本研究以Gaga和Utux為主題硏究泰雅族環境倫理。研究主軸以泰雅族的「人」、「靈」和「自然」之間具有聯繫和互為連結關係之整全觀為基礎；以民族誌生態學學理，探討泰雅族語言符號之細微意義來分析泰雅族環境倫理信念。研究假設是泰雅族的生活規範已存在環境倫理，只是隱而未彰顯；經由部落耆老的語言意義，所代表的自然觀和實踐觀，而成為普遍性遵守的泰雅族「人和環境」平衡關係之環境倫理意義；再經由部落實地觀察與研究理解特定部落如何實踐生物文化保護、土地、水和森林資源生態利用，以構築泰雅族部落環境哲學基礎之研究。泰雅族是以Gaga與Utux作為核心文化或習慣，型塑他們在特定部落人與自然互動關係之宇宙觀。本研究從這兩個核心的語言符號所隱含與大自然之關聯性和互為連結關係開始，探索有關泰雅族如何做人和如何生活之一切理想、原則和實踐其環境倫理和生態倫理之信念。這個研究方法包含了泰雅族族群主體關係網絡之脈絡、泰雅族的傳統生態知識、以及現代環境倫理思想等意義和概念，進而推論環境倫理之意義。研究程序分兩個階段進行，第一階段實際到研究場域，進行部落耆老訪談資料蒐集、分析和理解泰雅族的文化習慣，所形塑之環境倫理觀和實踐觀，並且進行分析和推論語言意義表達之環境哲學。第二階段進行特定部落居民實踐觀真實的觀察，選定三個小尺度之部落環境現況和生態農業實踐，以分析與理解部落居民的觀念和實踐的觀察。本研究發現泰雅族在語言符號意義上具有豐富的環境倫理意義，也呈現在土地利用和動植物採集等生態智慧，而且他們對於環境倫理意義，自有其存在方式和表達方式。研究顯示泰雅族人將自然的規律與居民的行為規範統合一致為實踐倫理之意義，並隱含可持續發展之意涵。泰雅族的環境倫理意義上常以隱喻的表達其謙卑態度，而且處處可見泰雅族的共勞、分享的概念實踐，可以推論這種每日實踐的倫理哲學基礎，來自於他們Gaga與Utux關係連結的宇宙觀；而Utux的信念在倫理道德行為和態度具關鍵性作用。有關土地價值觀上每個部落之環境不同，所執持的價值觀也不同，這是個人世界價值觀理解之差異，不會是有正確之答案。在Gaga和Utux架構分析下，泰雅族人的實踐觀具有豐富的生態倫理信念和真實的生態實踐。

This research involved the study of Tayal environmental ethics with the overarching theme of Gaga and Utux. The primary focus is based on the Tayal's holistic view for managing "humans", "spirits", and "nature" relationships and connection on physical and psychological planes. We analyzed the subtle meanings of Tayal language symbols based on ethnographic ecological theory on the Tayal Environmental Ethical Beliefs. Our hypothesis is that environmental ethics already exist in the norms of the Tayal, but they are only hidden. It is only through interpreting the meaning and use of the words through the tribal elders that the natural and practical views of the Tayal can be observed, as well as the balance between the "people and the environment", and significance of environmental ethics. This then allows us to understand how specific tribes practice biological and cultural protection, and land, water and forest ecological utilization through field observation and research. This approach builds on Tayal TEK, environmental literacy, and an environmental philosophy. The Tayal people use Gaga and Utux as their core culture to shape their cosmology and interactions between people and nature in a particular tribe. We began with the relationship and interconnection with nature that is implied by these two core language symbols, and then explored Tayal ideals, principles, and beliefs on how to behave and live, and to practice their environmental and ecological ethics. This research approach included the context of the subject-relationship network of the Tayal, Tayal TEK, and meanings and concepts of modern environmental ethics within Tayal linguistics, which then allowed us to infers the significance of Tayal environmental ethics. The research was carried out in two stages. Interviews with tribal elders, followed by data analysis and interpretation of Tayal cultural habits, the environmental ethics and practical views formed based on language, environmental philosophy, and expression in Stage 1. In the Stage 2, observations related to the views of specific tribal residents were noted. Three small-scale tribal environmental conditions and ecological agricultural practices were selected to analyze and understand the tribal residents' concepts and practical observations. We found that the Tayal have a rich environmental ethical philosophy, which is manifested in the language symbols used, as well as the ecological wisdom associated with land use, animal, and plant collections, and they have their own way to express the important of their ecological resources and environmental ethical significance of these practices. The research also showed that the Tayal integrate the laws of nature and the behavioral norms of residents into the meaning of practical ethics, which then forms and helps define sustainable development. The environmental ethics of the Tayal are often used metaphors to express their humility, attitude, and the conceptual practice of co-working and sharing with humans and non-humans. It can be inferred that the ethical and philosophical basis of this daily practice comes from the relationship between Gaga and Utux cosmology, and Utux's beliefs that play key roles in ethical behavior and attitudes. Regarding land values, the environment of each tribe is different, and the values that each tribe hold are different. This is the difference in the understanding of personal world values and there will be no correct answer. Under the analysis of Gaga and Utux framework, the Tayal’s view of practice has rich ecological ethics beliefs and real ecological practice.

