中 文 摘 要
本研究主要目的在探討(一)桃園縣國民中學校長教學領導之現況。(二)桃園縣國民中學學校效能之現況。(三)桃園縣國民中學教育人員對校長教學領導行為知覺的差異情形。(四)桃園縣國民中學教育人員對學校效能知覺的差異情形。(五)桃園縣國民中學校長教學領導行為與學校效能之關係。(六)桃園縣國民中學校長教學領導對學校效能是否有顯著的預測力。(七)依據研究結果，研擬改進國民中學校長教學領導的建議。
本研究以問卷調查法為主，半結構式訪談為輔，受試者包括桃園縣公立國民中學校長、主任、組長、導師、專任老師，每校16-31人共1037人，其中有效樣本908人可用率為87.6%，研究工具為『國民中學校長教學領導調查問卷』及『國民中學學校效能量表』，Cronbach’s 信度係數介於.7903 -.9307之間。本研究以SPSS for windows 10.0版的套裝軟體為統計分析工具，玆將研究主要發現分述如下：
一、桃園縣國民中學教育人員所知覺到的「校長教學領導」，得分平 均數為3.70，整體而言屬中上程度。
二、桃園縣國民中學教育人員所知覺到的「學校效能」，得分平均數為3.67，整體而言亦屬中上程度。
三、不同環境變項的桃園縣國民中學教育人員所知覺到的「校長教學領導」差異情形不一。
1.就不同學校規模而言：以37-72班學校得分最高，但沒有顯著差異。
2.就不同地區學校而言：都是一般地區得分高於偏遠地區，且有顯著差異。
四、不同人口變項的桃園縣國民中學教育人員所知覺到的「校長教學領導」差異情形不一。
1.性別、年齡、年資、職務對「校長教學領導」知覺度有顯著差異，以男性、年齡在51歲以上、服務滿26年以上及擔任校長者得分最高。
2.學歷對「校長教學領導」知覺度沒有顯著差異。
五、不同環境變項的桃園縣國民中學教育人員所知覺到的「學校效能」有顯著差異，以37-72班學校及一般地區學校得分較高。
六、不同人口變項的桃園縣國民中學教育人員所知覺到的「學校效能」現況有顯著差異，以男性、51歲以上、服務26年以上、擔任校長職務、研究所或四十學分班結業者得分較高。
七、桃園縣國民中學「校長教學領導」各層面與「學校效能」各層面有極顯著正相關。
八、桃園縣國民中學「校長教學領導」行為對「學校效能」各層面有顯著預測力。依據文獻分析與研究結果對教育行政機關、國民中學校長與未來相關研究，提出下列建議：
壹、對主管教育行政機關的建議：
一、校長甄選應加強國中校長的領導專業知能，以提昇學校效能。
二、應編列專款及增加人員編制補助偏遠地區學校，提昇其效能。
三、應積極規劃教育資源，發展適度規模的學校。
四、可依據本研究之校長「教學領導」與「學校效能」指標，作為評鑑學校的參考。
貳、對國民中學校長的建議：
一、校長應不斷自我進修，增進教學領導知能。
二、校長應積極推動「教學領導」以提昇學校效能。
三、校長應協助教師將七大領域發展為自發性組織。
四、校長應實施校內兼行政職務教師輪調制，並重視與未兼行政教師的互動。
五、校長應尊重資深優良教師使之成為教師的楷模。
六、校長應支持與關懷女性教師。
七、學校應舉辦多元活動，廣邀家長與社區參與，增進對學校認同感。
八、校長應營造良好學習環境，促進教師專業成長，提昇學生學習成效。
參、對未來研究的建議
一、在研究對象方面可擴及台灣地區與私立學校及國小與高中職。
二、在研究方法方面可加強質的研究。
三、在研究工具方面可發展更為妥適的研究工具。
四、在研究變項方面可擴充研究變向及向度的內容。
關鍵詞：教學領導、學校效能、國民中學。

A Study on Relationships between Principals’ Instructional leadership and School Effectiveness of Junior High Schools
in Taoyuan County
Abstract
The purposes of this study were: (1)to explore the status quo of instructional leadership of junior high school in Taoyuan County, (2)to explore the status quo of school effectiveness of junior high school in Taoyuan County, (3)to probe the difference of perceptions of principals’ instructional leadership among educators, (4)to investigate the difference of perceptions of school effectiveness among teachers, (5)to understand the relationship between principal’s instructional leadership and school effectiveness of junior high school, (6)to explore if principals’ instructional leadership has predictive efficacy for school effectiveness, and (7)to make some recommendations for improvement of principals’ instructional leadership.
