簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 謝仕福
Shih-Fu Hsieh
論文名稱: 北台灣體育班及非體育班學生的足部結構差異調查
Comparison of foot structure between athletic and non-athletic class students in Northern Taiwan
指導教授: 相子元
Shiang, Tzyy-Yuang
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 運動競技學系
Department of Athletic Performance
論文出版年: 2010
畢業學年度: 99
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 63
中文關鍵詞: 足弓指標扁平足拇趾外翻體能活動體育班
英文關鍵詞: arch index, flatfoot, hallux valgus, physical activities, athletic class
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:163下載:6
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 目的:比較同樣年齡層體育班及非體育班學學生的足部結構包括足弓指標與拇趾外翻角度,以觀察承受不同程度運動活動強度是否會影響足部結構。方法:以國中、高中與大學體育班及非體育班學生為受試對象,蒐集受測者足印,以電腦軟體分析足弓指標 (arch index),以量角器測量拇趾外翻角度,以國際體能活動量表計算每週身體活動當量。使用雙因子變異數分析的統計方法分析體育班及非體育班的差異,以及國中、高中及大學學生的學級差異是否影響足弓指標即拇趾外翻。結果:體育班學生有較高的每週身體活動當量,有較高的足弓指標以及較大的拇趾外翻程度。結論:在長期高強度的體能活動下可能使得足部產生結構改變,變得較為扁平以及有較大的拇趾外翻角度,此改變在合理的生理範圍,尚未達到病理性變化程度。

    Purpose:Comparing difference of foot structure between students at same school age but with different level of physical activity intensity. Methods: Healthy junior high school, senior high school, and college students were included and classified into athletic class students group and non-athletic class students group. Harris Mat foot print measure device were used to collect subject’s foot print and Arch index(AI) is used to classify foot arch. Hallux valgus angle was measured by a goniometer. Physical activities level was measured by International Physical Activities Questionare (IPAQ). All data were analyzed by two-ways analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results: Statistically difference were noted between athletic class students and non-athletic class students. Athletic students have higher physical activities level, arch index and hallux valgus angle. Conclusions: The result of this study showed that athletic class students have lower foot arch and larger halluxs valgus angle comparing to non-athletic students. The result implies that students could have long term foot structural change under high intensity of physical activity.

    中文摘要 i 英文摘要 ii 誌謝詞 iii 目次 iv 表次 vii 圖次 viii 第壹章 緒論 1 第一節 問題背景 1 第二節 研究問題 3 第三節 研究目的 4 第四節 研究假設 4 第五節 研究範圍 5 第六節 研究限制 5 第七節 名詞操作性定義 6 第八節 研究的重要性 6 第貳章 相關文獻探討 6 第一節 拇趾外翻之相關研究 7 第二節 足弓高度之相關研究 10 第三節 拇趾外翻測量方法 20 第四節 足弓測量方法 22 第五節 身體活動量測量方法 25 第六節 文獻總結 26 第參章 研究方法 28 第一節 受試者選取 28 第二節 實驗地點 28 第三節 實驗儀器與設備 28 第四節 實驗過程與步驟 33 第五節 資料分析與統計方法 33 第肆章 結果 35 第一節 體育班與非體育班學生拇趾外翻的差異 35 第二節 體育班與非體育班學生足弓高度的差異 37 第三節 體育班與非體育班學生身體活動量的差異 40 第伍章 討論 43 第一節 體育班與非體育班學生拇趾外翻的差異 43 第二節 體育班與非體育班學生足弓高度的差異 47 引用文獻 52 附錄一 基本問卷調查表 58 附錄二 實驗參與者同意書 59 附錄三 台灣活動量調查短版問卷 60 附錄四 研究生簡要履歷 62

    李宏滿、陳五洲、侯耀東 (2003)。扁平足之生物力學分析。國軍桃園總醫院民診基金九十二年度醫學研究發展計畫成果報告書。
    陳五洲、陳協鴻、王素珍 (2006)。我國役齡男子之足弓參數邏輯迴歸分析。大專體育學刊,8(1),213-228。
    董莉貞、蕭珮琦、周偉倪、許正澂、林彣芷、杜詠文(2008)。遲緩兒童扁平足篩檢探討。台灣復健醫學雜誌,36(1),31-37。
    Beck, T. J., Ruff, C. B., & Shaffer, R. A. (2000). Stress fracture in military recruits: Gender differences in muscle and bone susceptibility factors. Bone, 27(3), 437-444.
    Bordin, D., De Giorgi, G., Mazzocco, G., & Rigon, F. (2001). Flat and cavus foot, indexes of obesity and overweight in a population of primary-school children. Minerva Pediatrica, 53(1), 7-13.
