本研究主要目的有四：（一）建構華人教練-選手關係及教練-選手溝通的內涵，編製具信效度的測量工具；（二）探討不同背景變項在教練-選手關係及教練-選手溝通的差異；（三）探討知覺教練-選手關係、教練-選手溝通與團隊滿足感和教練-選手關係滿足感的相關及預測情形；（四）以結構方程模式驗證本研究所提出的「華人教練-選手關係之互動模式」。研究方法先採用質性研究探索相關問題，訪談9位優秀的選手及9位資深的教練，以開放式問卷調查120位大學及80位高中運動選手，將所得資料加以分析，建立初步的概念，並以此結果編製專家評定問卷，請5位具運動心理學博士學位，且有多年擔任運動代表隊教練經驗的學者，進行專家審查。接著以利用質性研究結果，針對1023位高中及大學運動選手，經過二階段的探索性及驗證性因素分析，發展出「教練-選手關係量表」和「教練-選手溝通量表」，並經研究分析，得到以下之結論：
（一）教練-選手關係量表包含三個分量表：自發性感情、工具性關係、義務性人情；教練-選手溝通量表包含二個分量表：工作互動、人際互動，皆具有良好的內部一致性，經驗證性因素分析後因素的構念效度不錯，且具有良好的輻合效度、區辨效度、聚斂效度及複核效度。
（二）男子選手在自發性感情、工具性關係及工作互動、人際互動皆優於女子選手；大專選手在自發性感情及人際互動優於高中選手；無上場機會的選手在義務性人情優於有時先發的選手；先發選手在工作互動及人際互動上優於替補選手；國家級選手在人際互動優於縣市級選手；與教練建立關係6個月以下的選手在義務性人情優於與教練建立關係6-18個月的選手；每週練習6小時以下及每週練習7-12小時的選手在自發性感情上，優於每週練習19小時以上的選手；每週練習7-12小時的選手在工作互動與人際互動上，優於每週練習19小時以上的選手。
（三）團隊滿足感、關係滿足感與自發性感情、義務性人情、工具性關係、工作互動、人際互動皆呈正相關；自發性感情及義務性人情可以有效預測團隊滿足感；自發性感情、工具性關係、工作互動及人際互動皆能有效預測教練-選手關係滿足感。
（四）研究結果部分支持本研究所提「華人教練-選手關係之互動模式」。
根據研究結果與討論，本研究亦對於實際應用與未來進一步研究提出建議。

The purpose of this study were: (1) to explore the conceptualization of coach-athlete relationship and communication and to develop reliable measures of Chinese coach-athlete relationship and communication; (2) to examine the difference of coach-athlete relationship and coach-athlete communication on different coach’s and athlete’s demographics; (3) to explore the relationship of coach-athlete relationship, coach-athlete communication, team satisfaction and coach-athlete relationship satisfaction; (4) to examine the adequacy of the hypothesized model of Chinese coach-athlete interaction relationship by Structural equation modeling (SEM). In Qualitative research phase, 9 elite athletes and 9 coaches from various sports background were interviewed, as well as an open-ended questionnaire from 120 intercollegiate and 80 senior high school athletes. The results were revised by 5 experts who were Ph.D. and several years of coaching experience. The sample comprised 1023 intercollegiate and senior high school athletes. After EFA and CFA, the results of this study were following:
1. The latent structure of the Chinese Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire was underlined by the latent variables of spontaneous emotion, responsible courtesy, and instrument relationship. The latent structure of the Chinese Coach-Athlete Communication Questionnaire was underlined by the latent variables of task interaction, interpersonal interaction. And those two questionnaires were all showed good content, predictive, and construct validity, as well as internal consistency.
2. Male athletes had better on spontaneous emotion, instrument relationship, task interaction, and interpersonal interaction than female athletes. College athletes had better on spontaneous emotion, and interpersonal interaction than senior high school athletes. Bench players had better on responsible courtesy than main players sometimes. Main players had better on task interaction, and interpersonal interaction than bench players. National athletes had better on interpersonal interaction than county athletes. The athletes who practiced 12 hours per week under had better on spontaneous emotion, and task interaction than the athletes who practiced 19 hours per week above.
3. It were all showed positive relation on team satisfaction, coach-athlete relationship satisfaction, spontaneous emotion, responsible courtesy, instrument relationship, task interaction, and interpersonal interaction. Spontaneous emotion, responsible courtesy could effectively predict team satisfaction. Spontaneous emotion, instrument relationship, task interaction, and interpersonal interaction could effectively predict coach-athlete relationship satisfaction.
4. The results partially supported the hypothesized model of Chinese Coach-Athlete Interaction Relationship.
According to the results and discussion, the practical application and future research suggestions were provided.

中文部分
朱瑞玲（1987）。中國人的社會互動：試論面子的運作。中國社會學期刋，11，23-53。
朱瑞玲（1993）。中國人的慈善觀念。載於楊國樞、余安邦(主編)，中國人的心理與行為──文化、教化及病理篇。台北市：桂冠圖書。
吳明隆（2007）。SPSS操作與應用：問卷分析統計實務。台北市：五南。
吳毓瑩（1996）。量表奇偶數的效度議題。調查研究，2，5-34。
李烱煌（2002）。教練領導行為與教練-選手關係滿意度之相關研究。大專體育學刋，4(2)，67-77。
杜永泰（2005）。師生關係測量之研究。未出版碩士論文，國立台北教育大學，台北市。
何友暉、陳淑娟、趙志裕（1991）。關係取向：為中國社會心理方法論求答案。載於楊國樞、黃光國（主編），中國人的心理與行為。台北市：桂冠圖書。
邱皓政（2003）。結構方程模式：LISREL的理論技術與應用。台北：雙葉。
周美伶、何友暉（1992）。從跨文化的觀點分析面子的內涵及其在社會交往中的運作。載於楊國樞、余安邦（主編），中國人的心理與行為──理念及方法篇，台北市：桂冠圖書公司。
周麗芳（2002）。華人組織中的關係與社會網絡。本土心理學研究，18，175-228。
周麗芳（2007）。關係與人際網絡。載於鄭伯壎、姜定宇、鄭弘岳等(主編)，組織行為研究在台灣（頁206-247），台北市：華泰文化。
林清和（2001）。教練心理學。台北市：文史哲。
林清和（2005）。心身優勢活出精華。台北縣：泰宇。
高三福、陳鈺芳（2006）。運動教練的教誨領導：高中運動團隊的個案研究。大專體育學刋，8(1), 97-111。
徐西森（1997）。團體動力與團體輔導。台北：心理出版社。
徐西森（1998）。商業心理學。台北：心理出版社。
徐西森、連廷嘉、陳仙子、劉雅瑩（2002）。人際關係的理論與實務。臺北市：心理。
梁漱溟（1987）。中國文化的要義。台北：學林出版社。
黃光國（1989）。人情與面子：中國人的權力與遊戲。載於黃光國(主編)，中國人的權力遊戲（頁7-55），台北市：巨流。
黃光國（1999）。儒家倫理與專業倫理。思與言，37(4)，31-58。
黃芳銘（2004）。社會科學統計方法學：結構方程模式。台北：五南。
黃金柱（1990）。國家級運動教練行為調查研究。國立體育學院論叢，2，33-62。
黃英哲、季力康（1994）。運動動機氣候與自覺能力對賽前狀態性焦慮和滿足感的相關研究。體育學報，18，321-332。
黃懿慧（2002）。關係取向理模式初探：組織與利益關係人關係之探討。本土心理學研究，18，95-172。
郭進財（2001）。網球選手對教練認同與關係品質之研究。體育學報，30，217-227。
郭進財（2002）。以LMX理論分析運動團隊的形成與互動。中華體育，16(2)，45-52。
陳詩欣、董俊男、季力康。（2007）。知覺動機氣候、運動動機與教練-選手關係之研究。96年大專體育學術專刋，260-264。
陳皎眉（2004）。人際關係與人際溝通。台北市：雙葉書廊。
陳鈺芳（2004）。探索運動員追求自我實現的可能性－從交易領導與轉型領導理論探討之。中華體育，18(2)，43-49。
楊中芳（1999）。人際關係與人際情感的構念化。本土心理學研究，12，105-179。
楊宜音（2001）。自己人：一項有關中國人關係分類的個案研究。載於楊中芳（主編），中國人的人際關係、情感與信任—一個人際交往的觀點(頁131-157)。台北市：遠流。
楊純碧（1998）。教練領導行為對團隊氣氛與教練-選手關係滿意度之影響。未出版碩士論文，國立體育學院，桃園縣。
楊國樞（1992）。中國人的社會取向：社會互動觀點。載於楊國樞、余安邦（主編），中國人的心理與行為－方法與理念篇，台北市：桂冠圖書。
費孝通（1948）。鄉土中國與鄉土重建。上海：觀察社。
樊景立、鄭伯壎（2000）。家長式領導：一項文化觀點的分析。本土心理學研究，13，127-180。
鄭志富（1997）。運動教練領導行為研究取向。中華體育，11(1)，22-31。
鄭伯壎（1991），家族主義與領導行為。載於楊中芳、高尚仁（主編），中國人、中國心：人格與社會篇（頁366-407），台北：遠流出版公司。
鄭伯壎（1999）。華人人際關係的困境與出路。本土心理學研究，12，203-214。
鄭伯壎（2007）。台灣組織行為研究：過去、現在、未來。載於鄭伯壎、姜定宇、鄭弘岳等（編著），組織行為研究在台灣（頁2-67），台北：華泰文化。
鄭伯壎、謝佩鴛、周麗芳（2002）。校長領導作風、上下關係品質及教師角色外行為：轉型式與家長式領導的效果。本土心理學研究，17，105-161。
鄭佩芬（2000）。人際關係與溝通技巧。台北：揚智文化事業公司。
鄭嘉勝（2005）。教練領導風格與運動員參與動機之關係研究：自主性、關係感及勝任感之中介效果。未出版碩士論文，國立台北師範學院，台北市。
簡曜輝、季力康、卓俊伶、洪聰敏、黃英哲、黃崇儒、廖主民、盧俊宏（譯）（2002）。競技與健身運動心理學。台北市：台灣運動心理學會。(Weinberg, R. S., & Gould, D., 1999)

英文部分
Anshel, M. H. (1987). Psychological inventories used for sport psychology research. The Sport Psychologist, 1, 331-349.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Academic of Marketing Science, 16, 76-94.
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectation. New York: Free Press.
Bass, B., & Avolio, B. J. (1990). The implications of transactional and transformational leadership for individual, team, and organizational development. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 4, 231-272.
Bentler, P. M., & Wu, E. J. C. (1993). EQS/Windows user’s guide. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software.
Bercheid, E., Snyder, M., & Omoto, A. M. (1989). The relationship closeness inventory: Assessing the closeness of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 792-807.
Bloom, G. A., Durand-Bush, N., & Salmela, J. H. (1997). Pre- and post-competition routines of expert coaches of team sports. The Sport Psychologist, 11, 127-141.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: prentice Hall.
Brammer, L. M. (1993). The Helpering Relationship: Process and Skill. New York: Allyn & Bacon.
Brewer, C. J., & Jones, R. L. (2002). A five-stage process for establishing cotextually valid systematic observation instruments: The case study of rugby union. The Sport Psychologist, 16, 138-159.
Burns, J. H. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
Byrne, B. M. (1989). A prime of LISREL. London: Sage
Carron, A. V., & Bennett, B.B. (1977). Compatibility in the coach-athlete dyad. Research Quarterly, 48, 671-679.
Chelladurai, P. (1978). A contingency model of leadership in athletics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Management Sciences, University of Waterloo, Canada.
Celladurai, P. (1993). Leadership. In R. N. Singer, M. Murphy, ＆ L. K. Tennant (Eds.), Handbook of research on sport psychology (pp.647-671). New York：Macmillan.
Chelladurai, P., Imamura, H., Yamaguchi, Y., Oinuma, Y., & Miyauchi, T. (1988). Sport leadership in a cross-national setting: the case of Japanese and Canadian university athletes. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 10, 374-389.
Chelladrai, P., & Riemer, H. A. (1998). Measurement of leadership in sport. In J. L. Duda (Ed.), Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement (pp. 227-253). Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.
Chelladurai, P., & Saleh, S. D. (1980). Dimensions of leader behavior in sports: development of a leadership scale. Journal of Sport Psychology, 2, 34-45.
Cumming, S. P., Smith, R. E., & Smoll, F. L. (2006). Athlete-perceived coaching behaviors: Relation two measurement traditions. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 28, 205-213.
Dansereau, F., Graen, G., & Haga, W. J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organization Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 46-78.
DeVito, J. A. (2003). The interpersonal communication book (10th ed.). New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.
Dienescg, R. M., & Liden, R. C. (1986). Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 618-634.