This study was proceeding with survey study as well as semi-constructed interview. Two scales (Questionnaire of principals’ Instructional Leadership of Junior High School and Scale of school effectiveness of Junior High School). were used to data aggregation, The Cronbach’s coefficients of the scales were between 0.79 and 0.93, it indicated a good reliability and conformity among the items. 16-31 teachers were chosen from each junior high school in Taoyuan County. Finally, 908 data were collected and were analyzed by SPSS 10.0 for Windows the conclusions of this research were as follows：
1. The teachers of junior high schools perceived an upper level on “principals’ instructional leadership”, and the average was 3.70.
2. The teachers of junior high schools also perceived an upper level on “school effectiveness”, and the average was 3.67
3. The teachers of junior high schools have different perceptions of “principals’ instructional leadership” in terms of different demographic variables.
(1) So far as the school size is concerned, there was no significant difference in schools with 37-72 classes scored the highest.
(2) In terms of the school district, the general areas scored higher than distant areas, but did have significant difference.
4. The educators of junior high schools have significant difference of “school effectiveness” in schools with 37-72 classes and the general areas scores the highest.
5. The educators of junior high schools had no different perceptions of “principals’ instructional leadership” under different demographic variables.
(1) In terms of gender、age、service years、a post have significant difference of “principals’ instructional leadership” and the man、age above 51 years、service above 26 years、the principals scores the highest.
(2) In terms of academic background, was no significant difference of “principals’ instructional leadership”
6. The educators of junior high schools have significant difference of “school effectiveness” under different demographic variables, and the man、age above 51 years、service above 26 years、the principals 、a research station or forty credit scores the highest.
7. There were positive and strongly significant correlations among all dimensions of principals’ instructional leadership and school effectiveness.
8. Principal’s instructional leadership had predictive efficacy for all the dimensions of school effectiveness and the ranking (from strong to weak) was “The whole dimension of principals’ instructional leadership”, “Development of Supportive Environment”, and “Promotion of Teacher Expertise”
Based on the findings, several suggestions were made for the authorities of concerned and junior high schools’ principals and respective researchers.
Keyword：Instructional leadership, school effectiveness, junior high school

參考文獻
壹、中文部份
江志正(2000)。國民小學團體動力、組織學習、學校發展策略與學校效能關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系博士論文，未出版，高雄。
李 幸(2001)。國民中學學習型組織、教師自我效能與學校效能關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版，高雄。
李玉林(2001)。桃園縣國小校長教學領導角色知覺與實踐之研究。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
李安明(1999)。「為教學而行政」的校長教學領導：理論與實務。教育政策論壇，2(2)，158-203。
李佳霓(1999)。國民中學組織學習教師參與學習與學校效能關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版，高雄。
李新寶(2001)。國民小學校長教學領導與教師教學效能之研究。國立新竹師範學院學校行政碩士班碩士論文，未出版，新竹。
李清華(2002)。國民小學教師之校長教學領導知覺、教師效能感與統整課程實施態度之關係研究，國立彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，彰化。
李雲漳(2002)。國民小學校長教學領導與教師效能之研究。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，屏東。
吳宗立(1998)。國民中學組織衝突、外在壓力、行政決策與學校效能關係之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文，未出版，台北。
吳雨錫(2002)。國民小學校長教學領導與教師專業成長關係之研究。國立台中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台中。
吳明清（1990）。談組織效能之提昇與校長角色。教師天地，46，48。
吳明雄(2001)。國民小學校長轉型領導行為與學校效能之研究。國立台中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台中。
吳培源（1994）。臺灣省高級中學領導型態學校氣氛與學校效能關係之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文。未出版。台北。
吳清山 (1998)。學校效能研究。台北：五南。
吳清山、湯志民、李俊達、邱馨儀、吳林輝、張清楚、黃久芬、丁一顧、林天祐、胡慧宜(1997)。有效能的學校。台北：國立教育資料館。
林金福(1992)。國中校長領導型式與學校效能關係之研究。國立政治大學教研所碩士論文。未出版。台北。
林明地(2000)。校長教學領導實際：一所國小的參與觀察。教育研究集刊，（44），143-172。
林清山(1992)。心理及教育統計學。台北：東華。
林蕙質(2002)。國民中學校長性別角色、轉換型領導與學校效能關係之研究。國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
黃乃熒(1996)。從教學領導談學校教育革新。中等教育47(6)，50-57 。
陳明璋（1979）。組織效能的研究途徑及其衡量。中國行政。29,48-71。
陳美言(1998)。國民小學校長教學領導與教師教學自我效能關係之研究。台北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
陳淑嬌(1889)。國民中學校長領導型式、教師工作投入與組織效能關係之研究。國立高雄師範學院教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄。
陳鐘金(2002)。國民中小學學校本位管理與學校效能關係之研究。國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，花蓮。
張笠雲(1986)。組織社會學。台北：三民。
張慈娟(1997)。國民小學校長教學領導與學校效能之研究。國立新竹師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。未出版，新竹。
張鈿富(1996)。School based indicators of effectiveness : An experience of Taiwan。健行學報, 16(3), 1-16.
張碧娟(1999)。國民中學校長教學領導、學校氣氛與教師效能關係之研究。國立政治大學教育學系博士論文，未出版，台北。
張德銳(1995)。教育行政研究。台北：五南。
張潤書（1986）。行政學。臺北：三民書局。
游進年(1990)。國民中學學校氣氛與學校效能關係之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
彭瓊瑤(2002)。國民中學全面品質管理與學校效能關係之研究。私立淡江大學教育政策與領導研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
喬玉全、陳鋅、錢華譯(Stuart,C.Smith & Philip, K. Piele原著)(1991)。學校行政領導原理。台北：五南。
葉天賞(2001)。國民中學校長行政溝通行為與學校效能之關係研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版，高雄。
趙廣林(1996)。國民小學校長教學領導之研究。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，屏東。
楊振昇(1999)。邁向二十一世紀落實教學領導之省思。教育政策論壇，1(2)，81-117。
楊振昇(2000)。破除迷思、開創新猷－對教學領導應有的認識。師友月刊，2000，3月號，41-45。
蔡秀媛(1998)。國民小學校長教學領導計其影響因素之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版，台北。
蔡培林(1993)。國民中學學校管理模式與學校效能關係之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育學系碩士論文，未出版，台北。
蔡進雄(1999)。國民中學校長轉型領導、互易領導、學校文化與學校效能關係之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育學系博士論文，未出版，台北。
魯先華(1994)。國民中學校長教學領導之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
劉春榮(1993)。國民小學組織結構、組織承諾與學校效能關係之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文，未出版，台北。
劉慶中、趙廣林(1999)。從教學視導到教學領導—以校長為例。課程與教學季刊，1992，2(4) ，103-118。
鮑世青(2001)。國民小學校長與教師對「校長教學領導」所為知覺度之研究。國立新竹師範學院學校行政碩士班碩士論文，未出版，新竹。
潘慧玲(1999)。學校效能研究領域的發展。教育研究集刊，（43）, 77-101。
鄭燕祥(2001)。學校效能及校本管理發展的機制。台北：心理。
歐曉玟(2001)。彰化縣國民小學校長教學領導之研究。國立台中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台中。
謝 元(2002)。國小校長提升教學效能的教學領導研究－以實施久年一貫課程的台南市國小為例。國立台東師範學院教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台東。
謝建成(2001)。台北縣國民小學校長教學領導與教師專業成長之調查研究。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
顏麗琴(2002)。台北市民中學學校內部公共關係與學校效能關係之研究。國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
貳、英文部份
Arnn. J.W., and Mangieri, J. N.(1988). Effective leadership for effective schools:Asurvey of principal attitudes. NASSP Bulletin,72(505),1-7.
Babcock, C. L. (1991). A comparison of male and female elementary school principals' perceived instructional leadership behavior. [CD-ROM]. Abstracts from: ProQuest File: Dissertation Abstracts Item: AAT 9211826.
Barnard, C.I.(1971). The function of the executive. MAs: Harvard University Press.
Bass, J. D. (1989). Instructional leadership activity of elementary principals in effective schools. [CD-ROM]. Abstract From: ProQuest File: Dissertation Abstracts Item:AAC 8915716.
Bullard, P.,& Taylor, B.O.(1993). Making school reform happen. Boston:Allyn and Bacon.
Cameron, K. S. (1984).The Effectiveness of Ineffectiveness. Reseach in Organizational Behavior,6, 235-285.
Cantu, M. M. I. (1994). A study of principal instructional leadership behaviors manifested in successful and nonsuccessful urbanelementary schools. [CD-ROM]. Abstract From: ProQuest File:Dissertation Abstracts Item: AAC 9428472.
Cawelti,G. (1987). How effective instructional leaders get results.(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED 328 935).
Champeau, R. D. (1993). The nature of instructional leadership in Wisconsin high schools. [CD-ROM]. Abstracts from: ProQuest File: Dissertation AbstractsItem: AAT 9426819.
Chapman, J. D.(Ed.)(1990). School-based decision-making and management. London:Falmer Press.
Collins, C. R. (1987). Teacher and principal perception of the effect of principal's engagement in selected instructional leadership functions on student achievement. [CD-ROM]. Abstracts from: ProQuest File: Dissertation Abstracts Item: AAT 8801139.
Coleman, P., ＆ Collinge, J.(1991). In the web: Internal and external influences affecting school improvement. School Effective and School Improvement, 2(4), 262-285.
Creemers, B. P. M.(1994). The effective classroom. London:Cassell.
Daresh,J.C.(1991). Instructional leadership: A proactive administrative process. Theory into Practice,30(2),109-112
De Bevoise, W. (1984). Synthesis of research on the principal as instructional leader. Educational Leadership,41(5),14-20.
Drake,T. L.,& Roe,W. H. (1986). The principalship(3rd ed.). New York:Macmillan.
Duignan, P. (1986). Research on effective schooling: Some implications for school improvement. The Journal of Educational Administration, 24(1), 59-73.
Duke, D. L.(1982). What can principals do ? Leadership functions and instructional effectiveness. NASSP Bulletin, 66(456), 1-12.
Dwyer, D. C.(1984). The Search for instructional leadership: Routines and subtleties in the principals’ role. Educational Leadership,41(5),32-37.
Eberts, R. W.,& Stone, J. A. (1988). Student achievement in public schools: Do principals make a difference? Economics of Education Review, 7（3）, 291-299.
Edmonds, R. R.(1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership,37(1),15-24.
Gaynes,Colleen(1990). The “who”and“what”of instructional leadership.Thrust,19(7),40-42.
Gersten, R.,Carnine, D.,& Green, S.(1982). The principal as instructional leader: A second look. Educational Leadership, 40(3), 47-50.
Good, T. L.,(1981). Teacher expectations and student perceptions: A decade of research. Educational Leadership, 38(5), 415-422.
Greenfield,W.(1987). Moral imagination and interpersonal competence:Antecedents to instructional leadership. In W. Greenfield (Ed), instructional leadership: Concepts, inssues, and controversies (pp.56-73). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Gulledge B.T. (1994).The perceptions of career ladder I,career ladder II, and career ladder III: Elementary principals regarding instructional leadership.(From ProQuest-Dissertation Abstracts,1995.No.AAC 9502661)
Hallinger, P. (1983). Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation,
Stanford University.
Hallinger, P.(1992). The evolving role of American principals: Form managerial to instructional to transformational leaders. Journal of Educational Administration. 30(3), 35-48.
Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1987a).Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals. Educational Leadership, 45(1), 54-61.
Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1987b). Organizational and social context and theinstructional leadership role of the school principal. presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington.（ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED309528）
Hallinger, P., Murphy, J., Weil, M., Mesa, R. P., & Mitman, A. (1983). School effectiveness identifying the specific practices behaviors for principals. NASSP Bulletin,67 (463), 83-91.
Heck, R. H. (1992). Principals' instructional leadership and school performance: Implications for policy development. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14（1）, 21-34.
Herman, J. J., & Herman J. L.(1994). Education quality management: Effective schools through systemic change. Lancaster, Pennsylvania: Technomic.
Heuss, R., & Psencik, K.(1986). Aiming for administrative excellence: Appraising principals.(Report No. MF01/pc01)(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED 297 416).
Hinds, A. A. C. (1990). Perceptions of teachers and principals in selected Texas public schools of principals' instructional leadership behaviors and responsibilities. [CD-ROM]. Abstracts from: ProQuest File: Dissertation Abstracts Item: AAT 9115339.
Hoy, W. K. ＆ Miskel, C. G. (1987). Educational administration theory,research, and practice. (3rd ed.) New York :Random House.
Ibrahim, A. S.(1985).Instructional leadership behaviors of high school principals department heads and other administrative staff as perceived by teachers and principals. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, The Florida State University.
Immegart,G. L., & Pilecki, F. J.(1970). Assessing organization output: a framework and some implication. Educational Administration Quarterly, 6(10), 62-76.
Johnson, S. A. (1989). Criteria for assessing the effectiveness of schools and principals, Education Canada, Summer, 15-16.
Justis, L. C. (1990). Teachers' perceptions of elementary principals' performance of instructional leadership functions. [CD-ROM]. Abstract From: ProQuest File: Dissertation Abstracts Item: AAC 9111996.
Keefe, J. W. (1987). The critical questions of instructional leadership. NASSP Bulletin, 71(498), 49-55.
Keefe, J. W., & Jenkins, J. M. (Eds.). (1984). Instructional leadership handbook. Virginia: NASSP
Krug, F. S. (1986). The relationship between the instructional management behavior of elementary school principal and student achievment. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of San Francisco.
Krug, S. E. (1992). Instructional leadership, school instructional climate, and student learning outcomes. Project report.（ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED359668）
Leitner, D. (1988). Principal instructional management behavior and school effectiveness: An organizational perspective. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.（ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED302934）
Levine, D. U.＆ Lezotte, L. W. (1990). Unusually effective schools. National Center for Effective Schools Research and Development.
Liu, C. (1985). An identification of principals' instructional leadership behaviors in effective high schools. [CD-ROM]. Abstract From: ProQuest File: Dissertation Abstracts Item: AAC 8512638.
Mahmood, H. B. (1989). A study of principals' perceptions of their competencyand competency needs in instructional leadership. [CD-ROM]. Abstracts from: ProQuest File: Dissertation Abstracts Item: AAT 9001589.
Marsh, D. D. (1992). Enhancing instructional leadership lessons from the California school leadership academy. Education and Urban Society, 25（3）, 386-409.
Mcgorray, K. T. (1995). Instructional leadership in the principal role: Testing the effectiveness of slingerand multisensory approach encoding strategies for the first grade language arts program (CD-ROM). Abstract From;ProQuest File: Dissertation Abstracts Item: 9535864.
McEwan, E. K. (1998). Seven steps to effective instructional leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Miskel, C. G., Fevurly, R. & Steward, J. (1979). Organizational structures and process, perceived school effectiveness, loyalty, and job satisfaction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 5 (3), 97-118.
Mo, K. W. (1998). School climate and the effectiveness of teacher appraisal in HongKong self-managing schools. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego.（ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED420719）
Morris,V. C., Crowson, R. L., Porter-Gehrie. C., & Hurwitz, E. Jr. (1984). Principals I naction: The reality of managing schools. Columbus, O. H. :Charles E.Merrill.
Murphy, J. (1990). Principal instructional leadership. In Thurston, R. W., & Lotto, L. S. (Eds.), Advances in educational administration. (pp.163-200). Lodon: JAI Press .
Murphy, J., Hallinger, P., Weil, M., Mesa, R. P.,(1985). School effectiveness:Checking progress and assumptions and developing arole for state and federal government. Teachers College Record, 86(4), 615-641.
Pantelides, J. R. (1991). An exploration of the relationship between specific instructional leadership behaviors of elementary principal and student achievement. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Virginia Poiltechnic Institute and State University.
Purkey, S., & Smith, M. (1983). Effective schools : A review. The Elementary School Journal , 83, 427-452.
Reid, k., Hopkins, D., & Holly, P.(1987). Towards the effective school : the problems and some effectiveness and school improvement : An updated review of the british literature. In Reynolds, D. & Peter Cuttance (Eds.), School effectiveness：Research: policy and practice. London: Cassell.
Reynolds, & Cuttance,P. (1992). School effectiveness research: Police and practice. London: Cassell
Robbins. S. (1993). Organizational behavior, (6th ed.). Englewood Cliffs NJ: Premtice-Hall.
Rowan, B. (1985). The assessment of school effectiveness. In R. M. J. Kyle(ed). Reaching for excellence:A neffective school source book (pp.99-116). Washington: U.S.Govermment Printing Office.
Russel, J. S. (1985). Linking the behaviors and activities of secondary school principals to school effectiveness:A focus on effective and ineffective behaviors . (Report No.MF01/pc01) .
Center for Educational policy and Management, University of Oregon (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED 258 322).
Scheerens, J. & Bosker, R. (1997). The foundation of educational effectiveness. New York: Pergamon.
Schoch, A. P. (1992). The relationship between instructional leadership behavior, school effectiveness, school size, gender, race, and years of principalship experience in elementary schools in South Carolina. [CD-ROM].
Seashore, S. E. (1983). A framework for an inttegrated model of organizationa effectiveness. In K. S. Cameron, & D. A. Whetton. (eds.): Organizationa Effectiveness.:A comparison of multiple model. New York: Academic Press.
Sheppard, L. B. (1993). A study of the relationship among instructional leadership behaviors of the school principal and selected school level characteristics. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation,University of Ottawa, Canada.
Smith, W. F., & Andrews, R. L. (1989). Instructional leadership: How principals make adifference. Virginia: the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Snyder, K. J. (1983). Instructional leadership for productive schools. Educational Leadership, 40(5), 32-37.
Stevens, L. J. (1996). Instructional leadership: A single district study of elementary teachers. A Dissertation of the Graduate School of Education of the State University of New York.
Steers, R. M. (1977). Organization effectivenes：A behavioral view. CA. : Goodyear.
Stoll, L., & Fink, D. (1994). School effectiveness and school improvement: Voices from the field. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5(2), 149-177.
Stronge, James H. (1988). The elementary school principalship: A position in transition? Principal, 67(5), 32-33.
Stroud, D. J. (1989). Factors influencing the instructional leadership behaviors of elementary school pruncipals and the relationship to Student Achievement. (CD-ROM). Absaract From: ProQuest File:Dissertation Abstracts Item:9017489.
Thomas, M. D. (1997). The relationship of teachers' perceptions of instructional leadership behaviors of principals in Virginia to student achievement levels. [CD-ROM]. Abstracts from: ProQuest File: Dissertation Abstracts Item: AAT 9726497.
Thomas-Hodge, C. D. (1994). The relationship between the perceived instructional leadership skills of four elementary principals and the effectiveness of their schools. [CD-ROM]. Abstracts from: ProQuest File: Dissertation Abstracts Item: AAT 9426860.
Valentine, J. W. (1992). Principles and practices for effective teacher evaluation. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Weber, G. (1971). Inner city children can be taught toread: Four successful schools. (Occasional Paper No.18). Washington, DC:Council for Basic Education.
Weber, J. R. (1987). Instructional leadership: Contexts and Challenges.（ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED288261）
Weber, J. R. (1989). Leading the instructional program.（ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED309513）
Wildy, H., & Dimmock, C. (1993). Instructional leadership in primar and secondary schools in western Australia. Journal of Educational Administration, 31(2), 43-62.