    Cavangh, P. R., & Rodgers, M. M. (1987). The arch index: A useful measure from foot prints. Journal of Biomechanics, 20, 547-551.
    Chang, J. H., Wang, S. H., Kuo, C. L., Shen, H. C., Hong, Y. W., & Lin, L, C. (2009).
    Prevalence of flexible flatfoot in Taiwanese school-aged children in relation to
    obesity, gender, and age. European Journal of Pediatrics, 169(4), 447-452.
    Chen, J. P., Chung, M. J., & Wang, M. J. (2009). Flatfoot prevalence and foot
    dimensions of 5 to 13-year-old children in Taiwan. Foot and Ankle
    International, 30(4), 326-332.
    Cheng, J. C., Chan, P. S., & Hui, P. W. (1991). Joint laxity in children. Journal of
    Pediatric Orthopedics, 11(6), 752-756.
    Cho, N.H., Kim, S., Kwon, D.J., & Kim, H. A. (2009). The prevalence of hallux valgus
    and its association with foot pain and function in a rural Korean community,
    Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 91(4), 494-498.
    Chu, W. C., Lee, S. H., Chu, W., Wang, T. J., & Lee, M. C. (1995). The use of arch
    index to characterize arch height: A digital image processing approach. IEEE
    Transactions on Biomechanical Engineering, 42(11), 1088-1093.
    Coughlin, M. J., & Freund, E. (2001). The reliability of angular measurement in hallux
    valgus deformities. Foot and Ankle International,22(5), 369-379. `
    Del Rossi, G., Fiolkowski, P., Horodyski, M. B., Bishop, M., & Trimble, M. (2004). For
    how long do temporary techniques maintain the height of the medial
    longitudinal arch? Physical Therapy in Sport, 5(2), 84-89.
    Donatelli, R., Hurlbert, C., Conaway, D., & St. Pierre, R. (1988). Biomechanical foot
    orthotics: A retrospective study. The Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports
    Physical Therapy, 10(6), 615-624.
    Echarri, J. J., & Forriol, F. (2003). The development in footprint morphology in 1851
    Congolese children from urban and rural areas, and the relationship between this
    and wearing shoes. Jouranl of Pediatric Orthopedics. Part B, 12(2), 141-146.
    Esterman, A., & Pilotto, L. (2005). Foot shape and its effect on functioning in Royal
    Australian Air Force recruits. Part 1: Prospective cohort study. Military
    Medicine, 170(6), 623-628.
    Fitt, S. F. (1996). Dance kinesiology (2nd ed). New York: Schirmer Books.
    Forriol, F., & Pascual, J. (1990). Footprint analysis between three and seventeen years
    of age. Foot and Ankle,11(2) ,101-104.
    Garrow, A. P., Papageorgiou, A., Silman, A. J., Thomas, E., Jayson, M.I., &
    Macfarlane, G.J. (2001). The grading of hallus valgus. Journal of the America
    Podiatric Medical Association, 91(2), 74-78.
    Gartland, J.J. (1986). Fundamentals of orthopaedics(4th ed). London : WB Saunders.

    Genova, J. M., & Gross, M. T. (2000). Effect of foot orthotics on calcaneal eversion
    during standing and treadmill walking for subjects with abnormal pronation.
    Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 30(11), 664-675.
    Gould, N., Schneider, W., & Ashikaga, T. (1980). Epidemiological survey of foot
    problems in thecontinental United States: 1978-1979, Foot and Ankle
    International, 1, 8-10.
    Grabara, M. (2008) Influence of football training on alignment of the lower limbs and
    shaping of the feet. Human Movement, 9(1), 46-50.
    John, J. G. (1986). Fundamentals of orthopaedics (4th ed). London: WB Saunders.
    Kaye, R. A., & Jahss, M. H. (1991). Tibialis posterior: A review of anatomy and
    biomechanics in relation to support of the medial longitudinal arch. Foot and
    Ankle International, 11(4), 244-247.
    Klein, C., Groll-Knapp, E., Kundi, M., & Kinz, W. (2009). Increased hallux angle in
    children and its association with insufficient length of footwear: A community
    based cross-sectional study, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorder, 10, 159.
    Kulthanan, T. , & Techakampuch, S. (2004). A study of footprints in athletes and
    non-athletic people. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, 87(7),
    788-793.
    Ludwig, O. (1995) . A system of orthopaedic medicine. London : WB Saunders .
    Lynn, T. S. (2007). Practice of pediatric orthopedics (2nd ed). Philadelphia: Lippincott
    Williams & Wilkins.
    Magee, D.J. (2002). Orthopedic physical assessment (4th ed).Philadelphia: W.B.
