研究生: |
陳盈璇 Chen, Ying-Hsuan |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
擴增實境輔助英語單字發音學習系統 Augmented Reality-assisted Learning for English words pronunciation |
指導教授: |
張國恩
Chang, Kuo-En 宋曜廷 Sung, Yao-Ting 劉子鍵 Liu, Tzu-Chien |
口試委員: |
張國恩
Chang, Kuo-En 劉子鍵 Liu, Tzu-Chien 劉遠楨 Liu, Yuan-Chen |
口試日期: | 2019/07/30 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
資訊教育研究所 Graduate Institute of Information and Computer Education |
論文出版年: | 2022 |
畢業學年度: | 110 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 77 |
中文關鍵詞: | 擴增實境 、擴增實境輔助英語發音 、發音視覺化教學 、發音器官動畫 |
英文關鍵詞: | Augmented Reality, Augmented Reality Assisted English Words Pronunciation Training, Visualize Pronunciation Learning, Animated Articulatory Movements |
研究方法: | 準實驗設計法 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202200643 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:203 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
數位原生時代已經來臨,將科技融入教學,也一直是個廣受關注的議題,許多國內外研究紛紛指出行動設備搭配擴增實境對教學所帶來的益處,對於整合資源、創造學習環境等層面上都有顯著效果,讓虛擬物體將在真實世界中得到增強,還能使互動和介面變得更具親和力、引起學生學習動機、使學習者能沉浸於學習內容中等優勢。
著眼於語言新進學習者往往無法看到文字法上反應出發音、及無法自我評估發音準確性的困境,本研究設計一套擴增實境輔助英語發音單字學習系統,目標是設計一個簡單而有效的語音發音模型,以便學習者可以輕鬆理解如何發音。並探討在不同教學方式與不同擴增訊息輔助下,國小生在英語單字發音學習成效上的變化。
本實驗採用準實驗研究方法,藉由傳統教學方式、擴增實境聽覺教材方式、擴增實境視聽覺教材方式、擴增實境視聽覺加唇形對照教材方式,上述四種不同輔助資訊搭配的教學方式進行組間比較。
研究結果顯示,無論是以純聽覺、視聽覺或是視聽覺加唇形對照的擴增實境整合,其立即後測效果都明顯高於傳統教學的學習者,表示使用擴增實境應用於英語發音的教學上是有顯著效果的。而擴增實境整合的三個組別之間學習效果上無顯著差異,值得注意的是,擴增實境視聽覺組對於看字發音的學習保留效果是有明顯優勢的。
雖然唇形對照的教學設計仍有改善空間,但多數學習者仍對擴增實境中能提供反饋增加互動性的特性保持開放態度,也期待擴增實境系統能加入其他學科,由此可見擴增實境系統輔助學習有增強學習者學習成效與動機之效果。
Digital native era, making Information Technology Integrated into Instruction a big thing of these days. Many domestic and overseas studies have pointed out the benefits of mobile devices integrated with augmented reality for teaching, which has also significantly influenced integrating resources and developing learning environments. Making virtual objects stronger in the real world can also make interactions and interfaces more friendly , motivate students to learn, and immerse learners in the advantages of learning content.
This research has developed an Augmented Reality-Assisted English words Pronunciation Learning System to address the problem that new language learners are frequently unable to pronounce immediately when they see the text and cannot self-evaluate pronunciation accuracy. The aim of this study is to design a simple and effective pronunciation model so that learners can easily understand how to pronounce. It also discusses the changes in the effectiveness of primary school students' learning of single word pronunciation through different teaching methods and different information amplification.
In this experiment, the four teaching methods were compared by traditional teaching method, augmented reality with an auditory teaching method, augmented reality with an audiovisual teaching method, and augmented reality with both an audiovisual and lip-contrast teaching method.
The results show that the immediate post-test effect is significantly higher than traditional learners, indicating that the use of augmented reality in English pronunciation is effective. However, there has been no significant difference between the learning effects of the three augmented reality-integrated groups. It has been shown that the augmented reality audiovisual group has apparent advantages in the reading and pronunciation learning retention effect.
Although there is still room for improvement in the design of lip-contrast, the majority of students are still open to augmented reality features that can provide feedback and increase interactivity. And they hoped that the augmented reality system will be incorporated into other subjects. It is evident that an augmented reality-assisted learning system could improve the efficacy and motivation of learners.
