研究生: |
李坦營 Li, Tan-Ying |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
以STEAM為本 建構海洋教育新興議題融入視覺藝術之課程模式 Constructing A STEAM-Baesd Curriculum Model of Infusing Marine Education Current Issues with Visual Arts |
指導教授: |
陳瓊花
Chen, Chiung-Hua |
學位類別: |
博士 Doctor |
系所名稱: |
美術學系 Department of Fine Arts |
論文出版年: | 2018 |
畢業學年度: | 106 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 140 |
中文關鍵詞: | 新興議題 、海洋教育 、核心素養 、課程模式 、視覺藝術 |
英文關鍵詞: | Current Issues, Core Literacy, Curriculum Model |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/DIS.NTNU.DFA.070.2018.A10 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:412 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
由於當代跨學科課程、新興議題融入課程的實施,都有待更多實徵的研究,本研究試著探討海洋教育新興議題融入視覺藝術課程模式,採用行動研究法,施教對象為本校九年級三個班級的學生,每班約二十位同學,男女合班。研究發現一、海洋議題可以豐富視覺藝術課程的內涵。二、STEAM跨領域課程的設計與實施應以作品為前導。三、STEAM有別於傳統教學的優勢。四、資訊工具係STEAM統整工具的利器。五、STEAM在藝術課程的運用上可以超越只有學科內容的限制,進而到藝術在情感、方法上的運用,成為新興議題融入視覺藝術教育的課程模式,同時也對未來的相關研究就課程設計者、教學者、研究者提出其他面向的建議。
Due to carry out contemporary transdisciplinary and new issues blend into curriculums, it needs more actually research.The study attentions to discuss new issues about marine education combines with visual art curriculums, takes action research. Main objects of study are three classes of junior high school students (9th Grade), and each of class are twenty members with boys and girls.
According to research findings:
一、 Marine issues can enrich visual art curriculum’s intension.
二、 Workings should be as a guide based on trans-discipline curriculums design and carry out of STEAM.
三、 STEAM is superiority to traditional teaching.
四、 Information Engineering should be uses an integration tool of STEAM.
五、 Use STEAM on art curriculums can surpass courses contents limited, even on emotions and ways to art, and become a model of new issues combine with visual art education curriculums.
Finally, I want to propose else to curriculum designers、teachers, and research workers to those who will do related study in the future.
一、中文部分
丁一顧(2008)。教師專業發展評鑑實施的另類選擇--共同備課與觀課。教育研究月刊,167,36-46。
王德育(譯)(1983)。創造與心智成長。(原作者:Lowenfeld,V.)臺北市:文衆。
方德隆、張宏育(2013)。國中教育階段核心素養課程之建構。課程研究,8(1),65-99。
范信賢(2016)。核心素養與十二年國民基本教育課程綱要:導讀 《國民核心素養:十二年國教課程改革的DNA》。教育研究季刊,1(5),1-7。
夏林清譯(1997)。行動研究方法導論 : 教師動手做研究。遠流。臺北。
國家教育研究院網站(2016)十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱https://www.naer.edu.tw/files/15-1000-2983,c551-1.php
教育部(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。2017年12月17日查自http://12cur.naer.edu.tw/upload/files/96d4d3040b01f58da73f0a79755ce8c1.pdf
國家教育研究院(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要議題融入說明手冊(初稿)。臺北市:國家教育研究院。
莊明貞(2007)。九年一貫課程重大議題研修變革之探析
陳瓊花(2004)。視覺藝術教育。三民。臺北。P.23。
黃政傑(2013)。課程轉化整合探究之概念模式研析。課程與教學季刊,16(3),1-30。
詹志禹(2017)。實驗創新與十二年國民基本教育。課程與教學,20(4),1-24。
蔡清田(2006)。課程行動研究的通關密語。課程與教學,151,111-122。
蔡清田(2011)。素養:課程改革的DNA。臺北市:高等教育。
蔡清田(2013)。「素養」的構念與構念重建。教育研究月刊,233,109-120。
聯合新聞網https://udn.com/news/story/7321/2668986(基隆河因暖化烏仔魚集體暴斃)
二、英文部分
Alliance,E.(2004)m Museum Education as Curriculum: Four Models, Leading to a Fifth. Studies in Art Education,45(4),343-358.
Andrelchik,H.(2015).Reconsidering literacy in the art classroom.Art Education,68(1),6-11.
Chung, S.K., and Kirby, M. S. (2009). Media literacy art education: Logos, Culture Jamming and Activism. Art Education,62(1).
Darts, D. (2004). Visual culture jam: Art, pedagogy, and creative resistance. Studies in Art Education,45(4).
Duncum,P. (2015). A journey toward an art education for wired youth. Art Education, 56(4), 295-306.
Eisner, E. W. (2001). Should we create new aims for art education? Art Education, 54(5), 6-10.
Freedman, K. (2003). Teaching visual culture. New York:Teacher college press.
Gross, K. and Gross, S. (2016). Transformation: Constructivism, design thinking, and elementary,69(6),36-43.
Lasn, K. (1999). Culture jam: The uncooling of America. New York: Eagle Brook..
Liao, C. (2016). From interdisciplinary to transdisciplinary : An arts-integrated, approach to STEAM education, Art Education,69 (6),44-49 .
Liao, C.; Motter, J. L; Patton, R. M. (2016). Tech-Savvy Girls: Learning 21st-Century Skills Through STEAM Digital Artmaking. Art Education, 69(4), 29-35.
Marshall, J. (2010). Five ways to integrate: Using strategies from contemporary art. Art Education, 63(3), 13-19.
Marshall, J. (2014).Transdisciplinary and art integration:Toward a new understanding of art-based learning across curriculum. Art Education,55(2), 104-127.
Mirzoeff, N.(1999). An introduction to visual culture. London: Routledge.
Patton, R. M; Knochel, A. D. (2017). Meaningful makers: Stuff, sharing, and connection in STEAM curriculum. Art Education,71(1), 36-43.
Rita L. I.(2004). A/r/tography : rendering self through arts-based living inquiry. Vancouver:Pacific Educational Press,
Rolling, J. H., Jr.(2016). Reinventing the STEAM engine for Art + Design education, Art Education.,69(4), 4-7.
Rufo, D.(2016). STEAM-ing up the science fair, Art Education, 69(4), 12-16.
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass,108-115.
Walker,S.(2004) . Big ideas: Understanding the art making process: Reflective practice, Art Education,57(3), 6.
Watson, A. D. (2016). Reinventing the STEAM engine for Art + Design education. Art Education,69(4),8-9.
Watson, A., D.(2016). Revving up the STEAM engine. Art Education,69(4).
Wilson, B. (2003). Three sites for visual cultural pedagogy: Honoring students’ interests and imabery. The International Journal of Art Education, 1(3), 107-126.