國立臺灣師範大學博碩士論文全文系統

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表

研究生：	施姵如 Cindy Peiru Shih
論文名稱：	萬大泰雅語疑問句型之研究 Interrogative Constructions in Plngawan Atayal
指導教授：	黃美金 Huang, Mei-Jin 齊莉莎 Elizabeth Zeitoun
學位類別：	碩士 Master
系所名稱：	英語學系 Department of English
論文出版年：	2008
畢業學年度：	96
語文別：	英文
論文頁數：	134
中文關鍵詞：	疑問句結構、萬大泰雅語、台灣南島語言、是非問句、選擇問句、附加問句、訊息問句、構詞句法、語調、選擇性前置、主語感應限制、重音形式、語調下降終止
英文關鍵詞：	Interrogative constructions, Plngawan Atayal, Formosan languages, yes-no questions, alternative questions, tag questions, information questions, morphosyntax, intonation, optional fronting, subject sensitive constraint, stress pattern, downdrift suspension
論文種類：	學術論文
相關次數：	點閱：255 下載：22
分享至:	分享至facebook 分享至twitter

查詢本校圖書館目錄查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統勘誤回報

本研究旨在探討萬大泰雅語各種疑問句之句法結構及語調類型。萬大泰雅語屬於泰雅語中澤敖利語 (C’uli’) 的一支，主要分布於南投縣仁愛鄉境內。本文將萬大泰雅語疑問句型依據其詢問訊息、形成方式及語調三方面的差異，區分為四類，即是非問句、附加問句、選擇問句及訊息問句。
在句法結構方面，我們指出（一）是非問句可藉由其相對直述句的句末兩音節語調之改變而形成；（二）是非問句亦可藉由疑問詞ya’ 之出現在句首而形成，然而附加問句的疑問附加語 ’aw 則須出現在句尾；（三）選擇問句可分析為兩個是非問句的並聯結構，其中第一個是非問句經由改變音調形成，第二個則以疑問詞ya’ 起首，此外，萬大泰雅語選擇問句只允許前向刪除 (forward deletion)；（四）訊息問句中的疑問詞依其構詞句法特徵可區分為疑問名詞和疑問動詞，而根據這些疑問詞在句中的分布，萬大泰雅語應歸屬為選擇性前置 (optional-fronting) 的語言，並呈現主語感應 (subject-sensitive) 現象。
針對萬大泰雅語各種疑問句型的語調現象，我們探討以下幾個議題：（一）音節結構、重音形式及性別和語調的關聯性；（二）疑問詞 ya’ 和疑問附加語 ’aw 對是非問句和附加問句語調及語調下降終止 (downdrift suspension) 現象的影響；（三）謂語／非謂語的差異和選擇問句中ya’ 的語調表現之相關性；（四）疑問詞音節結構與疑問詞出現在句中的位置對訊息問句語調之影響。另外，我們也整理出萬大泰雅語語調的四種主要功能：（一）區辨不同的語言行為，例如直述句與是非問句；（二）區辨不同疑問句型；（三）衍生各種疑問句型的非疑問用法，例如不定詞、修飾問句、驚嘆與遲疑；（四）使說話者於詢問時能同時表達態度上的暗示，例如威嚇、強調或厭煩。

This thesis investigates both the morphosyntax and intonation of interrogative constructions in Plngawan Atayal, a C’uli’ Atayal dialect spoken in Ren-ai Township, Nantou County. In the study, four types of interrogative sentences are identified, including yes-no questions, tag questions, alternative questions and information questions. They differ from each other in terms of the piece of information being inquired, strategies being used, and intonation contours.
With respect to the morphosyntax of interrogative sentences, it is pointed out that (i) most yes-no questions are formed via contour modification that occurs within the last two syllables of declarative sentences, (ii) yes-no questions may also be formed by means of the question particle ya’ that occurs sentence-initially, while the question tag ’aw in tag questions has to appear sentence-finally, (iii) alternative questions are analyzed as the juxtaposition of a phonologically-marked yes-no question and a ya’-initiated yes-no question; besides, only forward deletion is allowed in Plngawan, and (iv) interrogative words used to form information questions may be divided into interrogative nouns and interrogative verbs based on their morphosyntactic characteristics. In terms of distribution of interrogative words, Plngawan Atayal is classified as an optional-fronting language that observes the subject-sensitive constraint.
Intonational phenomena of various interrogative sentences are also investigated, including (i) relations among syllable structure, stress pattern, gender and contour modification of yes-no questions, (ii) influences of ya’ and ’aw on contours of yes-no and tag questions as well as the phenomenon of downdrift suspension, (iii) influences of the predicate/non-predicate distinction on intonational behaviors of ya’ in alternative questions, and (iv) influences of syllable structure and position in a sentence of interrogative words on contours of information questions. Furthermore, it is found that intonation in Plngawan may exhibit at least four functions: (i) distinguishing among various illocutionary forces, e.g. to turn a statement into a yes-no question, (ii) differentiating among types of interrogative sentences, (iii) deriving non-question readings of interrogative sentences, e.g. indefinite, rhetorical question, exclamation and hesitation, and (iv) enabling speakers to express attitudinal implications while asking questions, e.g. threatening, emphasis and impatience.