一、中文目錄
小島由道/中研院民族所（1996）。番族慣習調查報告書第一卷泰雅族。臺灣總督府臨時臺灣舊慣調查會中央研究院民族學研究所編譯。(原著出版於1915年)
小泉鐵/黃廷嫥&何姵儀中譯（2014）。臺灣土俗誌。原住民族委員會。(原著出版於1933年)
小泉鐵/黃棯惠譯（2014）。蕃鄉土俗誌。原住民族委員會。原著出版於1933年)
中華環境工程協會(2014)。環境科學概論。中華環境工程協會。
井上伊之助（1997）。上帝在編織。台南：人光。
王相華、田玉娟（2009）。臺灣六個原住民部落之山田燒墾農耕方式及其傳統生態知識研究報告。國家公園學報二〇〇九年第十九卷第四期。
王梅霞（2003）。從Gaga的多義性看泰雅族的社會性質。人類學期刊。
王梅霞（2006）。泰雅族。三民。
王勤田（1995）。生態文化。楊智文化。
瓦歷斯．尤幹和余光弘（2002）。臺灣原住民史︰泰雅族史篇。國史館臺灣文獻館。
布興．大立（2007）。泰雅爾族的信仰與文化：神學的觀點。國家展望文教基金會出版：翰蘆圖書。
休斯(2013）。地球與人：生命群落的動態演繹(郭彥彤/吳緯疆譯)。遠足文化。(原著出版於2009)
貝爾、姆斯、格林、傑弗瑞、費雪、安德森（2003）。環境心理學(聶筱秋、胡中凡、唐筱雯、葉冠伶譯)。桂冠。
宋建和譯(1997)。日據時期原住民行政志稿。臺灣文獻會編印。
宋國用(2011)。原住民部落營造與再生策略-以復興鄉溪口臺部落為例。臺北大學，碩士論文。
李亦園、徐人仁、宋龍生、吳燕（1963）。南澳的泰雅人。中央研究院民族學研究所專刊之五，中央研究院民族學研究所出版。
李亦園（1982）。臺灣土著民族的社會與文化。聯經出版事業公司印行（臺灣研究叢刊）。
------ (1993)。臺灣土著社會的兩種社會及宗教結構系統。臺灣土著社會文化研究論文集(初版第三刷)。聯經。
李慧慧（2007）。社群雞驗與文化變遷---石門水庫淹沒區泰雅人遷移史。政治大學民族研究所碩士論文。
阮昌銳（2002）。泰雅人的生活型態探源-一個泰雅人的現身說法。新竹縣文化局。
沈明仁（1999）。從狩獵文化中的Gaga談泰雅族人的生活。原住民教育研究。
沈清松主編（2002）。哲學概論。五南。
林良謀(2009)。內發性社區營造─ 以比亞外部落為例。警察大學。
林明福（2017）。lmuhuw語典︰泰雅族口述傳統重要語彙匯編。文化部文化資產局。
林幼雀（2004）。宗教信仰（Utux，Gaga）與泰雅族婦女。drr.lib.ksu.edu.tw
林益仁（2015）。泰雅族傳統領域與流域治理的啟示。臺灣社會研究季刊。airitilibrary. com
林益仁（2017）。書評：全球現代性的危機：亞洲傳統與可持續的未來—一個生態人文的觀點。臺灣社會學第 33 期。
林晚生譯（2007）。福爾摩沙紀事：From far Formosa，馬偕臺灣回憶錄。前衛。
林衡道（1984）。臺灣史。臺灣文獻會(再版)。
吳榮順、林明福、李佳芸著（2014）。泰雅史詩聲聲不息：林明福的口述傳統與口唱史詩。桃園市文化局。
官大偉（2013）。泰雅族河川知識與農業知識的建構—一個民族科學的觀點。臺灣原住民族研究學報(第3 卷第 4 期 頁113-35 2013年/冬季號)。
官大偉（2014）。原住民與國土計畫—一個民族生態學的觀點。臺灣原住民族自然資源運用與永續發展。翰蘆圖書總經銷。
洪田浚（1994）。臺灣原住民籥天錄。台原出版社。
科達克．C.P.(2018)。文化人類學：領會文化多樣性(徐雨村編譯)。臺灣東華。(原著於2009出版)
洪英聖（1993）。臺灣先住民腳印︰十族文化傳奇。時報文化出版。
施正鋒（2005）。臺灣原住民的集體人權與美澳紐加等國的比較。發表於東吳大學主辦[第一屆人權學術論文研討會]，台北。
施正鋒主編（2014）。臺灣原住民族自然資源運用與永續發展。翰蘆圖書總經銷。
梁福鎮（2016）。教育哲學︰起源與問題的探索。五南。
馬騰嶽（2003）。分裂的民族語破碎的臉︰〔泰雅族〕民族認同的建構與分裂。國立清華大學人類學研究所。
徐榮春（2010）。日治時期，馬武督泰雅族人的土地變遷經驗與Gaga對話。未出版。
原民會（2014）。93年原住民重大歷史事件學術研討會成果報告。行政院原住民族委員會。
高萬金（1998）。編織的上帝:詮釋泰雅爾傳統信仰的經驗。臺灣神學教育年刊。
郭麗珍(2003)。環境正義給我的10堂課。環保署。
秦耀東（2013）。人類智慧溯源：人的本質探索。秀威資訊科技。
張萬富、川田隆(1985)。台灣的陸鳥。禽影圖書有限公司。
格雷(2012) 。文化研究︰民族誌方法與生活文化(許夢芸譯)。韋伯文化國際。原著於2003出版)
孫稚堤、顏愛靜（2012）。流域治理與土地倫理之研究－以石門水庫上游集水區的原住民族部落為例》。地理學報。airitilibrary.com
康培德（2009）。泰雅族msbtunux的美麗與哀愁~頭角與奎輝部落KButa世系群家族史。原民會。
莊慶信（2006）。臺灣原住民的傳統智慧與環境正義—哲學的省思。輔仁大學哲學與文化第33卷第3期。
移川子之藏（1935）。臺灣原住民族系統所屬之研究(中研院民族所編譯)。中央研究院民族學研究。
湯京平、簡秀華、張華（2013）。參與式治理和正義的永續性︰比較兩岸原住民發展政策的制度創意。人文及社會科學集刊。rchss.sinica.edu.tw
黑帶．巴彥（2000）。泰雅族的GAGA。新竹文獻(第3期2000/10)。
傅君（1997）。臺灣原住民「生態智慧」與野生動物保育。(山海文化雙月刊17 期1997.11：42-51)。
傅琪貽（2003）。原住民重大歷史事件：大嵙崁事事件1885~1910。行政院原住民族委員會。
張萬富、川田隆（1985）。臺灣的陸鳥。禽影圖書有限公司。
萊撒·阿給佑（2012）。泰雅爾族傳統文化︰部落哲學、神話故事與現代意義。新銳文創。
復興鄉公所（2000）。復興鄉誌。復興鄉公所發行。
復興鄉公所（2014）。復興鄉誌增修版。復興鄉公所發行。
黃約伯、劉秋玲、丁進添(2017)。在地取向，課程與原住民：教育人類學的觀點。Http://www.edubook.com.tw/OAtw/File/PDf/408512.pdf
黃森泉（1997）。論噶噶（Gaga）與泰雅族之倫理規範。原住民教育季刊。iritilibrary.com
黃新木（未出版）。臺灣原住民族系統所屬之研究譯稿。中研院民族學所。
黃國超（2002）。泰雅族的社會構成：Gaga、niqan 與 qalang。田野詮釋論文集。中央研究院民族學研究所。
曼恩(2013)。物種大交換丈量的是界史 (黃煜文譯)。遠足文化。(原著於2011年出版)
達西烏拉灣．畢馬（2003）。泰雅族神話與傳說。晨星。
楊南郡(2011)。臺灣原住民族系統所屬之研究。南天。
楊冠政（2002）。環境倫理－環境教育終極目標。環境教育學刊。
楊冠政（2011）。環境倫理學理論。大開資訊。
奧爾多．李奧波特（2015）。沙郡年紀：像山一樣的思考，荒野寫給我們的自然之歌(李靜瀅譯)。大雁文化發行。
廖守臣（1998）。泰雅族的社會組織。私立慈濟醫學暨人文社會學院。
臺灣總督府警務局理蕃課編著（1977）。高砂族調查書。南天書局。
蔡清田（2013）。社會科學研究方法新論。五南。
蔡秀菊（2005）。司馬庫斯部落共同經營模式之探討。靜宜大學生態學研究所碩士論文。
劉益昌（2009）。桃園縣復興鄉考古遺址調查與初步研究計畫報告書，桃園縣政府文化局。
鄭昭明（2010）。認知心理學︰理論與實踐。學富文化。
衛惠林、王人英（1966）。臺灣土著各族近年來人口增加與聚落移動調查報告。國立臺灣大學文學院考古人類學系。
蕭世暉和汪明輝（2016）。解殖民的文化地景再現：以泰雅族人繪製「會吟唱的地圖」為例。地理研究(第65期105年11月)。
簡鴻模(2000)。臺灣原住民傳統宗教與生態環保－以泰雅族賽德克亞支德克塔亞群為例，輔仁宗教研究(第2期)。
羅恩加（2016）。原住民知識、農業生產與部落發展︰泰雅族石磊部落的自然農業。國立政治大學民族系博士學位論文。
二、英文目錄
Agrawal, A. (1995). Dismantling the divide between indigenous and scientific Knowledge. Development and Change 26:413-439.
Allwood, C.M. & Berry, J.B. (2006). Origins and development of indigenous psychologies: An international analysis. International Journal of Psychology 41( 4):243-268.
Armitage, D. and Plummer, R. (2010). Adaptive Capacity and Environment Governance Springer.
Barnhardt, R, and Kawagely, A.O. (2005). Indigenous knowledge systems and Alaska Native Ways of knowing. Anthropology and Education Quarterly 36(1):8-23.
Berkes, F. (1993). Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Perspective. In Inglis (eds), Traditional Ecological knowledge, Concepts and Cases. International Program on Traditional Ecological Knowledge, International Development Research Center, 1-9.
Berkes, F., Folke, C. & Gadgil, M. (1995). Traditional ecological knowledge, boidiversity, resilience and sustainability, In C.A. Perrings et al.(eds.), Biodiversity Conservation, 281-299.
Berkes, F., Colding, J. & Folke, C. (2000). Redicovery of Traditional ecological knowledge as Adaptive Management. Ecological Applications 10(5): 125-162.
Berkes, F. (2009). Indigenous Ways of Knowing and the Study of Environmental Change. Taylor & Francis Online. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03014220909510568
Berkes, F. (2012). Sacred Ecology (3rd ed). Routledge.
Berg, K.J. (2013). Ecological and Ethnoecological Classification of a Forested Landscape in the Tayal Mrqwang Territories, Taiwan (ROC). University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada. https://atrium.lib.uoguelph.ca/xmlui/handle/10214/6966
Bellah, R.N. (1983). The ethical aims of social inquiry. In Haan et al. (eds). Social Science as Moral Inquiry. Columbia University Press, 360-382.
Bird-David, N. (1999). “Animism” revisited: personhood, environment, and relational Epistemology. Current Anthropology 40:67-91.
https://www.academia.edu/19548365/Bird_David_N_1999_Animism_revisited_Personhood_environment_and_relational_epistemology_Current_Anthropology_40s_S67_S91
Bowers, C.A. (2002). Toward an ecojustice pedagogy. Environmental Education Research 8(1):21-34.
Boylan, M. (2022). Environmental Ethics (3rd ed). John Wiley & Sons.
Brown, L. (2013). Storytelling and ecological management: understanding kinship and Complexity. Journal of Sustainability Education 4: www.jsedimensions.org. Accessed 6 July 2016.
Burger, J. (1990). The Gaia Atlas of First Peoples: A Future for the Indigenous World. Anchor Books/Doubleday.
Cajete, G. (1994). Look to the Mountain (6th printing). KAVAKI press.
Cajete, G. (2000). Native Science, Natural Laws of Interdependence. Clear Light publishers.www.clearlightbooks.com
Castellano, M.B. (2004). Ethics of aboriginal research. Journal of Aboriginal Health 2004:98-114.
Carney, M. (2021).Value(s): Building a Better World for All. Public Affairs. New York.
Chen, Y. Suchet-Pearson S. Howitt, R. (2018). Reframing Indigenous water rights in “ modern” Taiwan: reflecting on Tayal experience of colonized common. International Journal of the Commons 12:378-401.
Clark, D.A. & Slocombe, D.S. (2009). Respect for grizzly bear: an aboriginal approach for co-Existence and resilience. Ecology Society 14, 42
Clifford, J. (2001). Indigenous articulations. The Contemporary Pacific 13(2): 467-507. https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/ec5f3d4b-3615-468f-87bc-217d68b297ad/content
Cochran, P.A.L. & Marshall, C.A. (2008). Indigenous ways of knowing: Implications for participatory research and community. Journal of Public Health 1:22-27.https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/full/10.2105/AJPH.2006.093641
Colwell, T.B. (1969). The Balance of nature: A ground for human values. Main Currents in Modern Thought 26:46-52.
Dei, G.J.S. (2002). Spiritual knowing and transformative learning. Expanding the Boundaries of Transformative Learning. Springer.
Delpit, L. (1995). Other People’s Children: Cultural Conflict in the Classroom. The New Press. books.google.com
Denzin, N.K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 6(2):80-88.
Dove, M.R. (2006）. Indigenous People and Environmental Politics. Annual Review of Anthropology 35:191-208.
Dunlap, R.E., Van Liere K.D. (1984). Commitment to the dominant social paradigm and concern for environmental quality. Society Science Quarterly 65: 1013-1028. Search.proquest.com
Ellerby, J. H. (2000). Spirituality, Holism and Healing among the Lakota Sioux, towards an Understanding of Indigenous medicine. National Library of Canada.file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/MQ53153.pdf
Fang ,W.T., Hu, H.W. & Lee, C.S. (2016). Atayal’s identification of sustainability: traditional ecological knowledge and indigenous science of a hunting culture. Sustainability Science 11(1): 33-43.
Fernández‐Llamazares, Á. & Cabeza, M. (2018). Rediscovering the Potential of Indigenous Storytelling for Conservation Practice. Conservation Letters 11(3)https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12398
Feinberg, J. (1974). The Rights of Animals and Unborn Generations, in Blackstone, W. T.(ed.). Philosophy and Environmental Crisis. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 43-68.
Ferreira, M.P. & Gendron, F.(2011). Community-based participatory research with traditional and indigenous communities of the Americas: Historical context and future directions. International Journal of Critical Pedagogy 3(3):153-168.
Fischer, K.W., Wang, L. Kennedy, B. & Chang, C.L.(1998). Culture and biology in Emotional development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 81:21-43.https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ572339
Fitzgerald, T (2006) Walking between two worlds: Indigenous women and educational Leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership 34(2):201-213.
Fonda, M. (2011). Introductory essay: Traditional knowledge, spirituality and lands.The International indigenous Policy Journal. 22(4): // doi.org / 10.18584 /iipj.2011.2.4.1
Gadgil, M., Berkes, F. & Folke, C.(1993). Indigenous Knowledge for Biodiversity conversation. AMBO 22:2-3.
Gonzales, O. (2017). Spiritual knowledge Unearthed：Indigenous Peoples and Land Right. In Castillo, M.M. & Strecker, M. (eds.) Heritage and Rights of Indigenous peoople. 151-159.Publish by Leiden University press.
Haenn, N. & Wilk, R.(2006). The Environment in Anthropology: A Reader in Ecology Culture, and Sustainable Living. NYU Press. bookss.google.com
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of commons, Science 162, 1243.JSTOR.
Hart, M. (2007). Indigenous knowledge and research: The míkiwáhp as a symbol for reclaiming our knowledge and ways of knowing. First Peoples Child & Family Review 3(1):83-90.https://www.erudit.org/en/journals/fpcfr/1900-v1-n1-fpcfr05299/1069528ar.pdf
Hart, M.A. (2010). Indigenous worldviews, knowledge, and research: the development of an Indigenous Research paradigm. Journal of Indigenous Voices in Social Work 1:1A https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/jisd/article/view/63043
Henry, E. & Pene, H.(2001). Kaupapa Maori: Locating Indigenous ontology, epistemology and methodology in the academy. Organization 8(2), 234–242.https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1350508401082009?journal Code =orga
Huntington, H.P. (2000). Using Traditional Ecological Knowledge in science: Methods and Applications, Ecological Applications 10(5):1270-1274.
Inglis, J.T. (1993). Traditional Ecological Knowledge, Concepts and Cases. International Program on Traditional Ecological Knowledge, International Development Research Center, Canada Museum of Nature.
Iseke, J. (2013). Spirituality as decolonizing: Elders Albert Desjarlais, George Mcdermott, and Tom McCallum share understandings of life in healing practices. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society 2(1): 35-54.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0
Johannes, R.E. (2002). Did indigenous conservation ethics exist? SPC Traditional Marine Resource Management and Knowledge Information Bulletin #14:3-7.
Johnson, J.T., Howitt, R., Cajete, G., Berkes, F. & Lousis, R.P. (2016). Weaving Indigenous and sustainability sciences to diversify our methods. Sustainability Science 11:1-11.
Jones, J.P.G., & Andriamarovololona, M.M., Hockley, N. (2008). The importance of taboos and social norms to conservation in Madagascar. Conservation Biology 22(4) : 976-986.
Jucker, R. (2004). Have the cake and eat it: Ecojustice verus development? Is it possiple to reconcile social and economic equity, ecological sustainability, and human development, Educational Studies 36(1):10.1207/s15326993es3601_3
Karrow, D. and Fazio, X. (2010). Educating-within-place: Care, citizen science and ecojustice. In Cultural Studies and Environmentalism. Springer.193-214. http://www.researchgate.net/p.blication/227014820
Kawagley, A.O. & Norris, D.(1998). The indigenous worldview of Yupiaq culture: It’s scientific Nature and Relevance to the practice and teaching of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 35(2):133-144.
Kelbessa, W. (2011). Indigenous and modern environmental ethics: A study of the Indigenous Oromo environmental ethic and modern issues of environment and development. Ethiopian Philosophical Studies I. Cultural Heritage and Contemporary Change Series II, Africa, Volume 13.Washington DC: Council for Research in Values and Philosophy. https://crvp.org/publications/Series-II/13-Contents.pdf
Kovach, M. (2010) Conversational method in Indigenous research. First Peoples Child & Family Review 5(1):40-48.https://www.erudit.org/en/journals/fpcfr/1900-v1-n1-fpcfr05263/1069060ar.pdf
Kuan, D. W. 2015. Indigenous ecological knowledge and contemporary disaster management: A case study on the Tayal communities’ experience in the watershed of Shih-Men Reservoir. Journal of Geographical Science 76:97–132.
Layarty, S.M. (2003). Hermeneutic phenomenology and phenomenology: A comparison of historical and methodological considerations. International Journal of Qualitative Methodology 2(3): 10.1177/160940690300200303
Lee, K. (1997). An Animal: What is it? Environmental Values 6(4):393-410. INGENTA.https://doi.org/10.3197/096327197776679022
Lele, M.S.(1991). Sustainable development: a critical review. World Development 19(6): 607-621.https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/105953/mod_resource/content/9/texto_1.pdf
Lin, C.N. & Tsai, B.W. (2011). Agrarian land use change and constructions of the Commons : A case of Indidgenous agriculture development in Taiwan’s mountain Indiaana.edu.
https://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlc/bitstream/handle/10535/7376/402.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Lin, Y. R. (2015). Ecological governance of Indigenous peoples’ land: The case study of Nan-shan Event [400 Yi-shiuan Chen et al.]. Journal of the Taiwan Indigenous Studies Association 5(1):59–70.
Lowenstein, E., Martusewicz, R., Voelker, L. (2010). Developing teachers’ capacity for ecojustice education and community-based learning. Teacher Education Quarterly 37(4): 99-118.
Mangena, M.(1995). Our Black Languages are being suffocated. Pace Magganize, October.
Marietta, D.E.(1979). The interrelationship of ecological science and environmentalethics. Environmental Ethics 1(3):195-207.https://www.pdcnet.org/enviroethics/content/enviroethics_1979_0001_0003_0195_0207
Martusewicz, R.A., Lupinacci, J. and Schnakenberg, G. (2010). Ecojustice Education for Science Educators. In Doug Karrow & Xavier Fazio (eds.). Educating - Within- Place: Care, Citizen Science, and Ecojustice. Springer, 11-27. http://www.researchgate.net/p.blication/227014820
Mazzucato, M. (2020). The Value of Everything. Public Affairs.
McGinn, T.(1974). Ecology and Ethics, International Philosophical Quarterly 14:149-60.
McGregor, D.(2006).Traditional ecological knowledge. the Arts and Science Review, 3(1), Faculty of Arts & Science, University of Toronto. http://www.silvafor.org/assets/silva/PDF/DebMcGregor.pdf
Merchant, C. (1992). Radical Ecology. Routlege.
Merlan, F. (2014). Recent rituals of Indigenous recognition in Australia: welcome to Country. American Anthropologist 116:296-309. Wiley Online Library.
Montecinos, C. (1995). Culture as Ongoing Dialog: Implications for Multicultural Education, Critical Pedagogy, and the Politics of Difference. Sleeter, C. E., & McLaren, P. L. (eds.) State University of New York Press. books.google.com
Moore, D.S.(2005). Suffering for Territory: Race and Power in Zimbabwe. Weaver Press.
Moran, E.F.(1979). Human Adaptability: An Introduction to Ecological Anthology. Westview Press.
Næss, A. (1973). The shallow and the deep, long-lange ecology movement. Inquity 16: 95-100. aap.tandfonline.com
Odora Hoppers, C.A.(2000). The centre-periphery in knowledge production in the twenty-first century. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education 30(3):283-291.
O’Shannessy, C. (2009). Language variation and change in a north Australian Indigenous community. Variationist approaches to indigenous minority language. Books.google.com
Passmore, J.(1974). Man's Responsibility for Nature: Ecological Problems and Western Traditions. Scribner. pp. 186.‎
Peat, F.D.(1994). Indigenous science. In Lighting the Seventh fire: The Spiritual Ways, Healing, and Science of the Native American. Citadel, 239-274.
Pedersen, M.A. (2001). Totemism, Animism and North Asian Indigenous Ontologies. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 7(3):411-427.
Porsanger J (2004). An essay about indigenous methodology. Nordlit 15 (2004):105-120.
Posey D.A. (1999) Introduction: Culture and nature–The inextricable link. Cultural and spiritual Values of Biodiversity (1999): 1-18.
Robyn, L. (2002). Indigenous knowledge and technology: Creating environmental justice in the twenty-first century. American Indian Quarterly 26(2):198-220.http://www.jstor.org/stable/4128459 .Accessed: 30/08/2013 11:37
Rollston, H. III.(1975). Is There an Ecological Ethic? Ethics : An International Journal of Social, Political, and Legal Philosophy 85: 93-109.
Rollston, H. III.(2003). Environmental ethics.The Blackwell Companion to philosophy, 2nd (ed.) Nicholas Bunnin and E. P. Tsui-James (eds.) Blackwell Publishing.
Rose, C.M. (1994). Given-ness and Gift: Property and the Quest for Environmental Ethics. Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 1814.
https://openyls.law.yale.edu/bitstream/handle/20.500.13051/1075/Given_ness_and_Gift___Property_and_the_Quest_for_Environmental_Ethics.pdf?sequence=2
Rozzi, R., Arango, X., Massardo, F., Anderson, C., Heidinger, K., Moses, K. (2008).Field environmental philosophy and biocultural conservation: the Omora Ethobotanical Park educational program. 83(1):27-68.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273717836_Field_Environmental_Philosophy_and_Biocultural_Conservation
Rusinga, O. & Maposa R.(2010). Traditional religion and natural rehouses: A reflection on the Significance of Indigenous systems on the utilization of natural resouces among the Ndau People in Southeast Zimbabwe. Journal of Ecology and the Natural Environnment 2(9):201-206.
Schwartz B (1987). The battle for human nature: science. Morality and Modern Life.WW Norton & Company.
Schlosberg, D., Carruthers, D.(2010). Indigenous Struggles, Environmental Justice, and Community Capabilities. Global Environmental Politics 10 (4): 12–35.https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00029
Sibanda, T.,Dobson H.M., Cooper, J.F., Manyangarirwa W. Chiimba, W.(2000). Pest Management challenges for smallholder vegetable farmers in Zimbabwe. Crop Protection 19(8-10):807-815.
Smith, E.A., Wishnie, M. (2000). Conservation and subsistence in small-scale societies. Annual Review of Anthropology. 29:493-524. Doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.493
Snively, G., & Corsiglia, J. (1998). Discovering Indigenous Science: Implications for Science Education. National Association of Research in Science Teaching. Willey,19-22.
Snodgrass, J. & Tiedje, K. (2008). Indigenous nature reverence and conservation: seven ways of transcending an unnecessary dichotomy. Journal for the Study of Religion Nature and Culture 2(1)10.1558/jsrnc.v2i1.6
Song, K.S., Lepage, B., Fang, W.T. (2021). Managing water and wetlands based on the Tayal’s interpretation of Utux and Gaga. Wetlands 41, 92 (2021).https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-021-01473-y
Song, K.S. (2022). Book Review: Global Indigenous Health: Reconciling the Past, Engaging the Present, Animating the Future. AlterNative 18(3):470–471.
Song, K.S., Lepage, B., Fang, W.T. (2022).The conflict between environmental justice and culture. An international Journal of Indigenous People, AlterNative https://doi.org/10.1177/11771801221147947
Struck, P. (2014). Animals and divination. The Oxford Handbook of Animals in Classical Thought. books.google.com.
Tang, C.P. & Tang, S.Y. (2009). Institutional Adaptation and Community-Based Conservation of Natural Resources: The cases of the Tao and Atayal in Taiwan. Human Ecology 38:101–111.
Thaman K.H. (2003) Decolonizing Pacific studies: Indigenous perspectives, knowledge, and wisdom in higher education. The Contemporary Pacific 15:1-17.
Tinker, G.E. (1996). An American Indian theological response to Ecojustice. Defending Mother Earth: Native American perspectives on Ecojustice. 153-176, Uidaho.edu.
Vayada, A.P. (1983). Progressive contextualization: Methods research for in Human Ecology. Human Ecology 11(3): 265-281.
Venkataraman, B. (2009). Education for sustainable development. Science and Policy for Sustainable Development. Taylor & Francis.
Wang, M.H. (2008). The Reinvention of Ethnicity and Culture: A comparative study on the Atayal and the Truku in Taiwan. Journal of Archaeology and Anthropology. 68:1-44.
Washington W. Taylor B, Kopninna H.N., Cryer P, Piccolo J.J. (2017). Why egocentrism is the key pathway to sustainability. Ecology Citizen 1(1):35-41.
Watson‐Gegeo, K.A.(2004). Mind, Language, and Epistemology: Toward a Language Socialization Paradigm for SLA. The Modern Language Journal 88(3):331-350.
Waston, A. & Hungtington, O.H.(2008). They’re here—I can feel them: the epistemic spaces of Indigenous and Western Knowledges. Society Cultural Geography 9(3): 257-281.
Wilk, R.R. (1985). The ancient Maya and the political present. Journal of Anthropological Research 41(3):307-326.
Willerslev, R. (2004). Spirits as ‘ready to hand’ a phenomenological analysis of Yukaghir spiritual knowledge and dreaming. Anthropological Theory 4(4):395-418.https://doi.org/10.1177/14634996040479
Williams, B. Coyle, J. Healy, D.(1998). The meaning of patient satisfaction: an Explanation of high reported levels. Social Science & Medicine 47(9):1351-1359.
Wilson, S. (2008). Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Halifax, Nova Scotia: Fernwood Pubishing.
Wilson, S. (2001). What is an indigenous methodology? Canadian Journal of Native Education 25(2):175-179.
Wilson, C. (2001). Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples by Linda Tuhiwai Smith 1999, Zed Books, London.
Wolmer, W.(2007). From wilderness vision to farm invasions: Conservation and Development in Zimbabwe's South-east Lowveld. James Currey.
Wyk, J.A.V. (2002). Indigenous Knowledge Systems: implications for natural science and Technology teaching and learning. South African Journal of Education 22(4):305-312.
Zidny, R. and Eilks, I. (2018). Indigenous Knowledge as a Socio-Cultural Context of Science to Promote Transformative Education for Sustainable Development: Insights into a Case Study on the Baduy Community (Indonesia).
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328274745_Indigenous_knowledge_as_a_sociocultural_context_of_science_to_promote_transformative_education_for_sustainable_development_A_case_study_on_the_Baduy_community_Indonesia