簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表
研究生：
Bakary Singhateh
論文名稱：
The Effect of Innovative Corporate Culture on Organizational Learning in Taiwan’s Computer Industry: The Mediating Effect of Connectivism Practices
指導教授： 葉俶禎
Yeh, Chu-Chen
學位類別： 碩士
Master
系所名稱： 國際人力資源發展研究所
Graduate Institute of International Human Resource Developmemt
論文出版年： 2010
畢業學年度： 98
語文別： 英文
論文頁數： 87
中文關鍵詞： 社會軟體技術 、知識管理實作 、創新合作文化 、組織學習
英文關鍵詞： Social Software Technologies, Knowledge Management Practices, Innovative Corporate Culture, Organizational Learning
論文種類： 學術論文
相關次數： 點閱：140  下載：28 
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

    • Technology has altered the way we learn and work in the digital age; hence this study hopes to help business leaders and corporations to recognize and be aware of the crucial role of these societal-changing technologies that link people to information. Culture influences organizational outcomes such as learning, which makes it imperative to study how organizational culture affects social software technologies to bring about efficient organizational learning. This study introduced a mediating variable called Practices of Connectivism, to further explore whether or not it will have a mediating effect on the relationship between innovative corporate culture and organizational learning. Quantitative survey questionnaires were sent to 301 companies in the computer industry across Taiwan, resulting in 80 valid responses. Hierarchical regression was used to test four study hypotheses. Hypotheses on the direct effects among the three study variables of Innovative Corporate Culture, Practices of Connectivism, and Organizational Learning were supported; however, findings of this study revealed that the mediating effect hypothesis of the study was only partially supported. Finally, some company demographic variables such as tenure and location were found to be related to all three major variables. These were not hypothesized in this research but can potentially produce interesting results in future research as to the reasons why companies in these specific demographics have higher motivation to innovate, learn and adopt new technologies formally.

    TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT I TABLES OF CONTENTS III LIST OF TABLES V LIST OF FIGURES VII CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION 1 Background of the Study 2 Motivation of the Study 3 Research Objectives 4 Research Questions 4 Definition of Terms 5 CHAPTER II. LITERATURE REVIEW 7 Taiwan’s Computer Industry – Background and Achievement 7 Innovative Corporate Culture 9 Practices of Connectivism 13 Organizational Learning 22 The Relationship between Innovative Corporate Culture and Organizational Learning 25 The Relationship between Innovative Corporate Culture and Pract ices of Connectivism 26 The Relationship between Practices of Connectivism and Organizational Learning 27 The Mediating Effect of Connect ivism Practices on the Relationship between Innovative Corporate Culture and Organizational Learning 28 CHAPTER III. METHODOLOGY 31 Research Framework 31 Research Hypothesis 31 Research Methods and Data Collection 32 Sample 33 Research Instrumentation 35 Control Variables 38 Reliability and Validity Analysis 38 CHAPTER IV. FINDINGS AND DISCUSSIONS 45 Descriptive Statistics and Correlations 45 Hypothesis Testing 47 Hierarchical Regression 47 Discussions 56 CHAPTER IV. CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS 61 Conclusions 61 Practical Implications 63 Research and Theoretical Implications 63 Limitations 64 Future Research Suggestions 64 REFERENCES 67 APPENDICES 77 APPENDIX A: RESEARCH QUESTIONNNAIRE IN CHINESE 77 APPENDIX B: RESEARCH QUESTIONNAIRE IN ENGLISH 83 LIST OF TABLES Table 3.1. Sample Demographics 34 Table 3.2. Innovative Corporate Culture Measure after Factor Analysis 39 Table 3.3. Connectivism Practices Measure after Exploratory Factor Analysis 41 Table 3.4. Organizational Learning Measure after Exploratory Factor Analysis 42 Table 3.5. Reliability Statistics 43 Table 4.1. Correlation Analysis Results 46 Table 4.2. Effect of Innovative Corporate Culture on Organizational Learning 47 Table 4.3. Effect of Innovative Corporate Culture Dimensions on Organizational Learning 49 Table 4.4. Effect of Innovative Corporate Culture on Practices of Connectivism 50 Table 4.5. Effect of Innovative Corporate Culture Dimensions on Practices of Connectivism 51 Table 4.6. Effect of Practices of Connectivism on Organizational Learning 52 Table 4.7. Effect of Practices of Connectivism Dimensions on Organizational Learning 53 Table 4.8. Mediating Effect of Connectivism Practices on the Relationship between Innovative Corporate Culture and Organization Learning 55 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 3.1. Research Framework 31

    Alexander, B., (2006) Web 2.0: A new wave of innovation for teaching and learning? EDUCAUSE Review, 41(2), 32–44
    Ansoff, H. I., (1979), Strategic Management, London: Macmillan.