Chinese Abstract             i
English Abstract           iii
Acknowledgements                 v
Table of Contents           vii
List of Tables, Maps and Figures    xi
Abbreviations and Symbols      xiii

Chapter One: Introduction              1
1.1 Genetic classification and geographical distribution of Plngawan                          1
1.2 Previous studies on Plngawan          3
1.3 Goals of the thesis and methodology      4
1.4 Outline of the thesis          5

Chapter Two: A Sketch Grammar of Plngawan Atayal   7
  2.1 Phonology                       7
     2.1.1 Phoneme inventory           7
     2.1.2 Syllable structure and stress      10
     2.1.3 Intonation              11
  2.2 Morphology                  12
     2.2.1 Morphological processes          12
           2.2.1.1 Affixation          12
        2.2.1.2 Reduplication          14
     2.2.2 Morphophonemic rules          14
        2.2.2.1 Insertion          14
        2.2.2.2 Alternation          15
        2.2.2.3 Monophthonization      16
  2.3 Syntax                      17
     2.3.1 Word order              17
     2.3.2 Case marking system          20
     2.3.3 Pronouns                  23
     2.3.4 Focus markers              27
     2.3.5 Tense/aspect/mood (TAM) marking system    30
        2.3.5.1 Realis mood          30
        2.3.5.2 Irrealis mood          32
  2.4 Summary                      33
Chapter Three: Literature Review           35
  3.1 Interrogative constructions in general linguistics 35
    3.1.1 Types of interrogative sentences       35
     3.1.2 Formation of interrogative constructions  36
        3.1.2.1 Yes-no questions      36
        3.1.2.2 Alternative questions       38
        3.1.2.3 Information questions      39
              3.1.2.3.1 Parts of speech of interrogative words                  40
              3.1.2.3.2 Distribution of interrogative words                  42
     3.1.3 Functions of interrogative constructions  43
  3.2 Interrogative constructions in Formosan languages  45
     3.2.1 Yes-no questions           46
     3.2.2 Alternative questions          48
     3.2.3 Information questions           50
        3.2.3.1 Parts of speech of interrogative words                               50
            3.2.3.1.1 Nominal interrogative words                           51
            3.2.3.1.2 Verbal interrogative words                          52
            3.2.3.1.3 Adverbial interrogative words                          53
            3.2.3.1.4 More about parts of speech of interrogative words                  55
        3.2.3.2 Distribution of interrogative words                          56
     3.2.4 Functions of interrogative constructions  57
        3.2.4.1 The use of multiple strategies     57
        3.2.4.2 Specific syntactic structures     58
        3.2.4.3 Special communicational contexts 59
  3.3 Summary                         60

Chapter Four: Formation and Function of Interrogative Constructions                                             61
  4.1 Yes-no questions                     61
  4.2 Tag questions                     64
  4.3 Alternative questions                 66
  4.4 Information questions                 69
    4.4.1 Parts of speech of interrogative words     70
        4.4.1.1 Interrogative nouns         71
        4.4.1.2 Interrogative verbs         80
          4.4.1.2.1 haco’/hico’ ‘do what’     80
          4.4.1.2.2 h<un>aco’ ‘how condition/manner)’ and maga’amol ‘how (condition)’     82
          4.4.1.2.3 pa-sa’ no ‘how (manner)’     83
          4.4.1.2.4 makpira’ ‘how long’ and minpira’ ‘how many times’                             84
             4.4.1.2.5 hunco’ ‘why’         85
4.4.2 Distribution of interrogative words         88
     4.4.3 Interrogative words used as indefinites     91
  4.5 Summary                         92