宋曜廷, 張國恩, & 于文正. (2006). 行動載具在博物館學習的應用:促進「人一機一境」互動的設計. [Usage of Mobile Devices in Museums: Promotion of Human-Computer-Situation Interactive Design]. 博物館學季刊, 20(1), 17-34.
教育部(2018)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校(語文領域-英語文)。臺北市:教育部。
黃鈺婷. (2015). 結合擴增實境技術與引導發現學習策略應用於植物園學習之成效. (碩士), 國立臺灣師範大學, 台北市.
劉子鍵、張國恩、黃國駿.配戴式錄音錄影裝置.臺灣.I636455.2018-09-21
Aguilar-Valera, J. A. (2019). Psycholinguistics in language teaching: Current vision. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 1(1), 6-11.
Ahn, T. Y., & Lee, S. M. (2016). User experience of a mobile speaking application with automatic speech recognition for EFL learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(4), 778-786.
Ajabshir, Z. F. (2014). The effect of implicit and explicit types of feedback on learners’ pragmatic development. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 463-471.
Alghazo, S. M. (2015). Advanced EFL Learners' Beliefs about Pronunciation Teaching. International Education Studies, 8(11), 63-76.
Ali, A. Z. M., Segaran, K., & Hoe, T. W. (2015). Effects of verbal components in 3D talking-head on pronunciation learning among non-native speakers. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(2), 313-322.
Baber, C., Bristow, H. W., Cheng, S.-L., Hedley, A., Kuriyama, Y., Lien, M., . . . Sorrell, P. (2001). Augmenting Museums and Art Galleries. Paper presented at the Interact.
Bacca, J., Baldiris, S., Fabregat, R., & Graf, S. (2015). Mobile augmented reality in vocational education and training. Procedia Computer Science, 75, 49-58.
Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege, 1334, 1-47.
Billinghurst, M. (2002). Augmented reality in education. New horizons for learning, 12(5), 1-5.
Biocca, F., Owen, C., Tang, A., & Bohil, C. (2007). Attention issues in spatial information systems: Directing mobile users' visual attention using augmented reality. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(4), 163-184.
Bitter, G., & Corral, A. (2014). The pedagogical potential of augmented reality apps. Journal of Engineering Science Invention ISSN (Online), 2319, 13-17.
Blum, L., Wetzel, R., McCall, R., Oppermann, L., & Broll, W. (2012). The final TimeWarp: using form and content to support player experience and presence when designing location-aware mobile augmented reality games. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the designing interactive systems conference.
Blyth, C. (2018). Immersive technologies and language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 225-232.
Buckley, J. M., Coopey, S. B., Sharko, J., Polubriaginof, F., Drohan, B., Belli, A. K., . . . Gadd, M. A. (2012). The feasibility of using natural language processing to extract clinical information from breast pathology reports. Journal of pathology informatics, 3.
Bueno Alastuey, M. C. (2011). Perceived benefits and drawbacks of synchronous voice-based computer-mediated communication in the foreign language classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(5), 419-432.
Bujang, M. N. B., & Riaz, R. P. M. (2012). M-Jako Iban: A mobile application to introduce Iban language. Paper presented at the 2012 IEEE Symposium on Humanities, Science and Engineering Research.
Burston, J. (2017). MALL: Global prospects and local implementation. CALL-EJ, 18 (1), 1-8.
Carroll, S. (2000). 2000: Input and evidence: the raw material of second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D. M., & Goodwin, J. M. (2010). Teaching pronunciation hardback with audio CDs (2): A course book and reference guide: Cambridge University Press.
Chang, H.-Y., Yu, Y.-T., Wu, H.-K., & Hsu, Y.-S. (2016). The Impact of a Mobile Augmented Reality Game: Changing Students' Perceptions of the Complexity of Socioscientific Reasoning. Paper presented at the 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT).
Chang, K.-E., Chang, C.-T., Hou, H.-T., Sung, Y.-T., Chao, H.-L., & Lee, C.-M. (2014). Development and behavioral pattern analysis of a mobile guide system with augmented reality for painting appreciation instruction in an art museum. Computers & Education, 71, 185-197.
Chang, Y.-L., Hou, H.-T., Pan, C.-Y., Sung, Y.-T., & Chang, K.-E. (2015). Apply an augmented reality in a mobile guidance to increase sense of place for heritage places. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(2), 166-178.
