Author: |
Pratiwi, Elok Surya Pratiwi, Elok Surya |
---|---|
Thesis Title: |
故事性地形特徵圖於印尼崩塌災害風險溝通的設計、 評估與未來發展 Visual Story-based Geomorphological Map (VSGM) as Innovative Landslide Risk Communication Instrument in Indonesia: Design, Evaluation, and Future Development |
Advisor: |
沈淑敏
Shen, Su-Min |
Committee: |
沈淑敏
Shen, Su-Min 林俊全 Lin, Jiun-Chuan Sartohadi, Junun Sartohadi, Junun 林貝珊 Lin, Pei-Shan 高慶珍 Kao, Ching-Jen |
Approval Date: | 2025/01/14 |
Degree: |
博士 Doctor |
Department: |
地理學系 Department of Geography |
Thesis Publication Year: | 2025 |
Academic Year: | 113 |
Language: | 英文 |
Number of pages: | 192 |
Keywords (in Chinese): | 地形特徵圖 、故事敘述 、風險溝通 、崩塌風險降低 |
Keywords (in English): | Geomorphological map, storytelling, risk communication, landslide risk reduction |
Research Methods: | 參與觀察法 、 個案研究法 、 主題分析 、 內容分析法 、 半結構式訪談法 |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202500135 |
Thesis Type: | Academic thesis/ dissertation |
Reference times: | Clicks: 41 Downloads: 0 |
Share: |
School Collection Retrieve National Library Collection Retrieve Error Report |
氣候變遷導致的崩塌災害威脅日益加劇,亟需有效的風險溝通工具來吸引更廣泛的社群參與並支持災害風險管理。所幸隨著製圖技術的進步,比以往更容易製作大比例尺的地形特徵圖,而有助於增強人們對崩塌災害和風險的空間覺察,並促進符合當地的減災策略。然而地形特徵圖的複雜性,常限制非地學專家使用這類地圖的可能性,因此,本研究提出一組向非專家使用者傳達山崩風險的創新工具—「視覺化之以故事為本的地形特徵圖」(Visual Story-Based Geomorphological Map,VSGM,簡稱故事性地形特徵圖),並以印尼松賓火山地景 (Sumbing volcanic landscape) 為案例,探討「故事性地形特徵圖」在增進空間覺察和自主減災行動中的潛力。
「故事性地形特徵圖」包含一張衍生的地形特徵圖、一冊漫畫和一份使用說明,旨在傳達地形特徵圖在降低災害風險所能扮演的重要角色——從提升使用者對在地之崩塌災害和風險的空間覺察,到增強使用者能力而提出對具體情境的減災策略。本研究探討四個核心問題:VSGM 是如何設計的?根據地圖可用性(usability)其製圖品質如何?VSGM對使用者識覺的影響程度為何?以及VSGM未來發展的策略為何?本研究採質性研究方法進行分析,包括︰採用共同產製地圖的取徑 (co-production approach) ;以半結構式訪談八位受訪者,評估地圖的可用性和使用者識覺;採用 SWOT 分析,提出 VSGM未來發展的建議。
在VSGM開發過程中採用共同產製的取徑有兩個關鍵意義:一是使地圖目標與使用者需求一致,以提高資訊溝通成效;二是整合專業人士和使用者的回饋意見,以產出經過可讀性測試的高品質地圖設計。可用性評估顯示,VSGM 的製圖品質良好,其友善的使用者引導設計可讓讀圖者輕鬆理解該地圖的用途。雖然多數受訪者認為 VSGM 需要花時間學習,但他們有高度意願使用和分享此地圖,則反映了VSGM的實用性和其所激發的正向感受。對於未來 VSGM 的使用,建議包括探索具資訊價值的地理視覺化技術、增強視覺故事元素、支援數位地圖格式,以及擴大合作夥伴關係以確保資源支持。
本研究的主要貢獻為改善大比例尺地形特徵圖對非專家的實用性,透過漫畫和使用說明等這類基於故事敘述的媒介整合,而能做更有效的崩塌災害風險溝通。相對於崩塌分區圖等傳統地圖的簡化表現形式,「故事性地形特徵圖」可傳遞詳細的科學資料,使非專家能在減災行動中充分利用地形特徵圖。此外,本研究也強調設計風險溝通地圖的重要性,不僅限於單向的資訊傳遞,還能積極吸引和鼓勵使用者應對在地真實地點的挑戰,讓使用者對地圖高度認可其實用性、引發正向感受並確保未來持續使用。最後,本研究的創新方法展現的可行性,可提供各領域科學家們參考,將自己專業製圖的成果讓更廣泛的非專家使用者更易於理解而更具有影響力。
The increasing threat of landslide hazards due to climate change highlights the critical need for effective risk communication tools to engage wider communities and support disaster risk management. Meanwhile, advances in mapping technology have enabled the creation of large-scale geomorphological maps that enhance spatial awareness of landslide hazards and risks, facilitating site-specific mitigation strategies. However, these maps remain predominantly accessible to geoscience experts due to their complexity, limiting their usability among non-experts. To bridge this gap, this study introduces the Visual Story-Based Geomorphological Map (VSGM), an innovative tool designed to communicate landslide risks to non-expert users. Using the Sumbing volcanic landscape in Indonesia as a case study, this research explores the potential of the VSGM to enhance spatial awareness and encourage proactive disaster risk reduction (DRR) actions.