Duda, J. L., & Hayashi, C. T. (1998). Measurement issues in cross-cultural research within sport and exercise psychology. In J. L. Duda (Ed. ), Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement (pp. 213-226). Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.
Fielder, F. E. (1964). A contingency model of leadership effectiveness. In L. Berkowitz(Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. (pp. 149-190). New York: Academic Press.
Fisher, A. C., Mancini, V. H., Hirsch, R. L., Proulx, T. J., & Staurowsky, E. J. (1982). Coach-athlete interactions and team climate. Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, 388-404.
Frederick, C. M. & Morrison, C. S. (1999). Collegiate coaches: An examination of motivational style and its relationship to decision making and personality. Journal of Sport Behavior, 22, 221-233.
Graen, G. (1976). Role making process within complex organizations. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Graen, G., & Cashman, J. F. (1975). A role of making model in formal organizations: A developmental approach. In J. G. Hunt & L. L. Larson (Eds.), Leadership frontiers. Kent, OH: Dent State University Press.
Graen, G., Novak, M. A., & Sommerkamp, P. (1982). The effects of leader-member exchange and job design on production and satisfaction: Testing a dual attachment model. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30, 109-131.
Greenleaf, C., Gould, D., & Dieffenbach, K.(2001). Factors influencing Olympic performance: Interviews with Atlanta and Nagano U. S. Olympians. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 13, 154-184.
Hemery, D. (1986). The pursuit of sporting excellence: A study of sport’s highest achievers. London: Willow Books Collins.
Hinde, R. A. (1997). Relationships: A dialectical perspective. London: Psychology Press.
Ho, D. Y. F. (何友暉)(1998). Interpersonal relationships and relationship dominance: An analysis based on methodological relationalism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 1-16.
Hofsted, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
House, R. J. & Mitchell, T. R. (1974). Path-goal theory of leadership. Journal of Contemporary Business. 74(3), 81-97.
Hsu, F. L. K. (許烺光)(1971). Under the ancestors’ shadow: Kinship, personality and social mobility in China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Hu, H. C. (胡先縉)(1949). Emotions, real and assumed, in Chinese society. Institute for Intercultural Studies, Columbia University, New York.
Hwang, K. K. (2000). Chinese relationalism: Theoretical construction and methodological considerations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 30(2), 155-178.
Iso-Ahola, S. E. (1995). Intrapersonal and interpersonal factors in athletic performance. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 5, 191-199.
Jacobs, B. J. (1979). A preliminary model of particularistic tie in Chinese political alliance: Kan-ching and Kuan-his in a rural Taiwanese township. The Chinese Quarterly, 78, 237-273.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software.
Jowett, S. (2003). When the honeymoon is over: a case study of a coach-athlete dyad in crisis. The Sport Psychologist, 17, 444-460.
Jowett, S. (2006). Interpersonal and structural features of Greek coach-athlete dyads performing in individual sports. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 18, 69-81.
Jowett, S., & Cockerill, I. (2002). Incompatibility in the coach-athlete relationship. In Cockerill (Ed.), Solutions in Sport Psychology. London: Thompson Learning.
Jowett, S., & Gale, E. (2002, July). An exploratory study into the nature of the coach-athlete relationship in track and field athletics. Presented at the Annual Conference of the British Association of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Manchester, UK.
Jowett, S., & Meek, G. A. (2000). The coach-athlete relationship in married couples: An exploratory content analysis. The Sport Psychologist, 14, 157-175.
Jowett, S., & Ntoumanis, N. (2004). The Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART-Q): Development and initial validation. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 14, 245-257.
Jowett, S., Paull, G., Pensgaard, A. M. Hoegmo, P. M., & Riise, H. (2005). Coach-athlete relationship. In J. Taylor, & G. S. Wilson (Eds.), Applying sport psychology: Four perspectives (pp. 153-170). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Jowett, S., & Poczwardowski, A. (2007). Understanding the coach-athlete relationship. In S. Jowett, & D. Lavallee (Eds.), Social psychology in sport (pp. 3-14). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-36.
Kelley, H.H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G., McClintock, E., Peplau, L. A., & Peterson, D. R. (1983). Close relationships. New York, NY: Freeman.
Kenny, D. A., & Kashy, D. A. (1994). Enhanced co-orientation in the perceptions of friends: A social relations analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1024-1033.
Kenow, L., & Williams, J. M. (1999). Coach-athlete compatibility and athlete’s perception of coaching behaviors. Journal of Sport Behavior, 22, 251-259.
Kiesler, D. J. (1983). The 1982 interpersonal circle: A taxonomy for complementarity in human transactions. Psychological Review, 90, 185-214.
Kim, Y., & Gudykunst, W. (1988). Theories in Intercultural Communication. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
Levinger, G., & Snoek, J. G. (1972). Attraction in relationship: A new look at interpersonal attraction. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
Marsh, H.W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness of fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 391-410.
Noar, S. M. (2003). The role of sturctual equation modeling in scale development. Structual Equation Modeling, 10(4), 622-647.
Posner, S. E. (1999). Athletes’ perceptions of coaching empowerment. UMI: Bell & Howell.
Redding, S. G., Norman, A., & Schlander, A. (1993). The nature of individual attachment to the organization: a review of East Asia variations. In M. D. Munnete & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, vol. 4 (pp. 647-688). Palo alto, CA: Consulting Psychology Press.
Remer, H. A., & Chelladurai, P. (1995). Leadership and satisfaction in athletics. Journal of Sport Psychology, 17, 276-293.
Roberta, A. P., & Roland, S. (2006). Closeness, co-orientation and complementarity in coach-athlete relationships: what male swimmers say about their male coaches. Psychology of Sport & Exercise, 7(2), 159-171.
Salminen, S., Liukkonen, J., & Telama, R. (1990). The differences in coaches’ and athletes’ perception of leader behavior of Finnish coaches. Paper presented at the AIESEP Congress, Loughborough, England.
Scandura, T. A., & Graen, G. B. (1984). Moderating effects of initial leader-member exchange status on the effects of a leadership intervention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 418-436.
Schutz, W. (1966). The interpersonal underworld. Palo Alto, Calif.: Science and Behavior Books.
Smith, R. E., & Smoll, F. L. (1990). Self-esteem and children’s reactions to sport coaching behaviors: A field study of self-enhancement process. Developmental Psychology, 26(6), 987-993.
Smith, R. E., Smoll, F. L., & Hunt, E. B. (1977). A system for the behavioral assessment of athletic coaches. Research Quarterly, 48, 401-407.
Smith, R. E., Smoll, F. L., & Curtis, B. (1978). Coaching behaviours in Little League baseball. In F. L. Smoll & R. E. Smith (Eds.), Psychological perspectives in youth sports (pp. 173-201). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
Smoll, F.L, & Smith.R E. (1978). Toward a madiational model of coach-player relationship. Research Quarterly, 49,528-541.
Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173-180.
Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
Syer, J. (1989). Team spirit. New York: Simon & Schuster Ltd.
Taylor, D. A., & Altman, I. (1987). Communication in interpersonal relationships: Social penetration processes. In M. E. Roloff & G. R. Mill (Ed.), Interpersonal processes: New directions in communication research (pp. 257-277). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Udry, E., Gould, D., Bridges, D., & Tuffey, S. (1997). People helping people? Examining the social ties of athletes coping with burnout and injury stress. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 19, 368-395.
Vallerand, R. J. (2001). A hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport and exercise. In G. C. Roberts (Ed.), Advances in motivation in sport and exercise (pp. 263-319). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Verderber, R. R. & Verderber, K. S. (1995). Inter-Act: Using Interpersonal Communication Skills(7th ed.). New York: Thomson.
Vernacchia, R. A., McGurire, R. T., Reardon, J. P., & Templin, D. P. (2000). Psychosocial characteristics of Olympic track and field athletes. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 31, 5-23.
Walling, M. D., Duda, J. L., & Chi, L. (1993). The perceived motivational climate in sport questionnaire: Construct and predictive validity. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 15, 172-183.
Weiss, M. R., Ebbeck, V., & Horn, T. S. (1997). Children self-perceptions and sources of physical competence information: A cluster analysis. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 19, 52-70.
Westwood, R. L. (1997). Harmony and patriarchy: The cultural basis for “paternalistic headship” among overseas Chinese. Organization Studies, 18, 445-480.
Xin, K. R. & Pearce, J. L. (1996). Guanxi: Connections as substitutes for structural support. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1641-1658.
Yukelson, D. P. (1984). Group motivation in sport teams. In J. M. Silva, & R. S. Weinberg (Eds.), Psychological foundations of sport (pp. 229-240). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.