Chen, D.-R., Chen, M.-Y., Huang, T.-C., & Hsu, W.-P. (2013). Developing a mobile learning system in augmented reality context. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 9(12), 594627.
Chen, Y.-c. (2019). Effect of Mobile Augmented Reality on Learning Performance, Motivation, and Math Anxiety in a Math Course. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 0735633119854036.
Cheney, R. (2017). Kinesthetic Teaching Strategies for Adults in a Lecture Setting.
Chiang, T. H.-C., Yang, S. J., & Hwang, G.-J. (2014). An augmented reality-based mobile learning system to improve students' learning achievements and motivations in natural science inquiry activities. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 352-365.
Chien, C.-H., Chen, C.-H., & Jeng, T.-S. (2010). An interactive augmented reality system for learning anatomy structure. Paper presented at the proceedings of the international multiconference of engineers and computer scientists.
Chun, J. J., & Shatz, C. J. (1989). Interstitial cells of the adult neocortical white matter are the remnant of the early generated subplate neuron population. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 282(4), 555-569.
Cochrane, T. D. (2014). Critical success factors for transforming pedagogy with mobile W eb 2.0. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(1), 65-82.
De Bot, K., & Mailfert, K. (1982). The teaching of intonation: Fundamental research and classroom applications. Tesol Quarterly, 16(1), 71-77.
Derwing, T. M., Diepenbroek, L. G., & Foote, J. A. (2012). How well do general-skills ESL textbooks address pronunciation? TESL Canada Journal, 22-22.
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2005). Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research‐based approach. Tesol Quarterly, 39(3), 379-397.
Dlaska, A. (2013). The role of foreign language programmes in internationalising learning and teaching in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(3), 260-271.
Dlaska, A., & Krekeler, C. (2008). Self-assessment of pronunciation. System, 36(4), 506-516.
Dlaska, A., & Krekeler, C. (2013). The short-term effects of individual corrective feedback on L2 pronunciation. System, 41(1), 25-37.
Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of science Education and Technology, 18(1), 7-22.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching: Oxford University Press.
Engwall, O. (2008). Can audio-visual instructions help learners improve their articulation?-An ultrasound study of short term changes. Paper presented at the Ninth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association.
Erbas, C., & Demirer, V. (2019). The effects of augmented reality on students' academic achievement and motivation in a biology course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(3), 450-458.
Fagel, S., & Madany, K. (2008). A 3-D virtual head as a tool for speech therapy for children. Paper presented at the Ninth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association.
Fantini, A. E., Arias-Galicia, F., & Guay, D. (2001). Globalization and 21st century competencies: Challenges for North American higher education: Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education Boulder, CO.
Franquesa-Soler, M., Barraza, L., & Serio-Silva, J. C. (2019). Children's learning preferences for the development of conservation education programs in Mexican communities. The Journal of Educational Research, 112(1), 28-37.
Garrett, N. (2009). Computer‐assisted language learning trends and issues revisited: Integrating innovation. The modern language journal, 93, 719-740.
Gibert, G., Olsen, K. N., Leung, Y., & Stevens, C. J. (2015). Transforming an embodied conversational agent into an efficient talking head: from keyframe-based animation to multimodal concatenation synthesis. Computational cognitive science, 1(1), 7.
Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: a review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 70-105.
Grauwinkel, K., Dewitt, B., & Fagel, S. (2007). Visual information and redundancy conveyed by internal articulator dynamics in synthetic audiovisual speech. Paper presented at the Eighth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association.
Grim, F., & Sturm, J. L. (2015). Where does pronunciation stand in the 21st century foreign language classroom? Educators’ and learners’ views. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 7th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference, Dallas, TX.
Hazan, V., Sennema, A., Iba, M., & Faulkner, A. (2005). Effect of audiovisual perceptual training on the perception and production of consonants by Japanese learners of English. Speech communication, 47(3), 360-378.
Hsu, L. (2013). English as a foreign language learners’ perception of mobile assisted language learning: a cross-national study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(3), 197-213.
Huang, C. S., Yang, S. J., Chiang, T. H., & Su, A. Y. (2016). Effects of situated mobile learning approach on learning motivation and performance of EFL students. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(1), 263-276.
Jenkins, J. (2004). 5. research in teaching pronunciation and intonation. Annual review of applied linguistics, 24, 109-125.
Jensen, E. (2005). Teaching with the brain in mind: ASCD.
Joda, T., Gallucci, G., Wismeijer, D., & Zitzmann, N. (2019). Augmented and virtual reality in dental medicine: A systematic review. Computers in biology and medicine.
Jones, R. H. (1997). Beyond “listen and repeat”: Pronunciation teaching materials and theories of second language acquisition. System, 25(1), 103-112.
Jun, Y., Jiang, C., Li, R., Luo, C. W., & Wang, Z. F. (2016). Real-Time 3-D Facial Animation: From Appearance to Internal Articulators. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 28(4), 920-932.
Kesharwani, A. (2019). Do (How) Digital Natives Adopt A New Technology Differently than Digital Immigrants?-A Longitudinal Study. Information & Management, 103170.
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition.
Kusmaryani, W., Musthafa, B., & Purnawarman, P. (2019). The influence of mobile applications on students’ speaking skill and critical thinking in English language learning. Paper presented at the Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
Lan, X., Pan, C., Chen, H., Lei, C., Hua, L., Yang, X., . . . Lun, Y. (2007). DdeI polymorphism in coding region of goat POU1F1 gene and its association with production traits. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 20(9), 1342-1348.
Levy, M., & Stockwell, G. (2013). CALL dimensions: Options and issues in computer-assisted language learning: Routledge.
Liu. (2009). A context‐aware ubiquitous learning environment for language listening and speaking. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(6), 515-527.
Liu, P. H. E., & Tsai, M. K. (2013). Using augmented‐reality‐based mobile learning material in EFL English composition: An exploratory case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(1), E1-E4.
Mahdi, H. S., & Al Khateeb, A. A. (2019). The effectiveness of computer‐assisted pronunciation training: A meta‐analysis. Review of Education.
Massaro, D. W., & Light, J. (2004). Using visible speech to train perception and production of speech for individuals with hearing loss. Journal of speech, Language, and hearing research.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. E. (2010). Techniques that reduce extraneous cognitive load and manage intrinsic cognitive load during multimedia learning.
Mitsuhara, H., Shishibori, M., Kawai, J., & Iguchi, K. (2016). Game-based evacuation drills using simple augmented reality. Paper presented at the 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT).
Morita, L. C. (2003). Language shift in the Thai Chinese community. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 24(6), 485-495.
Nicol, D., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2004). Rethinking formative assessment in HE: a theoretical model and seven principles of good feedback practice. C. Juwah, D. Macfarlane-Dick, B. Matthew, D. Nicol, D. & Smith, B.(2004) Enhancing student learning though effective formative feedback, York, The Higher Education Academy.
Nicol, D., & Milligan, C. (2006). Rethinking technology-supported assessment practices in relation to the seven principles of good feedback practice Innovative assessment in higher education (pp. 84-98): Routledge.
Oberg, A., & Daniels, P. (2013). Analysis of the effect a student-centred mobile learning instructional method has on language acquisition. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(2), 177-196.
Offerman, H. M., & Olson, D. J. (2016). Visual feedback and second language segmental production: The generalizability of pronunciation gains. System, 59, 45-60.
Olson, D. J. (2014). Benefits of visual feedback on segmental production in the L2 classroom. Language Learning & Technology, 18(3), 173-192.
Papadima-Sophocleous, S., & Charalambous, M. (2014). Impact of iPod Touch-supported repeated reading on the English oral reading fluency of L2 students with specific learning difficulties. The EuroCALL Review, 22(1), 47-58.
Peng, X., Chen, H., Wang, L., & Wang, H. (2018). Evaluating a 3-D virtual talking head on pronunciation learning. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 109, 26-40.
Pennington, M. C., & Rogerson-Revell, P. (2019). Using Technology for Pronunciation Teaching, Learning, and Assessment English Pronunciation Teaching and Research (pp. 235-286): Springer.
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64(4), 878-912.
Raja, V., & Calvo, P. (2017). Augmented reality: An ecological blend. Cognitive Systems Research, 42, 58-72.
Ramaprasad, A. (1983). On the definition of feedback. Behavioral science, 28(1), 4-13.
Rasul, S., Bukhsh, Q., & Batool, S. (2011). A study to analyze the effectiveness of audio visual aids in teaching learning process at uvniversity level. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 78-81.
Rosell-Aguilar, F. (2007). Top of the pods—In search of a podcasting “podagogy” for language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(5), 471-492.
Ruellot, V. (2011). Computer-assisted pronunciation learning of French/u/and/y/at the intermediate level. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2nd pronunciation in second language learning and teaching conference.
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional science, 18(2), 119-144.
Sahin, N., & Ozcan, M. F. (2019). Effects of Augmented Reality in Teaching Old Turkish Language Mementoes on Student Achievement and Motivation. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(2), 198-213.
Saito, K., & Lyster, R. (2012). Effects of form‐focused instruction and corrective feedback on L2 pronunciation development of/ɹ/by Japanese learners of English. Language Learning, 62(2), 595-633.
Saito, K., & Plonsky, L. (2019). Effects of Second Language Pronunciation Teaching Revisited: A Proposed Measurement Framework and Meta‐Analysis. Language Learning.
Scarcella, R. C., & Oxford, R. L. (1994). Second language pronunciation: State of the art in instruction. System, 22(2), 221-230.
Sennema, A., Hazan, V., & Faulkner, A. (2003). The role of visual cues in L2 consonant perception. Paper presented at the Proc. 15th ICPhS.
Spada, N. (1997). Form-focussed instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language teaching, 30(2), 73-87.
Specht, M., Ternier, S., & Greller, W. (2011). Dimensions of mobile augmented reality for learning: a first inventory.
Stockwell, G. (2007). Vocabulary on the move: Investigating an intelligent mobile phone-based vocabulary tutor. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(4), 365-383.
Sugimoto, J., & Uchida, Y. (2018). Accentedness and acceptability ratings of Japanese English teachers’ pronunciation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 9th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference.
Sung, Y.-T., Chang, K.-E., & Liu, T.-C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students' learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252-275.
Tai, Y. (2012). Contextualizing a MALL: Practice design and evaluation. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(2), 220-230.
Van Krevelen, D. (2010). en R. Poelman (2010).‘A survey of augmented reality technologies, applications and limitations.’. International Journal of Virtual Reality, 9(2), 1.
Wagner, E. A. (2014). Using a kinesthetic learning strategy to engage nursing student thinking, enhance retention, and improve critical thinking. Journal of Nursing Education, 53(6), 348-351.
Wang, L., Ma, L., & Soong, F. K.-P. (2012). Speech and text driven HMM-based body animation synthesis: Google Patents.
Wasko, C. (2013). What teachers need to know about augmented reality enhanced learning environments. TechTrends, 57(4), 17-21.
Wong, K.-H., Lo, W.-K., & Meng, H. (2011). Allophonic variations in visual speech synthesis for corrective feedback in capt. Paper presented at the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).
Wong, L.-H., & Looi, C.-K. (2011). What seams do we remove in mobile-assisted seamless learning? A critical review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2364-2381.
Yang, S. C., & Chen, Y.-J. (2007). Technology-enhanced language learning: A case study. Computers in human behavior, 23(1), 860-879.
Yilmaz, Y. (2013). The relative effectiveness of mixed, explicit and implicit feedback in the acquisition of English articles. System, 41(3), 691-705.
Yu, J., & Li, A. (2014). 3D visual pronunciation of Mandarine Chinese for language learning. Paper presented at the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).
Zak, E. (2014). Do you believe in magic? Exploring the conceptualization of augmented reality and its implications for the user in the field of library and information science. Information Technology and Libraries, 33(4), 23-50.
Zhang, J., Hou, H.-T., & Chang, K.-E. (2012). Designing a streamlined viewport strategy system to enhance performance in context awareness in mobile learning environments. Paper presented at the 2012 IIAI International Conference on Advanced Applied Informatics.
Zhang, J., Ogan, A., Liu, T.-C., Sung, Y.-T., & Chang, K.-E. (2016). The influence of using augmented reality on textbook support for learners of different learning styles. Paper presented at the 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR).
Zhang, J., Sung, Y.-T., & Chang, K.-E. (2011). Using a mobile digital armillary sphere (MDAS) in astronomical observation for primary school students. Paper presented at the E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education.
Zhang, J., Sung, Y.-T., Hou, H.-T., & Chang, K.-E. (2014). The development and evaluation of an augmented reality-based armillary sphere for astronomical observation instruction. Computers & Education, 73, 178-188.
Zohrabi, K., & Ehsani, F. (2014). The Role of Implicit & Explicit Corrective Feedback in Persian-speaking EFL Learners’ Awareness of and Accuracy in English Grammar. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 2018-2024.