The VSGM consists of a derivative geomorphological map, a comic, and an instruction sheet, all designed to communicate the essential roles of geomorphological maps in disaster risk reduction—from fostering the local spatial awareness of landslide hazards and risks to empowering users in designing context-specific mitigation strategies. This study investigates four central questions: How was the VSGM designed? How does its cartographic quality base on map usability? To what extent does the VSGM shape user perceptions? And what strategies should guide its future development? These questions are addressed through qualitative methods, including a co-production approach to map creation, semi-structured interviews with eight respondents to assess usability and user perceptions, and a SWOT analysis to provide recommendations for advancing the VSGM.
The co-production approach in VSGM development serves two critical roles: aligning map objectives with user needs for heightened communication efficacy and integrating feedback from professionals and users for a high-quality, readability-tested design. Usability evaluations show that the VSGM offers satisfactory cartographic quality, with user-friendly navigation enabling users to readily discern its purposes. Although most respondents found the VSGM challenging to master, their high willingness to use and share it underscores its perceived usefulness and the positive emotions it inspires. Recommended strategies for future VSGM utilization include exploring informative geovisualization techniques, enhancing visual storytelling elements, supporting digital map formats, and expanding partnerships to secure necessary resources.
This research contributes to improving the utilization of large-scale geomorphological maps for more effective landslide risk communication among non-experts. By integrating storytelling-based media, such as comics and instructional sheets, it moves beyond the traditional oversimplification of maps into landslide zoning maps, which often omit critical information. Instead, this approach facilitates the communication of detailed scientific data, enabling non-experts to fully harness the benefits of geomorphological maps for disaster risk reduction (DRR). In addition, this study also underscores the importance of designing risk communication maps that move beyond one-way information delivery to actively engaging and motivating users to address site-specific challenges, thereby offering high perceived usefulness, eliciting positive emotions, and ensuring sustained future use. Eventually, this innovative approach presents significant potential for adoption by scientists seeking to make their specialized maps more accessible and impactful for broader, non-expert audiences.
Abbott, H. P. (2008). The Cambridge Introduction to Narrative (Issue May). Cambridge University Press.
Albano, R., & Sole, A. (2018). Geospatial methods and tools for natural risk management and communications. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 7(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi7120470
Alcántara-Ayala, I. (2002). Geomorphology, natural hazards, vulnerability and prevention of natural disasters in developing countries. Geomorphology, 47(2–4), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-555X(02)00083-1
Alcántara-Ayala, I. (2018). TXT-tool 4.052-1.2 landslide risk communication. In K. Sassa, B. Tiwari, K. F. Liu, M. McSaveney, A. Storm, & H. Setiawan (Eds.), Landslide Dynamics: ISDR-ICL Landslide Interactive Teaching Tools (Vol. 2, pp. 731–742). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57777-7_47
Alcántara-Ayala, I., Garnica-Peña, R. J., Murillo-García, F. G., Salazar-Oropeza, M. O., Méndez-Martínez, A., & Coll-Hurtado, A. (2018). Landslide disaster risk awareness in Mexico: community access to mapping at local scale. Landslides, 15(8), 1691–1704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-018-1010-4
Alcántara-Ayala, I., & Sassa, K. (2021). Contribution of the International Consortium on Landslides to the implementation of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction: engraining to the Science and Technology Roadmap. In Landslides (Vol. 18, Issue 1, pp. 21–29). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01539-8
Alkhawaja, M. I., Halim, M. S. A., Abumandil, M. S. S., & Al-Adwan, A. S. (2022). System Quality and Student’s Acceptance of the E-learning System: The Serial Mediation of Perceived Usefulness and Intention to Use. Contemporary Educational Technology, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.30935/CEDTECH/11525
Amoako-Gyampah, K. (2007). Perceived usefulness, user involvement and behavioral intention: an empirical study of ERP implementation. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1232–1248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.12.002
Austin, T. R., & Chatman, S. (1979). Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. In The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism (Vol. 38, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.2307/430732
Avraamidou, L., & Osborne, J. (2009). The role of narrative in communicating science. International Journal of Science Education, 31(12), 1683–1707. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802380695
Bagdi, H., & Bulsara, H. P. (2023). Understanding the role of perceived enjoyment, self-efficacy and system accessibility: digital natives’ online learning intentions. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 15(5), 1618–1631. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-09-2022-0302
Bang-Kittilsen, A., & Midtbø, T. (2024). Improving intuitiveness in geoscience hazard maps: a web-based experiment supporting governmental map development. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 00(00), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2024.2314541
Behrens, J., Van Elzakker, C. P. J. M., & Schmidt, M. (2015). Testing the usability of openstreetmap’s iD tool. Cartographic Journal, 52(2), 177–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087041.2015.1119457
Beier, P., Hansen, L. J., Helbrecht, L., & Behar, D. (2017). A How-to Guide for Coproduction of Actionable Science. Conservation Letters, 10(3), 288–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12300
Berendsen, M. E., Hamerlinck, J. D., & Webster, G. R. (2018). Digital story mapping to advance educational atlas design and enable student engagement. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi7030125
Bloomfield, E. F., & Manktelow, C. (2021). Climate communication and storytelling. Climatic Change, 167(3–4), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03199-6
BNPB. (2021). Indonesian Disaster Data and Information. https://dibi.bnpb.go.id/
Bourrier, M., & Biede, C. (2018). Risk communication for the future towards smart risk governmence and safety management. In SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74098-0_10
Bruner, J. (1991). Bruner JS. The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry. 1991;17:1-21. Critical Inquiry, 18(Autumn 1991), 1–21. https://about.jstor.org/terms
Burian, J., Popelka, S., & Beitlova, M. (2018). Evaluation of the Cartographical Quality of Urban Plans by Eye-Tracking. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi7050192
Caquard, S., & Cartwright, W. (2014). Narrative cartography: From mapping stories to the narrative of maps and mapping. Cartographic Journal, 51(2), 101–106. https://doi.org/10.1179/0008704114Z.000000000130
Cardinali, M., Reichenbach, P., Guzzetti, F., Ardizzone, F., Antonini, G., Galli, M., Cacciano, M., Castellani, M., & Salvati, P. (2002). A geomorphological approach to the estimation of landslide hazards and risks in Umbria, Central Italy. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2(1–2), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2-57-2002
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory. In SAGE. SAGE Publication. http://scioteca.caf.com/bitstream/handle/123456789/1091/RED2017-Eng-8ene.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.06.005%0Ahttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/305320484_SISTEM_PEMBETUNGAN_TERPUSAT_STRATEGI_MELESTARI
Chelli, A., Bordoni, M., Cappadonia, C., Pepe, G., Rotigliano, E., & Smith, M. (2021). Geomorphological tools for mapping natural hazards. Journal of Maps, 17(3), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2021.1920794
Chen, C. Y., & Huang, W. L. (2013). Land use change and landslide characteristics analysis for community-based disaster mitigation. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 185(5), 4125–4139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-012-2855-y
Chiang, S. H., & Chang, K. T. (2011). The potential impact of climate change on typhoon-triggered landslides in Taiwan, 2010-2099. Geomorphology, 133(3–4), 143–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.12.028
Chingkhei, R. K., Shiroyleima, A., Singh, L. R., & Kumar, A. (2013). Landslide Hazard Zonation in NH-1A in Kashmir Himalaya, India. International Journal of Geosciences, 04(10), 1501–1508. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2013.410147
Collazo, N. A. J., Elen, J., & Clarebout, G. (2014). Towards a model on tool use in computer-based learning environments. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 6(2), 124–144. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2014.066859
Craig, C. L., Bauman, A., Latimer-Cheung, A., Rhodes, R. E., Faulkner, G., Berry, T. R., Tremblay, M. S., & Spence, J. C. (2015). An Evaluation of the My ParticipACTION Campaign to Increase Self-Efficacy for Being More Physically Active. Journal of Health Communication, 20(9), 995–1003. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2015.1012240
Dahlstrom, M. F. (2014). Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 13614–13620. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320645111
Darici, N. (2023). The Power of Storytelling: Analyzing the Significance of Stories in Communication, Education, and Cultural Preservation. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 10(3), 413–418. https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v10i3p413
Davies, T. ., Korup, O., & Clague, J. . (2021). Geomorphology an Natural Hazardz: Understanding Landscape Change for Disaster Mitigation (First edit). Hoboken, NJ : Wiley-American Geophysical Union.
de Bruijn, K. M., Lips, N., Gersonius, B., & Middelkoop, H. (2016). The storyline approach: a new way to analyse and improve flood event management. Natural Hazards, 81(1), 99–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-2074-2
Denil, M. (2016). Storied Maps. Cartographic Perspectives, 84, 5–22.
Dillard, J. P., Shen, L., & Vail, R. G. (2007). Does perceived message effectiveness cause persuasion or vice versa? 17 consistent answers. Human Communication Research, 33(4), 467–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00308.x
Dong, W. H., Liao, H., Xu, F., Liu, Z., & Zhang, S. B. (2014). Using eye tracking to evaluate the usability of animated maps. Science China Earth Sciences, 57(3), 512–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-013-4685-3
Dotta, G., Fornaciai, A., Bertolini, G., Isola, I., Nannipieri, L., Favalli, M., Burrato, P., Devoti, R., Gigli, G., Mucchi, L., Intrieri, E., Pizziolo, M., Gracchi, T., & Casagli, N. (2023). Geomorphology of the upper sector of the Roncovetro active landslide (Emilia-Romagna Region, Italy). Journal of Maps, 19(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2023.2277898
Dransch, D., Rotzoll, H., & Poser, K. (2010). The contribution of maps to the challenges of risk communication to the public. International Journal of Digital Earth, 3(3), 292–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538941003774668
Driedger, C. L., Ramsey, D. W., Scott, W. E., Faust, L. M., Bard, J. A., & Wold, P. (2024). Following the tug of the audience from complex to simplified hazards maps at Cascade Range volcanoes. Journal of Applied Volcanology, 13(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13617-024-00142-z
ElShafie, S. J. (2018). Making science meaningful for broad audiences through stories. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 58(6), 1213–1223. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icy103
Fairbairn, D., Gartner, G., Peterson, M. P., Fairbairn, D., & Gartner, G. (2021). Epistemological thoughts on the success of maps and the role of cartography of cartography. https://doi.org/10.1080/23729333.2021.1972909
Fairbairn, D., & Hepburn, J. (2023). Eye-tracking in map use, map user and map usability research: what are we looking for? International Journal of Cartography, 9(2), 231–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/23729333.2023.2189064
Fathani, T. F., Karnawati, D., & Wilopo, W. (2016). An integrated methodology to develop a standard for landslide early warning systems. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 16(9), 2123–2135. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-2123-2016
Følstad, A., Maria Haugstveit, I., Kvale, K., & Karahasanovic, A. (2016). Design Feedback from Users Through an Online Social Platform: Benefits and Limitations. Interacting with Computers, 28(4), 421–436. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwv017
Fraile-Jurado, P., Sánchez-Rodríguez, E., & Leatherman, S. B. (2019). Improving the learning processes of Physical Geography through the use of landscape photographs in class. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 43(1), 24–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2018.1515189
Frodella, W., Morelli, S., Fidolini, F., Pazzi, V., & Fanti, R. (2014). Geomorphology of the Rotolon landslide (Veneto Region, Italy). Journal of Maps, 10(3), 394–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2013.869666
Fuchs, S., Spachinger, K., Dorner, W., Rochman, J., & Serrhini, K. (2009). Evaluating cartographic design in flood risk mapping. Environmental Hazards, 8(1), 52–70. https://doi.org/10.3763/ehaz.2009.0007
Gaidzik, K., Ramírez-Herrera, M. T., Bunn, M., Leshchinsky, B. A., Olsen, M., & Regmi, N. R. (2017). Landslide manual and automated inventories, and susceptibility mapping using LIDAR in the forested mountains of Guerrero, Mexico. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 8(2), 1054–1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2017.1292560
Ganea, P., Pickard, M. B., & DeLoache, J. (2008). Transfer between picture books and the real world by very young children. Journal of Cognition and Development, 9(1), 46–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248370701836592
Gegenfurtner, A., Quesada-Pallarès, C., & Knogler, M. (2014). Digital simulation‐based training: A meta‐analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(6), 1097–1114. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12188
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: strategies for qualitative research. In Aldine Transaction. Aldine Transaction.
Gottschall, J. (2012). The storytelling animal: How stories make us human. Scientific Study of Literature, 2(2), 317–321. https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.2.2.07bor
Griffin, A. L., Robinson, A. C., & Roth, R. E. (2017). Envisioning the future of cartographic research. International Journal of Cartography, 3(sup1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/23729333.2017.1316466
Griffin, A. L., White, T., Fish, C., Tomio, B., Huang, H., Sluter, C. R., Bravo, J. V. M., Fabrikant, S. I., Bleisch, S., Yamada, M., & Picanço, P. (2017). Designing across map use contexts: a research agenda. International Journal of Cartography, 3(sup1), 90–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/23729333.2017.1315988
Griffiths, J. S., & Abraham, J. K. (2008a). Factors affecting the use of applied geomorphology maps to communicate with different end-users. Journal of Maps, 4(1), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.4113/jom.2008.89
Griffiths, J. S., & Abraham, J. K. (2008b). Factors affecting the use of applied geomorphology maps to communicate with different end-users. Journal of Maps, 4(1), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.4113/jom.2008.89
Guba EG, & Lincoln YS. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook of Qualitative Research, 163–194.
