本研究將動態能力作為前置變項，數位創新作為結果變項，並以數位轉型焦慮作為中介變項。以組織層級的角度，試圖探討動態能力、數位轉型焦慮與數位創新的關聯性。
本研究針對臺灣金融相關產業中「正在執行數位轉型」或「未來將導入數位轉型」之企業做為研究對象，以電子問卷進行發放，回收之有效樣本共70份，樣本之產業類別以金融與保險業居多，並使用IBM SPSS Statistics 23與Smart PLS 3統計軟體進行資料分析。本研究之結果顯示：動態能力對數位創新具有顯著正向影響，但其他假設均不成立。此外，大企業之動態能力及數位創新程度皆高於中小企業；已有導入數位轉型之企業之動態能力與數位創新程度高於尚未導入數位轉型之企業；已有導入數位轉型之企業之數位轉型焦慮程度低於尚未導入數位轉型之企業。由此可知，焦慮並不會影響組織的動態能力和數位創新，因此管理者在數位轉型時代下更應注重組織的動態能力，當公司擁有學習和整合新技術的動態能力時，數位創新績效就能被提升。

This study tried to explore the positive effect of dynamic capabilities on digital innovation, via the mediating role of digital transformation anxiety.
This research adopted questionnaire survey method to focus on companies within financial and insurance industries in Taiwan that "have continued to use digital transformation" or "will use digital transformation in the future." In total, 70 valid questionnaires were collected from financial and insurance companies. This study utilized IBM SPSS Statistics 23 and Smart PLS 3 to verify hypotheses. Results showed that dynamic capability has a significant positive effect on digital innovation, while other hypotheses are not supported. In addition, dynamic capability and digital innovation of large enterprises are higher than those small and medium-sized enterprises; enterprises that have used digital transformation have higher dynamic capability and digital innovation than those that have not used digital transformation; enterprises that have used digital transformation have lower digital transformation anxiety than those that have not used digital transformation. Therefore, anxiety will not affect the organization's dynamic capability and digital innovation, so managers should pay more attention to the organization's dynamic capability in the era of digital transformation. When companies have dynamic capabilities to learn and integrate new technologies, the performance of digital innovation can be increased.

一、中文部份
王金來（2020）。企業升級與轉型之策略與管理-以動態能力觀之〔未出版之博士論文〕。政治大學企業管理學系。http://doi.org/10.6814/NCCU202000574
邱皓政（2006）。量化研究與統計分析：SPSS 中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。台北市：五南。
張俊鴻（2014）。內外部知識、吸收能力與創新績效之關係：雙元性之調節效果〔未出版之碩士論文〕。中興大學企業管理學系所。http://doi.org/10.6845/NCHU.2014.00344
張鈺東（2021年8月）。2021台灣企業數位轉型關鍵報告。https://www.thinkwithgoogle.com/intl/zh-tw/future-of-marketing/digital-transformation/2021-台灣-企業數位轉型關鍵報告
張彥文（2021年10月14日）。數位轉型模範企業，拒當「時代眼淚」。哈佛商業評論，2021年10月號。
陳殷哲、侯春妃（2021）。動態能力之統合分析研究。管理實務與理論研究，15(1)，1-21。http://doi.org/10.29916/JMPP.202106_15(1).0001
彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽（2006）。管理研究中的共同方法變異：問題本質，影響，測試和補救。管理學報，23(1)，77-98。http://doi.org/10.6504/JOM.2006.23.01.05
詹文男、李震華、周維忠、王義智（2020）。數位轉型力。臺北市：商周出版。
歐宜佩、陳信宏（2018）。近期數位轉型發展趨勢之觀察。經濟前瞻，(178)， 94-99。http://doi.org/10.30071/EOB
蔣英利（2012）。中小企業市場導向、企業家精神、創新能力與經營績效關係之研究-以經濟部創新研究獎獲獎企業為例〔未出版之碩士論文〕。臺灣師範大學工業教育學系在職進修碩士班。
戴彗紋（2019）。掌握數位轉型契機 創造新獲利來源。臺灣經濟研究月刊，42(10)，56-65。http://doi.org/10.29656/TERM.201910_42(10).0008
二、外文部份
Aldehayyat, J. S. (2015). Environmental scanning in business organisations: Empirical evidence from a Middle Eastern country context. Management Research Review, 38(5), 459-481. http://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-02-2014-0032
Demarest, M. (1997). Understanding knowledge management. Long range planning, 30(3), 374-384. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(97)90250-8
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic management journal, 21(10‐11), 1105-1121.
http://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50. http://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
Gawer, A. (2014). Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework. Research policy, 43(7), 1239-1249.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.006
Raza, M. M., & Gupta, A. (2000). Job satisfaction and job anxiety among library professional employees working in Delhi University library system. IASLIC Bulletin, 45(3), 129-134.
Heilig, L., Lalla-Ruiz, E., & Voß, S. (2017). Digital transformation in maritime ports: analysis and a game theoretic framework. Netnomics: Economic research and electronic networking, 18(2), 227-254.
http://doi.org/10.1007/s11066-017-9122-x
Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2015). Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic management journal, 36(6), 831-850. http://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2247
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. New Jersey.
Henderson, R., & Cockburn, I. (1994). Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic management journal, 15(S1), 63-84. http://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150906
Khin, S., & Ho, T. C. (2019). Digital technology, digital capability and organizational performance: A mediating role of digital innovation. International Journal of Innovation Science, 11(2), 177-195.
http://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-08-2018-0083
Kyriakopoulos, K., & De Ruyter, K. (2004). Knowledge stocks and information flows in new product development. Journal of Management Studies, 41(8), 1469-1498. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00482.x
Legner, C., Eymann, T., Hess, T., Matt, C., Böhmann, T., Drews, P., Mädche, A., Urbach, N., & Ahlemann, F. (2017). Digitalization: opportunity and challenge for the business and information systems engineering community. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 59(4), 301-308.
http://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-017-0484-2
Leonard‐Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic management journal, 13(S1), 111-125. http://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250131009
Lin, Y., & Wu, L.-Y. (2014). Exploring the role of dynamic capabilities in firm performance under the resource-based view framework. Journal of business research, 67(3), 407-413. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.12.019
Lusch, R. F., & Nambisan, S. (2015). Service innovation. MIS quarterly, 39(1), 155-176. http://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.1.07
Meuter, M. L., Ostrom, A. L., Bitner, M. J., & Roundtree, R. (2003). The influence of technology anxiety on consumer use and experiences with self-service technologies. Journal of business research, 56(11), 899-906.
http://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00276-4
Muschalla, B., Linden, M., & Olbrich, D. (2010). The relationship between job-anxiety and trait-anxiety—A differential diagnostic investigation with the Job-Anxiety-Scale and the State-Trait-Anxiety-Inventory. Journal of anxiety disorders, 24(3), 366-371. https://core.ac.uk/download/225625393.pdf
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.02.001
Paladino, A. (2007). Investigating the drivers of innovation and new product success: a comparison of strategic orientations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(6), 534-553.
http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2007.00270.x
Pavlou, P. A., & El Sawy, O. A. (2011). Understanding the elusive black box of dynamic capabilities. Decision sciences, 42(1), 239-273.
http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2010.00287.x
Pavlou, P. A., & Fygenson, M. (2006). Understanding and predicting electronic commerce adoption: An extension of the theory of planned behavior. MIS quarterly, 115-143. http://doi.org/10.2307/25148720
Porter, M. E. (1997). Competitive strategy. Measuring business excellence, 1(2), 12-17. http://doi.org/10.1108/eb025476
Schwertner, K. (2017). Digital transformation of business. Trakia Journal of Sciences, 15(1), 388-393. http://doi.org/10.15547/tjs.2017.s.01.065
Shang, K.-C., Chen, S.-Y., Ye, K.-D., & Yu, H.-Y. (2019). Green dynamic capabilities-the necessity between green intellectual capital and firm performance: Evidence from Taiwan's manufacturing sector.　Chiao Da Management Review, 39(2), 37-67. http://doi.org/10.6401/CMR
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic management journal, 28(13), 1319-1350. http://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Teece, D. J. (2014). A dynamic capabilities-based entrepreneurial theory of the multinational enterprise. Journal of international business studies, 45(1), 8-37. http://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2013.54
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal, 18(7), 509-533.
http://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
Tidd, J., Bessant, J. R., & Pavitt, K. (1997). Managing innovation: Integrating technological, market and organizational change. Wiley.
Um, S. Y., Yoo, Y., Wattal, S., Kulathinal, R., & Zhang, B. (2013). The architecture of generativity in a digital ecosystem: A network biology perspective.
Van Valen, L. (1977). The red queen. The American Naturalist, 111(980), 809-810.
http://doi.org/10.1086/283213
Wang, Y.-Y., & Wang, Y.-S. (2019). Development and validation of an artificial intelligence anxiety scale: An initial application in predicting motivated learning behavior. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-16.
http://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1674887
Watson, R., Wilson, H. N., Smart, P., & Macdonald, E. K. (2018). Harnessing difference: a capability‐based framework for stakeholder engagement in environmental innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(2), 254-279. http://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12394