Chapter Five: Intonation of Interrogative Constructions     93
5.1 Intonation of four types of interrogative sentences     93
5.1.1 Phonologically-marked yes-no questions         93
5.1.1.1 Accent placement and syllable structure         95
5.1.1.2 Contour modification and pitch range         97
5.1.2 ya’-initiated yes-no questions and tag questions    100
5.1.3 Alternative questions                103
5.1.4 Information questions                106
5.1.5 Interim summary                    110
5.2 Interrogative sentences interpreted as non-questions 111
5.3 Speakers’ attitudes expressed via intonation modification                                 115
5.4 Summary                         119

Chapter Six: Concluding Remarks                 121
6.1 Summary of previous chapters             121
6.2 Suggestions for further research             123

References                         125
Appendix                         131
                                

Aldridge, Edith. 2002. Nominalization and WH-movement in Seediq and Tagalog. Language and Linguistics 3.2:393-426.
Anward, Jan. 2001. Parts of speech. Language Typology and Language Universals, ed. by Martin Haspelmath, et al., 726-735. Berlin: New York: Walter De Gruyter.
Blust, R. 1999. Subgrouping, circularity and extinction: some issues in Austronesian comparative linguistics. Selected Papers from the Eighth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, ed. by Elizabeth Zeitoun and Paul Jen-Kuei Li, 31-94. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
Bolinger, Dwight. 1989. Intonation and Its Uses: Melody in Grammar and Discourse. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Chang, Chung-liang. 1996. A Study of Seediq Interrogatives. MA Thesis, Hsinchu: National Tsing Hua University. (In Chinese)
Chang, Lisa Chia-liang. 2006. Application of Politeness Theory to Tag Questions Translated from English to Chinese. MA Thesis, Taichung: Providence University.
Chang, Melody Ya-yin. 1998. Wh-Constructions and the Problem of Wh-Movement in Tsou. MA thesis, Hsinchu: National Tsing Hua University.
Chang, Melody Ya-yin. 2000. On Tsou wh-questions: Movement or in situ? Language and Linguistics 1.2:1-18.
Chen, Cheng-fu. 1999. Wh-words as Interrogatives and Indefinites in Rukai. MA Thesis, Taipei: National Taiwan University.
Chen, Cheng-fu. 2002. Nominalization of interrogatives in Kucapungan Rukai. Language and Linguistics 3.2:369-392.
Chen, Cheng-fu and Li-may Sung. 2005. Interrogatives as polarity items in Kucapungan Rukai. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics 31.1: 95-117.
Cheng, L.-S. Lisa. 1997. On the Typology of WH-questions. New York: Garland.
Chiang, Wen-yu. 1996. The Intonation of Interrogative Sentences in Nantou Atayal. NSC83-0301-H002-072, Taipei: National Taiwan University. (in Chinese)
Chiang, Wen-yu. 1998. A cross-linguistic study on inter-relations among question particles, intonation and downdrift suspension: exemplified by Mandarin Chinese, Southern Min and Atayal. Selected Papers from the Second International Symposium on Languages in Taiwan, ed. by Shuan-fan Huang, 345-378. Taipei: The Crane. (in Chinese)
Chow, Ivan. 2006. Interactions between syllabic-level prosody and prosodic-group boundary markers in Cantonese. In Proceedings of the 2006 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association, ed. by Claire Gurski and Milica Radisic, 10 pages. http://ling.uwo.ca/publications/CLA2006/Chow.pdf.
Chuo, Fred P. L. 1998. A comparative study of interrogatives in Tsou and Yami. Fu Jen Studies 31:1-18.
Cruttenden, Alan. 1997. Intonation (2nd edition). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Diessel, Holger. 2003. The relationship between demonstratives and interrogatives. Studies in Language 27.3:635-655.
Esposito, Christina M. and Patrick Barjam. 2003. The intonation of questions in Farsi: wh-questions, yes/no questions and echo questions. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 105: 1-18.
Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2004. The Phonology of Tone and Intonation. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. Indefinite Pronouns. New York: Oxford University Press.
Huang, Chuian-Fang. 2003. A Study of the Tsou Intonation. MA Thesis, Taipei: National Taiwan University.
Huang, Lillian M. 1995. A Study of Mayrinax Syntax. Taipei: The Crane.
Huang, Lillian M. 1996. Interrogative constructions in Mayrinax Atayal. Journal of Taiwan Normal University: Humanities & Social Science 41:263-296.
Huang, Lillian M. 2000. Verb classification in Mayrinax Atayal. Oceanic Linguistics 39.2:364-390.
Huang, Lillian M. 2006. Case marking system in Plngawan Atayal. Streams Converging into Ocean. Festschrift in Honor of Professor Paul Jen-kuei Li on His 70th Birthday, ed. by Henry Y. Chang, Lillian M. Huang, and Dah-an Ho, 205-238. Language and Linguistics Monograph Series W5. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
Huang, Lillian M., Elizabeth Zeitoun, Marie M. Yeh, Anna H. Chang and Joy J. Wu. 1999. Interrogative constructions in some Formosan languages. Chinese Languages and Linguistics, Vol. 5: Interactions in Language, ed. by Yuen-mei Yin, I-li Yang, Hui-chen Chan, 639-680. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
Katamba, Francis. 1989. An Introduction to Phonology. UK: Longman.
Ladd, D. Robert. 1996. Intonational Phonology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Li, Paul Jen-kuei. 1981. Reconstruction of proto-Atayalic phonology. BIHP 52.2: 349-405. Republished in Selected Papers on Formosan Languages, Vol. 1, 625-692. Language and Linguistics Monograph Series C3. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
Li, Paul Jen-kuei. 1985a. The position of Atayal in the Austronesian family. Austronesian Linguistics at the 15th Pacific Science Congress, ed. By Andrew Pawley and Lois Carrington, 257-280. Pacific Linguistics C-88. Canberra: The Australian National University. Republished in Selected Papers on Formosan Languages, Vol. 2, 805-833. Language and Linguistics Monograph Series C3. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
Li, Paul Jen-kuei. 1985b. Linguistic criteria for classifying Atayalic dialect groups. BIHP 56.4:699-718. Republished in Selected Papers on Formosan Languages, Vol. 2, 835-852. Language and Linguistics Monograph Series C3. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
Lin, Chiao-chun Bery. 2005. Interrogatives in Squliq Atayal. MA thesis, Hsinchu: National Tsing Hua University.
Liu, Dorinda Tsai-hsiu. 1999. Cleft Constructions in Amis. MA Thesis, Taipei: National Taiwan University.
McDonough, Joyce. 2002. The prosody of interrogative and focus constructions in Navajo. Formal Approaches to Functional Phenomena, ed. by A. Carnie and H. Harley. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Payne, Thomas E. 1997. Describing Morphosyntax: A Guide for Field Linguists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rau, Der-Hwa Victoria. 2004. Lexical similarity, sound change and intelligibility of Atayalic dialects. Papers in Austronesian Subgrouping and Dialectology, ed. by John Bowden and Nikolaus P. Himmelmann, 37-96. Pacific Linguistics 563. Canberra: The Australian National University.
Siemund, Peter. 2001. Interrogative constructions. Language Typology and Language Universals, ed. by Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard Konig, Wulf Oesterreicher and Wolfgang Raible, 1010-1028. New York: Mouton De Gruyter.
Starosta, Stanley. 1995. A Grammatical Subgrouping of Formosan Languages. Austronesian Studies Relating to Taiwan: Symposium Series of the Institute of History and Philology, ed. by Paul Jen-Kuei Li, 683-726. Taipei: Academia Sinica.
Tan, Cindy Ro-lan. 1997. A Study of Puyuma Simple Sentences. MA Thesis, Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University.
Tsai, W.-T. Dylan. 1997. Indefinite wh-construals in Formosan languages—A comparative study of Kavalan, Tsou, and Seediq. Tsing Hua Journals of Chinese Studies 27. 4:381-422. (in Chinese)
Tsai, W.-T. Dylan and M. Y. Chang. 2003. Two types of wh-adverbials: A typological study of How and Why in Tsou. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 2003:213-236.
Tseng, Chia-Hsing. 2008. “Grammaticalization” of ‘nanu’ in Mayrinax Atayal.
Powerpoint handout presented at the 2008 Austronesian Workshop held in Hsinchu, National Tsing Hua University, May 10th 2008.
Ultan, Russell. 1978. Some general characteristics of interrogative systems. Universals of Human Languages, Vol. 4: Syntax, ed. by Joseph H. Greenberg, Charles A. Ferguson and Edith A. Moravcsik, 211-248. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Vella, Alexandra. 2007. The phonetics and phonology of wh-question intonation in
Maltese. International Congress of Phonetic Sciences XVI, ed. by Jürgen Trouvain and William J. Barry, 1285-1288. Saarbrücken, Germany.
Yuan, Jiahong, Chilin Shih and Greg P. Kochanski. 2002. Comparison of declarative and interrogative intonation in Chinese. Speech Prosody 2002, 711-714. France: Aix-en-Provence.
Zeitoun, Elizabeth. 2007. A Grammar of Mantauran (Rukai). Language and Linguistics Monograph Series A4-2. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
Webpages:
Council of Indigenous Peoples (CIP): http://61.31.235.34/
Praat: http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

相關論文