Gustafson, A., Ballew, M. T., Goldberg, M. H., Cutler, M. J., Rosenthal, S. A., & Leiserowitz, A. (2020). Personal Stories Can Shift Climate Change Beliefs and Risk Perceptions: The Mediating Role of Emotion. Communication Reports, 33(3), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2020.1799049
Hazel, D., & Kang, J. (2018). The Contributions of Perceived CSR Information Substantiality Toward Consumers’ Cognitive, Affective, and Conative Responses: The Hierarchy of Effects Model Approach. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 36(2), 62–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X17750747
Hearn, G. J. (2019). Geomorphology in engineering geological mapping and modelling. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 78(2), 723–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1166-5
Henderson, F. M., & Rickard, T. J. (1972). Space photographs as a geographic teaching aid. Journal of Geography, 71(5), 307–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221347208981674
Hengl, T., & Husnjak, S. (2006). Evaluating Adequacy and Usability of Soil Maps in Croatia. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 70(3), 920–929. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2004.0141
Henstra, D., Minano, A., & Thistlethwaite, J. (2019). Communicating disaster risk? An evaluation of the availability and quality of flood maps. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 19(1), 313–323. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-19-313-2019
Höppner, C., Buchecker, M., & Bründl, M. (2010). Risk Communication and Natural Hazards. In CapHaz-Net WP5 report. Birmendsdorf: WSL. http://caphaz-net.org/outcomes-results/CapHaz-Net_WP5_Risk-Communication.pdf
Howes, M., Tangney, P., Reis, K., Grant-Smith, D., Heazle, M., Bosomworth, K., & Burton, P. (2015). Towards networked governance: improving interagency communication and collaboration for disaster risk management and climate change adaptation in Australia. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58(5), 757–776. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2014.891974
Huang, T., & Grant, W. J. (2020). A Good Story Well Told: Storytelling Components That Impact Science Video Popularity on YouTube. Frontiers in Communication, 5(October), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.581349
Huang, Y. M., Lou, S. J., Huang, T. C., & Jeng, Y. L. (2019). Middle-aged adults’ attitudes toward health app usage: a comparison with the cognitive-affective-conative model. Universal Access in the Information Society, 18(4), 927–938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-018-0621-9
Huggett, R. J. (2017). Fundamentals of Geomorphology. Routledge.
ISDR-ICL. (2015). ISDR-ICL Sendai Partnerships 2015-2025 For Global Promotion of Understanding and Reducing Landslide Disaster Risk. http://wlf5.iplhq.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/ISDR-ICL-Sendai-Partnerships-2015-2025-18.01.08.pdf
Issa, S. (2018). Comics in the English classroom: a guide to teaching comics across English studies. Journal of Graphic Novels and Comics, 9(4), 310–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/21504857.2017.1355822
Jaboyedoff, M., Oppikofer, T., Abellán, A., Derron, M. H., Loye, A., Metzger, R., & Pedrazzini, A. (2012). Use of LIDAR in landslide investigations: A review. Natural Hazards, 61(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9634-2
Jones Michael, D., & Anderson Crow, D. (2017). How can we use the “science of stories” to produce persuasive scientific stories. Palgrave Communications, 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-017-0047-7
Karnawati, D., Fathani, T. F., Wilopo, W., & Andayani, B. (2018). TXT-tool 4.062-1.1 community hazard maps for landslide risk reduction. In K. Sassa, B. Tiwari, K. F. Liu, M. McSaveney, A. Storm, & H. Setiawan (Eds.), Landslide Dynamics: ISDR-ICL Landslide Interactive Teaching Tools (Vol. 2, pp. 599–606). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57777-7_36
Karnawati, D., Fathani, T. F., Wilopo, W., & Maarif, S. (2018). TXT-tool 4.062-1.1 a socio-technical approach for landslide mitigation and risk reduction. In K. Sassa, B. Tiwari, K. F. Liu, M. McSaveney, A. Storm, & H. Setiawan (Eds.), Landslide Dynamics: ISDR-ICL Landslide Interactive Teaching Tools (Vol. 2, pp. 621–630). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57777-7_38
Katz, Y. (2013). Against storytelling of scientific results. Nature Methods, 10(11), 1045. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2699
Kelly, R. P., Cooley, S. R., & Klinger, T. (2014). Narratives can motivate environmental action: The whiskey creek ocean acidification story. Ambio, 43(5), 592–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-013-0442-2
Keon, D., Steinberg, B., Yeh, H., Pancake, C. M., & Wright, D. (2014). Web-based spatiotemporal simulation modeling and visualization of tsunami inundation and potential human response. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 28(5), 987–1009. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2013.875548
Kim, Y. H., Kim, M. C., & Goh, B. K. (2011). An examination of food tourist’s behavior: Using the modified theory of reasoned action. Tourism Management, 32(5), 1159–1165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2010.10.006
Klimeš, J., Rosario, A. M., Vargas, R., Raška, P., Vicuña, L., & Jurt, C. (2019). Community participation in landslide risk reduction: a case history from Central Andes, Peru. Landslides, 16(9), 1763–1777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01203-w
Kowalski, A., Wajs, J., & Kasza, D. (2018). Monitoring of anthropogenic landslide activity with combined UAV and lidar-derived dems – A case study of the czerwony wąwóz landslide (SW Poland, western sudetes). Acta Geodynamica et Geomaterialia, 15(2), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.13168/AGG.2018.0008
Krasnoryadtseva, A., Dalbeth, N., & Petrie, K. J. (2020). The effect of different styles of medical illustration on information comprehension, the perception of educational material and illness beliefs. Patient Education and Counseling, 103(3), 556–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2019.09.026
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom ’ s Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212–218.
Kumpas-Lenk, K., Eisenschmidt, E., & Veispak, A. (2018). Does the design of learning outcomes matter from students’ perspective? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59(January), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.07.008
Kurtuluş, A., & Ada, T. (2017). Evaluation of Mathematics Teacher Candidates’ the Ellipse Knowledge According to the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(10), 1782–1794. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.051017
Kuster, F., Ruginski, I. T., & Fabrikant, S. I. (2023). How does your viewing perspective matter for decision-making with flood risk maps?*. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 50(6), 562–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2023.2268502
Lam, H., Bertini, E., Isenberg, P., Plaisant, C., & Carpendale, S. (2012). Empirical studies in information visualization: Seven scenarios. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 18(9), 1520–1536. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2011.279
Latham, G. P., & Locke, E. A. (2007). New developments in and directions for goal-setting research. European Psychologist, 12(4), 290–300. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.12.4.290
Lee, M. K. O., Cheung, C. M. K., & Chen, Z. (2005). Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: The role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation. Information and Management, 42(8), 1095–1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.10.007
Li, Z., Jiao, Q., Liu, L., Tang, H., & Liu, T. (2014). Monitoring geologic hazards and vegetation recovery in the wenchuan earthquake region using aerial photography. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 3(1), 368–390. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi3010368
Lin, K. H. E., Khan, S., Acosta, L. A., Alaniz, R., & Olanya, D. R. (2020). The dynamism of post disaster risk communication: A cross-country synthesis. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 48(August 2019), 101556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101556
Lin, Q., Steger, S., Pittore, M., Zhang, J., Wang, L., Jiang, T., & Wang, Y. (2022). Evaluation of potential changes in landslide susceptibility and landslide occurrence frequency in China under climate change. Science of the Total Environment, 850(August), 158049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158049
Lindahl, C. (2012). Legends of Hurricane Katrina: The right to be wrong, survivor-to-survivor storytelling, and healing. Journal of American Folklore, 125(496), 139–176. https://doi.org/10.1353/jaf.2012.0015
Lo, C. M., Lee, C. F., & Keck, J. (2017). Application of sky view factor technique to the interpretation and reactivation assessment of landslide activity. Environmental Earth Sciences, 76(10), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6705-7
Luke, A., Sanders, B. F., Goodrich, K. A., Feldman, D. L., Boudreau, D., Eguiarte, A., Serrano, K., Reyes, A., Schubert, J. E., Aghakouchak, A., Basolo, V., & Matthew, R. A. (2018). Going beyond the flood insurance rate map: Insights from flood hazard map co-production. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 18(4), 1097–1120. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-1097-2018
Martinello, C., Delchiaro, M., Iacobucci, G., Cappadonia, C., Rotigliano, E., & Piacentini, D. (2024). Exploring the geomorphological adequacy of the landslide susceptibility maps: A test for different types of landslides in the Bidente river basin (northern Italy). Catena, 238(January), 107835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2024.107835
Meyer, V., Kuhlicke, C., Luther, J., Fuchs, S., Priest, S., Dorner, W., Serrhini, K., Pardoe, J., McCarthy, S., Seidel, J., Palka, G., Unnerstall, H., Viavattene, C., & Scheuer, S. (2012). Recommendations for the user-specific enhancement of flood maps. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 12(5), 1701–1716. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-1701-2012
Mohammadi, H. (2015). Investigating users’ perspectives on e-learning: An integration of TAM and IS success model. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 359–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.044
Morisano, D., Hirsh, J. B., Peterson, J. B., Pihl, R. O., & Shore, B. M. (2010). Setting, Elaborating, and Reflecting on Personal Goals Improves Academic Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(2), 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018478
Morris, B. S., Chrysochou, P., Christensen, J. D., Orquin, J. L., Barraza, J., Zak, P. J., & Mitkidis, P. (2019). Stories vs . facts : triggering emotion and action-taking on climate change Content courtesy of Springer Nature , terms of use apply . Rights reserved . Content courtesy of Springer Nature , terms of use apply . Rights reserved . 19–36.
Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. J., Morrison, J. R., & Kalman, H. K. (2020). Designing Effective Instruction. In Wiley. Wiley.
Mukherjee, S. (2023). Advancing perspectives in geomorphology – An apotheosis to sustainable natural spaces and eudaemonic citizenry in the 21st century. Sociedade & Natureza, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.14393/sn-v35-2023-69222
National Research Council. (1989). Improving Risk Communication. 17226. https://doi.org/10.17226/1189
Niethammer, U., James, M. R., Rothmund, S., Travelletti, J., & Joswig, M. (2012). UAV-based remote sensing of the Super-Sauze landslide: Evaluation and results. Engineering Geology, 128, 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.03.012
Norris, S. P., Guilbert, S. M., Smith, M. L., Hakimelahi, S., & Phillips, L. M. (2005). A theoretical framework for narrative explanation in science. Science Education, 89(4), 535–563. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20063
Nossum, A. S. (2012). Semistatic animation - Integrating past, present and future in map animations. Cartographic Journal, 49(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743277411Y.0000000014
Oliver-Smith, A., Alcántara-Ayala, I., Burton, I., & Lavell, A. M. (2016). Forensic Investigations of Disasters (FORIN): A conceptual framework and guide to research. Irdr-Forin, 9, 56. http://www.irdrinternational.org/2016/01/21/irdr-publishes-the-forin-project-a-conceptual-framework-and-guide-to-research-2/
Padian, K. (2018). Narrative and “Anti-narrative” in Science: How Scientists Tell Stories, and Don’t. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 58(6), 1224–1234. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icy038
Paton, D. (2008). Risk communication and natural hazard mitigation: How trust influences its effectiveness. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 8(1–2), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGENVI.2008.017256
Plough, A., & Krimsky, S. (1987). The Emergence of Risk Communication Studies : Social and Political Context. 12(3), 4–10.
Pratiwi, E. S., Shen, S. min, & Sartohadi, J. (2024). Understanding the nature of landslides through detailed geomorphological mapping on the Sumbing Volcanic Landscape, Java Island, Indonesia. Journal of Maps, 20(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2024.2429710
Pratiwi, E. S., Shen, S., & Sartohadi, J. (2023). Progress and challenges in designing landslide maps for disaster risk communication : a systematic review. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 50(6), 531–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/15230406.2023.2264754
Purworini, D., Hartuti, D. P., & Purnamasari, D. (2021). Why is evacuation so difficult? Sociocultural aspects of landslide disaster in Ponorogo, Indonesia. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 30(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-04-2019-0123
Raso, E., Mandarino, A., Pepe, G., Calcaterra, D., Cevasco, A., Confuorto, P., Di Napoli, M., & Firpo, M. (2021). Geomorphology of Cinque Terre National Park (Italy). Journal of Maps, 17(3), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2020.1837270
Robinson, A. C., Anderson, C. L., & Quinn, S. D. (2020). Evaluating geovisualization for spatial learning analytics. International Journal of Cartography, 6(3), 331–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/23729333.2020.1735034
Robinson, A. L., Morrison, J. L., Muehrcke, P. C., & Guptill, S. C. (1995). Elements of Cartography (6th editio). Wiley.
Rodgers, J., Su, G., Qi, W., Milledge, D., Densmore, A., Davis, C., England, P., Young, J., Cao, Y., Chakos, A., Li, X., Sim, T., So, E., Parsons, B., Sun, L., Yu, J., & Guo, C. (2020). Creating an earthquake scenario in China: A case study in Weinan City, Shaanxi province. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 42(December 2018), 101305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101305
Roth, R. E. (2021a). Cartographic Design as Visual Storytelling: Synthesis and Review of Map-Based Narratives, Genres, and Tropes. Cartographic Journal, 58(1), 83–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087041.2019.1633103
Roth, R. E. (2021b). Cartographic Design as Visual Storytelling: Synthesis and Review of Map-Based Narratives, Genres, and Tropes. Cartographic Journal, 58(1), 83–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087041.2019.1633103
Roth, R. E., Çöltekin, A., Delazari, L., Filho, H. F., Griffin, A., Hall, A., Korpi, J., Lokka, I., Mendonça, A., Ooms, K., & van Elzakker, C. P. J. M. (2017). User studies in cartography: opportunities for empirical research on interactive maps and visualizations. International Journal of Cartography, 3(sup1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/23729333.2017.1288534
Roth, R. E., Ross, K. S., & MacEachren, A. M. (2015). User-centered design for interactive maps: A case study in crime analysis. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 4(1), 262–301. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi4010262
Saadé, R. G. (2007). Dimensions of Perceived Usefulness: Toward Enhanced Assessment. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 5(2), 289–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2007.00142.x
Samodra, G., Ramadhan, M. F., Sartohadi, J., Setiawan, M. A., Christanto, N., & Sukmawijaya, A. (2020). Characterization of displacement and internal structure of landslides from multitemporal UAV and ERT imaging. Landslides, 17(10), 2455–2468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01428-0
Segel, E., & Heer, J. (2010). Narrative visualization: Telling stories with data. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 16(6), 1139–1148. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2010.179
Setiawan, H., Retnaningrum, E., Arrisaldi, T., & Wilopo, W. (2021). Capacity Building and Community Preparedness Towards Landslide Disaster in Pagerharjo Village, Kulon Progo Regency of Yogyakarta, Indonesia. In F. Guzzetti, S. Mihalić Arbanas, P. Reichenbach, K. Sassa, P. T. Bobrowsky, & K. Takara (Eds.), Understanding and Reducing Landslide Disaster Risk, ICL Contribution to Landslide Disaster Risk Reduction (pp. 603–610). Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60196-6_54
Shanahan, E. A., Jones, M. D., Mcbeth, M. K., & Radaelli, C. M. (2018). The Narrative Policy Framework. In Theories of the Policy Process. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494284-6
Shannon, C. E. (1948). A Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27(4), 623–656. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb00917.x
Shen, S., Chen, Y., Lo, C., Yu, M., Lin, S., Chang, C., & Lin, S. (2023). A user-centered mapping design for geomorphological hazard thematic map. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2023.2251510
Shen, S. M., Chen, Y. H., Lo, C. M., Yu, M. T., Lin, S. C., Wang, S., Chang, C. H., & Lin, S. C. (2023). A user-centered mapping design for geomorphological hazard thematic map. Journal of Maps, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2023.2251510
Sherry, J. L. (2004). Flow and media enjoyment. Communication Theory, 14(4), 328–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00318.x
Smith, M. J., Paron, P., & Griffiths, J. S. (2011). Geomorphological Mapping (First edit). Elsevier B.V.
Song, Z., Roth, R. E., Houtman, L., Prestby, T., Iverson, A., & Gao, S. (2022). Visual Storytelling with Maps: An Empirical Study on Story Map Themes and Narrative Elements, Visual Storytelling Genres and Tropes, and Individual Audience Differences. Cartographic Perspectives, 100.
Tateosian, L., Glatz, M., & Shukunobe, M. (2020). Story-telling maps generated from semantic representations of events. Behaviour and Information Technology, 39(4), 391–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1569162
Toolan, M. (2001). Narrative (Second edi). Routledge.
Tsai, Y. J., Syu, F. T., Shieh, C. L., Chung, C. R., Lin, S. S., & Yin, H. Y. (2021). Framework of emergency response system for potential large-scale landslide in Taiwan. Water (Switzerland), 13(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/w13050712
Tyner, J. A. (2014). Principles of map design. In The Guilford Press.
UNISDR. (2009). Terminology on Disaster Risk Reduction. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. www.unisdr.org/publications
Unrau, R., & Kray, C. (2019). Usability evaluation for geographic information systems: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 33(4), 645–665. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2018.1554813
Vanlalnunzira, J. T. C. (2024). A comparative study of statistical methods and machine learning algorithms for prediction of landslides in Mizoram state of India through analysis of causative factors using Geo-informatics. 1–17.
Verbovšek, T., Popit, T., & Kokalj, Ž. (2019). VAT method for visualization of mass movement features: An alternative to hillshaded DEM. Remote Sensing, 11(24), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11242946
Vernimmen, R., Hooijer, A., Yuherdha, A. T., Visser, M., Pronk, M., Eilander, D., Akmalia, R., Fitranatanegara, N., Mulyadi, D., Andreas, H., Ouellette, J., & Hadley, W. (2019). Creating a lowland and peatland landscape digital terrain model (DTM) from interpolated partial coverage LiDAR data for Central Kalimantan and East Sumatra, Indonesia. Remote Sensing, 11(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11101152
Viganò, A., Rossato, S., Martin, S., Ivy-Ochs, S., Zampieri, D., Rigo, M., & Monegato, G. (2021). Large landslides in the Alpine valleys of the Giudicarie and Schio-Vicenza tectonic domains (NE Italy). Journal of Maps, 17(3), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2021.1880979
Vollstedt, B., Koerth, J., Tsakiris, M., Nieskens, N., & Vafeidis, A. T. (2021). Co-production of climate services: A story map for future coastal flooding for the city of Flensburg. Climate Services, 22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2021.100225
Wang, C. H., Wu, K. C., & Tsau, S. Y. (2019). Flow Learning Experience: Applying Marketing Theory to Serious Game Design. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(2), 417–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117752454
Wang, Z., Romat, H., Chevalier, F., Riche, N. H., Murray-Rust, D., & Bach, B. (2022). Interactive Data Comics. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 28(1), 944–954. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2021.3114849
Widyaningrum, E., & Gorte, B. G. H. (2017). Challenges and opportunities: One stop processing of automatic large-scale base map production using airborne lidar data within gis environment case study: Makassar City, Indonesia. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives, 42(1W1), 365–369. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-1-W1-365-2017
Wijaya, B. S. (2012). TheDevelopmentofHierarchyofEffectsModelinAdvertising-IRJBS. 5(1), 1–7.
Wiley, J. (2019). Picture this! Effects of photographs, diagrams, animations, and sketching on learning and beliefs about learning from a geoscience text. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3495
Wong, E. Y. cheung, Hui, R. T. yin, & Kong, H. (2023). Perceived usefulness of, engagement with, and effectiveness of virtual reality environments in learning industrial operations: the moderating role of openness to experience. Virtual Reality, 27(3), 2149–2165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-023-00793-0
WP/WLI (International Geotechnical Societies’ UNESCO Working Party on World Landslide Inventory). (1993). A Suggested Method for Describing the Activity of a Landslide. Bulletin of the International Association of Engineering Geology, 47.
Yang, Z., Li, J., Hyyppä, J., Gong, J., Liu, J., & Yang, B. (2023). A comprehensive and up-to-date web-based interactive 3D emergency response and visualization system using Cesium Digital Earth: taking landslide disaster as an example. Big Earth Data, 7(4), 1058–1080. https://doi.org/10.1080/20964471.2023.2172823