之研究結果發現,大學生志工以傾聽同理、關心、瞭解、讚美、平靜溫和的回應等方式,帶給院童放鬆、開心、對晤談感到期待並捨不得結束的感受,且建立起具療癒性且穩定的陪伴關係。綜上所述,此方案符合且滿足院童的需求。而方案紓解了院內人力上的不足、協助社工更瞭解院童的生活情況與評估需要、也成功扮演的正向楷模的角色,代替院內照顧者引導小攜手正向處理問題。
本方案實施的困境包括:(1)系統合作上資訊流通與保密間的平衡;(2)聯繫程序複雜;(3)行政、經費與合作的不穩定;(4)配對時資訊不足影響適配度;(5)大學生課業、社團、服務生活安排之影響;以及(6)育幼院設備或其他人員之影響及限制。
整體而言,受訪者對於此方案給予相當正面的評價,肯定此方案對院童、院方的幫助,也增進大攜手經驗之累積。一致期待本方案能繼續執行,以及希望能繼續合作。並給予具體建議:(1)方案計畫須有完整運作制度;(2)維持系統合作間溝通管道的暢通;(3)針對服務特殊族群,增開相關課程;(4)育幼院院方協助營造安全、信任的晤談空間;以及(5)大學生志工在進行晤談的過程中,關懷、陪伴應優先於問題之解決或改變。
The purpose of this research is mainly an evaluation program for college student volunteers participating Hand-in-Hand Guidance Project for children's home. Using CIPP evaluation mode to analysis in four categories which includes, Context, Input, Process and the Product. On the other hand, the way of research covers: Focusing Group Interview, Semistructure Interview and Document Analysis Method.
After the research, primary needs of mental company of children in children’s home include: (1) Having someone to listen to then. (2) Security. (3) Trust relationship. (4) Discussing and deal with adaption problem. (5) Caring and company with a steady relationship. The expectations of children’s home include: (1) The role of company with children. (2) Positive model. (3) Helping to understand and evaluate children’s situation. (4) Caring ignored children. On the other side, the findings of Process and Product evaluation in CIPP evaluation mode show that college student volunteers use listening, empathy, caring, understanding, compliment, and mild response as the ways, to bring children relax, happiness, looking forward to meeting and not to closing the relationship, and building healing and steady helping relationship. In summary, this project fulfills children’s needs, and relieves the pressure of the manpower of a children’s home, helping socialworkers to understand children’s life situations and needs, and acting positive role and guide children to deal with problems in positive ways.
However, we are facing several challenges, such as: (1) The balance between information flow and confidentiality principle. (2) The complex of information tract.
(3) Unstable administration, fund and cooperation of children’s home. (4) Lack of information to pair. (5) Influences by college student volunteers’ planning on time, schoolwork and participate in associations. (6) The Influences by equipment and other workers in children’ home.
Generally speaking, positive evaluations were given by study participants to the help to children and children’s home, and to enhance volunteer’s professional experience. Largely due to the great effort, it is strongly recommended that this project should be continualy processed.
Finally, the researcher concludes suggestions provided by study participants, which include: (1) The program’s operation system should be more integrated. (2) To keep the communication smooth on system collaboration. (3) To increase courses about helping handicapped children. (4) To build security and trust workspace in children’ home.
(5) Volunteers’s caring and company with the children is more important than problem solving or possible change.
中文部份
中華育幼機構兒童關懷協會(2009)。98年大哥姐暨青年導師志工成果報告。未出版報告。
中華育幼機構兒童關懷協會(2010)。99年Mentor青年導師志工關懷服務成果報告。未出版報告。
中華育幼機構兒童關懷協會(2011)。100年Mentor青年導師志工關懷服務成果報告。未出版報告。
中華育幼機構兒童關懷協會(2012)。101年Mentor青年導師志工關懷服務成果報告。未出版報告。
內政部兒童局(2003)。臺閩地區兒童福利機構第一次評鑑總報告(育幼機構)。未出版報告。
江啟昱(1993)。CIPP評鑑模式之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
吳蕙玲(2000)。高雄地區育幼機構提供兒童福利服務工作中問題之探討。國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文。
李自強(2001)。少年司法工作人員建議或裁定安置輔導之研究。犯罪學期刊,8,1-25。
李園會(2000)。疼惜我們的寶貝:關心兒童權利。臺中市:內政部兒童局。
林小雅(2007)。家的意義轉變─長期安置育幼院者的生命敘說。私立中國文化大學心理輔導研究所碩士論文。
林俐君(2000)。育幼機構院童成長脈絡之探討-以受刑人子女為例。國立臺灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文。
林清江(1998)。教育部輔導工作六年計畫成果總輯。臺北:教育部訓育委員會。
邱智慧(1988)。家庭模式兒童福利機構內兒童生活適應之研究。私立中國文化大學心理輔導研究所碩士論文。
施教裕(1998)。兒童福利機關的行政重組和服務整合。載於二十一世紀基金會(主編),美國兒童福利的借鏡(153-204)。臺北市:臺灣東華。
洪若和(1993)。國立台東師院試辦攜手計畫效果評估研究。台東師範學院學報,5(1),387-460。
翁毓芳,謝麗紅(2000)。攜手義工參與災後學校輔導工作之可行性評估。學生輔導,71,104-109。
張紉(2000)。青少年安置服務福利屬性之探討。臺大社會工作學刊,2,191-215。
張祐誠(2011)。大學層級認輔志工與育幼院院童間助人關係之研究。臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系碩士論文。
畢國蓮(2006)。歷經長期機構安置的兒少保護個案結案後的生活經驗初探。臺灣大學社會工作學研究所碩士論文。
陳向明(2002)。 社會科學質的硏究。臺灣:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
陳阿梅(1996)。從兒童權利之觀點論兒福工作員應有的特質。社會建設,94,62-65。
陳建良(2011)。長期安置育幼院之獨立生活青年的生命經驗與因應─一個敘說探究。臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系碩士論文。
陳桂絨(2000)。復原力的發現─以安置於機構之兒少保個案為例。私立東吳大學碩士論文。
陳淑娟(2005)。社工所建構收容非自願少年安置機構之行動研究─以權力觀點的解釋。私立東吳大學社會工作研究所碩士論文。
陳毓文(2004)。少年憂鬱情緒的危險與保護因子之相關性研究。中華心理衛生學刊,17(4),67-95。
陳毓文(2008)。國內接受機構安置少年憂鬱情緒之探究:問題陳顯與解釋因素。中華心理衛生學刊, 21(1),75-101。
彭南元(1999)。美國現行收養法制之研究,中央警察大學法學論集,4,347-378。
彭南元(1999)。論國際收養之新趨勢暨我國因應之道,法學叢刊,4(44),17-31。
彭淑華(2005)。以家庭處遇為基礎的兒童保護工作之檢視。兒童及少年福利期刊,9,31-56。
曾華源、王篤強、李自強、陳玫伶(2004)。少年安置及教養機構服務類型與需求整體規劃研究。臺中:內政部兒童局委託研究報告。
黃昱得(2010)。探討良師益友方案作為協助性傾向弱勢青少年之實務策略。臺灣社會工作學刊,8,129-156。
黃貞容(2002)。育幼機構安置服務院童權益維護指標之研究。國立暨南國際大學社會政策與社會工作學系碩士論文 。
黃詩喬(2010)。育幼機構院童家人關係的意象。國立臺北教育大學幼兒與家庭教育學系碩士論文。
臺灣省政府社會處(1992)。臺澎金馬地區公私立育幼機構評鑑報告。未出版報告。
劉美芝(1999)。機構安置受虐兒童社會適應之研究。中國文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文。
劉德勝(1983)。臺灣地區不同模式育幼院兒童的自我概念與生活適應。文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文。
蔡季誠(2009)。大專學生志工參與攜手計畫之經驗探究。亞洲大學社會工作學系碩士論文。
蔡淑怡(2008)。中長期安置機構青少年學校適應之探究─以某一個少年安置機構為例。輔仁大學社會工作學系碩士論文。
謝明昆(1980)。國中階段育幼院少年人格適應輔導效果之研究。 國立台灣師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。
藍采風(1997)。兒童福利研究─寄養服務與社會工作。臺中:台中基督教兒童。
顏妙芬(2015)。自立少年良師益友關係初探:以 Mentor 青年導師方案為例。臺灣大學社會工作學研究所碩士論文。
羅舒璘(2003)。沒有父母陪伴的孩子─兩位在育幼機構的女孩之內心世界。國立臺北教育大學教育心理與輔導學系碩士論文。
王文科、王智弘(譯)(2003)。焦點團體訪談(原作者:Sharon Vaughn)。臺北市:五南。
英文部分
Ahrens, K. R., DuBois, D. L., Garrison, M., Spencer, R., Richardson, L. P., & Lozano, P. (2011). Qualitative exploration of relationships with important non-parental adults in the lives of youth in foster care. Children and youth services review, 33(6), 1012-1023.
Ajduković, M., & Franz, B. S. (2005). Behavioural and emotional problems of children by type of out‐of‐home care in Croatia. International Journal of Social Welfare, 14(3), 163-175.
Altshuler, S. J., & Poertner, J. (2002). The Child Health and Illness Profile--Adolescent Edition: Assessing Well-Being in Group Homes or Institutions. Child Welfare, 81(3), 495-513.
Clayden, J., & Stein, M. (2005). Mentoring young people leaving care. York, UK: Joseph Roundtree Foundation.
Currie, E. (2003). " It's Our Lives They're Dealing With Here": Some Adolescent Views of Residential Treatment. Journal of Drug Issues, 33(4), 833.
DuBois, D. L., Holloway, B. E., Valentine, J. C., & Cooper, H. (2002). Effectiveness of mentoring programs for youth: A meta-analytic review. American journal of community psychology, 30(2), 157-197.
DuBois, D. L., Portillo, N., Rhodes, J. E., Silverthorn, N., & Valentine, J. C. (2011). How effective are mentoring programs for youth? A systematic assessment of the evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest,12(2), 57-91.
DuBois, D. L., Portillo, N., Rhodes, J. E., Silverthorn, N., & Valentine, J. C. (2011). How effective are mentoring programs for youth? A systematic assessment of the evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest,12(2), 57-91.
Eggertsen, L. (2008). Primary factors related to multiple placements for children in out-of-home care. Child Welfare, 87(6), 71.
Fulcher, E. P., & Hammerl, M. (2001). When all is revealed: A dissociation between evaluative learning and contingency awareness. Consciousness and Cognition, 10(4), 524-549.
Furano, K., Roaf, P. A., Styles, M. B., & Branch, A. Y. (1993). Big Brothers/Big Sisters: A study of program practices. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.
Grossman, J. B., & Rhodes, J. E. (2002). The test of time: Predictors and effects of duration in youth mentoring relationships. American journal of community psychology, 30(2), 199-219.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Helsen, M., Vollebergh, W., & Meeus, W. (2000). Social support from parents and friends and emotional problems in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 29(3), 319-335.
Hudson, J. D., Shoaibi, M. A., Maestro, R., Carnero, A., Hannon, G. J., & Beach, D. H. (1999). A proinflammatory cytokine inhibits p53 tumor suppressor activity. The Journal of experimental medicine, 190(10), 1375-1382.
Hussey, D. L., & Guo, S. (2005). Characteristics and trajectories of treatment foster care youth. Child welfare, 84(4), 485.
Hussey, D. L., & Guo, S. (2005). Forecasting length of stay in child residential treatment. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 36(1), 95-111.
Jekielek, S. M., Moore, K. A., Hair, E. C., & Scarupa, H. J. (2002). Mentoring: A promising strategy for youth development. Child Trends Research Brief, 2, 1-8.
Johns Hopkins Hospital. (1997) Creating a Successful Youth Mentoring Program: A Practical Guide for Hospitals. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Hospital Youth Mentoring Program.
Kadushin, A., & Martin, J. A. (1988). Child welfare services(4th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Krueger, A. B., & Summers, L. H. (1986). Reflections on the inter-industry wage structure. NBER Working Paper, 1968, 1-34.
Madaus, G. F., Stufflebeam, D., & Scriven, M. S. (1983). Program evaluation. In Madaus, G. F., Scriven, M. S., Stufflebeam, D. (Eds.), Evaluation models (pp. 3-22). Boston: Springer Netherlands.
Mahoney M. (1983). Mentors. New York: The Commonwealth Fund.
Mecartney, C. A. (1994). Mentoring in the juvenile justice system: Findings from two pilot programs. Philadelphia, PA: Public/ Private Ventures.
Mech, E. V., Pryde, M. J. A., & Rycraft, J. R. (1995). Mentors for adolescents in foster care. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 12(4), 317-328.
Morrow, K. V., & Styles, M. B. (1995). Building relationships with youth in program settings: A study of Big Brothers/Big Sisters. Philadelphia, PA: Public/ Private Ventures.
Munson, M. R., & McMillen, J. C. (2009). Natural mentoring and psychosocial outcomes among older youth transitioning from foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 31(1), 104-111.
Munson, M. R., Smalling, S. E., Spencer, R., Scott Jr, L. D., & Tracy, E. (2010). Children and Youth Services Review:'A steady presence in the midst of change: non-kin natural mentors in the lives of older youth exiting foster care'. Adoption & Fostering, 34(4), 89-90.
Network Training and Research Group. (1996). Evaluation of the Mentoring Center and Bay Area Mentoring Efforts: First Evaluation Report. Redwood City, CA: Network Training and Research Group.
Pardeck, J. T. (1984). Multiple placement of children in foster family care: An empirical analysis. Social work, 29(6), 506-509.
Rhodes, J. E. (2005). A model of youth mentoring. In DuBois, D. L. & Karcher, M. J. (Eds.), Handbook of youth mentoring (pp. 30-43). London, UK: SAGE.
Rhodes, J. E., Spencer, R., Keller, T. E., Liang, B., & Noam, G. (2006). A model for the influence of mentoring relationships on youth development. Journal of community psychology, 34(6), 691-707.
Sipe, C. L. (1996). Mentoring: A Synthesis of P/PV's Research: 1988-1995. Philadelphia, PA: Public/Private Ventures.
Sipe, C. L. (2002). Mentoring programs for adolescents: A research summary. Journal of Adolescent Health, 31(6), 251-260.
Spencer, R., Collins, M. E., Ward, R., & Smashnaya, S. (2010). Mentoring for young people leaving foster care: Promise and potential pitfalls. Social Work,55(3), 225-234.
Styles, M. B., & Morrow, K. V. (1992). Understanding How Youth and Elders Form Relationships: A Study of Four Linking Lifetimes Programs. Philadelphia, PA: Public/ Private Ventures.