    Saunders.
    Mahaffey, D., Hilts, M., & Fields, K. B. (1999). Ankle and foot injuries in
    sports. Clinics in Family Practice, 1(1), 233-250.
    Malanga, G. A., & Ramirez-Del Toro, J. A. (2008). Common injuries of the foot and
    ankle in the child and adolescent athlete. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
    Clinics of North America, 19(2), 347-371.
    Mauch, M., Grau, S., Krauss, L., Maiwald, C., & Horstmann, T. (2008). Foot
    morphology of normal, underweight and overweight children. International
    Journal of Obesity, 32(7), 1068-1075.
    Menz, H. B., & Munteanu, S. E. (2005). Radiographic validation of the Manchester
    scale for the classification of hallux valgus deformity. Rheumatology, 44(8),
    1061-1066.
    Mickle, K. J., Steele, J. R., & Munro, B. J. (2006). The feet of overweight and obese
    young children: Are they flat or fat? Obesity, 14(11), 1949-1953.
    Miller, E. H., Schneider, H. J., Bronson, J. L., & McLain, D. (1975). A new
    consideration in athletic injuries: The classical ballet dancer. Clinical
    Orthopaedics and Related Research, 111, 181-191.
    Moraros, J., & Hodge, W. (1993). Orthotic survey: Preliminary results. Journal of the
    \ American Podiatric Medical Association, 83(3), 139-148.
    Nix, S., Smith, M., & Vicenzino, B. (2010). Prevalence of hallux valgus in the general
    population: A systematic review and meta-analysis, Journal of Foot and Ankle
    Research, 3(1), 21.
    Pigue-vidal, C., Maled-Garcia, I., Arabi-Moreno, J., & Vila, J. (2006). Radiographic
    angles in hallux valgus: Differences between measurements made manually and
    with a computerized program, Foot and Ankle International, 27(3), 175-180.
    Pommering, T. L., Kluchurorski, L., & Hall, S. L. (2005). Ankle and foot injuries in
    pediatric and adult athletes. Primary Care, 32(1), 133-161.
    Queen, R. M., Mall, N. A., Nunley, J. A., & Chuckpaiwong, B. (2009). Differences in
    plantar loading between flat and normal feet during different athletic tasks. Gait
    and Posture, 29(4), 582-586.
    Razeghi, M., & Bat, M. E. (2002). Foot type classification: A critical review of current
    methods (Review). Gait and Posture, 15(3), 282-291.
    Roddy, E., Zhang, W., & Doherty, M. (2008). Prevalence and associations of hallux
    valgus in a primary care population, Arthritis & Rheumatism, 59(6), 857-62.
    Shiang, T. Y., Lee, S.H., Lee S.J. & Chu, W.C. (1998). Evaluating different footprint
    parameters as a predictor of arch height. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and
    Biology, 17(6), 62-66.
    Simkin, A., Leichter, L., Giladi, M., Stein, M., & Milgrom, C. (1989). Combined effect
    of foot arch structure and an orthotic device on stress fractures. Foot and Ankle
    International,10, 25-29.
    Smith, M., Brooker, S., Vicenzino, B., & McPoil, T. (2004). Use of anti-pronation
    taping to assess suitability of orthotic prescription: Case report. Australian
    Journal of Physiotherapy, 50, 111-113.
    Staheli, L. T. (1998). Fundamentals of pediatric orthopedics (2nd ed). Philadelphia,PA:
    Lippincott-Raven.
    Tsung, B. Y., Zhang, M., Fan, Y. B., & Boone, D. A. (2003). Quantitative comparison
    of plantar foot shapes under different weight-bearing conditions. Journal of
    Rehabilitation Research and Development,40(6), 517-526.
    Tudor, A., Ruzic, L., Sestan, B., Sirola, L., & Prpic, T. (2009). Flat-footedness is not a
    disadvantage for athletic performance in children aged 11-15 years. Pediatrics,
    123, 386-392.
    Vicenzino, B., Franettovich, M., McPoil, T., Russell, T., & Skardoon, G. (2005). Initial
    effects of anti-pronation tape on the medial longitudinal arch during walking and
    running. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 39(12), 939-943.
    Villarroya, M. A., Esquivel, J. M., Tomas, C., Moreno, L. A., Buenafe, A., & Bueno, G.
    (2009). Assessment of the medial longitudinal arch in children and adolescents
    with obesity: Footprints and radiographic study. European Journal of
    Pediatrics, 68(5), 559-67.
    Volpon, J. B. (1994). Footprint analysis during the growth period. Journal of Pediatric
    Orthopedics, 14, 83-85.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE