Step migration, otherwise known as onward migration is a phenomenon referring to the movement of migrant labor from one country to another without the need to go back to the country of origin. While “brain drain” may hold true for the highly educated workers like doctors, engineers and scientists, subjects of this study are Filipino migrant domestic workers who are supposed to be mothering children or caring for families in home country. Conclusively due to lack of better employment or earning opportunities in home country, the Overseas Filipino Workers (OFWs) chose to migrate for work and do “menial labor” in Taiwan. For other reason, due to preconceived plans of migration to Canada through social networks and perceived better gains and benefits either known from acquainted friends, family or mass media. They gain valuable related experience in Taiwan then choose to step migrate in Canada under the Live-in Caregiver Program (LCP). A qualitative interview was done with 12 migrant domestic workers in Taiwan and Canada using semi structured questionnaire. The framework of the study represents a cycle of the transitional adaptation in the life and work adaptation of the Filipino migrant domestic worker. Transitional adaptation is a temporary process, prior to another cross-cultural adaptation. Three transitions are noted in the study during the five phases of their domestic life covering from Philippines, Taiwan and Canada highlighting the events while tying up with migration issues. Findings of this research may assist the subjects in their transitional adaptation, the labor sending and receiving countries in policy making, and inspire future researchers of migration theories.

Step migration, otherwise known as onward migration is a phenomenon referring to the movement of migrant labor from one country to another without the need to go back to the country of origin. While “brain drain” may hold true for the highly educated workers like doctors, engineers and scientists, subjects of this study are Filipino migrant domestic workers who are supposed to be mothering children or caring for families in home country. Conclusively due to lack of better employment or earning opportunities in home country, the Overseas Filipino Workers (OFWs) chose to migrate for work and do “menial labor” in Taiwan. For other reason, due to preconceived plans of migration to Canada through social networks and perceived better gains and benefits either known from acquainted friends, family or mass media. They gain valuable related experience in Taiwan then choose to step migrate in Canada under the Live-in Caregiver Program (LCP). A qualitative interview was done with 12 migrant domestic workers in Taiwan and Canada using semi structured questionnaire. The framework of the study represents a cycle of the transitional adaptation in the life and work adaptation of the Filipino migrant domestic worker. Transitional adaptation is a temporary process, prior to another cross-cultural adaptation. Three transitions are noted in the study during the five phases of their domestic life covering from Philippines, Taiwan and Canada highlighting the events while tying up with migration issues. Findings of this research may assist the subjects in their transitional adaptation, the labor sending and receiving countries in policy making, and inspire future researchers of migration theories.

Adler, P. (1976). Beyond cultural identity: reflections on cultural and multicultural man. In L. Samovar & R. Porter (eds.), Intercultural communication: A reader,389-408. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Arat-Koc, S. (1999). “Good enough to work but not good enough to stay”: Foreign domestic workers and the law. In E. Comac (Ed.), Locating Law: Race/ Class/ Gender Connections,125-159. Halifax: Fernwood Press.
Asis, M. (2005). Recent trends in international migration in Asia and the Pacific. Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 20(3), United Nations.
Bakan , A. & Stasiulis, D. (1977). Foreign domestic worker policy in Canada. Mc Gill- Queen’s University Press,
Barber, P. & Gardiner, B (2000). ''Agency in Philippine Women's Labour Migration and Provisional Diaspora.'' Women's Studies International Forum, 23 (24): 399-411.
Berry, J.W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation and adaptation. International Migration Review, 21, 491- 511.
Bognar, N. (2001, April). Cross-cultural adjustment and gender- related norms: A study of Eastern Europeans in the United States. Paper presented at the 2nd Biennial Congress of the International Academy for Intercultural Research, Oxford, MS.
Black, J. S. & Gregersen, H. B. (1991). Antecedents to Cross-Cultural adjustment for expatriates in Pacific Rim assignments. Human Relations, 44 (5), 497-515.
Church, A (1982). Sojourner Adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 540-575 (Review)
Cohen, R. (2000) ‘Mom is a stranger”: The negative impact of immigration policies on the family life of Filipina domestic workers. Canadian Ethnic Studies, 32(3), 76 -89.
Constable, N. (1977) Maid to Order in Hong Kong: An Ethnography of Filipina. London. Abbey Library.
David, H. (1969). Involuntary international migration: Adaptation of refugees. In E. Brody (Ed.), Behavior in new environments: Adaptation of migrant populations,73-95. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Dodd, C.H. (1998). Dynamics of Intercultural Communication (5th ed.). San Francisco, CA: McGraw-Hill.
Ellingsworth, H. W. (1988) A theory of adaptation in intercultural dyads. In Y. Y. Kim & W. B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Theories in intercultural communication, 259-79. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Freedman, A. (1986) A strategy for managing “cultural” transitions: Re-entry from training. In C. Austin (Ed.), Cross-cultural reentry: A book of readings, 19-27. Abilene, TX: Abilene.
Furnham, A. (1988) The Adjustment of Sojourners. In Y. Y. Kim & W. B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Cross-cultural adaptation: Current approaches, 42-61. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Furnham, A., & Bochner, S. (1982). Social difficulty in a foreign culture: An empirical analysis of culture shock. In S. Bochner (Ed.), Cultures in contact: Studies in cross-cultural interaction (pp. 161-198). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
Gallois, C., Franklyn, A., Giles, H., & Coupland, N. (1988) Communication accommodation in intercultural encounters. In Y. Y. Kim and W. B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Theories in intercultural communication, 157-185. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 8(4), 597-606. Retrieved June 10, 2010, from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR8-4/golafshani.pdf
Gudykunst, W. B. (2003). Cross-Cultural and Intercultural Communication, 169- 189, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Gudykunst, W. B., Lee, C. M., Nishida, T. & Ogawa, N. (2005). Theorizing about intercultural communication: an introduction. In W.B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication, 3-32. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Hall, B. (1976). Beyond Culture. New York: Doubleday.
Hall, B. J. (2005). Among Cultures: the challenge of communication (2nd ed.). Wadsworth, CA: Thomson.
Harris, P. & Moran, R. (2000). Managing cultural differences. Houston, TX: Gulf.
Hochschild, A. R. (2002). Love and gold. In B. Ehrenreich & A.R. Hochschild (Eds.), Global Woman: Nannies, Maids, and Sex Workers in the New Economy, 15- 30. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Hodge, J. (2006). Unskilled labor: Canada’s live-in caregiver program. Undercurrent, III, (2), 60-66.
Jandt, F.E. (2007). An introduction to intercultural communication: identities in a global community (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Kim, Y. Y. (1998). Communication and cross-cultural adaptation, Philadelphia: Multilingual Matter Ltd.
Kim, Y. Y. (2001) Becoming Intercultural: An Integrative Theory of Communication and Cross Cultural Adaptation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kim, Y. Y. (2002) Cross- cultural adaptation: An integrative theory. In Martin, J., Nakayama T. & Flores, L. (eds.) Reading in cultural contexts (2nd ed.), 237- 245. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
Kim, Y. Y. (2004). Long-term cross-cultural adaptation: training implications of an integrative theory. In J. M. Bennett, M. J. Bennett & D. Landis (Eds), Handbook of intercultural training (pp. 337- 362 ). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kim, Y. Y. (2005a). Inquiry in intercultural and development communication. Journal of Communication, 55, 554-577.
Kim, Y. Y. (2005b). Adapting to a new culture: an integrative communication theory. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed), Theorizing about intercultural communication, 375-400. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kim, Y. Y. (2005 c). Association and dissociation: a contextual theory of interethnic communication. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication, 323-349. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kim, Y. Y., & Ruben, B. D. (1988) Intercultural transformation: A systems theory. In Y. Y. Kim & W. B. Gudykunst (Eds.),Theories in intercultural communication, 299-321. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Lan, Pei-Chia. (2006). Global Cinderellas: Migrant Domestics and Newly Rich Employers in Taiwan. Durham: Duke University Press.
Nwanko, R. N., & Onwumechili, C. (1991) Communication and social values in cross-cultural adjustment. The Howard Journal of Communications, 3, 99-111.
Oberg, K. (1960). Culture Shock: Adjustment to new cultural environments. Practical Anthropology,7,177- 182.
Oetzel, J.G. (2005). Effective intercultural workgroup communication theory. In W.B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication, 351-371. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Portes, A. (1997). “Immigration for a New Century: Some Problems and Opportunities”, International Migration Review, 31, 799-825.
Parrenas, R. S. (2001). Servants of Globalization: women, migration and domestic work. Stanford University Press.
Parrenas, R. S. (2002). Migrant Filipina domestic workers and the international division of reproductive labour. Gender & Society, 14 (4), 560- 580.
Parrenas, R. S. (2008). The force of domesticity: Filipina migrants and globalization. New York and London. New York University Press
Santos, M. P. (2005). Human Rights and Migrant Domestic Work: A Comparative Analysis of the Socio-Legal Status of Filipino Migrant Domestic Workers in Canada and Hongkong. Retrieved on May 29, 2011 at www.google.books.com
Satzewich, V. (1991). Racism and the Incorporation of Foreign Labour: Farm Labour Migration to Canada since 1945. London and New York: Routledge.
Searle, W. & Ward, C. (1990). The prediction of psychological and sociocultural adjustment during cross-cultural transitions. International Journal of Intercultural Relations
Smith, S. L. (2002). The cycle of cross- cultural adaptation and re-entry. In J. M. Martin, T. K. Nakayama, and L. A. Flores (eds. ), Reading in Cultural contexts (2nd ed. , pp. 246-259). Mountain View , CA : Mayfield
Spincer, E. (1968). Acculturation. In D. Sills (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social science, 21-27. New York: Macmillan.
Szalay, L., & Inn, A. (1987). Cross-cultural adaptation and diversity: Hispanic Americans. In Y. Y. Kim and W. B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Cross-cultural adaptation: Current approaches, 212-232. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Taft, R. (1977) Coping with unfamiliar cultures. In N. Warren (Ed.), Studies in cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 1), 121-153. London: Academic Press
Thompson, M. (2009). Migrant Workers in Canada: Emerging Policy Issues. University of British Columbia.
Ting-Toomey, S. (2005). The Matrix of Face: an updated face-negotiation theory. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication, 71-92. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ward, C., Bochner, S., & Furnham, A. (2001). The psychology of culture shock (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Routledge.
Wee, V. & Sim, A. , 2003. Transnational Labour Networks in Female Labour Migration: Mediating Between Southeast Asian Workers and International Labour Markets. Southeast Asia Research Centre Working Paper Series. Hong Kong
Wong-Rieger (1984). In Kim, Y.Y. & Gudykunst, W. 1988. Cross cultural adaptation: current approaches. Volume 11. Sage Publications
Yeoh , B. S. A. , Huang ,S. & Devasahayam T. W. (2004). Diasporic subjects in nation: Foreign domestic workers, the reach of the Law and Civil Society in Singapore.” Asian Studies Review, 28 (1), 7-24.
Young, R. (1996). Intercultural communication: Pragmatics, genealogy, deconstruction. Philadelphia: Multilingual matters.
Website Sources:
http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/eng/corporate/facts/foreign workers.shtm
(Accessed on June 9, 2010)
http://liveincaregiverprogram.com
(Accessed on June 9, 2010)