本研究探討不同認知風格學生在資訊課中透過Google文件進行共編筆記活動其學習成效的異同。本研究邀請台南縣某國小兩個班級，每班皆為34人，共68名學生參與。本研究以認知風格明顯的學生為研究對象，其中有30位偏向場地依賴型學習者及22位偏向場地獨立型學習者。兩個班級的學生分別參與兩人一組的共編筆記活動。研究發現，場地獨立型學習者單元成就測驗表現比場地依賴型學習者好；在實驗教學活動結束的兩週後進行的綜合成就測驗中，場地獨立型學生和場地依賴型學生間並沒有顯著差異；不過，場地依賴型學習者在經歷共編筆記活動後，其對資訊課的學習態度較場地獨立型學習者更好。另外，本研究也發現，小組認知風格的組成，對其共編產出筆記的品質沒有明顯的影響。

This study aimed to investigate the differences and similarities of learning performance between students with different cognitive styles during co-editing notes using Google Docs in the computer science class. This study invited two sixth-grade classes in Tainan, each class had 34 students, total were 68 students. The subjects in this study were students who had obvious cognitive style. There were 30 students who trended to field dependent style and 22 students who trended to field independent style were subjects discussed. The result discovered that field independent students’ achievements significantly were better than field dependent students in the post-unit exams. There was no significant difference between field independent students and field dependent students in comprehensive exam that administered in two weeks later after all units finished. However, field dependent students had better learning attitude toward computer science classes than field independent students. In addition, the various combination of group members with cognitive styles had no significant effect on their quality of notes.

中文部份：
林達森（2001）。合作學習與認知風格對科學學習之效應。教育學刊，17，255-279。
張春興（1996）。教育心理學：三化取向的理論與實踐。台北市: 東華書局。
楊坤原（1996）。認知風格與科學學習成就的關係（一）。科學教育月刊，194，2-12。

英文部份：
Pierre, A. A. S., Carruthers, S., Coady, Y., Dunn-Krahn, S., Gibbs, C., Gibbs, G., Gibbs, H., lonergan, S., Proctor, J., Stege, U., Storey, C., & Storey, M. (2007). Young minds storming through challenging computer science concepts. Paper presented at the 12th Western Canadian Conference on Computing Education (WCCE 2007). Kamloops, Canada.
Di Vesta, F., & Gray, G. S. (1972). Listening and note taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(1), 8-14.
Matthew, K., Jingtao, W., Alastair, I., Eric, T., Jane, C., Daniel, G., Orna, T., & John, C. (2005). Livenotes: A system for cooperative and augmented note-taking in lectures. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. Portland, Oregon, USA.
Di Vesta, F., & Gray, G. S. (1973). Listening and note taking: Ⅱ. Immediate and delayed recall as functions of variations in thematic continuity, note taking, and length of listening-review intervals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 64(3), 278-287.
Eades, C., & Moore, W. M. (2007). Ideas in practice: Strategic note taking in developmental mathematics. Journal of Developmental Education, 31(2), 18-26.
Fisher, J. L., & Harris, M. B. (1973). Effect of note taking and review on recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65(3), 321-325.
Faber, J. E., Morris, J. D., & Lieberman, M. G. (2000). The effect of note taking on ninth grade students' comprehension. Reading Psychology, 21(3), 257-270.
Hartley, J., & Davies, I. K. (1978). Note-taking: A critical review. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 15(3), 207-224.
McMullin, B., & Munro, M. (2003). Access to lecture notes: Review and best practice. [Electronic Version]. Retrieved December 23, 2007, from http://odtl.dcu.ie/wp/2004/ODTL-2004-00.html
Hopkins, K. D. (1998). Educational and psychological measurement and evaluation (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 1-64.
Kiewra, K. A., & Frank, B. M. (1988). Encoding and external-storage effects of personal lecture notes, skeletal notes, and detailed notes for field-independent and field-dependent learners. Journal of Educational Research, 81(3).
Kardash, C. M., Lukowski, L., & Bentmann, L. (1988). Effects of cognitive style and immediate testing on learning from a lecture. Journal of Educational Research, 81(6), 360-364.
Frank, B. M. (1984). Effect of field independence-dependence and study technique on learning from a lecture. American Educational Research Journal, 21(3), 669-678.
Annis, L., & Davis, J. K. (1978). Study techniques and cognitive style: Their effect on recall and recognition. Journal of Educational Research, 71(3), 175-178.
Rickards, J. P., Fajen, B. R., Sullivan, J. F., & Gillespie, G. (1997). Signaling, notetaking, and field independence–dependence in text comprehension and recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 508-517.
Kiewra, K. A., & Frank, B. M. (1986). Cognitive style: Effects of structure at acquisition and testing. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11(3), 253-263.
Lipsky, S. A. (1989). Effect of field independence/dependence on two textbook notetaking techniques.
Ward, T. J., & Clark, H. T. (1987). The effect of field dependence and outline condition on learning high- and low-structure information from a lecture. Research in Higher Education, 27(3), 259-272.
Kiewra, K. A., Benton, S. L., Kim, S. L., Risch, N., & Christensen, M. (1995a). Effects of note-taking format and study technique on recall and relational performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20(2), 172-187.
Palkovitz, R. J., & Lore, R. K. (1980). Note taking and note review: Why students fail questions based on lecture material. Teaching of Psychology, 7(3), 159-161.
Gurminder, S., Laurent, D., & Arijit, D. (2004). Collaborative note taking. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (WMTE'04).
O'Donnell, A., & Dansereau, D. F. (1993). Learning from lectures: Effects of cooperative review. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 116-125.
Wu, C. Y., Chen, S. W., Chen, C. H., & Chiu, C. H. (2009). The effect of integrating web 2.0 technology in collaborative note-taking on elementary students' science learning. In Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2009 (pp. 3145-3153), Honolulu, HI, USA. AACE.
Riding, R., & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles—an overview and integration. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 11(3), 193 - 215.
Germann, P. J. (1988). Development of the attitude toward science in school assessment and its use to investigate the relationship between science achievement and attitude toward science in school. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(8), 689-703.
Goodenough, D. R. (1976). The role of individual differences in field dependence as a factor in learning and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 83(4), 675-694.
Piolat, A., Olive, T., & Kellogg, R. T. (2005). Cognitive effort during note taking. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(3), 291-312.
O'Malley, J. M., Anna, C., Gloria, S.-M., Lisa, K., & Rocco, P. R. (1985). Learning strategies used by beginning and intermediate esl students. Language Learning, 35(1), 21-46.
Kiewra, K. (1989). A review of note-taking: The encoding-storage paradigm and beyond. Educational Psychology Review, 1(2), 147-172.
Kiewra, K. A., F., N., DuBoisb, David Christianc, Anne McShanec, Meyerhofferc, M., & Roskelley, D. (1991). Note-taking functions and techniques. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 240-245.
Kobayashi, K. (2006). Combined effects of note-taking/-reviewing on learning and the enhancement through interventions: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychology, 26(3), 459-477.
DeZure, D., Kaplan, M., & Deerman, M. A. (2001). Research on student notetaking: Implications for faculty and graduate student instructors. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for Research on Learning and Teaching.
Maxwell, M. (1992 & 1993). Are the skills we are teaching obsolete? A review of recent research in reading and study skills,. In Mioduski, Sylvia & G. Enright (Eds.), Proceedings of Proceedings of the 13th and 14th Annual Insitutes for Learning Assistance Professiona (pp. 63-77), Tucson, AZ: University Learning Center, University of Arizona, 1994. .
Kiewra, K. A., DuBois, N. F., Christian, D., & McShane, A. (1988). Providing study notes: Comparison of three types of notes for review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 595-597.
Hayati, A. M., & Jalilifar, A. (2009). The impact of note-taking strategies on listening comprehension of efl learners. English Language Teaching, 2(1), 101-111.
Sedita, J. (1995). A call for more study skills instruction. Paper presented at the International Conference of the Learning Disabilities Association. Orlando.
Nessel, D. D., & Graham, J. M. (2007). Thinking strategies for student achievement: Improving learning across the curriculum, k-12 (2th ed.). CA: Corwin Press.
Katayama, A. D., & Robinson, D. H. (2000). Getting students "Partially" Involved in note-taking using graphic organizers. Journal of Experimental Education, 68(2), 119-133.
Kiewra, K. A., Benton, S. L., Kim, S.-I., Risch, N., & Christensen, M. (1995b). Effects of note-taking format and study technique on recall and relational performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20(2), 172-187.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Learning together and alone. Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Fourth edition: Allyn and Bacon, 160 Gould Street, Needham Heights, MA 02194.
Frank, B. M. (1983). Flexibility of information processing and the memory of field-independent and field-dependent learners. Journal of Research in Personality, 17(1), 89-96.
Annis, L. F. (1979). Effect of cognitive style and learning passage organization on study technique effectiveness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(5), 620-626.
Witkin, H. A., & Goodenough, D. R. (1981). Cognitive styles: Essence and origins. Field dependence and field independence. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
Bahar, M. (2003). The effect of instructional methods on the performance of the students having different cognitive styles. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 24, 26-32.
Anderson, J. R. (2005). Cognitive psychology and its implications (6th ed.). New York Worth Publishers.
Dyson, B., & Grineski, S. (2001). Using cooperative learning structures in physical education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 72(2), 28-31.
Dwyer, F. M., & Moore, D. M. (1991). Effect of color coding on visually oriented tests with students of different cognitive styles. Journal of Psychology, 125(6), 677.
Ipek, I. (2010). The effects of cbi lesson sequence type and field dependence on learning from computer-based cooperative instruction in web. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(1), 221-234.
Moore, D. M., & Dwyer, F. M. (1991). Effect of color coded information on students' levels of field dependence. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 72, 611-616.
Guisande, M. A., Páramo, M. F., Tinajero, C., & Almeida, L. S. (2007). Field dependence-independence (fdi) cognitive style: An analysis of attentional functioning. Psicothema, 19(4), 572-577.
Chiu, C. H. (2002). The effects of collaborative teamwork on secondary science. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(3), 262-271.
Strough, J., & Covatto, A. M. (2002). Context and age differences in same- and other-gender peer preferences. Social Development, 11(3), 346-361.
Riding, R. J., & Sadler-Smith, E. (1997). Cognitive style and learning strategies: Some implications for training design. International Journal of Training and Development, 1(3), 199-208.
Parkinson, A., & Redmond, J. A. (2002). Do cognitive styles affect learning performance in different computer media? SIGCSE Bull., 34(3), 39-43.