    Argyris, C. (1977). Double-Loop learning in organizations. Harvard Business Review 55 (5),115 – 125.
    Argyris, C., & Schon, D.A. (1996). Organizational learning II: theory, method, and practice, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
    Alexa. (2006). Alexa traffic rankings. Retrieved from: http://www.alexa.com. November 17,2009.
    Baets, WRJ., & van der, Linden G. (2003). Virtual corporate universities: A matrix of knowledge and learning for the new digital dawn. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.
    Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A., (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
    Brown, J.S., & Duguid, P. (2000). The social life of information, HBS Press, Boston, MA.
    Chatman, J. A., & Jehn, K. A. (1994). Assessing the relationship between industry characteristics and organizational culture: How different can you be? Academy of
    Management Journal, 37(3), 522-553.
    Chiva, R. (2004), The facilitating factors for organizational learning in the ceramic sector,Human Resource Development International, Vol. 7 No.2, pp.233-49.
    Chivée, L.L., Hamilton, B.A., & Cowan, E. (2008).Networking the way to success: Online social networks for workplace and competitive advantage. People and Strategy, 31 (4) 40-47.
    Christensen, C.M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma. Harvard Business School Press, Boston,MA.
    Cairncross, F. (2001). The death of distance 2.0: How the communications revolution will change our lives. Texere, London.
    Coffey, R.E., Cook, C.W. & Hunsaker, P.L. (1994). Management and organization behavior. Irwin, Burr Ridge, IL.
    Coutu, D.L. (2002). The anxiety of learning. Harvard Business Review, 80 (3), 2-8
    Cusumano, M.A., & Markides, C. (2001). Strategic thinking for the next economy. Jossey-Bass,San Francisco.
    Daft, R.L & Weick, K.E. (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems.Academy of Management Review. 9 (2) 254-295.
    Dale, M., (1994). Learning organizations, managing learning. The Open University, Rutledge,London.
    Davenport, E. (2001). Knowledge management issues for online organizations: Communities of practice as an exploratory framework. Journal of Documentation, 57 (1) 66-75.
    De Long, D. W., & Fahey, L. (2000). Diagnosing cultural barriers to knowledge management. Academy of Management Executive, 14(4), 113-127.
    Denison, D. R., (1984), Bringing Corporate culture to the bottom line, Organizational Dynamics,12(4), pp.4-22
    Dixon, N. M. (1993 ). Organizational learning. The Conference Board of Canada Report, 111-93.
    Dixon, N.M. (1993). Organizational Learning: A review of Literature with Implications for Human Resource Development Professionals. Human Resource Development Quarterly,387 – 101.
    Dobni, C.B. (2006). The innovation blueprint. Business Horizons. 49 (4) 329-39
    Dobni, C.B. (2008), The DNA of innovation, Journal of Business Strategy, 29 (2), pp.43-50
    Dobni, C.B. & Luffman, G. (2003). Determining the scope and impact of market orientation profiles on strategy implementation and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 24(6) 577-85.
    Downes, S., (2006). Learning networks and connective knowledge. Retrieved from http://it.coe.uga.edu/itforum/paper92.html. October 16 2009
    Downes, S., (2005). Introduction to connective knowledge. Retrieved from http://learningevolves.wikispace.com/connectiveknowledge. November 16, 2009
    Dunphy., Dexter., Turner., Dennis., Crawford., & Michael, (1997). Organizational learning as the creation of corporate competencies. Journal of Management Development. 16 (4),232.
    Ernst, D. (2000). Inter-organizational knowledge outsourcing: What permits small Taiwanese firms to compete in the computer industry? Asia Pacific Journal of Management 17 (2)223.
    Farell, H., (2003). The street finds its own use for things. Crooked Timber [blog], Retrieved from http://crookedtimber.org/2003/09/15/the-street-finds-its-own-use-forthings/on January 15, 2010
    Fiol, C.M. & Lyles, M.A. (1985). Organizational learning. Academy of ManagementReview, 10 803-813.
    Fioi, C.M., & Lyles, M. (1995). Organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 803-13.
    Garvin, D.(1993). Building and learning organization. Harvard Business Review,71 (4), 78-91.
    Gatignon, H., Tushman, M.L., Smith, W., Anderson, P. (2002), A structural approach toassessing innovation: construct development of innovation locus, type and
    characteristics, Management Science, Vol. 48 No.9, pp.1103-22.
    Ghoshal, S., & Bartlett, C.A. (1998). The individualized corporation: A fundamentally new approach to management. Heinemann, London.
    Godwin-Jones, R. (2007) Digital video update: YouTube, flash, high-definition. Retrieved from http://www.allbusiness.com/technology/4051526-1.html on January 12, 2010
    Gorge, M. (2007). Security for third level education organizations and other educational bodies.Computer Fraud & Security, (7) 6-9.
    Hamel, G. (2006). The why, what and how of innovation management. Harvard Business Review,84 (2) 72-84.
    Hodgetts, R. M., Luthans, F., & Lee, S. M., (1994), New paradigm organization: from total quality to learning to world-class, Organization Dynamics, 22 (3), pp.5-19
    Huang, K.T., Lee, Y.W., & Wang, R.Y. (1999). Quality information and knowledge. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
    Huber, G. (1989). Organizational learning; an examination of the contributing processes and a review of the literature. Conference on Organizational Learning, Carnegie Mello University, 18-20.
    Hurley, R.F. & Hult, G.T.M. (1998), Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning:
    an integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62 42-54.
    Hyland P., & Beckett, R. (2005) Engendering an innovative culture and maintaining operational balance. Journal of small business and enterprise development. 12 (3) 336
    Jassawalla, A.R., Sashittal, H.C., (2003), The DNA of cultures that promote product innovation, Ivey Business Journal, pp.1-6.
    Jaworski, B.J., Kohli, A.K. & Sahay, A. (2000). Market-driven versus driving markets. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(1) 45-54.
    Jones, A. & Hendry, C., (1992). The learning organization; A review of the literature and practice. Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
    Jöreskog & Sörbom, D., LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language, Scientific Software International, Chicago (1993).
    Kim, D.H. (1993). The link between individual and organizational learning. Sloan Management Review, 37-50.
    Kim, J.O., Mueller, C.W., (1978). Factor analysis: Statistical methods and practical issues, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA
    Kono, Toyohiro, (1990), Changing a company’s strategy and culture, Long Range Planning,27(5), pp.85-97
    Lings, I. N., (2004), Internal market orientation construct and consequences, Journal of Business Research, 57(4), pp.405-413
    Litwin, G. H., & Stringer, R. A., (1968), Motivation and organizational climate,Boston: Harvard University.
    Lock, E.A., Kirkpatrick, S.A., (1995), Promoting creativity in organizations, in Ford, C.M.,
    Gioia, D.A. (Eds), Creative Action in Organizations: Ivory Tower Visions and Real World Voices, Sage, London, pp.115-20.
    Martins, E.C., & Terblanche, F. (2003). Building organizational culture that stimulates creativity
    and innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 6 (1) 64-74.
    Marquardt, M.J., (2002). Building the learning organization: Mastering the 5 elements for corporate learning. Davies Black, Palo Alto, CA
    Moorman, C., & Miner A.S., (1998). Organizational improvisation and organizational memory.
    Academy of Management Review 23 (4), pp. 698–723
    Nevis, E., DiBella. A., & Gould, J. (1995). Understanding Organizations as Learning Systems. Sloan Management Review, 73 - 85.
    Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Orlikowski, W.J. (2002). Knowing in practice: enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organizational Science. 13 (3) 249-73.
    Pedler, M., Burgoyne, J., & Boydell, T. ( 1991 ). The learning company. McGraw Hill Book Company. N.Y.
    Pena, I., Corcoles, C. P., & Casado, C. (2006) El Profesor 2.0: docencia einvestigación desde la Red, UOC Papers, Retrieved from http://www.uoc.edu/uocpapers/3/dt/esp/pena_corcoles_casado.pdf January on 21, 2010.
    Peter, T. J., & Waterman, R. H., (1982), In search of excellence: Lessons from America’s Best-Run companies, New York: Harper & Row.
    Richard D. W., Emily B., Anna L., & Jessica L., (2009). Engaging stakeholders through social networking: How nonprofit organizations are using Facebook. Public Relations Review,35(2), 102-106.
    Sadler, P., (October 1993). The firm as a learning system, in learning more about learning organizations, AHMED. Focus Paper, Association for Management Education and
    Development, 10-14.
    Schein, E.H. (1984). Coming to a new awareness of organizational culture. Sloan Management Review, 25 3-16.
    Senge., P. ( 1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization.Doubleday/Currency. N.Y.
    Senge, P. (1993). The Fifth Discipline - The Art and practice of organizational learning.Doubleday. N.Y
    Siemens, G., (2003). New structures of learning: The systematic impact of connectiveknowledge. Retrieved from http://Elearnspace.org/Articles/systematicimpact.htm on
    December 12, 2009.
    Siemens, G., (2004) Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. Retrieved from http://www.Elearningspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm. December 12, 2009.
    Siemens, G., (2005). Learning as network creation. Retrieved from http://www.Elearningspace.org/Articles/networks.htm. October 10, 2009.
    Siemens, G. (2006). Connectivism: Learning theory or past time of the amused? Retrieved From http://www.Elearningspace.org/Response.htm. November 17, 2009.
    Siemens, G., (2008). What is connectivism? Retrieved from
    http://www.Elearningspace.org/Articles/connectivism -response.doc. September 8, 2009.
    Sinkula, J.M., Baker, W.E., & Noordewier, T. A., (1997) Framework for market-based
    organizational learning: Linking values, knowledge and behavior, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 25 (4), pp. 305–318
    Smith, J. (2006). Updated lists of all companies and regions on Facebook. Retrieved from http://www.insidefacebook.com. December 15, 2009.
    Sonnenfeld, J. A., (1989), Managing career systems channeling: The flow of executive careers, IL: Irwin.
    Stata, R., (1983) Organizational learning - the key to management innovation. Sloan Management Review, 30(3), 63-82
    Spender, J. C. (1996). Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic
    Management Journal, 17, 45–62.
    Tao, Y.H., & Rosa Yeh, C.C. (2008). Computers & Education. 50 23–36.
    Tapscott, D., Williams, A.D., (2006), Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything, Portfolio, New York, NY
    Tesluk, P.E., Faar, J.L., Klien, S.R. (1997), Influences of organizational culture and climate on individual creativity, The Journal of Creative Behavior, 31 (1), pp.21-41
    Tracy, M. (2008). The networked student. Retrieved from http://www.educationfutures.com December 6, 2009.
    Tushman, M.L., O'Reilly, C.A. III (1997), Winning through Innovation: A Practical Guide to Leading Organizational Change and Renewal, Harvard Business Press, Boston, MA
    Vygotsky, L., (1978).Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Wallach, E. J., (1983), Individuals and organizations: The culture match, Training and Development Journal, 37(2), pp.29-36.
    Wentling, T.L., Waight, C., Gallaher, J., La Fleur, J., Wang, & C., Kanfer, A. (2000).
    eLearning – A review of literature. Retrieved from
    http://learning.ncsa.uiuc.edu/papers/elearnlit.pdf December 14, 2009
    West, M.A. & Farr, J.L. (1990). Innovation at work. in West, M.A. and Farr, J.L. (Eds.).Innovation and creativity at work. Psychological and Organizational Strategies, Wiley, Chichester, 3-13.
    Zaltman, G., Duncan, R. & Holbek, J. (1973). Innovations and organizations. Wiley, New York,NY.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE