簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 王慕羽
Wang, Mu-Yu
論文名稱: 新媒體時代的校長領導:以媒體素養為視角的初探研究
Principal Leadership in the New Media Age: A Preliminary Study from the Perspective of Media Literacy
指導教授: 林子斌
Lin, Tzu-Bin
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 教育政策與行政研究所
Graduate Institute of Educational Policy and Administration
論文出版年: 2019
畢業學年度: 107
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 135
中文關鍵詞: 校長領導-媒體素養組合校長領導媒體素養新媒體
英文關鍵詞: Principal Leadership- Media Literacy Set, Principal Leadership, Media Literacy, New Media
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/THE.NTNU.GEPA.002.2019.F02
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:241下載:76
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 在新媒體技術蓬勃發展的二十一世紀中,媒體環境的改變不只已經成為我們文化中的一部分,也進而對學校教育的環境產生衝擊與影響。校長是一所學校的領導者,必須要在變化的環境中掌握脈絡並因應學校內外部參與者的需求,本研究的目的便是探討在新媒體時代下校長領導與媒體素養的關係,並理解校長領導的情境脈絡下,需要什麼樣特定的媒體素養組合。
    本研究以個案研究為取徑,訪談七位參與過「大學,請讓我們好好教孩子」連署活動,具有媒體參與經驗之公立高中校長,並以所屬學校為個案範疇,探討在學校環境與校長領導的脈絡下,校長對媒體素養的觀點。透過不同個案分析後,本研究發現新媒體的發展,一方面為校長提供以新媒體技術為治校工具的關係,另一方面新媒體環境也與學校生態互相影響,成為校長經營管理學校時不可忽視的重要因素。奠基在這樣的基礎上,本研究整合並建構一個符合脈絡性的校長領導-媒體素養組合,這個組合強調領導焦點(校務正常運作、課程教學品質、學生學習中心)作為引導校長發展媒體素養知能的方向,並且將校長所需的媒體素養分為校長個別層級知能(媒體轉化、後設媒體認知、媒體責任)與學校團隊共享知能(媒體參與、媒體運用),整體而言,透過上述媒體素養組合,有助於校長在新媒體時代檢視其領導脈絡與專業角色,並藉此發展對應的媒體素養知能。
    本研究提出的校長領導-媒體素養組合,透過與Buckingham媒體素養概念模型與新媒體素養框架的比較與分析後,進行了精緻化的修正與討論,並就媒體素養組合提供實務工作者應用上的建議與提醒,並對後續校長領導領域與媒體素養領域有興趣的研究者,提出後續研究可能的方向。

    In the twenty-first century, the development of new media has created a new culture of interaction and changed the way we communicate, and brought huge impact to school education. Principal as the main leader of a school, needs to respond to the change of environment and keep focus on the educational purpose for school participants including students, teachers, and administrators. This study is aimed to investigate the relationship between principal leadership and media literacy in the new media age, and what kind of specific media literacy set would be beneficial for principal to lead the school.
    Seven public high school principals who attended the petition of “Universities, let us teach the children well” were selected as the cases for this study to share their perspectives of media literacy based on their experience of their media participation and school leadership. Through analyzing the data collected from the semi-structured interview, it is found that the development of new media in one way offered principals new tools for managing school, in another way impact the school culture which become a new factor that principals need to consider in. The Principal Leadership- Media Literacy Set (PL-ML Set) is proposed in this study to show the specific media literacy that principals need in the context of leadership focus on school practice, classroom practice and student learning. The media literacy set is divided into individual literacy (media transformation, meta-media cognition, and media responsibility) and school team-shared literacy (media participation and media use). Overall, the PL-ML Set can help principals to examine their professional roles in new media age, and develop the corresponding media literacy with the context of their leadership practice.
    Finally, the PL-ML Set is compared with Buckingham’s media literacy conceptual model and New Media Literacy Framework. The PL-ML Set is further discussed and refined though the comparison. The suggestions to the practitioners and the follow-up researchers are mentioned for the possible direction of the application and further investigation.

    目次 vi 表次 vii 圖次 viii 第一章、 緒論 1 第一節、 研究背景與動機 1 第二節、 研究目的與問題 4 第二章、 文獻探討 7 第一節、 媒體素養的發展脈絡 7 第二節、 媒體素養的理論架構 18 第三節、 校長領導與媒體素養 35 第三章、 研究設計與實施 49 第一節、 研究設計 49 第二節、 研究對象 51 第三節、 資料蒐集 53 第四節、 資料分析 54 第五節、 研究信實度 57 第六節、 研究倫理 58 第四章、研究結果與分析 59 第一節、媒體環境對學校與校長的影響 59 第二節、校長領導與媒體素養的關係 74 第五章、研究討論 95 第一節、校長領導中的媒體素養組合 95 第二節、不同媒體素養理論觀點的比較 101 第六章、結論與建議 113 第一節、結論 113 第二節、建議 116 第三節、研究者省思 118 參考文獻 121 附錄一、 訪談大綱 133 附錄二、 訪談大綱與文獻對應關係表 134 附錄三、 媒體素養定義整合表 135

    壹、 中文部分:
    中央通訊社(2018年3月)。台大五冠王報導 建中校長:不值得鼓勵。取自:http://www.cna.com.tw/news/ahel/201803260302-1.aspx
    王文良、徐瑤芬(2011)。基督教教會牧執同工資訊素養內涵之研究—以台中市為例。新世紀宗教研究,10(2),75-105。
    江宜芷(2017)。教育改革的媒體再現:以111學年度大學入學方案調整為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。
    自由時報(2016年11月)。「轉眼到人生終章」建中生跳樓身亡。取自:http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/society/paper/1048251
    自由時報(2018年3月)。響應建中拒訪六冠王 蘭女校長:華而不實。取自:http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/2378877
    吳明清(2006)。學校領導的整合架構。臺灣教育,642,2-5。
    吳翠珍、陳世敏(2007)。媒體素養教育。臺北:巨流。
    呂傑華、秦梅心(2008)。花蓮縣國小教師電視媒體素養內涵認知及媒體素養教育實踐之研究。社會科教育研究,13,265-294。
    呂傑華、陳逸雯(2009)。參與媒體素養研習之國民小學教師實施媒體素養教育之調查研究。教育實踐與研究,22(1),1-39。
    李柏佳(2017)。從第三隻眼看「學校行政的未來領導與決策」-以國民教育為例。學校行政,112,1-13。
    周韞維(2003)。媒體素養教育現況調查。台北:台北市政府教育局。
    林子斌(譯)(2006)。媒體教育:素養、學習與現代文化(原作者:David Buckingham)。臺北:巨流。
    林文律(2012)。校長專業的內涵及校長專業體系之建構。載於林文律(主編),校長專業之建構(頁3-34)。臺北:心理。
    林明地(2002)。校長學—校長學工作分析與角色取向。臺北:五南。
    林明地、梁金都(2016)。校長領導與學校集體智慧。臺北:高等教育。
    林菁、郭玫叔(2012)。國小一年級資訊素養教育課程實施成效之探討。教育資料與圖書館學,50(1),41-74。
    林菁、陳尚蕙(2009)。國民小學教師媒體素養之調查研究。臺中教育大學學報:教育類,23(2),1-28。
    林誠、林介銘(2010)。外勤基層員警對資訊素養能力提升的研究-以臺北市為例。創新研發學刊,6(1),80-99。
    林雍智(2015)。臺灣媒體素養教育政策2008~2014分析研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。
    洪秀熒(2005)。國民小學行政人員資訊素養與學校效能關係之研究。學校行政,36,32-51。
    洪啟昌(2001)。教育行政機關媒體應對與公眾發言。北縣教育,47,51-60。
    孫敏芝、吳宗立、林官蓓(2012)。中小學校長培訓與評鑑制度之跨國研究-以臺灣、新加坡、韓國為例。屏東:國立屏東教育大學。
    財團法人臺灣網路資訊中心(2017)。2017年臺灣無線網路使用調查報告。國立政治大學。
    高潔純、吳定興(2015)。護理人員對行動護理站的接受度與資訊素養之相關性研究。醫務管理期刊,16(1),59-77。
    張芬芬(2010)。質性資料分析的五步驟:在抽象階梯上爬升。初等教育學刊,35,87-120。
    張奕華、徐新逸(2010)。幼稚園教育人員資訊素養與學校效能關係之研究。學校行政,67,68-86。
    張嘉倫(2006)。我國國小媒體素養教育能力指標之建構(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北。
    教育部(2002)。媒體素養政策白皮書。取自:
    http://history.moe.gov.tw/important_list.asp
    教育部(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。取自:http://www.thdf.tc.edu.tw/ischool/widget/main_menu/show.php?id=474&map=0
    章明哲(2015)。媒體記者與國小教師偕同實施媒體素養教育研究。南台人文社會學報,13,45-77。
    許育典(2010)。媒體素養教育在我國公民教育的現況與檢討。當代教育研究。18(4),121-159。
    郭玉慧、葉興華(2014)。媒體人與教育人的跨界實踐—以媒體素養課程發展為例。課程與教學,17(2),43-66。
    郭宜婷(2012)。國中學生媒體識讀能力施測問卷之建構(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。
    陳瑞南(2015)。警察人員媒體素養之研究:以六都為例(未出版之博士論文)。中央警察大學,桃園。
    陳麗梅、彭麗蓉、蔡育真、王玉霞與吳玫錚(2011)。護理人員資訊素養能力及其相關因素之探討∼以某醫療體系為例。秀傳醫學雜誌,10(3&4),143-155。
    富邦文教基金會(2018)。關於我們-基金會簡介。取自:http://www.fubonedu.org.tw/aboutus02.aspx
    曾俊凱(2000)。從國民教育法第九條修正案談校長新角色。北縣教育,36,60-65。
    黃宗顯(2008)。領導理論研究蓋覽。載於黃宗顯主編,學校領導:新理論與實踐(頁1-25)。臺北:五南。
    翟本瑞(2011)。從社區、虛擬社區到社會網絡網站:社會理論的變遷。資訊社會研究,21,1-31。
    臺北市媒體服務代理商協會(2017)。2017年臺灣媒體白皮書。臺北市:臺北市媒體服務代理商協會。
    數位時代(2013)。Google發表2013年第一季智慧型手機使用調查,臺灣依賴度居亞太區之冠,取自:
    https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/28915/BN-ARTICLE-28915
    潘慧玲(2004)。教育研究的取徑:概念與應用。臺北:高教出版。
    蔡金田(2009)。學校品牌建構與行銷管理之探究。國民教育研究學報,23,139-160。
    蔡進發、蕭至惠與蕭元笙(2014)。哀兵訴求必勝?品牌故事與品牌強度對消費者品牌認同與購買意願之影響。商略學報,6(4),261-279。
    蔡進雄(2017)。教育領導新論:微領導時代的來臨。臺北:翰蘆。
    聯合新聞網(2017年5月)。花蓮某國中傳霸凌事件 校長:只是玩鬧過頭。取自:https://udn.com/news/story/7320/2487416
    謝文全(2015)。教育行政學(五版)。臺北:高等教育。
    羅曉南、余陽洲(主編)(2015)。批判的媒體識讀(第三版)。臺北:正中書局。
    蘇益利、劉素滿、王如杏、許俊傑、陳紅蓮、林俊賢、徐文成、脈樹、塔給鹿敦、林進鎰、陳育民(2012)。學校媒體公關與校園危機處理。載於國家教育研究院(編印),第129期國中校長儲訓班:個案研究集(頁35-78)。臺北:國家教育研究院。

    貳、 英文部分:
    Aiken, C. B., and Keller, S. P. (2007). The CEO’s role in leading transformation. Retrieved from http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/organization/our-insights/the-ceos-role-in-leading-transformation
    Aufderheide, P., Firestone, C. (1993). Media literacy: A report of the National Leadership Conference on media literacy. Queenstown, MD: The Aspen Institute.
    Bawden D (2008) Origins and concepts of digital literacy. In: Lankshear C and Knobel M (ed.) Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices. New York, NY: Peter Lang, 17–32.
    Bekdemir, Ü. and Tağrikulu, P. (2018). The academic and social effects of using social media on university students. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 7(1), 316-348.
    Bentley, T. (1998) Learning beyond the classroom. London, UK: Routledge.
    Bernard, H. R. (1988). Unstructured and semistructured interviewing: Research methods in cultural anthropology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    Buckingham, D. (1990). Media education: From pedagogy to practice. In D. Buckingham(ed.), Watching media learning: Making sense of education. London, UK: The Falmer Press.
    Buckingham, D. (1998). Media education in the UK: Moving beyond protectionism. Journal of Communication, 48(1), 33-42.
    Buckingham, D. (2003). Media education: literacy, learning and contemporary culture. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
    Buckingham, D. (2007). Beyond technology: Children’s learning in the age of digital culture. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
    Buckingham, D. (2009). Power to the people? The past and future of amateur video. In Buckingham, D., and Willett, R. (Ed.), Video cultures: Media technology and Everyday Creativity (pp. 230-238). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Buckingham, D. (2014). Developing media literacy: Concepts, progresses and practices. Retrieved from https://davidbuckingham.net/education-and-culture/media-education/
    Buckingham, D. (2015). Do we really need media education 2.0? Teaching media in the age of participatory culture. In T. B. Lin, V. Chen, and C. S. Chai (Eds.), New media and learning in the 21st Century: A socio-cultural perspective. Singapore: Springer.
    Buckingham, D. and Sefton-Green, J. (1997). From regulation to education. English and Media Magazine, 36, 28-32.
    Buckingham, D., Banaji, S., Burn, A., Carr, D., Cranmer, S., and Willett, R. (2005). The media literacy of children and young people. London, UK: Ofcom.
    Castells, M. (2000). The rise of the network society (2nd Ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
    Cervi, L. M. P., Paredes, O., and Tornero, J. (2010). Current trends of media literacy in Europe: An overview. International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence, 1(4), 1-9.
    Chen, D.-T., Wu, J., and Wang, Y.-M. (2011). Unpacking new media literacy. Journal on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 9(2), 84-88.
    Chen, G-M. (2007). Media (literacy) education in the United States. China Media Research, 3(3), 87-103.
    Cope, B. and Kalantzis, M. (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. London, UK: Routledge.
    Cox, D., McLeod, S. (2014). Social media strategies for school principals. NASSP Bulletin, 98(1), 5-25.
    Craggs, E. C. (1992). Media education in the primary school. London, UK: Routledge.
    Elma, C., Kesten, A., Dicle, A.N., Mercan, E., Çinkir, Ş., & Palavan, Ö. (2009). Evaluation of media literacy course according to school principals' opinions. Hacettepe Egitim Dergisi, 36, 87-96.
    Fedrov, A. (2003). Media education and media literacy: Experts’ opinions. UNESCO.
    Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Galloway, S. (2017). The four: The hidden DNA of Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google. New York, NY: Penguin Random House.
    Gauntlett, D. (2011). Media studies 2.0, and other battles around the future of media research. Published on Kindle apps, ASIN: B005E9E3HI.
    Goldring, E. B., and Rallis, S. F. (1993). Principals of dynamic schools: Taking charge of change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
    Hobbs, R. (1994). Pedagogical issues in the U.S. media education. Communication Yearbook, 17, 453-466.
    Hobbs, R. and Tuzel, S. (2015). Teacher motivations for digital and media literacy: An examination of Turkish educators. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(1), 7-22.
    Hoffman, D. L. and Novak, T. P. (1997). A new marketing paradigm for electronic commerce. The Information Society, 13, 43-54.
    IDC (2014). The digital universe of opportunities: Rich data and the increasing value of the internet of thing. Hopkinton, MA: Dell EMC.
    Ito, M., Horst, H., Bittanti, M., Boyd, d., Herr-Stephenson, B., Lange, P. G. and Tripp, L. (2008). Living and learning with new media: Summary of findings from the digital youth project. Chicago, IL: The MacArthur Foundation.
    Ivanović M. (2014). Development of Media Literacy – an Important Aspect of Modern Education. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 149, 438-442.
    Jameson, J. (2006). Leadership in post compulsory education: Inspiring leaders of the future. New York, NY: David Fulton Publishers.
    Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. NY: New York Press.
    Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Clinton, K., Weigel, M., and Robison, A. J. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21th century (White Paper). Retrieved from: http://mitpress.mit.edu/sites/default/files/titles/free_download/9780262513623_Confronting_the_Challenges.pdf
    Johnston-Goodstar, K., Richards-Schuster, K., and Seith, J. K. (2014). Exploring critical youth media practice: Connections and contributions for social work. Social Work, 59(4), 339-346.
    Jordan, T. (1999). Cyberpower: The culture and politics of cyberspace and the Internet. New York, NY: Routledge.
    Koltay, T. (2011). The media and the literacies: media literacy, information literacy, digital literacy. Media, Culture & Society, 33(2), 211-221.
    Küpers, W. M. (2007). Phenomenology and integral phenol-practice of wisdom in leadership and organization. Social Epistemology, 21(2), 169-193.
    Leavis, F. R. and Thompson, D. (1933). Culture and environment: The training of critical awareness. London, UK: Chatto & Windus.
    Leithwood, K. A., and Riehl, C. (2005). What we know about successful school leadership. Philadelphia, PA Laboratory for student success, Temple University.
    Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons, P., Harris, A. and Hopkins, D. (2006). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. Nottingham, UK: National College for School Leadership.
    Levitin, D. J. (2015). The organized mind: Thinking straight in the age of information overload. New York, NY: First Plume Printing.
    Lichtman, M. (2006). Qualitative research in education: A user's guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    Lin, T. B. (2010). Conceptualising media literacy: Discourses of media education. Media Education Research Journal, 1(1), 29-42.
    Lin, T. B., Chen, V., and Chai, C. S. (2015). Emerging practices and issues of new media and learning. In T. B. Lin, V. Chen, and C. S. Chai (Eds.), New media and learning in the 21st Century: A socio-cultural perspective. Singapore: Springer.
    Lin, T. B., Li, J. Y., Deng, F., and Lee, L. (2013). Understanding new media literacy: An explorative framework. Educational Technology & Society, 16(4), 160-170.
    Livingstone, S. (2004). Media literacy and the challenge of new information and communication technologies. The Communication Review, 7, 3-14.
    Livingstone, S. (2014). Developing social media literacy: How children learn to interpret risky opportunities on social network sites. Communications, 39(3), 283-303.
    Livingstone, S. (2015). From mass to social media? Advancing accounts of social change. Social Media + Society, 1(1), 1-3.
    Livingstone, S., Couvering, E. V., and Thumim, N, (2005). Adult media literacy: A review of the research literature. London: Department of Media and Communications.
    Luke, C. (1989). Pedagogy, printing, and protestantism: The discourse on childhood. New York, NY: State University of New York Press.
    Luke, C. (1997). Media literacy and cultural studies. In S. Muspratt, A. Luke, & P. Freebody (Eds.), Constructing critical literacies (pp. 19-50). New York, NY: Hampton Press.
    Luke, C. (1999). Media and cultural studies in Australia. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 42(8), 622-626.
    Martin, C. (2011). An information literacy perspective on learning and new media. On the Horizon, 19(4), 268-275.
    Masterman, L. (1985). Teaching the media. New York, NY: Routledge.
    Matthews, J. and Crow, G. M. (2010). Principalship, the new roles in a professional learning community. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
    Miller, W. L. & Crabtree, B. F. (1999). Doing qualitative research (2nd Ed.). London: Sage.
    Morley, D. (1992). Television, audiences and cultural studies. London: Routledge.
    National Association for Media Literacy Education (2008). Media literacy. Retrieved from http://namle.net/publications/media-literacy-definitions/
    Nielsen Survey (2017). 2016 Nielsen social media Report. Retrieved from: http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports/2017/2016-nielsen-social-media-report.html
    OECD (2010). PISA2009 results: What students know and can do: Student performance in reading, mathematics and science (Volume 1), Retrieved 15 September, 2018, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264091450-en
    Potter, W. J. (2008). Media literacy. (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
    Potter, W. J. (2010). The state of media literacy. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 54 (4), 675-696.
    Rainie, L., and Wellman, B. (2012). Networked: The new social operating system. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
    Reich, B. and Solomon, D. (2008). Media rules: Mastering today’s technology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
    Rose, T. (2016). The end of average: How we succeed in a world that values sameness. CA: HarperOne.
    Sergiovanni, T. J. (2000). The lifeworld of leadership: Creating culture, community, and personal meaning in our schools. The Jossey-Bass Education Series. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    Shouse, R. C. and Lin, K-P. (2010). Principal leadership in Taiwan schools. Plymouth, UK: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    Silverblatt, A. (1995). Media literacy: Keys to interpreting media messages. London: Praeger.
    Smelser, N. J. and Baltes, P. B. (Eds). (2001). International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences. 14, Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.
    Snyder, I. (1998). Beyond the hype: reassessing hypertext. In I. Snyder (Ed.), Page to screen: Taking literacy into the electronic era (pp. 125-143). London: Routledge.
    Solis, B., Breakenridge, D. (2009). Putting the public back in public relations: How social media is reinventing the aging business of PR. Upper Saddle River, NJ: FT Press.
    Thomas D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237-246.
    Thomas D.R. (2000). Qualitative data analysis: Using a general inductive approach. University of Auckland. New Zealand.
    Thomas, S. (Ed.) (1993). Principals for our changing schools: The knowledge and skill base. Lancaster, PA: Technomic.
    Tyner, K. (1998). Literacy in a digital world: Teaching and learning in the age of information. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
    UNESCO (2005). Aspects of literacy assessment: topics and issues from the UNESCO Expert Meeting 10-12 June 2003. Paris: UNESCO.
    United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2017). Reading the past, writing the future: Fifty years of promoting literacy. France: UNESCO.
    Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. (2007). Studies on the current trends and approaches to media literacy in Europe. Retrieved 12 April, 2018, from http://ec.europa.eu/avpolicy/media_literacy/docs/studies/study.pdf.
    Wang, M. Y., Chen, Y. W., and Lin, T. B. (2016, October). Improving school performance through leadership empowerment: A case study of national leader of education. Paper presented at the meeting of The International Academic Forum, Kobe, Japan.
    Waters, T. and Cameron, G. (2007). The Balanced Leadership Framework: Connecting vision with action. Denver, CO: Mid-Continent Regional Education and Learning.
    Waters, T., Marzano, R. J., and McNulty B. (2003). Balanced leadership: What 30 years of research tells us about the effect of leadership on student achievement. A working paper. Aurora, CO: Mid-Continent Regional Educational Lab.
    Weinberger, A. (2011). State of the internet with a focus on New Zealand. Retrieved 12 April , 2018, from: http://www.comscore.com/Insights/Press_Releases/2011/7/In_New_Zealand_Females_Spend_Significantly_More_Time_Social_Networking_than_Males
    Wiles, J., and Bondi, J. (1983). Principles of school administration: The real world of leadership in schools. Columbus: Merrill.
    Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Yukl, G. A. (2002). Leadership in organizations (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE